Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 23.12 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 23.12 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 23.12

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 23
MISCELLANEOUS EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 23.12
23.12 Short title.This part may be cited as the “Florida Mutual Aid Act.”
History.s. 1, ch. 69-112; s. 1, ch. 92-165.

F.S. 23.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 23.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 23.12


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 23.12
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 23.12.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE HOCH, M. v. E. J. J. J. J., 577 B.R. 202 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2017)

. . . Carolina Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (the “UVTA”), North Carolina General Statutes §§ 39-23.1 to 39-23.12 . . . all assert claims for relief arising under the UVTA, North Carolina General Statutes §§ 39-23,1 to 39-23.12 . . . Stat. § 39-23.12 (“This Article, which was- formerly cited as the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, may . . .

CEPIA, LLC, v. UNIVERSAL PICTURES VISUAL PROGRAMMING LIMITED,, 177 F. Supp. 3d 1129 (E.D. Mo. 2016)

. . . See Missouri App’d Jury Inst. 7th Ed. at § 23.12(1). . . .

IN RE REDF MARKETING, LLC, LLC, v. LLC, LLC, v. LLC, v. v. J. LLC, LLC, L. LLC, L. C. P. A. P. A. G. LLC, v. LLC, LLC, LLC, v. CB LLC, LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, LLC, v. L. CPA, P. A. L. J LLC, LLC, v. LLC,, 536 B.R. 646 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . . § 39-23.12 (“This Article may be cited as the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act”), and N.C.G.S. § 39- . . .

DREW, v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, 992 F. Supp. 2d 1177 (N.D. Ala. 2014)

. . . APJI 23.12 (2d ed.1993). . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. H. BAUER,, 723 F.3d 758 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . By August 31, 2000, illiquid securities made up 7.99% of Short Duration Fund net assets and 23.12% of . . . By contrast, illiquid securities comprised as much as 23.12% of net assets in the High Yield Fund in . . .

UNITED STATES, v. L. PLACE,, 693 F.3d 219 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 23.12(a)(1), 23.12(a)(2), 23.15 (2004), and an import permit is additionally required for trade . . . in Appendix I species, CITES art. 111(3); 50 C.F.R. § 23.12(a)(1) (2004). . . . CITES, 50 C.F.R. §§ 23.1-23.92; and these regulations impose, e.g., permitting requirements, id. §§ 23.12 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOARD FEET AND DOORS AND CASINGS, MORE OR LESS, OF DIPTERYX PANAMENSIS IMPORTED FROM NICARAGUA,, 587 F. Supp. 2d 740 (E.D. Va. 2008)

. . . . §§ 23.11, 23.12, and 23.13. . . . Section 23.11 generally addressed prohibitions, while § 23.12(a)(3) codified the requirements for a Certificate . . . household effects of persons moving their residences to or from the United States.” 50 C.F.R. §§ 23.11, 23.12 . . . Subsequently sections 23.11 and 23.12 were deleted from section 23. . . . The Certificate of Origin requirement originally located in Section 23.12 has been included in 23.15. . . .

v. v., 32 Ct. Int'l Trade 1196 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . As a result, in the Final Results, Commerce assigned Navneet and Aero the rate of 23.12 percent, the . . .

FISHKIN, v. SUSQUEHANNA PARTNERS, G. P. v. TABFG, LLC,, 563 F. Supp. 2d 547 (E.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . ET, the Dow was up 15.20, near the 23.12-point gain that the fan-value formula anticipated.” . . . ET, the Dow was up 15.20, near the 23.12-point gain that the fair value formula anticipated.” . . . The predicted 23.12 point gain is eight times the 2.89 points that the S & P Futures were trading over . . . Dow Industrial Index (“Dow Cash”) to the value of the S & P 500 index (“SPU Cash”) to get a predicted 23.12 . . .

