Cases from cite.case.law:

DISABILITY RIGHTS NEW JERSEY, INC. A v. COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 796 F.3d 293 (3d Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 30:4-27.10(g), which means that he is dangerous to himself, others, or property by reason of mental . . . Ann. § 30:4-27.10 (emphasis added). . . .

HOWARD TOWN CENTER DEVELOPER, LLC, v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY, v. LLC,, 7 F. Supp. 3d 64 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . including reasonable attorneys’ fees,” Def.’s Mem. at 27, to which it is entitled under Sections 16.4 and 27.10 . . .

In WATERFORD HOTEL, INC., 497 B.R. 255 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2013)

. . . the claims in 240 equal monthly installments, without interest, which translates into a payment of $27.10 . . . in Class 2 is $650,402.21, and that the equal monthly payment by the Debtor to this Class would be $27.10 . . . That equates to a total payment to Class 2 of $6,504.00 ($27.10 x 240) over the life of the Plan. . . .

HATCHETT, v. K. SHINSEKI,, 957 F. Supp. 2d 960 (S.D. Ind. 2013)

. . . Hatchett’s hourly pay from $27.10 to $19.20, effective January 2, 2011. [Id.] . . .

OBADO, v. UMDNJ, BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER A- Z A- Z, 524 F. App'x 812 (3d Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 30:4-27.10(a)(1), (g). . . . .

GRAY, a L. v. BOSTIC, AL,, 625 F.3d 692 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . The Court disallows the $27.10 claimed for facsimile expenses because they were not shown to be related . . .

GRANT, v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE, 727 F. Supp. 2d 677 (M.D. Tenn. 2010)

. . . 30.70% 2002 1-7 29.90% 62.90% 8-15 70.10% 37.00% 2003 1-7 28.90% 60.50% 8-15 71.10% 39.50% 2004 1-7 27.10% . . .

BP v., 34 Ct. Int'l Trade 676 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . is characterized as a preparation, rather than a petroleum oil, BP contends that “[Explanatory Note 27.10 . . . preparations] by its terms incorporates by reference the aromatics exclusion applicable to [Explanatory Note 27.10 . . . World Customs Organization, Harmonized Commodity & Coding System Explanatory Notes, Explanatory Note 27.10 . . . Furthermore, the final paragraph of Explanatory Note 27.10 contains several generally applicable exclusions . . . observations, the court concludes that this sentence is limited to section (B) of Explanatory Note 27.10 . . .

BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 716 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

REXALL SUNDOWN, INC. v. PERRIGO CO., 707 F. Supp. 2d 357 (E.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, 5 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 27.10 (4th ed.) . . .

L. DANOW, v. LAW OFFICE OF DAVID E. BORBACK, P. A., 634 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . Yarbrough at trial in which he attests to working 27.10 hours on the ease for which he requests payment . . . Yarbrough 165.60 hours Deepak Gupta 56.05 hours Leo Bueno 27.10 hours Mr. . . .

ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 559 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . Wastes containing mainly petroleum oils or oils obtained from bituminous minerals are excluded (heading 27.10 . . . and brake fluids containing mainly petroleum oils or oils obtained from bituminous minerals (heading 27.10 . . .

v., 32 Ct. Int'l Trade 343 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 64 Fed. Cl. 515 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . ENIP avers that Consolidated Edison submitted a DCS for DOE to dispose of 27.10 MTU of SNF between January . . . 2002 DCS included in ENIP’s appendix, and cited by ENIP’s Reply for the appropriate allocation, lists 27.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. T. MILLER,, 366 F. Supp. 2d 128 (D. Me. 2005)

. . . . §§ 30:4-27.10(a) & (g). . . .

In SEPTEMBER LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE CASES, 333 F. Supp. 2d 111 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . . § 27.10(a) (“Policies issued by unauthorized insurers pursuant to this Part are exempt from the provisions . . .

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION, v. ETHAN ALLEN, INC., 259 F. Supp. 2d 625 (N.D. Ohio 2003)

. . . Wang, 2002 WL 1341762 at ¶¶ 27.7, 27.10. The Wang court is not alone. . . .

In CABLETRON SYSTEMS, INC. BGC R. Jo E. M. C. D D J. O. M. V. M. F. X. He, F. W. E. J. L. M. C. L. Ed W. A. R. J. U. F. R. F. Jr. C. W. J. J. G. M. R. BYSG Ed C. v. R. R. J. F. D. J., 311 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2002)

. . . Bloomenthal, Securities Law Handbook § 27.10(4) (2002 ed.) (collecting cases). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARLINO,, 143 F.3d 340 (7th Cir. 1998)

. . . Article 27.10 of the International constitution provides another exception by prohibiting use of the . . .

