The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 23
MISCELLANEOUS EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 23

MISCELLANEOUS EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS

PART I

FLORIDA MUTUAL AID ACT

(ss. 23.12-23.127)

PART II

PAPERWORK REDUCTION

(ss. 23.20-23.22)

PART III

CUSTOMER SERVICE STANDARDS

(s. 23.30)

PART I

FLORIDA MUTUAL AID ACT

23.12 Short title.

23.121 Policy and purpose.

23.1225 Mutual aid agreements.

23.1231 Florida Mutual Aid Plan; powers and duties.

23.127 Powers, privileges, and immunities.

23.12 Short title.—This part may be cited as the “Florida Mutual Aid Act.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 69-112; s. 1, ch. 92-165.

23.121 Policy and purpose.—

(1) Because of the existing and continuing possibility of the occurrence of natural or manmade disasters or emergencies and other major law enforcement problems, including those that cross jurisdictional lines, and in order to ensure that preparations of this state will be adequate to deal with such activity, protect the public peace and safety, and preserve the lives and property of the people of the state, it is found and declared to be necessary:

(a) To create a state law enforcement mutual aid plan which provides for the command and coordination of law enforcement planning, operations, and mutual aid;

(b) To provide for the coordination of the dispatch and use of state law enforcement and Florida National Guard personnel and equipment because of natural or manmade disasters or emergencies whenever a local law enforcement agency requires law enforcement assistance from the state or any other jurisdiction;

(c) To provide for a system for the receipt and dissemination of information, data, and directives pertaining to activities among law enforcement agencies;

(d) To prescribe a procedure for the inventory of all law enforcement personnel, facilities, and equipment in the state;

(e) To collect and disseminate information and intelligence relating to disasters or emergencies, either existing or pending;

(f) To preplan distribution and allocation of state resources in support of the overall law enforcement mission; and

(g) To allow a law enforcement agency to enter into a mutual aid agreement with another law enforcement agency of this state or any other state or with any law enforcement agency of the United States or its territories.

(2) It is further declared to be the purpose of this part to authorize the establishment of such organization and the development and employment of such measures as are necessary and appropriate to carry out the provisions of this part.

History.—s. 2, ch. 69-112; s. 1, ch. 81-142; s. 2, ch. 92-165; s. 1, ch. 93-211.

23.1225 Mutual aid agreements.—

(1) The term “mutual aid agreement,” as used in this part, refers to one of the following types of agreement:

(a) A voluntary cooperation written agreement between two or more law enforcement agencies, which agreement permits voluntary cooperation and assistance of a routine law enforcement nature across jurisdictional lines. The agreement must specify the nature of the law enforcement assistance to be rendered, the agency or entity that shall bear any liability arising from acts undertaken under the agreement, the procedures for requesting and for authorizing assistance, the agency or entity that has command and supervisory responsibility, a time limit for the agreement, the amount of any compensation or reimbursement to the assisting agency or entity, and any other terms and conditions necessary to give it effect. Examples of law enforcement activities that may be addressed in a voluntary cooperation written agreement include, but are not limited to, establishing a joint city-county task force on narcotics smuggling, authorizing school safety officers to enforce laws in an area within 1,000 feet of a school or school board property, authorizing state university or Florida College System institution police officers to enforce laws within a specified jurisdictional area as agreed upon in a voluntary cooperation written agreement, or establishing a joint city-county traffic enforcement task force.

(b) A requested operational assistance written agreement between two or more law enforcement agencies, which agreement is for the rendering of assistance in a law enforcement emergency. The agreement must specify the nature of the law enforcement assistance to be rendered, the agency or entity that shall bear any liability arising from acts undertaken under the agreement, the procedures for requesting and for authorizing assistance, the agency or entity that has command and supervisory responsibility, a time limit for the agreement, the amount of any compensation or reimbursement to the assisting agency or entity, and any other terms and conditions necessary to give it effect. An example of the use of a requested operational assistance written agreement is to meet a request for assistance due to a civil disturbance or other emergency as defined in s. 252.34.

(d) As used in this section, the term “law enforcement agency” means any agency or unit of government that has authority to employ or appoint law enforcement officers, as defined in s. 943.10(1).

(2) A mutual aid agreement may allow for discretion by the parties as to when, whether, and to what extent assistance will be available.

(3) A mutual aid agreement may be entered into by a law enforcement agency through a written agreement executed by the chief executive officer of the agency, who is authorized to contractually bind the agency.

(4) A copy of a mutual aid agreement must be filed with the Department of Law Enforcement within 14 days after it is signed.

(5) In the event of a disaster or emergency such that a state of emergency is declared by the Governor pursuant to chapter 252, the requirement that a requested operational assistance agreement be a written agreement for rendering of assistance in a law enforcement emergency may be waived by the participating agencies for a period of up to 90 days from the declaration of the disaster.

(a) When a law enforcement agency lends assistance pursuant to this subsection, all powers, privileges, and immunities listed in s. 23.127, except with regard to interstate mutual aid agreements, apply to the agency or entity, if the law enforcement employees rendering services are being requested and coordinated by the affected local law enforcement executive in charge of law enforcement operations.