K. BALL, v. CITY OF CORAL GABLES, 548 F. Supp. 2d 1364 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . . §§ 23.12, et. seq. See e.g., Rinaldo v. . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. DOROZHKO,, 606 F. Supp. 2d 321 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . IMS Health stock eventually closed on October 18 at $23.12 per share, still 22% percent off the previous . . .

WESTERFIELD, v. QUIZNO S FRANCHISE COMPANY, LLC,, 527 F. Supp. 2d 840 (E.D. Wis. 2007)

. . . the Franchise Agreement, just over the parties’ signatures, the following acknowledgments appeared: 23.12 . . . A. § 23.12) (capitalization in original). . . . A. § 23.12.) This is not the advice of a party engaged in “bargaining naughtiness.” . . .

APONTE, v. R. NICHOLSON,, 21 Vet. App. 470 (Vet. App. 2007)

. . . ) According to OPM, $18.60 to $22.51 per hour in the Washington, D.C., area; (2) according to BLS, $23.12 . . .

NATIVE FEDERATION OF MADRE DE DIOS RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES De v. BOZOVICH TIMBER PRODUCTS, INC. TBM T. Co., 491 F. Supp. 2d 1174 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . . § 23.12(a)(2)® (requiring “a valid foreign export permit issued by the country of origin”). . . . The “requirements in this part 23” referenced in § 23.11(a) above are contained in § 23.12(a)(2)®, which . . . permit issued by the country of origin ... must be obtained prior to such importation. 50 C.F.R. § 23.12 . . . species anticipates trade in those species, on the condition that “the requirements in ... [50 C.F.R. § 23.12 . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 23.12(a)(l)(i) (requiring both "a United States import permit, issued pursuant to § 23.15 . . .

De v. TBM T. Co., 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 585 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . . § 23.12(a)(2)(i) (requiring “a valid foreign export permit issued by the country of origin”). . . . The “requirements in this part 23” referenced in § 23.11(a) above are contained in § 23.12(a)(2)(i), . . . permit issued by the country of origin . . . must be obtained prior to such importation. 50 C.F.R. § 23.12 . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 23.12(a)(l)(i) (requiring both “a United States import permit, issued pursuant to § 23.15 . . . Cir. 2004) (noting 50 C.F.R. § 23.12(a)(3)(i) “does not specify the conditions that a foreign export . . .

UNITED STATES v. W. NORRIS,, 452 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 23.12(a)(1)®. . . . IV at 1095-97; 50 C.F.R. § 23.12(a)(2)®. . . .

RADFORD TRUST, v. FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 321 F. Supp. 2d 226 (D. Mass. 2004)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 23.12 at 169, § 23.7 at 155 (1983) (discussing the “orthodox” view . . .

KANE, v. L. WINN, F. M. C., 319 F. Supp. 2d 162 (D. Mass. 2004)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 23.7, at 155, § 23.12, at 169 (1983) (discussing the “orthodox . . .

CENTRAL VALLEY WATER AGENCY, R. C. v. UNITED STATES, 327 F. Supp. 2d 1180 (E.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . Defendants’ Motion at 23.12. . . .

CASTLEWOOD PRODUCTS, L. L. C. v. A. NORTON, In U. S., 361 U.S. App. D.C. 151 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 23.12(a)(3)(i). . . . as arbitrary and capricious, claiming that it rests on impermissible interpretations of 50 C.F.R. §§ 23.12 . . . Section 23.12(a)(3)(i) provides: In order to import into the United States any wildlife or plant listed . . . re-export certificate issued by such country must be obtained prior to such importation. 50 C.F.R. § 23.12 . . . Appellants argue that the Government’s interpretation of § 23.12(a)(3)® is at odds with the plain text . . .

CASTLEWOOD PRODUCTS, L. L. C. v. A. NORTON, In U. S., 365 F.3d 1076 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 23.12(a)(3)(i). . . . as arbitrary and capricious, claiming that it rests on impermissible interpretations of 50 C.F.R. §§ 23.12 . . . Section 23.12(a)(3)(i) provides: In order to import into the United States any wildlife or plant listed . . . re-export certificate issued by such country must be obtained prior to such importation. 50 C.F.R. § 23.12 . . . Appellants argue that the Government’s interpretation of § 23.12(a)(3)(i) is at odds with the plain text . . .

