The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 27
STATE ATTORNEYS; PUBLIC DEFENDERS; RELATED OFFICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 27.06

27.06 Habeas corpus and preliminary trials.—The several state attorneys of this state shall represent the state in all cases of habeas corpus arising in their respective circuits, and shall also represent the state, either in person or by assistant, in cases of preliminary trials of persons charged with capital offenses in all cases where the committing trial court judge shall have given due and timely notice of the time and place of such trial. Notice of the application for the writ of habeas corpus shall be given to the prosecuting officer of the court wherein the statute under attack is being applied, the criminal law proceeding is being maintained, or the conviction has occurred.

History.—s. 3, ch. 5399, 1905; RGS 3010; CGL 4746; s. 4, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 4, ch. 73-334; s. 2, ch. 2004-11.

F.S. 27.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 27.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 27.06

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 27.06

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 27.06.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

RYAN, v. ALLIED INTERSTATE, INC. J. v., 882 F. Supp. 2d 628 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . complaint ($350.00), counsel’s travel expenses to a conference in New York ($77.00) and a transcript fee ($27.06 . . .

PRISON LEGAL NEWS, v. SCHWARZENEGGER,, 561 F. Supp. 2d 1095 (N.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . conferences and meetings where multiple attorneys were in attendance and $8,125.22 of fees based on 27.06 . . .

F. BARRY, v. B. WEST,, 503 F. Supp. 2d 313 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . In those years, the repurchase prices offered were $27.06, $28.70, and $53.94, respectively. . . . value of ULLICO stock at the time — and the price offered in the 1997 formal repurchase program — was $27.06 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SCARBOROUGH,, 203 F. App'x 184 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . undercover sting in Wagoner, Oklahoma, law enforcement officers recovered 76.08 grams of cocaine base, 27.06 . . .

A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, INC. D. Jr. W. E. v. W. CHESTERTON,, 128 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1997)

. . . the grandson of the original Arthur Chesterton, is currently the Company’s largest shareholder, with 27.06% . . .

A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, INC. v. W. CHESTERTON,, 907 F. Supp. 19 (D. Mass. 1995)

. . . The defendant, who owns 27.06% of the stock, is the son of Arthur Devereaux Chesterton. . . .

OF AMERICA BANK, MID- MICHIGAN, N. A. a E. W. v. UNITED STATES, 752 F. Supp. 764 (E.D. Mich. 1990)

. . . 34.12 1995 48.32 32.70 1996 50.90 31.39 1997 53.62 30.18 1998 56.48 29.07 1999 59.49 28.03 2000 62.67 27.06 . . .

In SAUNDERS, SAUNDERS, v. REEHER,, 105 B.R. 781 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1989)

. . . But see 1 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice, § 27.06 (1988). . . .

In MADISON MADISON INTERNATIONAL OF ILLINOIS, P. C. MADISON MADISON INTERNATIONAL OF ILLINOIS, P. C. v. MATRA, S. A. S A, 77 B.R. 678 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1987)

. . . . § 27.06 (1986 Annual Cumulative Supplement). . . .

EAST- BIBB TWIGGS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, v. MACON- BIBB PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION,, 662 F. Supp. 1465 (M.D. Ga. 1987)

. . . EXHIBIT A MACON-BIBB LAND DEVELOPMENT RESOLUTION ZONING ADMINISTRATION Section 27.06. . . .

KINOSHITA v. CANADIAN PACIFIC AIRLINES, LIMITED,, 803 F.2d 471 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . may be held out of service without pay pending investigation for more than seven (7) work days____ 27.06 . . .

CARIBOU FOUR CORNERS, INC. v. AMERICAN OIL COMPANY, USA, Co. L. T. D. Co. Co. Co. US Co. U. S. A. Un. La Co. Co. Co. Co. Co. Co., 628 F. Supp. 363 (D. Utah 1985)

. . . Entitlements Notice reflected a net entitlements purchase obligation overstated by 78,862 entitlements at $27.06 . . .

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LOCAL INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS,, 619 F. Supp. 1273 (E.D. Pa. 1985)

. . . 1, for example, in the period from July 30, 1984, through July 26, 1985, there was a total of only 27.06 . . . the percentage of minority employer recalls (13.3%) that the sum total minority referrals was only 27.06 . . .

In D. OLSON E. D. OLSON E. v. McFARLAND CLINIC, P. C., 38 B.R. 515 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 1984)

. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law & Procedure § 27.06, at 27-11 (1981), recent decisions have strongly suggested . . .

