The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . Penal Code § 20.06) (“A person commits an offense if, during a period that is 10 or more days in duration . . .
. . . All three districts were severely underpopulated in 2010 — by 17.64, 20.06, and 21.37 percentage points . . .
. . . each owned property adjoining the railroad corridor on which the railroad operated between milepost 20.06 . . .
. . . Penal Code § 20.06. . . . Penal Code §§ 20.05, 20.06, 71.02(a). . . .
. . . isocyanurates ... in the [PRC],” and that Jiheng’s total estimated countervailable subsidy rate was 20.06 . . .
. . . In May 20.06, both children were placed in a therapeutic foster home. Id. at DFPS # 3449. . . .
. . . Martin, The Law of Pooling and Unitization, § 20.06 (3d ed. LexisNexis Matthew Bender 2014). . . .
. . . Coverage Disputes, § 20.06], at 1615-161 (16th ed.) (collecting cases). . . .
. . . . ¶ 20.06), contractual interpretation at summary judgment takes place in two stages. . . .
. . . Kramer & Martin, The Law of Pooling and Unitization, § 20.06[1]. . . . Kramer & Martin, supra, at § 20.06[1]. . . .
. . . Martin, The Law of Pooling and Unitization § 20.06[1] (3d ed.2013). . . .
. . . Bus. & Comm.Code § 20.06(d), (e) Section 20.06 of the Tex. Bus. & Comm. . . . Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 20.06(a) (West 2003); Gore v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc., No. . . . Code Ann. § 20.06(d). . . . Id. § 20.06(e). . . . Bus. & Comm.Code § 20.06(d), (e) 1. . . .
. . . Randolph were convicted of most counts of the indictment, and petitioner was sentenced, on December 20, 20.06 . . .
. . . outdoor storage 11 Feb. 00 2,711,500 8.00 348.480 7.78 S88 Industrial development 12 June 04 2,140,000 20.06 . . .
. . . About six months into the Agreement term, on October 27, 20.06, the parties entered into Amendment No . . .
. . . and existing contracts of the Board of Regents are transferred by a type two transfer, pursuant to s. 20.06 . . .
. . . This section must be read together with section 20.06, which reads: “Upon the occurrence and continuation . . .
. . . See § 20.06, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .
. . . day of the next following month.” 1 Collier Guide to Chapter 11: Key Topics and Selected Industries ¶ 20.06 . . . and necessary expense of preserving the debt- or’s estate. 1 Collier Guide to Chapter 11, supra, ¶ 20.06 . . .
. . . fees that were “too high compared to the Region and Conus fee averages,” which were 18.14 percent and 20.06 . . .
. . . fees that were “too high compared to the Region and Conus fee averages,” which were 18.14 percent and 20.06 . . .
. . . May 2, 20.06 AM Trial Tr. at 18-19 (Michael Abney). . . .
. . . The Policy Between February 28, 20.06 and February 28, 2007, Aspen insured Pengilly under a general liability . . .
. . . It included a $20.06 interest assessment. 24. . . .
. . . HMA Equipment Service Associates currently have a starting hourly rate of $20.06 and overtime is paid . . .
. . . the increased square footage and correct building construction “would have revealed a deviation of -20.06% . . . Theisman ran an ITV using the correct data, it yielded a deviation of -20.06%, which the Court notes . . .
. . . . & Com.Code § 20.06 Ewbank has also alleged a vague claim under Tex. Bus. & Com.Code § 20.06. . . . Bus. & Com.Code § 20.06(a). . . . Id. at § 20.06(d). . . .
. . . Pennell, supra, at H 20.06[2]. . . .
. . . revenues and lowered its projections for fiscal year 2001, causing JNI’s stock price to drop further to $20.06 . . .
. . . revenues and lowered its projections for fiscal year 2001, causing JNI’s stock price to drop further to $20.06 . . .
. . . The real estate is also listed on the Debtor’s Schedule A as Parcel 33 and is a portion of the 20.06 . . .
. . . revenues and lowered its projections for fiscal year 2001, causing JNI’s stock price to drop further to $20.06 . . .
. . . Coliman at § 20.06. . . .
. . . In order to appear before this Court, they were required to comply with Uniform District Court Rule 20.06 . . .
. . . parties to pursue such alternative and inconsistent claims. 2A & 3A Moore’s Federal Practice §§ 8.32, 20.06 . . .
. . . Local Rule 20.06 provides that visiting attorneys may participate in Eastern District cases if certain . . .
. . . Callman, The Law of Unfair Competition, Trademarks & Monopolies § 20.06, at 27, § 20.61, at 498 (4th . . .
. . . Lindahl, Modern Tort Law: Liability & Litigation § 20.06 (Rev. ed. 1990). . . .
. . . Cavitch, Business Organizations § 20.06[2] at 20-43 (1989); 68 C.J.S. Partnership § 13 at 423. . . . Cavitch, Business Organizations § 20.06[2] at 20-43 (1989); 1 R. . . . Cavitch, Business Organizations § 20.06[2] at 20-43 (1989). . . .
. . . payments Total to be Paid 8/16/84 $1024.58 13.22(L) + 37.72(D) 24 $ 292.48 23.76 24 $1392 11/29/84 549.78 20.06 . . . Disability Insurance Charge Disability Insurance Rebate 8/16/84 $ 13.22 $ 10.18 $ 37.22 $ 29.04 11/29/84 20.06 . . .
. . . IRS sent plaintiff the excess $20.06 as a cash refund. . . .
. . . Cf. 3A Callman Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies § 20.06 (4th ed. 1983) (“When equitable . . .
. . . Callman, The Law of Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, Section 20.06 (4th ed. 1983). . . . .
. . . of actual confusion is greater when the products involved are low value items. 3A Callman, supra, § 20.06 . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Text § 20.06, at 391 (1972), and properly so. . . .