CASTLEWOOD PRODUCTS, v. A. NORTON, U. S., 264 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . . §§ 23.12(a)(3)®, 23.14(a). . . .

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW COMMITTEE,, 283 F.3d 650 (5th Cir. 2002)

. . . Ins.Code Ann. art. 23.12 (Vernon 1981). . Tex. Bus. Corp. . . .

STATE v. ALLEN,, 790 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . the Hills-borough County Sheriffs Department, as authorized by the Florida Mutual Aid Act, section 23.12 . . .

UNITED STATES v. KOCZUK,, 252 F.3d 91 (2d Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 23.12(a)(2)(i). . . .

P. A. v. OF, 114 T.C. 366 (T.C. 2000)

. . . See 1A Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, sec. 22.32, at 283; sec. 23.12, at 363 (5th ed. 1993 . . .

SNOW, v. JESSE L. RIDDLE, P. C., 143 F.3d 1350 (10th Cir. 1998)

. . . goods from a Circle-K Store and paid for the merchandise with his personal cheek in the amount of $23.12 . . . Snow: The check written by you to Circle-K on or about September 23, 1994 for $23.12 was dishonored. . . . In response to Riddle’s letter of May 10, 1996, Snow paid the face amount of the check, i.e., $23.12, . . .

UNITED STATES v. GRIGSBY,, 111 F.3d 806 (11th Cir. 1997)

. . . AGENT DECKER: In that case, then, you go to Number 2 under 23.12 where it gives you the requirements . . .

UNITED STATES v. BERNAL,, 90 F.3d 465 (11th Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 23.12(b)(1) (in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 1538(c)(1) and (g)); and (5) attempting to export endangered . . .

In U. S. A. DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS, INC. R. BOYER, v. DAVIS, P. A., 193 B.R. 868 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1995)

. . . See generally, 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 23.02, 23.03, 23.08, 23.12 (14th ed. 1995); 5 Remington on Bankruptcy . . .

UNITED STATES v. WALLACE, III, 866 F. Supp. 1008 (W.D. Tex. 1994)

. . . . § 23.12(a)(2)(i). . U.S. v. Ivey, 949 F.2d 759 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied; Wallace v. . . .

In QUALITY BEVERAGE CO. INC., 170 B.R. 310 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1994)

. . . The market value of an inventory is given slightly different treatment under § 23.12, which states that . . . TEX.TAX CODE ANN. § 23.12(a) (Vernon Supp.1994). . . . TEX.TAX CODE ANN. § 23.12(f). . . .

UNITED STATES v. JENNINGS,, 855 F. Supp. 1427 (M.D. Pa. 1994)

. . . O’Malley, 2 Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 23.12. See also United States v. . . . Devitt, et al., supra, § 23.12; United States v. Oakie, 12 F.3d 1436, 1443 (8th Cir.1993). . . .

JACKSON, E. v. NASSAU COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, N. P. L. A. P., 818 F. Supp. 509 (E.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . Municipality Population Population Votes Power Hempstead 738,517 55.92 * 58 53.85 Oyster Bay 305,750 23.12 . . . Supervisor Hemp. 27.96 25.00 -2.96 Total: 55.92 53.85 -2.07* Oyster Bay 23.12 21.15 -1.97 North Hempstead . . . Percent Voting Power Deviation Hempstead 738,517 55.92% 53.85% -2.07% Oyster Bay 305,750 23.12% 21.15% . . .

INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS OF AMERICA, INC. v. L. CLARKE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIFE UNDERWRITERS, v. L. CLARKE,, 955 F.2d 731 (D.C. Cir. 1992)

. . . Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction § 23.12, at 355 (4th rev. ed. 1985) (“When the amendatory act . . .