(b) A listing of such agencies or entities and the officers and employees of such agencies or entities rendering assistance pursuant to this subsection must be maintained by the agency or entity requesting such assistance and filed at the end of the 90-day period with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

History.—s. 2, ch. 81-142; s. 7, ch. 83-217; s. 1, ch. 83-334; s. 1, ch. 87-380; s. 3, ch. 92-165; s. 2, ch. 93-211; s. 1, ch. 96-276; s. 1, ch. 98-183; s. 3, ch. 2000-369; s. 882, ch. 2002-387; s. 1, ch. 2003-153; s. 1, ch. 2009-216; s. 1, ch. 2013-171.

23.1231 Florida Mutual Aid Plan; powers and duties.—

(1) The Florida Mutual Aid Plan must prepare for the distribution and allocation of state resources, including the Florida National Guard, in support of the overall law enforcement mission. The plan shall be administered by the Department of Law Enforcement to implement the policy and purposes set forth in s. 23.121.

(2) The executive director of the Department of Law Enforcement acting under the Governor as the state’s chief law enforcement officer is the director of the Florida Mutual Aid Plan. The director of the Florida Mutual Aid Plan shall:

(a) Coordinate, integrate, and implement law enforcement planning and activities for the use of mutual aid and state resources;

(b) Coordinate the organization and direction of the law enforcement services of the Florida Mutual Aid Plan;

(c) Coordinate and implement the gathering and collection of information and intelligence relating to law enforcement mutual aid or assistance from state agencies to support local law enforcement agencies in any local disaster or emergency, and provide information to state and local law enforcement agencies;

(d) During a state of emergency declared by the Governor under chapter 252, command, control, and coordinate all state law enforcement personnel and equipment to support local law enforcement agencies;

(e) Act as the liaison with the Division of the Florida Highway Patrol of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles in order to coordinate and integrate plans for traffic control and the participation of the department in the law enforcement operation;

(f) Serve as liaison and guide the flow of requests from local law enforcement for requesting law enforcement services from the Florida National Guard;

(g) Serve as liaison to the Governor, federal and state departments and agencies, and local law enforcement officials in order to achieve close coordination and cooperation in planning and operations in trouble areas;

(h) Guide the flow of law enforcement information from federal and state organizations to local law enforcement officials;

(i) Serve as liaison to the Attorney General in order to keep him or her informed of changes in law enforcement plans and regulations, mutual aid agreements, and current developments in all situations from a legal standpoint; and

(j) Do other things necessary for the implementation of this part.

(3) The department may:

(a) Maintain an inventory of all state and local law enforcement resources and the resources of the Florida National Guard, as directed by the director of the Florida Mutual Aid Plan;

(b) Provide technical assistance to state and local agencies in making inventories of their resources, planning, and preparing mutual aid agreements;

(d) Do other things necessary for the implementation of this act.

History.—s. 3, ch. 81-142; s. 2, ch. 87-380; s. 5, ch. 92-165; s. 3, ch. 93-211; s. 87, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 2013-18.

23.127 Powers, privileges, and immunities.—

(1) Any employee of any Florida law enforcement agency who renders aid outside the employee’s jurisdiction but inside this state pursuant to the written agreement entered under this part has the same powers, duties, rights, privileges, and immunities as if the employee was performing duties inside the employee’s jurisdiction. Any employee rendering aid pursuant to an interstate mutual aid agreement entered under this part shall have such powers, duties, rights, privileges, and immunities as the parties agree are consistent with the laws of the jurisdictions involved and with the purposes for which such agreement was entered.

(2) A political subdivision that furnishes equipment pursuant to this part must bear the cost of loss or damage to that equipment and must pay any expense incurred in the operation and maintenance of that equipment unless otherwise provided in the written agreement entered under this part. The political subdivision furnishing aid pursuant to this part shall compensate its employees during the time of the rendering of aid and shall defray the actual travel and maintenance expenses of its employees while they are rendering aid, including any amounts paid or due for compensation for personal injury or death while its employees are rendering aid, unless otherwise provided in the agreement entered under this part.

(3) The privileges and immunities from liability, exemption from laws, ordinances, and rules, and pension, insurance, relief, disability, workers’ compensation, salary, death, and other benefits that apply to the activity of an employee of an agency when performing the employee’s duties within the territorial limits of the employee’s agency apply to the employee to the same degree, manner, and extent while engaged in the performance of the employee’s duties extraterritorially under the provisions of the mutual aid agreement. This section applies to paid, volunteer, and auxiliary employees.

(4) A mutual aid agreement between law enforcement agencies in this state and any law enforcement agencies of another state or of the United States or its territories has the status of an interstate compact, but in any case or controversy involving performance or interpretation thereof or liability thereunder, the law enforcement agencies party thereto are real parties in interest and the state may maintain an action to recoup or otherwise make itself whole for any damages or liability that it incurs by reason of being joined as a party therein. Such action is maintainable against any public agency or agencies whose acts or omissions caused or contributed to the incurring of damages or liability by the state.