HELLER, SECRETARY, KENTUCKY CABINET FOR HUMAN RESOURCES v. DOE, DOE,, 509 U.S. 312 (U.S. 1993)

. . . . §30:4-27.10 (West Supp. 1993) (mental illness); N. M. Stat. . . .

WESTERN AND SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CROWN AMERICAN CORPORATION s, 877 F. Supp. 1041 (E.D. Ky. 1993)

. . . Plf Ex. 1 & 5, 28.10, 27.10. III. Analysis A. . . . Section 27.10 of the operating agreement, to which Western & Southern is a party, gives “any Party” the . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. WOODS., 986 F.2d 669 (3d Cir. 1993)

. . . Israel, Criminal Procedure § 27.10, at 404 (1984). . . .

TRANSPORTATION LEASING COMPANY v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 861 F. Supp. 931 (C.D. Cal. 1993)

. . . Stipulated facts 27.9 to 27.10 demonstrate the Belvedere GDD arranged with a transporter for transport . . .

SOLER, v. G U, INC. d b a, 801 F. Supp. 1056 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . This figure includes 27.10 hours that Legal Services spent preparing its Reply Brief. . . .

A. O. SMITH CORPORATION f k a v. LEWIS, OVERBECK FURMAN, A. A. A., 777 F. Supp. 1405 (N.D. Ill. 1991)

. . . 1985), citing cases from numerous jurisdictions; 2 Roland Mallen & Jeffrey Smith, Legal Malpractice § 27.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. AYALA,, 894 F.2d 425 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

. . . Israel, Criminal Procedure § 27.10(c), at 404 (1984). . . . .

In DAVIDSON REHAB ASSOCIATES, a DAVIDSON REHAB ASSOCIATES, a v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, D. W., 103 B.R. 440 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . . §§ 3701 et seq. and 24 C.F.R. part 27.10, provide for designation of a commissioner to conduct a non-judicial . . .

BATTAGLIA FRUIT CO. v. CITY OF MAITLAND,, 530 So. 2d 940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Anderson 4 American Law of Zoning 3d (1986) § 27.10. . . . .

F. WILSON, v. R. BOWEN,, 691 F. Supp. 1257 (D. Ariz. 1988)

. . . to complete work on this case in an efficient manner, therefore the requested rate of $125 for the 27.10 . . .

GEORGIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, v. ALABAMA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,, 678 F. Supp. 854 (M.D. Ala. 1987)

. . . L. 27.10 Nachman, M. R., Jr. 17.50 Boynton, F. G. .20 Maycock, W. W. 75.30 Mevs, P. . . .

UNITED STATES v. T. GORNY,, 674 F. Supp. 263 (N.D. Ill. 1987)

. . . U.S. 333, 346, 94 S.Ct. 2298, 2305, 41 L.Ed.2d 109 (1974); see LaFave & Isreal, Criminal Procedure § 27.10 . . .

J. A. CROSON COMPANY, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, J. A. CROSON COMPANY, v. CITY OF RICHMOND,, 822 F.2d 1355 (4th Cir. 1987)

. . . See generally Richmond, Va.Code Ch. 24.1, Art. 1(F) (Part B) (27.10) (27.20) and Art. VIII-A. . . . .

EAST- BIBB TWIGGS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, v. MACON- BIBB PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION,, 662 F. Supp. 1465 (M.D. Ga. 1987)

. . . Section 27.10. Land use only approval. . . .

J. A. CROSON COMPANY, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, J. A. CROSON COMPANY, v. CITY OF RICHMOND,, 779 F.2d 181 (4th Cir. 1985)

. . . Richmond Va.Code Ch. 24.1, Art. 1(F) (Part B) (27.10) (27.20) and Art. VIII-A. . . . Richmond, Va.Code Ch. 24.1, Art. 1(F) (Part B) (27.10). . . .

G. RADIN, v. UNITED STATES, 699 F.2d 681 (4th Cir. 1983)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law §§ 27.00-27.10 (1982 Supp.). . . .

In GAS METERS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 500 F. Supp. 956 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . Young 27.10 James W. Christie 85.80 Barbara H. . . .

CAPE FOX CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES L. R. S. V., 456 F. Supp. 784 (D. Alaska 1978)

. . . Law of Seventies §§ 27.00-27.10, at 196 (Supp.1977). . . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA L. SHEVIN, v. EXXON CORPORATION, 526 F.2d 266 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . . §§ 17.20, 27.10 (1961) (collection of state claims; Fla. . . .

R. MANOS, d b a v. CITY OF GREEN BAY, a, 372 F. Supp. 40 (E.D. Wis. 1974)

. . . observed a single dancer, dancing bare breasted in the presence of patrons in violation of Section 27.10 . . . Section 27.10, City Ordinances, City of Green Bay, states: “No person shall appear in any public place . . .