. . . Pension Contribution Year Computation of Earnings Earnings 1983 9.45% x 218 $20.60 1984 9.2% x 218 20.06 . . .
. . . Callmann, The Law of Unfair Competition, Trademarks, and Monopolies § 20.06 (1983). . . .
. . . 23.37 21.91 24.40 15.90 13.74 28.51 12.42 31.14 23.59 21.88 24.08 18.39 20.39 17.51 34.59 18.77 18.01 20.06 . . .
. . . . § 20.06(4). . . .
. . . the shippers were rebilled at what is termed the column commodity rate for fish-meal, approximately $20.06 . . .
. . . See 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 19.02 at 19-36 to 42, and ¶ 20.06 at 20-36 to 43. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958). . . .
. . . Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1655, at 280 (1972); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice H 20.06 . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06, at 92-94 (1958); Fuchs, supra note 7, at 870. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958); Fuchs, Prerequisites to Judicial Review of Administrative . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958, 1976 Supp. & 1980 Supp.) & cases cited therein. . . .
. . . Blount, 461 F.2d 1133 (5th Cir. 1972); see Davis, supra, at § 20.06. Thus, whatever relief Mr. . . .
. . . City of Philadelphia, 454 F.Supp. 652, 661 (E.D.Pa.1978); 3A Moore's Federal Practice § 20.06 at 20—46 . . .
. . . A check from the well operator shows a deduction of $6.17 for WPT from a gross royalty payment of $20.06 . . .
. . . Fed.R.Civ.P. 20; 7 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 1657 (1972); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 20.06 . . .
. . . See also 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise 20.06 at 91-97 (1958). . . .
. . . This rate amounted to $19.57 per net ton plus a 2.5% surcharge, a total of approximately $20.06 per net . . .
. . . giving in exchange a promissory note in the amount of $240.72, payable in monthly installments of $20.06 . . .
. . . generally views requests to join additional defendants with favor, see 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 20.06 . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 20.06 (1958 and 1976 Supp.). . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958; 1970 Supp.). . . . .
. . . Similarly, § 20.06(a) allows the village board to refuse a license to an applicant if in the board’s . . .
. . . P.I.K.2d § 20.06 is also a formulation of this distinction: In making the apportionment of percentage . . .
. . . Aragon, 329 U.S. 143,155, 67 S.Ct. 245, 91 L.Ed. 136 (1946); 3 Davis Administrative Law Treatise, sec. 20.06 . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958; 1970 Supp.). . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958, 1970 Supp.). . . .
. . . United States, 387 F.2d 502, 504-06 (1st Cir. 1967); Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958 . . .
. . . A type one transfer is defined by Section 20.06, subsection (1), Florida Statutes, as follows: “(1) Type . . . Section 20.06, subsection (1), Florida Statutes, authorizes the transferee department to review the exercise . . . Article IV, Section 9, Florida Constitution; Section 20.06(1), Florida Statutes (1976). . . .
. . . duties and functions, as provided by law, are hereby transferred by a type four transfer pursuant to s. 20.06 . . .
. . . its quasi-judieial duties and fuñe-tions, as provided by law, by a type four transfer pursuant to s. 20.06 . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958). . . .
. . . Dávis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958). This rule, however, is not inflexible. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Text § 20.06 (3d ed. 1972). . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06, at 92 (1958). See also McKart v. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958; Supp.1970). . . .
. . . new Department of Transportation, the defendant in the case at bar, under the provisions of Sections 20.06 . . .
. . . In his authoritative treatise on Administrative Law, Vol. 3, sec. 20.06, Professor Davis has not dealt . . . Aragon, 329 U.S. 143, 67 S.Ct. 245, 91 L.Ed. 136 (1946)]. 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 . . .
. . . In bis authoritative treatise on Administrative 1/aw, Yol. 3, sec. 20.06, Professor Davis bas not dealt . . . Aragon, 329 U.S. 143 (1946)]. 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958). . . .
. . . See generally 3 Davis, supra, at § 20.06. . . . See, Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958). . . .
. . . . § 20.06(3), F.S.A.), the Division of Electronic Data Processing established by Chapter 23, Part II, . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958) ; Note, Judicial Review of Final Deportation Orders . . .
. . . A reading of F.S. section 20.06(3), F.S.A., discloses the Department of Business Regulations has such . . .
. . . . § 20.06(1), F.S.A. wherein it is provided that such agency shall henceforth “exercise its powers, duties . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958). . . .
. . . United States, 1 Cir. 1967, 387 F.2d 502, 504-505; Davis, Administrative Law § 20.06 (1958); cf. . . .
. . . See 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, Section 20.06 (1958 ed), p. 96: “The problem of the Tucker . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law §§ 20.04, 20.06 (1958). . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958). . . . Davis, supra, § 20.06, at 92. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §20.06 (1958). . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law § 20.06, 20.08 (1958). . United States v. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 20.06 (1958); L. . . . See generally 3 Davis, supra note 2, at §, 20.06-.07; Jaffe, supra, note 2, 450-458. . . . .
. . . 47051, Fork 650.41 18.14 1 cent each + 803195 19.72 17.5% ad val. 19.42 or 19.54 66/47082, Fork 650.41 20.06 . . .
. . . 803195 Fork 650.41 18.14 19.72 1 cent each + 17.5% ad val. 19.42 or 19.54 66/47082, 892285 Fork 650.41 20.06 . . .
. . . See also 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, Section 20.06 (1958 ed.). In Manual Enterprises v. . . .
. . . Commission, 355 U.S. 411, 413-414, 78 S.Ct. 377, 2 L.Ed.2d 370; 3 Davis Administrative Law Treatise, § 20.06 . . .