History.—s. 8, ch. 69-112; s. 48, ch. 79-40; s. 4, ch. 81-142; s. 4, ch. 92-165; s. 4, ch. 93-211.

PART II

PAPERWORK REDUCTION

23.20 Legislative intent with respect to paperwork reduction.

23.21 Definitions.

23.22 Paperwork reduction; activities of departments.

23.20 Legislative intent with respect to paperwork reduction.—The Legislature finds that:

(1) The paperwork burden associated with collecting information from individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments may have a significant economic impact on these entities as they attempt to comply with the state’s information reporting requirements.

(2) These information-reporting requirements are found in most interactions between state government and these entities, such as application and permitting processes, title registration, various licensure processes, environmental monitoring, growth management, and tax collection.

(3) The failure of state agencies to identify information they are collecting and to share that information with other agencies, as well as with local governments, has increased the paperwork burden on other entities.

(4) The state must minimize the paperwork burden by evaluating its need for information, determining whether it already has access to the necessary information, and coordinating data collection initiatives at their source.

(5) The collection of information by state government must be done in a manner that balances the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of government with the cost and convenience to individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments providing the information.

History.—s. 3, ch. 96-390.

23.21 Definitions.—For purposes of this part:

(1) “Collect information” means the obtaining, causing to be obtained, soliciting, or requiring the disclosure to third parties of facts or opinions by or for a department, regardless of form or format, calling for answers to identical questions posed to, or identical reporting or recordkeeping requirements imposed on, 10 or more persons, other than departments or employees of this state.

(2) “Department” means a principal administrative unit within the executive branch of state government as defined in chapter 20 and includes the State Board of Administration, the Executive Office of the Governor, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the Florida Commission on Offender Review, the Agency for Health Care Administration, the State Board of Education, the Board of Governors of the State University System, the Justice Administrative Commission, the capital collateral regional counsel, and separate budget entities placed for administrative purposes within a department.

(3) “Paperwork burden” means the resources expended by the entity providing information. Resources may include the time, effort, or financial expenditure associated with reviewing the instructions; acquiring, installing, and using technology to obtain, compile, or report the information; searching data sources; completing and reviewing the collected information; or transmitting the required information to the requesting department.

History.—s. 3, ch. 96-390; s. 63, ch. 99-245; s. 3, ch. 2006-1; s. 4, ch. 2007-217; s. 5, ch. 2014-191; s. 10, ch. 2023-8.

23.22 Paperwork reduction; activities of departments.—

(1) In order to reduce the amount of paperwork associated with the collection of information from individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments and to provide more efficient and effective assistance to such individuals and organizations in completing necessary paperwork required by the government, each department head shall, to the extent feasible:

(a) Integrate information systems between programs and departments to reduce the paperwork burden on such individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments.

(b) Implement a department-wide paperwork review process designed to achieve the following outcomes:

1. Streamline information-collection processes that balance the cost and efficiency desired by the department with the cost and convenience to the reporting entities.

2. Ensure the reporting entities’ participation in the identification of data elements, the estimation of the paperwork burden on them, and the design of information-collection instruments and processes.

3. Collect information necessary for the performance of agency functions without duplicating other information accessible to the agency.

(d) Design information collection forms and similar instruments to make them easy to understand and “user-friendly” to the individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments that are required to complete and return them. Departmental telephone numbers or electronic mail addresses for the public to obtain assistance in completing the forms must be provided on each form.

(e) Evaluate existing and prospective statutes and rules for the paperwork burden they generate and seek modification of the statutes and rules to reduce the paperwork burden being placed on individuals, private sector organizations, and local government.

(f) Collaborate with the Division of Library and Information Services, pursuant to s. 119.021(2), to identify and index records retention requirements placed on private sector organizations and local governments in Florida, clarify and reduce the requirements, and educate the affected entities through various communications media, including voice, data, video, radio, and image.

(2) Departments shall make available, upon request, a list of the initiatives taken to reduce paperwork associated with collecting information from individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments.

History.—s. 3, ch. 96-390; s. 30, ch. 2004-335; s. 480, ch. 2011-142.

PART III

CUSTOMER SERVICE STANDARDS

23.30 Florida Customer Service Standards Act.

23.30 Florida Customer Service Standards Act.—

(1) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the “Florida Customer Service Standards Act.”

(2) PURPOSE.—It is the purpose of this section to direct state departments to practice and employ all the measures set forth in this section.

(3) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section:

(a) “Customer” means any member of the public who uses or requests services or information provided by a state department or who is required by statute to interact with the department.

(b) “Department” means a principal administrative unit within the executive branch of state government, as set forth in chapter 20, and also includes the Public Service Commission.

(4) MEASURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED.—State departments shall:

(a) Designate an employee or employees in the department who shall be responsible for facilitating the resolution of customer complaints, including any customer complaints regarding unsatisfactory treatment by department employees.

