Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 25.025 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 25.025 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 25.025

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 25
SUPREME COURT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 25.025
25.025 Headquarters.
(1)(a) A Supreme Court justice who permanently resides outside Leon County is eligible for the designation of a district court of appeal courthouse, a county courthouse, or another appropriate facility in his or her district of residence as his or her official headquarters for purposes of s. 112.061. This official headquarters may serve only as the justice’s private chambers.
(b)1. A justice for whom an official headquarters is designated in his or her district of residence under this subsection is eligible for subsistence at a rate to be established by the Chief Justice for each day or partial day that the justice is at the headquarters of the Supreme Court to conduct court business, as authorized by the Chief Justice. The Chief Justice may authorize a justice to choose between subsistence based on lodging at a single-occupancy rate and meal reimbursement as provided in s. 112.061 and subsistence at a fixed rate prescribed by the Chief Justice.
2. In addition to subsistence, a justice is eligible for reimbursement for travel expenses as provided in s. 112.061(7) and (8) for travel between the justice’s official headquarters and the headquarters of the Supreme Court to conduct court business.
(c) Payment of subsistence and reimbursement for travel expenses between a justice’s official headquarters and the headquarters of the Supreme Court shall be made to the extent that appropriated funds are available, as determined by the Chief Justice.
(2) The Chief Justice shall coordinate with each affected justice and other state and local officials as necessary to implement subsection (1).
(3)(a) This section does not require a county to provide space in a county courthouse for a justice. A county may enter into an agreement with the Supreme Court governing the use of space in a county courthouse.
(b) The Supreme Court may not use state funds to lease space in a district court of appeal courthouse, county courthouse, or other facility to allow a justice to establish an official headquarters pursuant to subsection (1).
(4) The Chief Justice may establish parameters governing the authority provided in this section, including, but not limited to, specifying minimum operational requirements for the designated headquarters, limiting the number of days for which subsistence and travel reimbursement may be provided, and prescribing activities that qualify as the conduct of court business.
(5) If any term of this section conflicts with s. 112.061, this section shall control to the extent of the conflict.
History.s. 1, ch. 2019-95; ss. 64, 115, ch. 2019-116; s. 1, ch. 2020-61.

F.S. 25.025 on Google Scholar

F.S. 25.025 on Casetext

Amendments to 25.025


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 25.025
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 25.025.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 25.025

Total Results: 20

Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re: Limiting Government Interference with Abortion

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-01

Snippet: Amends., 699 So. 2d 1304; Askew, 421 So. 2d 151. 25 25. The closest cases cited by the majority to

Diaz v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-03

Citation: 272 So. 3d 482

Snippet: order revoking his probation and sentencing him to 25.25 years’ imprisonment on his underlying crimes. His

Smith v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-12-21

Citation: 211 So. 3d 176, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18676

Snippet: allege facts establishing a timely prosecution).25 25 A defendant who has waived the statute of limitations

Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Phillips

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-11-16

Citation: 110 So. 3d 908, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18182, 2011 WL 5555691

Snippet: Limitations Apply in Arbitration?, 81 Fla. Bar J. 25, 25 (2007) (citing New York’s and Georgia’s statutes

Santana v. Henry

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-05-29

Citation: 12 So. 3d 843, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6652

Snippet: 5th DCA 1988); Sutton v. Strickland, 485 So.2d 25, 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), or anything less than a state

Santana v. Henry

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-05-29

Citation: 12 So. 3d 843, 2009 WL 1492650

Snippet: 5th DCA 1988); Sutton v. Strickland, 485 So.2d 25, 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), or anything less than a state

Jones v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-05-17

Citation: 764 So. 2d 659, 2000 WL 627862

Snippet: imprisonment and a maximum recommended sentence of 25.25 months' imprisonment. Appellant was sentenced by

Sauceda v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-10-14

Citation: 724 So. 2d 107, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12859, 1998 WL 712912

Snippet: sentence, variously stated as 25.95 months and as 25.25 months in prison. In his motion, he claimed entitlement

Houser v. Manning

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-07-22

Citation: 719 So. 2d 307, 1998 WL 406048

Snippet: (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Driggers v. Carson, 486 So.2d 25, 25-26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). It is true that one portion

Florida Board of Bar Examiners

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-03-14

Citation: 676 So. 2d 372, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 122, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 442, 1996 WL 108536

Snippet: of the Board. The Board shall have twenty-five (25) 25 days after the service of said copy on the Executive

The Florida Bar v. Graham

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-06-11

Citation: 605 So. 2d 53, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 357, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1023, 1992 WL 125121

Snippet: 31, 1990; $30,503.13 on April 30, 1990; and $30,025.25 on May 31, 1990. By June 30, 1990, Graham had reduced

Prugh v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-04-04

Citation: 578 So. 2d 1130, 1991 WL 44909

Snippet: the boundaries of the SJRWMD. Rule 40C-42.025; 17-25.025; 17-302.500; 17-302.560; 17-3.402(1) F.A.C. See

Miller v. Highlands Insurance Company

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-08-06

Citation: 336 So. 2d 636, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15359

Snippet: of sheer speculation. 22 Am.Jur.2d, Damages, § 25; 25 C.J.S. Damages § 26, p. 675 et seq.; 9A Fla.Jur

Methodist Episcopal Church of Middletown v. Richardson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-10-28

Citation: 244 So. 2d 475, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6585

Snippet: consisting of certain shares of stock together with $25,025.34 in cash. Eva R. Rogers, individually as the

Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-10-11

Citation: 133 So. 2d 755

Snippet: $25, county and state occupational licenses of $25.25, and the amounts assessed for such licenses in other

Campbell v. Horne, Et Ux.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-06-17

Citation: 3 So. 2d 125, 147 Fla. 523, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1314

Snippet: L.Ed. 808, 2 S.Ct. 854; Mills v. Scott, 99 U.S. 25, 25 L.Ed. 294; Kentucky Union Co. v. Kentucky, 219

Sutton v. Gulf Life Insurance

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-06-23

Citation: 189 So. 828, 138 Fla. 692, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1477

Snippet: Wnyte, 49 Ill. App. 97; Bartlett v. Blaine, 83 Ill. 25, 25 Am. Rep. 346. "It is of the very essence of an

State Ex Rel. Worth v. Culbreath

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-04-21

Citation: 188 So. 604, 137 Fla. 485, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1855

Snippet: Application .......................... .25 .25 (4) Copies for interested parties — Last

Pritchett v. New York Life Insurance

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-07-27

Citation: 170 So. 700, 125 Fla. 653, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1342

Snippet: further sum of Twenty-five and 25/100 Dollars ($25.25) to Lakeland Abstract Title Insurance Company for

Malone v. Meres

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1926-04-30

Citation: 109 So. 677, 91 Fla. 709

Snippet: 510, 31 Am. Dec. 668; Crompton v. Beach,62 Conn. 25, 25 Atl. Rep. 446, 18. L.R.A. 187; 24 R. C. L. 127