Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. BARTHMAN,, 919 F.3d 1118 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . P. 27.03, subdiv. 9 (emphasis added), if it was "unauthorized ... at the time it was imposed," State . . .

BRAYAK, v. NEW BOSTON PIE, INC., 292 F. Supp. 3d 520 (D. Mass. 2017)

. . . Laws ch. 149, § 152A and its implementing regulations at 454 CMR § 27.03(2), and the FLSA. . . .

M. HOLDEN, v. CENPATICO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC,, 347 F. Supp. 3d 77 (D. Mass. 2017)

. . . See 454 C.M.R. 27.03(3) (adopting the federal regulatory scheme defining "bona fide executive, or administrative . . .

BENEDICT, v. HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY,, 314 F.R.D. 457 (N.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . . § 27.03(3); 7 Colo.Code Regs. 1103-1:5; Reyes v. . . .

D. MOHAMMADI, v. NWABUISI, d b a, 990 F. Supp. 2d 723 (W.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . nursing visits Jan. 11-24 116 (2 $17.31 $25.97 $1,384.80 $1,852.26 $467.46 weeks) Jan. 25-31 58 $18.02 $27.03 . . . nursing visits May 10-16 58 $17.62 $26.43 $727.40 $1,180.54 $453.14 1 nursing visit May 17-23 58 $18.02 $27.03 . . . visits May 24-June 13 174(3 $17.31 $25.97 $2,077.20 $3,479.58 $1,402.38 weeks) June 14-20 58 $18.02 $27.03 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 549 F. Supp. 2d 613 (D.N.J. 2008)

. . . reimbursement to the client, but rather, payment to the attorney. 3 Social Security Practice Guide § 27.03 . . . that "a federal debt may accrue during the pendency of the claim.” 3 Social Security Practice Guide § 27.03 . . . received pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act to the attorney.” 3 Social Security Practice Guide § 27.03 . . .

In IAC INTERACTIVECORP SECURITIES LITIGATION, 478 F. Supp. 2d 574 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . second-quarter 2004 earnings, IAC’s stock price dropped by sixteen percent or $4.23 per share, from $27.03 . . . IAC’s stock price declined on this news by sixteen percent or $4.23 per share, from $27.03 per share . . .

DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES OF NEBRASKA, v. CITY OF LINCOLN,, 504 F. Supp. 2d 726 (D. Neb. 2007)

. . . supplemental reply brief and evidence (filing 174) will be granted instanter. .Lincoln Municipal Code Chapter 27.03 . . .

SPINA, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,, 470 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2006)

. . . P. 27.03, subd. 4; Miss.Code Ann. § 99-19-23; Mo. . . .

VTECH HOLDINGS LIMITED, v. PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP,, 348 F. Supp. 2d 255 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . Williams, Miller GAAP Guide § 27.03-04 (2002). . Cpt. ¶¶ 68-73. . Id. ¶ 73. . Id. ¶¶ 68, 69, 71. . . . .

E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a v. RHONE POULENC FIBER AND RESIN INTERMEDIATES, S. A. S. S. A. a S. A. S. S. A. S. SA, f k a Et S. A. SAS SA,, 269 F.3d 187 (3d Cir. 2001)

. . . . ¶ 27.03. . . . A158, ¶ 27.03. . . .

SOLUTECH, INC. v. SOLUTECH CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., 153 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (E.D. Mo. 2000)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 27.03 (4th ed.1999)(hereinafter “McCarthy . . .

In C. BENTON,, 237 B.R. 353 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999)

. . . Benton also refers to various provisions in the Retirement Ordinance, such as § 27.03, under which the . . .

In KOPEL P. C. DVM, P. C. v. a k a P. C., 232 B.R. 57 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . Lease §§ 4.01, 27.03(d). . . .

M. BELL v. FUR BREEDERS AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE, a, 3 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Utah 1998)

. . . discounts, offsets, or allowances not reflected in the invoice price.” 4 J. von Kalinowski, supra § 27.03 . . . FTC, 324 U.S. 726, 740, 65 S.Ct. 961, 968, 89 L.Ed. 1320 (1945); 4 J. von Kalinowski, supra § 27.03[3 . . . ], § 27.03[4] n. 45 and text accompanying. . . .

ECKEL INDUSTRIES, INC. v. PRIMARY BANK E., 26 F. Supp. 2d 313 (D.N.H. 1998)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 27.03 (3d ed.1996). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. LOPEZ,, 125 F.3d 597 (8th Cir. 1997)

. . . officer Ronald Deist, Jr. purchased cocaine from Lopez three times in December of 1995: one ounce (27.03 . . .

BROWN, v. ARMSTRONG,, 957 F. Supp. 1293 (D. Mass. 1997)

. . . person; and (5) plaintiff has been or is likely to be damaged by these acts. 3 McCarthy on Trademarks § 27.03 . . .

SUMMIT TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. HIGH- LINE MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS, CO., 933 F. Supp. 918 (C.D. Cal. 1996)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 27.03[l][a]. . . .

CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC. v. MONTAGUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION,, 78 F.3d 10 (1st Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 27.03(13). . . .

CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC. v. MONTAGUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION,, 78 F.3d 10 (1st Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 27.03(13). . . .

PHC, INC. v. PIONEER HEALTHCARE, INC., 75 F.3d 75 (1st Cir. 1996)

. . . Thomas MeCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 27.03 (3d ed. 1992). . . .

VORNADO AIR CIRCULATION SYSTEMS, INC. a v. DURACRAFT CORPORATION,, 58 F.3d 1498 (10th Cir. 1995)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Competition §§ 1.09[3], 27.03[1][b] (3d ed.1994). . . . See McCarthy, supra, §§ 1.09[3], 7.31, 27.03[1][b]. . . .

AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. WINBACK AND CONSERVE PROGRAM, INC. a G. AT T, 42 F.3d 1421 (3d Cir. 1994)

. . . See 3 McCarthy on Trademarks, § 27.03[l][a] at 27-21. . . .

GORDON AND BREACH SCIENCE PUBLISHERS S. A. STBS, GMBH, v. AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, 859 F. Supp. 1521 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . See McCarthy on Trademarks §§ 27.02[3], 27.03. . . .

AmCAN ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, v. RENZI,, 32 F.3d 233 (7th Cir. 1994)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 27.03[l][b] (3d ed. 1994). . . .

In CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC. CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC. v. MONTAGUE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION,, 168 B.R. 455 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1994)

. . . See 760 CMR § 27.03(13). . . .

A. SCHNEIDER, v. D. CURREY,, 584 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Norton Bankr.L & Prac § 27.03 (1982). . . .

A. A. POULTRY FARMS, INC. v. ROSE ACRE FARMS, INC., 881 F.2d 1396 (7th Cir. 1989)

. . . Co., 52 F.T.C. 1504, 1520 (1956); Julian O. von Kalinowski, 4 Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation § 27.03 . . .

CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION v. GORMAN, 18 Fla. Supp. 2d 261 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1986)

. . . agency shall forward to the Commission a report in accordance with procedures established in Rule 1 IB-27.03 . . .

L. v., 86 T.C. 492 (T.C. 1986)

. . . Of the total gross receipts of $189,797, only $27.03 was from the sale of Norwood products. . . . We have found that J & G had sales of Norwood products of $27.03. . . . to the sale of Norwood products, and because J & G had revenues from this activity of no more than $27.03 . . .

STATE v. BILLIE, 17 Fla. Supp. 2d 68 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . Likewise, the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission has by Chapter 39-27.02 and 39-27.03 designated . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 34.69 24.29 26.37 22.07 21.30 22.49 23.81 23.29 25.59 23.84 26.14 26.96 20.47 28.80 7.22 52.52 27.65 27.03 . . . 28.85 13.66 23.00 18.46 49.04 17.25 20.26 28.47 23.63 25.50 15.20 13.18 32.24 12.08 34.62 21.61 22.51 27.03 . . .

BLACK GOLD, LTD. a v. ROCKWOOL INDUSTRIES, INC. a, 729 F.2d 676 (10th Cir. 1984)

STATE v. KING,, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982)

. . . . § 27.03, Fla.Stat. (1979). He signed the indictment in this cause and prosecuted under it. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DALLAS COUNTY COMMISSION,, 548 F. Supp. 794 (S.D. Ala. 1982)

. . . 35.900 Fayette 14,395 87.24 2,105 12.76 16.500 Franklin 25,346 95.29 1,254 4.71 26,600 Greene 2.892 27.03 . . .

BARTLEYS TOWN AND COUNTRY SHOPS, INC. a v. DILLINGHAM CORPORATION, a, 530 F. Supp. 499 (D. Haw. 1982)

. . . The provisions of Section 27.03 of the lease agreement shall govern this two-month holding over period . . .

In FULGHUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, H. WALDSCHMIDT, v. H. RANIER, H., 7 B.R. 629 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1980)

. . . Id. at 27.03. . . .

FLORIDA BUSINESSMEN FOR FREE ENTERPRISE, a a Co. a v. STATE OF FLORIDA, a a, 499 F. Supp. 346 (N.D. Fla. 1980)

. . . See, §§ 27.02, 27.03, 30.15, Fla. Stat. (1979); Art. 5, Fla.Const. § 17; Art. 8, Fla.Const. § 1(d). . . .

In LLOYD, CARR AND COMPANY, H. ABRAHAMS. UNITED STATES, 617 F.2d 882 (1st Cir. 1980)

. . . See 2A Collier’s, supra, ¶ 27.03 at 1090. . . .

In LLOYD, CARR AND COMPANY, H. ABRAHAMS. UNITED STATES, 617 F.2d 882 (1st Cir. 1980)

. . . See 2A Collier’s, supra, ¶ 27.03 at 1090. . . .

INDIAN COFFEE CORP. v. PROCTER GAMBLE COMPANY, 482 F. Supp. 1104 (W.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . .1966); See also Rose, “Price Discrimination Under Robinson-Patman,” 87 (1962) ; 4 Von Kalinowski ¶ 27.03 . . .