(b) Provide available information, except information which is confidential pursuant to any other state or federal law, and accurate responses to questions and requests for assistance in a prompt manner.

(d) Provide local or toll-free telephonic or electronic access either through a centralized complaint-intake call center or directly to a department employee or employees designated to resolve customer complaints.

(e) Develop a process for review by upper-level management of any customer complaints not resolved by the department employee or employees designated to resolve customer complaints. In evaluating the appropriateness of response time, management may consider periodic, high volume inquiries as a justifiable cause of delay.

(f) Develop customer satisfaction measures as part of the department’s performance measurement system.

(g) Employ a system by which customer complaints and resolutions of those complaints are tracked.

(h) Provide statistical data on customer complaints and resolutions of those complaints, and on customer satisfaction measures in annual reports or other performance publications, and use this data when conducting management and budget planning activities.

(i) Provide training to employees on improving customer service and on the role of the department employee or employees designated to resolve customer complaints.

(j) Include in the departmental strategic plan a program outline or goal regarding customer service.

(k) Conduct interdepartmental discussions on methods of providing and improving customer service.

(5) OPERATING HOURS.—Departments shall be staffed and open to the public for business on all regular business days.

(6) FUNDING.—Departments shall use available resources to achieve the purposes of this section.

(7) FAILURE TO COMPLY.—No cause of action shall arise in favor of any person due to a department’s failure to comply with any provision of this section.

(8) EXCEPTIONS.—This section does not apply to a person who uses or requests services or information from a department when such service or information is related to that person’s:

(a) Pending or current criminal prosecution;

(b) Current incarceration;

(d) Current lawful state or local government custody.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2001-80.

F.S. 23 on Google Scholar

F.S. 23 on Casetext

Amendments to 23

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 23

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S104.23 - ELECTION LAWS - DISCLOSE HOW ELECTOR VOTES - F: T

S206.23 1 - TAX REVENUE - FAIL TO SEPARATELY STATE OR COLLECT FUEL TAX - F: T

S206.23 2 - TAX REVENUE - ADVERTISE REFUND OF FUEL TAX SUBSQ OFFENSE - M: F

S206.23 2 - TAX REVENUE - ADVERTISE REFUND OF FUEL TAX 1ST OFFENSE - M: S

S327.23 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 4399 - M: S

S370.23 - CONSERVATION-FISH - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 6665 - M: S

S370.23 - CONSERVATION-FISH - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 6666 - M: F

S454.23 - FRAUD-IMPERSON - MISREPRESENT SELF AS QUALIFIED TO PRACTICE LAW - F: T

S483.23 1a1 - HEALTH-SAFETY - REPEALED 2018-024 - M: S

S483.23 1a2 - HEALTH-SAFETY - REPEALED 2018-024 - M: S

S483.23 1a3 - HEALTH-SAFETY - REPEALED 2018-024 - M: S

S483.23 1a4 - HEALTH-SAFETY - REPEALED 2018-024 - M: S

S483.23 2 - PASS FORGED - REPEALED 2018-024 - F: T

S538.23 1 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - M: F

S538.23 1a1 - OBSTRUCT - PENALTY INCREASE SEE REC# 7333 - M: F

S538.23 1a1 - OBSTRUCT - PENALTY INCREASE SEE REC# 7334 - M: F

S538.23 1a1 - OBSTRUCT - SEC METAL RECYCLER REFUSE LEO INSPECTION - F: T

S538.23 1a1 - OBSTRUCT - SEC METAL RECYCLER REFUSE HONOR HOLD NOTICE - F: T

S538.23 1a2 - PROPERTY CRIMES - PENALTY INCREASE SEE REC# 7335 - M: F

S538.23 1a2 - PROPERTY CRIMES - SEC METAL RECYCLER FAIL TO KEEP REQ RECORDS - F: T

S538.23 1a3 - PROPERTY CRIMES - PENALTY INCREASE SEE REC# 7336 - M: F

S538.23 1a3 - PROPERTY CRIMES - SEC METAL RECYCLER BUY WO SELLER HAVING VEH - F: T

S538.23 1a4 - PROPERTY CRIMES - PENALTY INCREASE SEE REC# 7331 - M: F

S538.23 1a4 - PROPERTY CRIMES - SEC METAL RECYCLER PAY CASH OVER 1K DOLS - F: T

S538.23 1b - PROPERTY CRIMES - PENALTY INCREASE SEE REC# 7332 - F: T

S538.23 1b - PROPERTY CRIMES - SEC METAL RECYCLER VIOL LAW THIRD SUBSQ TIME - F: S

S538.23 2 - RECEIVE STOLEN PROP - REGULATED METALS - M: F

S538.23 3a - PASS FORGED - ALTER ID REGULATED METALS PROP UND 300 DOLS - F: T

S538.23 3a - FRAUD-IMPERSON - FALSE ID REGULATED METALS PROP UND 300 DOLS - F: T

S538.23 3a - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - VERIF OWNERSHIP REGULATED METALS UND 300 DOLS - F: T