In FAIRCHILD AIRCRAFT CORP., 124 B.R. 488 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1991)

. . . TEX.PROP.TAX CODE, § 23.12(a) (Vernon Supp.1990). . . . Id., § 23.12(c). . . .

LANDSTROM JENSEN, v. BARRINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, 739 F. Supp. 441 (N.D. Ill. 1990)

. . . In the specific area of child abuse, Section 10-23.12 obligates Board: To provide staff development for . . . policy or to usurp such authority in an area for which Board is expressly made responsible by Section 10-23.12 . . .

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF DALLAS,, 734 F. Supp. 1317 (N.D. Tex. 1990)

. . . Mexican-American Combined 1 19.78 20.91 40.68% 2 43.38 33.34 76.73 3 5.27 10.64 15.9 4 5.32 3.36 8.67 5 4.66 18.46 23.12 . . .

In AIR CRASH DISASTER AT STAPLETON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, DENVER, COLORADO, ON NOVEMBER, 720 F. Supp. 1433 (D. Colo. 1988)

. . . MCL.2d § 21.22 (citing authority for the court’s power to order attendance by parties), § 23.12. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LIVE CANARY WINGED PARAKEETS BROTOGERIS VERSICOLORUS, 689 F. Supp. 1106 (S.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species [hereinafter referred to as “CITES”]) and section 23.12 . . . issued by the country of origin ... must be obtained prior to such importation.” 50 C.F.R. section 23.12 . . . the permit was not in fact a “valid export permit.” 16 U.S.C. section 1538(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. section 23.12 . . .

In H. HARBOUR, W. HUFFMAN, v. M. PERKINSON N. Jr. t a a, 840 F.2d 1165 (4th Cir. 1988)

. . . See Bardes, 178 U.S. 524, 20 S.Ct. 1000, 44 L.Ed. 1175 (1900); 2 Collier HIT 23.12, 23.13 (14th ed.); . . .

In H. HARBOUR, W. HUFFMAN, v. M. PERKINSON N. Jr. t a a, 840 F.2d 1165 (4th Cir. 1988)

. . . See Bardes, 178 U.S. 524, 20 S.Ct. 1000, 44 L.Ed. 1175 (1900); 2 Collier ¶1¶ 23.12, 23.13 (14th ed.); . . .

ALLIED ACCESSORIES AND AUTO PARTS COMPANY, INC. a v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a, 825 F.2d 971 (6th Cir. 1987)

. . . Bauer, Federal Antitrust Law § 23.12 (1983). . . .

FLORIDA GAME AND FRESHWATER FISH COMMISSION, STATE OF FLORIDA v. PADGETT, 22 Fla. Supp. 2d 244 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1985)

. . . The Commission issues Lake Okeechobee Haul Seine Permits pursuant to Rule 39-23.12, F.A.C., which, pertinent . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 10.63 20.81 30.20 15.34 22.89 18.20 21.19 22.72 29.01 22.79 19.51 22.63 23.01 18.76 23.16 24.60 16.37 23.12 . . . 21.88 24.08 18.39 20.39 17.51 34.59 18.77 18.01 20.06 21.28 23.64 14.72 12.87 26.94 13.13 33.58 20.72 23.12 . . .

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NASSAU COUNTY, v. NASSAU COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,, 737 F.2d 155 (2d Cir. 1984)

. . . of Population Percent Voting Power Deviation Hempstead 738,517 55.92 53.85 -2.07 Oyster Bay 305,750 ■23.12 . . .

APPLE, v. JEWISH HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER,, 570 F. Supp. 1320 (E.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . . § 23.12. Moreover, as a member of the National Health Services Corps Dr. . . . under the direct supervision and control of the Secretary [of Health and Human Services].” 42 C.F.R. § 23.12 . . .