ROSE, v. P. D ALESSANDRO,, 364 So. 2d 763 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . trial of a criminal case pursuant to its statutory investigatory or pros-ecutorial duties, §§ 27.02, 27.03 . . .

In BOLAND,, 79 F.R.D. 665 (D.D.C. 1978)

. . . California, 292 U.S. 341, 347, 54 S.Ct. 735, 78 L.Ed. 1298 (1934); 4 Moore’s Federal Practice, 27.03, . . .

CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA, v. KLEPPE, Co., 418 F. Supp. 1243 (N.D. Cal. 1976)

. . . See generally 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 27.03-27.-05; and 1970 Supp. § 27.01. . . .

PARTIDA, v. CASTANEDA,, 524 F.2d 481 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . Art. 27.03 provides: “[A] motion to set aside an indictment may be based on the following: . . . .

L. STEBBINS, Jr. v. C. WEAVER, 396 F. Supp. 104 (W.D. Wis. 1975)

. . . state” for the purpose of the Eleventh — has been called a “fiction.” 3 Davis, Administrative Law § 27.03 . . .

V. DUMONT, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., 513 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . See V.A.C.C.P. art. 27.03, subd. 3. . . .

In CASTRO, 43 Fla. Supp. 203 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1975)

. . . . §27.03, Florida Statutes, is in the following language — “Whenever required by the grand jury, the . . .

WILSON, v. W. J. ESTELLE,, 504 F.2d 562 (5th Cir. 1974)

. . . See Tex.C.Cr.P., Arts. 19.27, 27.03; Scott v. State, 474 S.W.2d 226 (Tex.Cr.App. 1971) ; Smith v. . . .

B. RAGLAND, v. A. MUELLER,, 460 F.2d 1196 (5th Cir. 1972)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, Vol. 3, 27.03. . . .

KAPIOLANI MOTORS, LTD. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION MIKE SALTA PONTIAC, INC. v. ZUKERKORN,, 337 F. Supp. 102 (D. Haw. 1972)

. . . 324 U.S. 720, 65 S.Ct. 961, 89 L.Ed. 1320 (1045) ; Von Kalinowski, op. cit. supra note 1, Vol. 4 § 27.03 . . .

MOW SUN WONG v. E. HAMPTON,, 333 F. Supp. 527 (N.D. Cal. 1971)

. . . See generally 3 Davis on Administrative Law (Treatise), § 27.01 at 546-547, § 27.03, § 27.10. . . .

In MEDICAL STERILE PRODUCTS,, 310 F. Supp. 262 (D.P.R. 1970)

. . . Moss, 62 F.2d 37, 39-40 (4 Cir.1932); 2 Colliers on Bankruptcy, 14th Edition, Sections 27.03 to 27.05 . . .

A. WESTBERRY v. FISHER, M. D., 309 F. Supp. 12 (D. Me. 1970)

. . . that the suit was in practical effect a suit against the state. 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 27.03 . . .

F. URBANO, v. BOARD OF MANAGERS OF NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, 415 F.2d 247 (3d Cir. 1969)

. . . 209 U.S. 123, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908); 3 Davis, Administrative Law § 27.01 (Supp.1965), § 27.03 . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES v. M. WHITE, 418 F.2d 1126 (D.C. Cir. 1969)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law § 27.03 (1958). . See Baker v. . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ARKANSAS A M COLLEGE, a Dr. A M v. H. DAVIS,, 396 F.2d 730 (8th Cir. 1968)

. . . the suit was in practical effect a suit against the state.” 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 27.03 . . .

STATE MARTIN, v. B. MICHELL, MARTIN, v. STATE, 188 So. 2d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . . § 27.03. . F.S.A. § 932.17. . Section 10, Declaration of Rights, Constitution of Florida. . . . .

In ALBERT- HARRIS, INC., 213 F. Supp. 602 (N.D. Ohio 1961)

. . . A.6, 1921); 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., pars. 27.03, 27.04. . . .

W. H. MIRACLE, v. A. M. JACOBY, U. S. H. C. U. S., 192 F. Supp. 907 (W.D. Ark. 1961)

. . . beyond his authority or in violation of the Constitution. 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, Sec. 27.03 . . .

FLORIDA TRAILER AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, v. R. DEAL, d b a, 284 F.2d 567 (5th Cir. 1960)

. . . sufficiency under General Orders 28 and 33, 11 U.S.C.A. following section 53. 2 Collier, Bankruptcy § 27.03 . . . omission of a specific reference to any such potential claim was either waived, 2 Collier, Bankruptcy § 27.03 . . .

WEBER FLOUR MILLS CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 82 F.2d 764 (10th Cir. 1936)

. . . See Paul & Mertens, Law of Federal Taxation, vol. 3, § 27.03; New Colonial Ice Co. v. . . .

MUIR v. HODGES, 116 F. 912 (C.C.D. Vt. 1902)

. . . creditors’ bill, showing a judgment in this court against the defendant Maria for $2,000 damages and $27.03 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)