S538.23 3b - PASS FORGED - ALTERED ID REG METAL PROP 300 DOLS OR MORE - F: S

S538.23 3b - FRAUD-IMPERSON - FALSE ID REGULATED METALS PROP 300 DOLS MORE - F: S

S538.23 3b - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - VERIF OWNRSHP REGULATED METALS 300 DOLS MORE - F: S

S538.23 5 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - UNREGISTERED SECONDARY METAL RECYCLER - F: T

S561.23 - LIQUOR - BEVERAGE LIC NOT DISPLAY PREMISES SUBSQ OFF - F: T

S561.23 - LIQUOR - BEVERAGE LICENSE NOT DISPLAY PREMISES 1ST OFF - M: S

S562.23 - LIQUOR - CONSPIRACY VIOL BEVERAGE LAW FELONY - F: T

S562.23 - LIQUOR - CONSPIRACY TO VIOL BEV LAW MISDEMEANOR - M: S

S578.23 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL TO KEEP REQUIRED SEED DEALER RECORDS - M: S

S790.23 1a - POSSESSION OF WEAPON - OR AMMO BY CONVICTED FLA FELON - F: S

S790.23 1b - POSSESSION OF WEAPON - OR AMMO BY FLA DELINQUENT ADULT FELONY - F: S

S790.23 1c - POSSESSION OF WEAPON - OR AMMO BY CONVICTED UNITED STATES FELON - F: S

S790.23 1d - POSSESSION OF WEAPON - OR AMMO BY OTHER STATE DELINQUENT ADULT FELONY - F: S

S790.23 1e - POSSESSION OF WEAPON - OR AMMO BY OTHER STATE FELON - F: S

S790.23 4 - POSSESSION OF WEAPON - OR AMMO BY GANG-RELATED FELON OR DELINQUENT - F: F

S817.23 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - ON AFFIDAVIT WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD INSURANCE - F: T

S831.23 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - IMPEDE CIRCULATION OF BANK BILL OR NOTE - M: F

S839.23 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - TAKE INSUFFICIENT BAIL BY OFFICER - M: S

S843.23 2a - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - TAMPERING WITH ELECTRONIC MONITORING DEVICE - F: T

S843.23 2b - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REQ/AUTH PERSON TAMPER ELEC MONITORING DEVICE - F: T

S843.23 3 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 9346 - F: T

S849.23 - GAMBLING - VIOL LAW RE SLOT MACHINE THIRD OR SUBSQ VIOL - F: T

S849.23 - GAMBLING - VIOLATE LAW REGARDING SLOT MACHINE 2ND VIOL - M: F

S849.23 - GAMBLING - VIOLATE LAW REGARDING SLOT MACHINE 1ST VIOL - M: S

S876.23 - SOVEREIGNTY - ATTEMPT OR COMMIT SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES - F: S

S914.23 - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - RENUMBERED. SEE REC #8879 - F: S

S914.23 - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - RENUMBERED. SEE REC #8880 - F: T

S914.23 1 - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - RETALIATE FOR WITNESS ATTEND TESTIMONY EVIDEN - F: S

S914.23 1 - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - BODILY INJ RETALIATE WIT ATTEND TESTIFY EVID - F: T

S914.23 2 - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - RETALIATE FOR INFO CRIME SUPERVISION PROCEED - F: S

S914.23 2 - OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE - BODILY INJ RETALIATE INFO CRIME SUPERV PROCEED - F: T

S951.23 10 - OBSTRUCT POLICE - VIOL COUNTY DETENTION RULE 2 OR MORE TIMES - M: S

S1003.23 2 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - SCH FAIL KEEP ATTEND RECORDS FILE REPORT - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

LITTLE, v. RECLAIM IDAHO,, 140 S. Ct. 2616 (U.S. 2020)

. . . The district court's June 23, June 26, and June 30, 2020 orders are stayed pending disposition of the . . . Thurston , 967 F. 3d 727, 740-41 (C.A.8, July 23, 2020), and Morgan v. . . .

P. BARR, v. PURKEY, 140 S. Ct. 2594 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 505 (WD Mo., Jan. 23, 2004); United States v. Purkey , 428 F.3d 738, 745 (CA8 2005). . . .

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Taylor, Grand Inquest: The Story of Congressional Investigations 19-23 (1955). . . .

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Beale et al., Grand Jury Law and Practice § 6:23, p. 6-243 (2014). . . . Recording of Oral Arg. in No. 19-3204 (CA2, Oct. 23, 2019), at 28:20- 28:40; 36:35-36:45, https://www.ca2 . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Hitchcock , 187 U.S. 553, 566-568, 23 S.Ct. 216, 47 L.Ed. 299 (1903). . . . for their parcels that "convey[ed] to [them] all right, title, and interest of the Creek Nation." § 23 . . . Act of Mar. 3, 1885, ch. 341, § 9, 23 Stat. 385 (emphasis added); see also 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (defining . . . See § 9, 23 Stat. 385. . . . A)(i) (emphasis added) (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act); see Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 23 . . .

