The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 27.02 [4] (3d ed. 1996) (describing . . .
. . . maintain proper payroll records in violation of M.G.L. c. 149, § 148, M.G.L. c. 151, § 15 and 454 CMR 27.02 . . .
. . . See 2A Col- Her on Bankruptcy ¶ 27.02 & nn. 20-21 (James Wm. Moore & Lawrence P. . . .
. . . Ann. art. 27.02(5)). . . .
. . . Davison held ticket number 00623464108735 and had been charged $27.02 for the Tax. . . .
. . . Sussman & Watkins incurred $1,756.78 in costs, including a $350 filing fee, $120 in service fees, $27.02 . . .
. . . Under subsection 27.02(1), Florida Statutes (2011), the state attorney is authorized to defend the state . . .
. . . concluded that the State did have standing to oppose the motion in the trial court, based on section 27.02 . . . On appeal, the Third District cited the state attorney’s statutory obligation under section 27.02(1) . . . Section 27.02(1), Florida Statutes (2007), provides, in pertinent part, that “[t]he state attorney shall . . .
. . . By June 25, 2010, BP’s share price had fallen to $27.02 a share, reflecting a 55.3% drop in the two months . . .
. . . Ann. art. 27.02(5) (West 2006). . . .
. . . Ann. arts. 27.02(5), 42.12 § 5(a); United States v. Cuevas, 75 F.3d 778, 781 n. 8 (1st Cir.1996). . . .
. . . that termination of the lease would result in the entire Facility reverting to the University: Section 27.02 . . .
. . . M21-1, ¶ 27.02 (1966). . . . The provisions of M21-1 paragraphs 27.02 and 27.07, which must be l’ead in pari materia with paragraph . . .
. . . After the S & P report, MBIA’s stock fell from $28.04 to $27.02 per share. (CAC ¶ 58.) . . . The next day, MBIA’s stock dropped from the December 19, 2007 closing price of $27.02 to $19.95 at the . . .
. . . Section 27.02, Florida Statutes, provides in pertinent part, “[t]he state attorney shall appear in the . . . state all suits, applications, or motions, civil or criminal, in which the state is a party.... ” § 27.02 . . . State’s status as a party to the criminal cases, as well as its statutory obligation under section 27.02 . . .
. . . Milgrim, Milgrim on Licensing § 27.02 (2008) (“Often a license is of such critical value to an enterprise . . .
. . . (AUA §§ 27.02-27.04.) . . .
. . . 417, 419 (1977) (citing 1A Sutherland, Statutory Construction (4th Ed.) pp. 59, 310, 81; §§ 20.08, 27.02 . . .
. . . Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to state a claim for common law fraud and a violation of § 27.02 . . .
. . . Singer, Sutherland on Statutory Construction § 27.02, at 459 (4th ed.1985)). . . .
. . . .- a transactional guide § 27.02[3], at 27-12 (Howard Ruda ed., 1985); see also White & Summers, Uniform . . . See, e.g., Asset-based Financing: a transactional guide § 27.02[11], at 27-20 (explaining that "[t]he . . .
. . . Bergman, Bergman on New York Mortgage Foreclosures, § 27.02(2) (2001). . . .
. . . Bergman, Bergman on New York Mortgage Foreclosures, § 27.02(2) (2001). . . .
. . . .; § 27.02, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .
. . . P. art. 27.02(5)). . Brady v. . . .
. . . Ann. art. 27.02(5). . . .
. . . anywise interested, in the Supreme Court and district courts of appeal of this state.”) and section 27.02 . . . in which the state is a party, except as provided in chapters 39, 984, and 985.”). §§ 16.01(4) and 27.02 . . . Raft also timely responded to the order, acknowledging sections 16.01(4) and 27.02 but arguing that, . . . Notably, section 27.02 is confined to only the trial courts within the State Attorney’s jurisdiction. . . . Raft’s common law argument is plainly inconsistent with section 16.01(4) and section 27.02. . . .
. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy’s (sic) on Trademark and Unfair Competition, § 27.02[3], at 27-17 (3d ed.1996 . . .
. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy’s on Trademark and Unfair Competition, § 27.02[3], at 27-17 (3d ed.1996). . . .
. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and, Unfair Competition § 27.02[3] (3d ed. 1996) (discussing . . . See Truck Components, 776 F.Supp. at 409; McCarthy on Trademarks, supra, at § 27.02[4] (describing these . . . Cir.1990) (discussing effect of 1988 amendment to Lanham Act); McCarthy on Trademarks, supra, at § 27.02 . . .
. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 27.02[4] (3rd ed. 1995). . . .
. . . general business practices beyond the scope of traditional intellectual property law. 3 McCarthy § 27.02 . . .
. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 27.02[1] at 27-13 (hereinafter “McCarthy . . .
. . . In addition, the district court dismissed INA’s counterclaims pursuant to Section 27.02 of the Lease . . .
. . . McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition §§ 27.02[3], [4] (3d ed. 1992) (“McCarthy on . . . See McCarthy on Trademarks §§ 27.02[3], 27.03. . . .
. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 27.02[3], at 27-17 (3d ed. 1992). . . .
. . . . § 27.02, at 459 (1985). . . .
. . . Bloomenthal, Securities Law Handbook, § 27.02 at 1096 (1990-91 ed.). . . .
. . . . ¶¶ 27.02[2][d][i], 27.05-27.05[1] (collecting cases). . . .
. . . Const § 27.02, at 459 (4th ed. 1985) (“courts are not bound to follow a statutory definition where obvious . . .
. . . United, n. 17 at 147. . 1 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice, sections 27.02 and 27.04. . . . .
. . . That statute, Article 27.02(5), Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, provides in part that: The legal effect . . .
. . . Domke, The Law and Practice of Commercial Arbitration, Sec. 27.02 at 413-415 (Rev.Ed.). . . .
. . . . § 27.02 (1985) clearly establishes that it is the States Attorney who is assigned the duty to “... . . .
. . . See § 27.02 Fla.Stat.; Dade County v. Strauss, 246 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1971). . . .
. . . Code Ann. art. 27.02(5) (Vernon Supp.1987) (“A plea of nolo contendere, the legal effect of which shall . . .
. . . . § 27.02 (Sands 4th ed. 1985). See id. § 47.07. . . .
. . . . § 27.02[6] at 2762, n. 42(a) (1983). . . .
. . . depreciation, deducted 72.98 percent of that amount ($401,390) on his 1977 joint tax return and the other 27.02 . . .
. . . Felis Concolor Co-ryl), without specific permit from the executive director, as prohibited in F.A.C. 39-27.02 . . .
. . . Id. 27.02, at 1085 (quoting In re Stuart, 272 F. 938 (6th Cir.1921)). . . .
. . . . ¶ 27.02, at 1085 (quoting In re Stuart, 272 F. 938 (6th Cir.1921)). . . .
. . . Likewise, the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission has by Chapter 39-27.02 and 39-27.03 designated . . .
. . . attorney did not have authority derived from article V, section 17, Florida Constitution and section 27.02 . . .
. . . Sands, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 27.02, at 310 (4th ed. 1972). . . .
. . . Sands, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 27.02, at 310 (4th ed. 1972). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) . . .
. . . depreciation on the master recording of $401,390 (72.98 percent of $550,000) in 1977 and $148,610 (27.02 . . .
. . . In addition, Section 27.02, Florida Statutes (1981), provides that the state attorney represent the state . . .
. . . Section 27.02, Florida Statutes (1983) provides: Duties before Court: The state attorney shall appear . . .
. . . Lease, Section 27.02, Entire Agreement. . . .
. . . In that order, the court specifically ruled: (1) section 27.02 is merely enabling legislation for article . . . Discussion Appellant essentially argues that section 27.02 when read in conjunction with article Y, section . . . We reach this conclusion after examining article V, section 17 and section 27.02 together, as well as . . . Furthermore, we hold that section 27.02 contrary to appellant’s contention, is not such a specific general . . . Section 27.02 provides: "The state attorney shall appear in the circuit and county courts within his . . .
