Florida Statute 25.031 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 25
SUPREME COURT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 25.031

25.031 Supreme Court authorized to receive and answer certificates as to state law from federal appellate courts.—The Supreme Court of this state may, by rule of court, provide that, when it shall appear to the Supreme Court of the United States, to any circuit court of appeals of the United States, or to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, that there are involved in any proceeding before it questions or propositions of the laws of this state, which are determinative of the said cause, and there are no clear controlling precedents in the decisions of the Supreme Court of this state, such federal appellate court may certify such questions or propositions of the laws of this state to the Supreme Court of this state for instructions concerning such questions or propositions of state law, which certificate the Supreme Court of this state, by written opinion, may answer.

History.—s. 1, ch. 23098, 1945; s. 1, ch. 57-274.

F.S. 25.031 on Google Scholar

F.S. 25.031 on Casetext

Amendments to 25.031

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 25.031

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 25.031.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 25.031

Total Results: 20

CID TORREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-04-22T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Stat. (2017); accord Salomon v. State, 267 So. 3d 25, 31 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). Expert testimony must concern

CID TORREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-04-22T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Stat. (2017); accord Salomon v. State, 267 So. 3d 25, 31 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). Expert testimony must concern

Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando v. MMB Properties

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-05-22T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 171 So. 3d 125, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7717, 2015 WL 2414382

Snippet: irreparable injury.”); Coffman v. James, 177 So.2d 25, 31 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965) (“It is well established in

State of Florida v. Zachariah Dorsett

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-02-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 158 So. 3d 557, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 103, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 369

Snippet: quoting Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25, 31 (Alaska 1978)). In Mancuso, we

Paola A. Alvardo-Fernandez v. Matthew Mazoff

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-10-08T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 151 So. 3d 8, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15631, 2014 WL 4988409

Snippet: Laino v. Cuprum S.A. de C.V., 235 A.D.2d 25, 31, 663 N.Y.S.2d 275, 279 (N.Y.App.Div.1997) (“[T]

Dorsett v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-01-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 147 So. 3d 532, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1405, 2013 WL 331602

Snippet: .2d at 372 (quoting Ki-moktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25, 31 (Alaska 1978)).2 The supreme court approved of

Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. South Florida Water Management District

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-11-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 48 So. 3d 811, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 675, 41 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20028, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1975, 2010 WL 4643070

Snippet: .2002), and City of Boca Raton v. State, 595 So.2d 25, 31 (Fla.1992)). The final judgment of validation comes

Sarasota Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of Sarasota

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-10-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 48 So. 3d 755, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 627, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1787, 2010 WL 4237584

Snippet: (citing City of Boca Raton v. State, 595 So.2d 25, 31 (Fla.1992); Panama City Beach Cmty. Redev. Agency

Bay County v. Town of Cedar Grove

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2008-09-18T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 992 So. 2d 164

Snippet: (citing City of Boca Raton v. State, 595 So.2d 25, 31 (Fla.1992); Panama City Beach Cmty. Redev. Agency

City of Parker v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2008-09-18T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 992 So. 2d 171

Snippet: (citing City of Boca Raton v. State, 595 So.2d 25, 31 (Fla.1992); Panama City Beach Cmty. Redev. Agency

Strand v. Escambia County

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2008-09-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 992 So. 2d 150

Snippet: Fla.2002); City of Boca Raton v. State, 595 So.2d 25, 31 (Fla.1992)). The final judgment of validation comes

Thompson v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2008-08-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 990 So. 2d 482

Snippet: , 583 (Fla. 2006); Arbelaez v. State, 898 So.2d 25, 31-32 (Fla.2005); State v. Davis, 872 So.2d 250, 253

Ridel v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-08-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 990 So. 2d 581, 2008 WL 2986472

Snippet: defendant." North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970). The record

Kuvin v. City of Coral Gables

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-08-22T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 62 So. 3d 604, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13015, 2007 WL 7548631

Snippet: Westlaw database updated Jan. 2007); 8 McQuillin, § 25.31 (3d ed. Westlaw database updated Oct. 2006); 1 E.C

Soto v. Soto

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-01-04T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 974 So. 2d 403

Snippet: would have reflected a quotient of approximately $25,031. The court then used this erroneously calculated

Williams v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-03-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 924 So. 2d 897

Snippet: .2d 674 (1984). In Arbelaez v. State, 898 So.2d 25, 31 (Fla.2005), the Florida Supreme Court stated: [

City of Gainesville v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2003-09-04T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 863 So. 2d 138

Snippet: de novo. City of Boca Raton v. State, 595 So.2d 25, 31 (Fla.1992) (upholding trial court findings that

Dickinson v. Gonzalez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-01-01T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 839 So. 2d 709

Snippet: is permissible. See Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 25, 31, 112 S.Ct. 358, 116 L.Ed.2d 301 (1991); 1 Sheldon

Castillo v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-12-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 835 So. 2d 306, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 19376, 2002 WL 31870335

Snippet: ex rel. Grady v. Coleman, 133 Fla. 400, 183 So. 25, 31 (1938), the Florida Supreme Court stated that if

Lopez v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-03-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 781 So. 2d 473

Snippet: Co. v. Lake Region Packing Ass'n, 211 So.2d 25, 31 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968) (concluding that the determination