In ROMEO J. ROY, INC. ROMEO J. ROY, INC. v. NORTHERN NATIONAL BANK, v. JIM ROY PLUMBING HEATING PRODUCTS, INC. L., 32 B.R. 240 (Bankr. D. Me. 1983)

. . . Collier, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 23.12 at. 589 (14th ed. 1976). . . . federal courts to determine controversies relating to the estates of bankrupts. 2 Collier, supra ¶ 23.12 . . .

In D. H. OVERMYER TELECASTING CO. INC. HADAR LEASING INTERNATIONAL CO. INC. v. D. H. OVERMYER TELECASTING CO. INC., 23 B.R. 823 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . Klein, 35 Tr. 3283, 3287; Sources and Uses of Omega Funds, FNBB Ex. 192) 23.12. . . .

BROADHEAD f d b a s I. G. A. f d b a s I. G. A. v. KANSAS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, a, 671 F.2d 1264 (10th Cir. 1982)

. . . Collier, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 23.12.at 589 (14th ed. 1976). . . . federal courts to determine controversies relating to the estates of bankrupts. 2 Collier, supra ¶ 23.12 . . .

BROADHEAD f d b a s I. G. A. f d b a s I. G. A. v. KANSAS POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, a, 671 F.2d 1264 (10th Cir. 1982)

. . . Collier, Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 23.12 at 589 (14th ed. 1976). . . . federal courts to determine controversies relating to the estates of bankrupts. 2 Collier, supra ¶ 23.12 . . .

AMERICAN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. EQUITABLE GENERAL CORPORATION, 493 F. Supp. 721 (E.D. Va. 1980)

. . . Delaney, the then present value of the consideration in July of 1977, as discounted, was approximately $23.12 . . .

T. GOODWIN, v. UNITED STATES, 602 F.2d 107 (6th Cir. 1979)

. . . . § 23.12 (1976), and was sentenced by the late District Judge Swinford to a year and a day in federal . . .

A. GABRILOWITZ, v. NEWMAN,, 582 F.2d 100 (1st Cir. 1978)

. . . “All decisions made by a judicial board shall be by a majority vote. . . . ” Sec- tion 23.12. . . .

SCHLICK, v. PENN- DIXIE CEMENT CORPORAION, 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir. 1974)

. . . the actual book value of Penn-Dixie would have been approximately $16 per share, rather than, the $23.12 . . .

W. KELLEY C. v. METROPOLITAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, v. L. RICHARDSON,, 372 F. Supp. 528 (M.D. Tenn. 1973)

. . . Davis § 23.12. . . .

BASSIS v. UNIVERSAL LINE, S. A. SS CARIBIA, THEODORATOS v. UNIVERSAL LINE, S. A. SS CARIBIA,, 436 F.2d 64 (2d Cir. 1970)

. . . He calculated the average payments required by Panama law to be $179.01 for overtime, $23.12 for Sundays . . . and holidays, $23.12 for alternate day off, and $42.53 for accrued vacation pay to the date of discharge . . .

K. HOLLAND L. v. UNITED STATES, 311 F. Supp. 422 (C.D. Cal. 1970)

. . . sum of $612.37 assessed against plaintiffs as a deficiency for the calendar year 1962, the sum of $23.12 . . . erroneously assessed and collected by the defendant, and plaintiffs are entitled to the return of $23.12 . . .

PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 187 Ct. Cl. 129 (Ct. Cl. 1969)

. . . 52.02 1948- 28.88 32.80 20.49 43.58 1949- 26.92 30.29 19.14 35.00 1950- 24.33 26.97 16.23 29.72 1951- 23.12 . . .

STATE OF MINNESOTA, St. St. St. v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Co. St. Co. St., 44 F.R.D. 559 (D. Minn. 1968)

. . . Additionally, plaintiffs receive support from Professor Moore in 3A Moore, Federal Practice fí 23.12, . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN, H. R. R. H., 281 F. Supp. 31 (E.D. La. 1968)

. . . Non-whites comprise 23.12% of the literate adult population of the seven parishes (computed on the assumption . . .

