Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 25.025 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 25.025 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 25.025

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 25
SUPREME COURT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 25.025
25.025 Headquarters.
(1)(a) A Supreme Court justice who permanently resides outside Leon County is eligible for the designation of a district court of appeal courthouse, a county courthouse, or another appropriate facility in his or her district of residence as his or her official headquarters for purposes of s. 112.061. This official headquarters may serve only as the justice’s private chambers.
(b)1. A justice for whom an official headquarters is designated in his or her district of residence under this subsection is eligible for subsistence at a rate to be established by the Chief Justice for each day or partial day that the justice is at the headquarters of the Supreme Court to conduct court business, as authorized by the Chief Justice. The Chief Justice may authorize a justice to choose between subsistence based on lodging at a single-occupancy rate and meal reimbursement as provided in s. 112.061 and subsistence at a fixed rate prescribed by the Chief Justice.
2. In addition to subsistence, a justice is eligible for reimbursement for travel expenses as provided in s. 112.061(7) and (8) for travel between the justice’s official headquarters and the headquarters of the Supreme Court to conduct court business.
(c) Payment of subsistence and reimbursement for travel expenses between a justice’s official headquarters and the headquarters of the Supreme Court shall be made to the extent that appropriated funds are available, as determined by the Chief Justice.
(2) The Chief Justice shall coordinate with each affected justice and other state and local officials as necessary to implement subsection (1).
(3)(a) This section does not require a county to provide space in a county courthouse for a justice. A county may enter into an agreement with the Supreme Court governing the use of space in a county courthouse.
(b) The Supreme Court may not use state funds to lease space in a district court of appeal courthouse, county courthouse, or other facility to allow a justice to establish an official headquarters pursuant to subsection (1).
(4) The Chief Justice may establish parameters governing the authority provided in this section, including, but not limited to, specifying minimum operational requirements for the designated headquarters, limiting the number of days for which subsistence and travel reimbursement may be provided, and prescribing activities that qualify as the conduct of court business.
(5) If any term of this section conflicts with s. 112.061, this section shall control to the extent of the conflict.
History.s. 1, ch. 2019-95; ss. 64, 115, ch. 2019-116; s. 1, ch. 2020-61.

F.S. 25.025 on Google Scholar

F.S. 25.025 on Casetext

Amendments to 25.025


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 25.025
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 25.025.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 25.025

Total Results: 20

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re: Limiting Government Interference with Abortion

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-04-01T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Amends., 699 So. 2d 1304; Askew, 421 So. 2d 151. 25 25. The closest cases cited by the majority to

Diaz v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-03T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: order revoking his probation and sentencing him to 25.25 years’ imprisonment on his underlying crimes. His…his probation. It then re-sentenced Mr. Diaz to 25.25 years’ imprisonment to be followed by 10 years’

Smith v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-12-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 211 So. 3d 176, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18676

Snippet: allege facts establishing a timely prosecution).25 25 A defendant who has waived the statute of limitations

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration & the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-10-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 125 So. 3d 743, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 776, 2013 WL 5878859, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2350

Snippet: . Art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. . See ch.2013-25, § 25, Laws of Fla. (providing effective date). .

Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Phillips

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-11-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 110 So. 3d 908, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18182, 2011 WL 5555691

Snippet: Limitations Apply in Arbitration?, 81 Fla. Bar J. 25, 25 (2007) (citing New York’s and Georgia’s statutes

In Re Amend. to the Fla. Family Law Forms

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-12-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 59 So. 3d 792

Snippet: ______ 25. ______________________________________________________________ 25. $ ______

Santana v. Henry

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-05-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 12 So. 3d 843

Snippet: 5th DCA 1988); Sutton v. Strickland, 485 So.2d 25, 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), or anything less than a state

Santana v. Henry

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-05-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 12 So. 3d 843, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6652

Snippet: 5th DCA 1988); Sutton v. Strickland, 485 So.2d 25, 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), or anything less than a state

Amendments to Approved Family Law Forms

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2009-03-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 20 So. 3d 173

Snippet: _ 25. _________________________________________________________________________________ 25. $ __

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure & Family Law Forms

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-09-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 810 So. 2d 1, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 13, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2272, 2000 WL 1352932

Snippet: $_ Other {explain}_: 23. _ 23. $_ 24. _ 24. $_ 25. _ 25 $_ _ 26! TOTAL EXPENSES FOR CHILD(REN) COMMON

Jones v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-05-17T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 764 So. 2d 659

Snippet: imprisonment and a maximum recommended sentence of 25.25 months' imprisonment. Appellant was sentenced

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Forms

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1999-07-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 759 So. 2d 583, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 321, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1174, 1999 WL 462636

Snippet: $_ Other {explain}: 23. _ 23. $, 24. _ 24. $. 25. _ 25. $. 26. TOTAL EXPENSES FOR CHILD(REN) COMMON TO

Sauceda v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-10-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 724 So. 2d 107, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12859, 1998 WL 712912

Snippet: sentence, variously stated as 25.95 months and as 25.25 months in prison. In his motion, he claimed entitlement… are made to the numbers supplied by Appellant, 25.25 prison months becomes Appellant’s maximum guidelines

Houser v. Manning

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-07-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 719 So. 2d 307

Snippet: Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Driggers v. Carson, 486 So.2d 25, 25-26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). It is true that one portion

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1998-02-25T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 713 So. 2d 1

Snippet: _________ 25. _______________________________________________________________ 25. $_________

Florida Board of Bar Examiners

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1996-03-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 676 So. 2d 372, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 122, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 442, 1996 WL 108536

Snippet: of the Board. The Board shall have twenty-five (25) 25 days after the service of said copy on the Executive

The Florida Bar v. Graham

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1992-06-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 605 So. 2d 53

Snippet: 31, 1990; $30,503.13 on April 30, 1990; and $30,025.25 on May 31, 1990. By June 30, 1990, Graham had reduced

Prugh v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-04-03T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 578 So. 2d 1130

Snippet: the boundaries of the SJRWMD. Rule 40C-42.025; 17-25.025; 17-302.500; 17-302.560; 17-3.402(1) F.A.C. See

Miller v. Highlands Insurance Company

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1976-08-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 336 So. 2d 636

Snippet: of sheer speculation. 22 Am.Jur.2d, Damages, § 25; 25 C.J.S. Damages § 26, p. 675 et seq.; 9A Fla.Jur

Methodist Episcopal Church of Middletown v. Richardson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-10-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 244 So. 2d 475, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6585

Snippet: consisting of certain shares of stock together with $25,025.34 in cash. Eva R. Rogers, individually as the