In RATH PACKING COMPANY,, 35 B.R. 615 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 1983)

. . . Norton, Bankruptcy Law & Procedure § 27.06, at 27-11 (1981). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. MASTROPIERI,, 685 F.2d 776 (2d Cir. 1982)

. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 27.06, at 9-20 (3d ed. . . .

ESPINOZA, v. HILLWOOD SQUARE MUTUAL ASSOCIATION,, 532 F. Supp. 440 (E.D. Va. 1982)

. . . In addition, Blacher spent 27.06 hours and Sunderland 15.06 hours pursuing the emotional damages issue . . .

WALT DISNEY WORLD CO. v. MERRITT, 404 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . The above instruction is based upon Rules 4A — 27.01(2) and 4A-27.06 of the Rules of the State Fire Marshal . . . Merritt did not prove she fell in an “aisle,” to which the rule (Rule 4A-27.06) is directed. . . . Rule 4A-27.06, the basis for the jury instruction herein, is designed to provide ready access by aisles . . . Rule 4A-27.06. . . . Rule 4A-27.06, the applicable rule, reads: In each room where chairs, or tables and chairs, are used, . . .

In JOE DeLISI FRUIT CO. JOE DeLISI FRUIT CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, W. Co. C. H. Co., 11 B.R. 694 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1981)

. . . . § 27.06 which states: “Any person claiming himself to be damaged by any breach of the conditions of . . . § 362(a) on the rights of the Suppliers and the Commissioner to go forward with the hearing under § 27.06 . . .

MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY B., 520 F. Supp. 420 (N.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . cost of lower tiered price-controlled and uncontrolled crude oil — more than tripled from $8.74 to $27.06 . . . Therefore, the expected additional profit to be gained by withholding old oil would be $27.06 per barrel . . .

UNITED STATES v. P. LUTZ, UNITED STATES v. D. STEWART, UNITED STATES v. A. WHITE, UNITED STATES v. ZITEK,, 621 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1980)

. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 27.06 (3d ed. 1977). . . .

LARRY P. P. v. RILES,, 495 F. Supp. 926 (N.D. Cal. 1979)

. . . Classes 1968- 69 57,148 not reported 25.50% 1969- 70 54,078 not reported 27.06% 1970- 71 47,864 not reported . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. KILBREATH, 362 So. 2d 474 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Rule 4-27.06 was promulgated by the Florida Department of Insurance pursuant to the mandate contained . . . in § 627.-741(1), Florida Statutes (1971) and provides: 4r-27.06 Extent of insurer’s liability. . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. ENRIGHT,, 579 F.2d 980 (6th Cir. 1978)

. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 27.06 (3d ed. 1977), to the effect that the jury may . . .

UNITED STATES v. HAMMERMILL PAPER COMPANY,, 429 F. Supp. 1271 (W.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . market shares of the highest 4, and highest 8, were as follows: 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 Top 4 27.06% . . .

OMERNICK, v. L. LaROCQUE J. OMERNICK, v. CROOKS OMERNICK, v. STATE OF WISCONSIN, 406 F. Supp. 1156 (W.D. Wis. 1976)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 27.06 (1958), cited in Barry Labs., Inc., supra. . . .

ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, v. PEREZ, ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, v. PEREZ,, 424 F.2d 433 (1st Cir. 1970)

. . . For elaboration on this subject, see 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 27.06 (1958). . . . .

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE v. KING, 30 Fla. Supp. 115 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1968)

. . . nor misdemeanors, strictly speaking, within the meaning of the constitutional provision, or Section 27.06 . . . admissible upon the question of the credibility of a witness may well be applied in construing Section 27.06 . . .

ESTRADA, De v. P. AHRENS,, 296 F.2d 690 (5th Cir. 1961)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 27.06 (1958). . . .

CITY OF MIAMI, a v. GILBERT,, 102 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

. . . See also 9 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, § 27.06 (3d Ed. 1950). . . .

ZEIBER v. HILL, 30 F. Cas. 917 (D. Or. 1870)

. . . the sum expended, after deducting the amount of money in his hands belonging to the estate, to wit, $27.06 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CUSHMAN, 25 F. Cas. 734 (C.C.D.N.H. 1836)

. . . rendered thereon on the 8th October, 1829, in favor ■ of the United States, for $918.53 debt, and $27.06 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CUSHMAN, 25 F. Cas. 732 (C.C.D.N.H. 1836)

. . . Sherburne, and John Abbot—for the sum of $918.53 debt, and $27.06 cost The said judgment was rendered . . .