H. BENDER v. UNITED STATES, 383 F.2d 656 (6th Cir. 1967)

. . . Mertens, The Law op Federal Income Taxation §§ 23.09, 23.12 (1966 rev.). . . .

D. BARTLE, M B H, v. S. MARKSON,, 357 F.2d 517 (2d Cir. 1966)

. . . MacLachlan, Bankruptcy § 219, or from § 2a (7) with § 23 as a limitation, see 2 Collier, Bankruptcy $23.12 . . .

LIPSETT L. L. v. UNITED STATES, 37 F.R.D. 549 (S.D.N.Y. 1965)

. . . While recognizing that intervention should be liberally permitted (3 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶23.12 . . .

GEORGIA JEWELERS, INC. v. BULOVA WATCH CO. Co., 302 F.2d 362 (5th Cir. 1962)

. . . And see 2 Collier, Bankruptcy § 23.12. . . .

UNION CARBIDE AND CARBON CORPORATION v. NISLEY, Jr. UNION CARBIDE AND CARBON CORPORATION v. F. WADE UNION CARBIDE AND CARBON CORPORATION v. BALSLEY UNION CARBIDE AND CARBON CORPORATION v. UNNAMED PLAINTIFFS,, 300 F.2d 561 (10th Cir. 1961)

. . . American Motorists, D.C., 101 F.Supp. 946; 3 Moore § 23.12, p. 3476. . . .

NEWBERG v. AMERICAN DRYER CORPORATION, F. F. J. M. J. Co., 195 F. Supp. 345 (E.D. Pa. 1961)

. . . Guaranty Trust Co., 2 Cir., 1944, 143 F.2d 503; 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶23.12, p. 3476 (2d ed. 1948 . . .

v., 28 T.C. 269 (T.C. 1957)

. . . Counsel on brief have called our attention to sections 23.1 (a), 23.10 (a) (1), 23.12 (5) and (c), as . . . Section 23.12 of Regulations 104 states that each subsidiary file a duplicate original of Form 1122 in . . . Sec. 23.12. Making Consolidated Return and Filing Other Forms. . . .

CASTLE, v. UNITED STATES, 238 F.2d 131 (8th Cir. 1956)

. . . . § 23.12, and to receive, conceal, store, barter, sell and dispose of stolen motor vehicles moving as . . .

COFFMAN v. COBRA MFG. CO., 214 F.2d 489 (9th Cir. 1954)

. . . Kaplan, 1944, 323 U.S. 97, 98, 65 S.Ct. 155, 89 L.Ed. 97; 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 23.12. . In B. . . .

WESTERN PAC. R. R. CORP. v. WESTERN PAC. R. CO. METZGER v. WESTERN PAC. R. CO., 197 F.2d 994 (9th Cir. 1951)

. . . Regulation 104, Section 23.12 provides that the consolidated return shall be made by the parent corporation . . . Regulation 104, Section 23.12(e). . . .

AUSTRIAN v. WILLIAMS, 159 F.2d 67 (2d Cir. 1946)

. . . Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., § 3.20 (containing specific criticism of the opinion of the district court); 2 id., § 23.12 . . .

RALPH v. COLE, 249 F. 81 (9th Cir. 1918)

. . . By virtue of that statute and of the provisions-of section 23.12 of the Revised Statutes, the defendant . . .

FOWLER v. EQUITABLE TRUST COMPANY. EQUITABLE TRUST COMPANY v. FOWLER., 141 U.S. 408 (U.S. 1891)

. . . entitled to recover $2162.48 as the balance of the principal actually received by the defendants, $23.12 . . .

HELLRIGLE v. DULANY, 11 F. Cas. 1059 (C.C.D.C. 1834)

. . . Verdict for plaintiff, for $23.12. Mr. . . .

v., 4 D.C. 473 (C.C.D.C. 1834)

. . . Verdict for plaintiff, for $23.12. Mr. . . .