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . App. 23, 75. As a result, she was her students' religion teacher. Morrissey-Berru earned a B. . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 1536(a)(1) ; 23 U.S.C. § 138. . . . risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer ), Brief for National Women's Law Center et al. as Amici Curiae 23 . . . grandfathered" plans from 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-13(a)(4) -i.e. , "those [plans] that existed prior to March 23 . . . See Tr. of Oral Arg. 20-23. . . . 50 employees, 26 U.S.C. § 4980H(c)(2), or "grandfathered health plans"-plans in existence on March 23 . . .

B. CHIAFALO, v. WASHINGTON, 140 S. Ct. 2316 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Hay (Aug. 23, 1823), in 3 Farrand 458. . . . Rhodes , 393 U.S. 23, 29, 89 S.Ct. 5, 21 L.Ed.2d 24 (1968). . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . California , 413 U.S. 15, 23, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) (obscenity); Virginia Bd. of Pharmacy . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Organization et al. as Amici Curiae 14-22; Brief for Justice and Freedom Fund et al. as Amici Curiae 22-23 . . . ' and one dissent's efforts to downplay it in contravention of Ramos , see Brief for Respondents 16-23 . . . 2293 - 2294, n. 2 (opinion of SOTOMAYOR, J.); see also Brief for Respondents 18; Tr. of Oral Arg. 22-23 . . . Rev. 279, 298 (2001) (Jeffries & Ryan); see also, e.g. , CER Brief 23-26. . . . Hook, Paradoxes of Freedom 23 (1962)); see also 1 T. . . . See Brief for Respondents 18-23; Brief for Montana Constitutional Convention Delegates as Amici Curiae . . . See Brief for Respondents 17-23. . . .

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, v. BOOKING. COM B. V., 140 S. Ct. 2298 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See §§ 1114(1), 1125(a)(1)(A) ; 4 McCarthy § 23:1.50 (collecting state law). . . . Marketing Displays, Inc. , 532 U.S. 23, 32, 121 S.Ct. 1255, 149 L.Ed.2d 164 (2001) (internal quotation . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . ." § 7601(23). . . . Boumediene , 553 U.S. at 764, 128 S.Ct. 2229 ; see also, e.g. , Neuman, Understanding Global Due Process, 23 . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Hazeltine Research, Inc. , 395 U.S. 100, 123, 89 S.Ct. 1562, 23 L.Ed.2d 129 (1969) ). . . . (slip op., at 22-23). • For those patients who do experience complications at the clinic, the transfer . . . (slip op., at 23). . . . (slip op., at 23-24) ; see also Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 84 Fed. . . . (slip op., at 23-24). . . . J., for the Court) (slip op., at 20-23); Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Hyatt , 587 U. . . . MS-23, 25, 26, 29. . . . Thus, in class-action suits, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(4) demands that the named plaintiff . . . S., at ---- - ----, ----, ---- - ----, 136 S.Ct., at (slip op., at 22-23, 26, 31-32). . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Act of Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See id. , at 23-27; Brief for Professors of Sri Lankan Politics as Amici Curiae 7-11; see also ante , . . . See App. 87; see also, e.g. , id. , at 23-26. . . . See Tr. of Oral Arg. 14-15, 23-24; Brief for Petitioners 38. . . . The Japanese Immigrant Case , 189 U.S. 86, 100, 23 S.Ct. 611, 47 L.Ed. 721 (1903) ; see also ante , at . . . In re Stupp, 23 F.Cas. 296, (No. 13563) (CC SDNY 1875), which the Court cites in passing, emphatically . . . See also, e.g. , In re Stupp , 23 F.Cas. 296, 303, (No. 13563) (CC SDNY 1875). . . .

C. LIU, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Denig , 92 U.S. 716, 720, 23 L.Ed. 764 (1876). . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 8303(c)(2) (Office of Volunteers for Prosperity) • 23 U.S.C. § 140(a) (Federal-Aid Highways; Nondiscrimination . . . ) • 23 U.S.C. § 324 (Highways; Prohibition of Discrimination on the Basis of Sex) • 25 U.S.C. § 4223( . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Brief for Petitioner Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, 22-23, n. 2. . . . Stat. §§ 23-69, 23-70 (2017); N. H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 216-D:2 (2019) ; Me. Rev. Stat. . . .

ANDRUS v. TEXAS, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (U.S. 2020)

. . . AP-76,936, p. 5 (CCA, Mar. 23, 2016) (Reh'g Op.); see also 54 Tr., Pl. . . . See Reh'g Op. 7; see also 46 Tr. 23-25 (arresting officer explaining that only Andrus's clothing matched . . .

J. LOMAX, v. ORTIZ- MARQUEZ,, 140 S. Ct. 1721 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id., at 23; see id., at 21 (invoking the "interpretive canon noscitur a sociis , a word is known by the . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . 13, 31 Stat. 144 (Hawaii, same); Act of Aug. 24, 1912, § 4, 37 Stat. 513 (Alaska, same); Act of Aug. 23 . . . Court expressly declined to answer any question related to the Appointments Clause. 501 U.S. at 277, n. 23 . . .