. . . Matter of Towers Magazines, Inc. 27 F.Supp. 693 (M.D.Pa.1939), cited in 2A Collier on Bankruptcy 11 27.02 . . .
. . . SMSAs: TABLE 6 Defendant’s Market SMSA Share Percentage Cincinnati 30.32 Columbus 39.57 Indianapolis 27.02 . . .
. . . and should be given controlling effect. 1A Sands (Southerland), Statutes and Statutory Construction § 27.02 . . .
. . . Central’s objection, provided that Central would receive $108.08 on the arrearage per month, of which $27.02 . . .
. . . 11.02, 12, 13.01, 13.02,14,15.01,15.02,16,17.01,17.02,18,19, 21, 22.01, 22.02, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27.01, 27.02 . . .
. . . Miller, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Guide 27.01-27.02 (1979). . . . Id. at 27.02. . . .
. . . The sum of $75.06 will be applied to pay back the principal arrearage, while $27.02 will cover interest . . .
. . . See, §§ 27.02, 27.03, 30.15, Fla. Stat. (1979); Art. 5, Fla.Const. § 17; Art. 8, Fla.Const. § 1(d). . . .
. . . plea of nolo contendere is béing used as an admission to prove the fact of guilt contrary to Article 27.02 . . .
. . . to the trial of a criminal case pursuant to its statutory investigatory or pros-ecutorial duties, §§ 27.02 . . .
. . . Court’s order of March 4, 1977 and is hereby authorized and directed under the authority of Chapter 27.02 . . .
. . . , Welfare Regulations for Any Occupation, Trade, or Industry; Alaska General Safety Code, Ch. 27, § 27.02 . . .
. . . . § 27.02 (1961) (original criminal proceedings; Fla.Stat.Ann. §§ 17.20, 27.10 (1961) (collection of . . .
. . . Proc., Art. 27.02 (1966), as amended by Tex. Sess. Laws, 60th Leg., c. 659, § 17, p. 1738 (1967). . . .
. . . V, § 17, F.S.A.), in whom the Legislature vested the duty to prosecute (Fla.Stat., § 27.02, F.S.A.). . . .
. . . Article 27.02, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Article 42.12 § 3a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. . . .
. . . Domke, The Law and Practice of Commercial Arbitration, Sec. 27.02 at 272-73 (1968). . . .
. . . . § 27.02 (1971), § 32.01 (1971), F.S.A., Article Y, § 9B of the Constitution of the State of Florida . . .
. . . In Rule 27.02 of the Missouri Supreme Court Rules of Criminal Procedure, V.A.M.R., we note that in cases . . .
. . . cause “why the defendant ought not to be tried upon the accusation presented against him”, Article 27.02 . . .
. . . (See sec’s 905.16, 905.17, 905.19, 905.22, 27.02, 27.16, 27.21 & 27.22 FS.) . . .
. . . . § 27.02. . F.S.A. § 27.03. . F.S.A. § 932.17. . . . .
. . . The background of this doctrine is discussed in 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, Sec. 27.02. . . .
. . . approval extends to controversies and not merely those involved in pending suits. 2 Collier, Bankruptcy § 27.02 . . .
. . . Thus, the low bid exceeded the estimate by 27.02 percent, which was in excess of the amount under which . . .
. . . Tractor hauling charge...... 27.02 E. . . .
. . . Tractor hauling charge- 27.02 E. . . .
. . . and the joint expectation of life of said employee and his widow, according to' the same exhibit, was 27.02 . . .
. . . See also Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, voL 5, § 27.02, wherein it is said, at page 9: Where . . .
. . . period fiom July 19, 1940, to October 24, 1940, a period of 14 weeks, the plaintiffs weekly wage was $27.02 . . . from October 24, 1940, to October 5, 1941, a period of 49 weeks, the weekly wage of plaintiff was $27.02 . . .
. . . numbered 68209 and 68205 to the Auditor for the War Department stated at a net per capita fare of $27.02 . . .