BILLEN, v. HIX, 260 So. 2d 284 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . .); 2 Harper & James, Law of Torts § 27.10 at 1475; Restatement of Torts § 341. . . .

MOW SUN WONG v. E. HAMPTON,, 333 F. Supp. 527 (N.D. Cal. 1971)

. . . See generally 3 Davis on Administrative Law (Treatise), § 27.01 at 546-547, § 27.03, § 27.10. . . .

SOSTRE, v. A. ROCKEFELLER, D. W., 312 F. Supp. 863 (S.D.N.Y. 1970)

. . . Davis, 3 Administrative Law Treatise §§ 27.01, 27.10 (Supp.1965). . . .

FANNING DOORLEY CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GEIGY CHEMICAL CORPORATION d b a P. EDDY, Jr. A. d b a v. AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 305 F. Supp. 650 (D.R.I. 1969)

. . . B38-SD-104) Specifications — sections 27.10 and 27.-12 also, provide that the unit prices for the items . . .

LINDSEY v. E. SMITH, E., 303 F. Supp. 1203 (W.D. Wash. 1969)

. . . 29.85 Boy, 13 through 15 yrs. 40.45 35.95 32.95 29.95 28.45 26.95 Girl, 16 through 20 yrs. 33.30 29.60 27.10 . . .

M. CHAPPELL, F. F. v. OLIN- MATHIESON CHEMICAL CORPORATION I. T. E., 305 F. Supp. 544 (E.D. Tenn. 1969)

. . . Contractor at p. 514 n. 27.10 (1963). . . .

UNITED STATES v. SANCHEZ,, 361 F.2d 824 (2d Cir. 1966)

. . . The indictment charged appellant with selling approximately 27.10 grams of unlawfully imported heroin . . .

M. G. DAVIS CO. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 252 F. Supp. 402 (S.D.N.Y. 1966)

. . . See generally, Davis, Administrative Law §§ 27.01-27.10 (1958). Plaintiffs cite Amos Treat & Co. v. . . .

LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BAKER, 339 F.2d 911 (5th Cir. 1964)

. . . See 3 Davis, Administrative DawTreatise § 27.10 (1958). . . . .

PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION, a v. Ed PIERSON, L. R. P. I, II III,, 284 F.2d 649 (10th Cir. 1960)

. . . E. g. 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 27.01-27.10 (1958); Hart and Wechsler, The Federal Courts . . .

In HOROWITZ,, 171 F. Supp. 873 (E.D.N.Y. 1959)

. . . Brooklyn on August 28, 1957, less than five months earlier, of $670 payable in monthly instalments of $27.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA, 153 F. Supp. 132 (S.D.N.Y. 1957)

. . . .. .August 11, 1956 Limited..............August 14, 1956 “The price of 99%-plus ingot was raised to 27.10 . . .

KERMAREC, v. COMPAGNIE GENERALE TRANSATLANTIQUE,, 245 F.2d 175 (2d Cir. 1957)

. . . of care is owed to licensees whose presence is to be expected.” 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts § 27.10 . . .

AMERICAN VIKING CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 150 F. Supp. 746 (Cust. Ct. 1956)

. . . and maintaining 380 volts, 3 phase shore supply to ship’s board and disconnecting when finished with. 27.10 . . .

v., 37 Cust. Ct. 237 (Cust. Ct. 1956)

. . . and maintaining 380 volts, 3 phase shore supply to ship’s board and disconnecting when finished with. 27.10 . . .

B. DAVIS, v. JOHNSON, 138 F. Supp. 572 (N.D. Ill. 1955)

. . . relating to the subject, the statute is controlling. 1 C.J.S., Abatement and Revival, § 135, p. 183; § 27.10 . . .

GOSS DeLEEUW MACH. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 53 F. Supp. 853 (D. Conn. 1943)

. . . This amount included as income an item of $27.10 representing a bad debt which plaintiff had charged . . . result from the restoration of asset values as aforesaid, together with the additional deductions of $27.10 . . . deduction of $5,790.97 from the adjusted net income in 1936, together with the additional deductions of $27.10 . . . Rev.Acts, plaintiff is entitled to a deduction of the item of $27.10 from the net income for 1936. 2. . . . Government also concedes that under the retroactive provisions of the Revenue Act of 1942 an item of $27.10 . . .

WHEELING STEEL CORP. v. FOX, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER,, 298 U.S. 193 (U.S. 1936)

. . . assessed value of its real estate and tangible personal property in West Virginia was $8,673,205, or 27.10 . . .

In BOORSTIN, 114 F. 696 (N.D. Ga. 1902)

. . . of the opinion that this enormous loss in a business carried on in a small town, with store rent at $27.10 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)