KELLY, v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1565 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Cleveland , 531 U.S. at 23, 121 S.Ct. 365. . . . Id., at 23-24, 121 S.Ct. 365. And so his conduct, however deceitful, was not property fraud. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . T. 2016, No. 16-273 (Feb. 23, 2017) (ordering briefing on intervening Department of Education and Department . . . United States , 579 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 23, 195 L.Ed.2d 895 (2016) ; Welch v. . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Lynah , 188 U.S. 445, 458-459, 23 S.Ct. 349, 47 L.Ed. 539 (1903). . . .

GEORGIA, v. PUBLIC. RESOURCE. ORG, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1498 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Dmitrieva, State Ownership of Copyrights in Primary Law Materials, 23 Hastings Com. & Entertainment L . . . Dmitrieva, State Ownership of Copyrights in Primary Law Materials, 23 Hastings Com. & Entertainment L . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . ." § 5-23(a)(3) (in effect prior to July 21, 2019) (emphasis added); id. , at 88. . . . Brief in Opposition 9, 21-23. . . . be "direc[t]" and travel within the City must be "continuous and uninterrupted." 38 N.Y.C.R.R. §§ 5-23 . . . Petitioners' prayer for relief asks the court to enjoin 38 N.Y.C.R.R. § 5-23 insofar as it "prohibit[ . . . For a similar reason, 38 N.Y.C.R.R. § 5-23 also violated the Second Amendment. . . .

BARTON, v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 1442 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued November 4, 2019 Decided April 23, 2020 Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General., Joseph H. . . .

COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII, v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND,, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued November 6, 2019 Decided April 23, 2020 County of Maui, Moana M. Lutey, Richelle M. . . .

ROMAG FASTENERS, INC. v. FOSSIL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1492 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued January 14, 2020 Decided April 23, 2020 Jonathan Freiman, Wiggin and Dana LLP, New Haven, CT, . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. A. CHRISTIAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 23-24. . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Ohio , 395 U.S. 444, 89 S.Ct. 1827, 23 L.Ed.2d 430 (1969) (per curiam ); Katz v. . . . See, e.g., Juries Act 1974, ch. 23, § 17 (Eng.); ABA Project on Standards for Criminal Justice, Trial . . . Juries Act 1974, ch. 23, § 17 (replacing Criminal Justice Act 1967, ch. 80, § 13). . . . Pendleton, Sept. 14 and 23, 1789). . . .

BABB, v. WILKIE,, 140 S. Ct. 1168 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 464 U.S. 16, 23, 104 S.Ct. 296, 78 L.Ed.2d 17 (1983) (" '[W]here Congress includes particular . . .

KANSAS, v. GLOVER, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . California , 374 U.S. 23, 33, 83 S.Ct. 1623, 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963) )). . . . See generally Brief for Andrew Manuel Crespo as Amicus Curiae 23-27. . . .

CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY, v. FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., 140 S. Ct. 1081 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Brief for Petitioners 23, 25. . . . (emphasis added); see also 23 Willis-ton § 63:8, at 499 (2018) ("Liability for a breach of contract is . . . Cargo of Java Sugar , 187 U.S. 248, 23 S.Ct. 86, 47 L.Ed. 163 (1902) ; The Gazelle and Cargo , 128 U.S . . . Cargo of Java Sugar , 187 U.S. 248, 253, 23 S.Ct. 86, 47 L.Ed. 163 (1902) ; see also The Gazelle and . . . Mencke , 187 U.S. at 253-254, 23 S.Ct. 86. . . .

ROCKWOOD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,, 140 S. Ct. 2563 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-23. Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

COMCAST CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN- OWNED MEDIA,, 140 S. Ct. 1009 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued November 13, 2019 Decided March 23, 2020 Miguel Estrada, Los Angeles, CA, for the petitioner Morgan . . . United States , 464 U.S. 16, 23, 104 S.Ct. 296, 78 L.Ed.2d 17 (1983). . . .

K. KAHLER, v. KANSAS, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued October 7, 2019 Decided March 23, 2020 Derek Schmidt, Attorney General of Kansas, Jeffrey A. . . . See Brief for Petitioner 20-23; see also post , at 1045. . . . The Aims of the Criminal Law, 23 Law & Contemp. Prob. 401, 405 (1958). . . . No. 98-577, p. 15 n. 23 (1984) ("Mental illness rarely, if ever, renders a person incapable of understanding . . .

DAVIS v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Decided March 23, 2020 . . .

GUERRERO- LASPRILLA, v. P. BARR, v. P., 140 S. Ct. 1062 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued December 9, 2019 Decided March 23, 2020 Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Joseph H. . . . See id., at 302-303, and nn. 18-23, 121 S.Ct. 2271. . . . Co. , 92 U.S. 315, 318-319, 23 L.Ed. 515 (1876) (distinguishing between a "mixed question of law and . . . McAnnulty , 187 U.S. 94, 108, 23 S.Ct. 33, 47 L.Ed. 90 (1902). . . .

AVERY v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1080 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Decided March 23, 2020 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. . . .

BAZAN, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2016 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth . . .

BAZAN, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2016 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth . . .

DOE, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2016 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies . . .

MAYES, v. WINDOM,, 140 S. Ct. 2016 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied . . .

MEDINA, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2017 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020. . . .

CLOWERS, v. CRADDUCK,, 140 S. Ct. 2017 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under . . .

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU., 140 S. Ct. 2017 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 The motion of Virginia, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae . . .

ST. JAMES SCHOOL, v. BIEL, ESTATE OF BIEL., 140 S. Ct. 2017 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020. . . .

CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, v. L. FULTON,, 140 S. Ct. 2017 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae . . .

RAYMOND, v. ROY,, 140 S. Ct. 2018 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District denied . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA,, 140 S. Ct. 2505 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Motion of petitioner in No. 19-431 to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted . . .

J. TRUMP, v. PENNSYLVANIA,, 140 S. Ct. 2505 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Motion of petitioner in No. 19-431 to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted . . .

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2505 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae . . .

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP,, 140 S. Ct. 2505 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae . . .

J. TRUMP, v. DEUTSCHE BANK AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2505 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae . . .

MORRIS, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2506 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis . . .

SMITH, v. FLORIDA., 140 S. Ct. 2506 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. . . .

DOE v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION., 140 S. Ct. 2506 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District . . .

INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES PROJECT, INC. v. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY,, 140 S. Ct. 2506 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit . . .

SIDDIQUI, v. NETJETS AVIATION, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2507 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

REESE, v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION,, 140 S. Ct. 2507 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal . . .

L. FRANCWAY, Jr. v. WILKIE,, 140 S. Ct. 2507 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal . . .

WOODCREST HOMES, INC. v. CAROUSEL FARMS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT., 140 S. Ct. 2507 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado denied. . . .

ADKINS, v. COLLENS., 140 S. Ct. 2508 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alaska denied. . . .

TONG, v. TWEED- NEW HAVEN AIRPORT AUTHORITY,, 140 S. Ct. 2508 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit . . .

TAYLOR, v. PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA,, 140 S. Ct. 2508 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

C. ANGINO, v. TRANSUNION LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2508 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit . . .

FAUST, v. B. K. BY TINSLEY,, 140 S. Ct. 2509 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

MAXELL, LTD. v. FANDANGO MEDIA, LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2509 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020. . . .

A. RAMIREZ, v. HOGUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2510 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied. . . .

V. CALDWELL, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA., 140 S. Ct. 2510 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit . . .

SWARTZ, v. HEARTLAND EQUINE RESCUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2510 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh . . .

K. NEGASH, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2510 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit . . .

A. LONGMIRE, v. WARSHAW BURSTEIN COHEN SCHLESINGER KUH, LLP., 140 S. Ct. 2510 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, . . .

JENSEN, v. BLUMENSTIEL,, 140 S. Ct. 2511 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

R. MCDONALD, v. BELLCO CREDIT UNION., 140 S. Ct. 2511 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied. . . .

OCHOA, v. LEVINE,, 140 S. Ct. 2511 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office . . .

CASTRO, v. SIMON,, 140 S. Ct. 2511 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit . . .

SIDDIQUI, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2512 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit . . .

SCOTT, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 140 S. Ct. 2512 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit . . .

J. LUCERO, v. R. KONCILJA,, 140 S. Ct. 2512 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit . . .

M. PAZ, v. DIRECTOR, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION., 140 S. Ct. 2512 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division . . .

A. CLARK, v. NEW YORK COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES., 140 S. Ct. 2513 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit . . .

HASELRIG, v. INSLEE., 140 S. Ct. 2513 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 denied . . .

LAWRENCE, v. UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL,, 140 S. Ct. 2513 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

S. CRICK, v. KEY,, 140 S. Ct. 2513 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

K. JOHNSON, M. v. UBS AG., 140 S. Ct. 2514 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit . . .

PRIMM, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2514 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit . . .

HOTZE HEALTH WELLNESS CENTER INTERNATIONAL ONE, LLC, v. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2514 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

ABDUL- AZIZ, v. NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION PLAYERS PENSION PLAN., 140 S. Ct. 2514 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit . . .

F. KELLY, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2515 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020. . . .

J. WALKER, v. AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED., 140 S. Ct. 2515 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020. . . .

SOLUTRAN, INC. v. ELAVON, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2515 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal . . .

CITY OF FERGUSON, MISSOURI, v. FANT,, 140 S. Ct. 2515 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit . . .

CASWELL, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2516 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

I. WATERS, Jr. v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2516 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

KHRAPKO, v. SPLAIN,, 140 S. Ct. 2516 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit . . .

INCHIERCHIERE, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 140 S. Ct. 2516 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

NINO, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2517 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

REFUGIO QUINTANAR, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2517 (U.S. 2020)

. . . March 23, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit . . .