Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 27.08 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 27.08 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 27.08

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 27
STATE ATTORNEYS; PUBLIC DEFENDERS; RELATED OFFICES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 27.08
27.08 State claims; surrender of papers to successor.Upon the qualification of the successor of any state attorney, the state attorney going out of office shall deliver to his or her successor a statement of all cases for the collection of money in favor of the state under his or her control and the papers connected with the same, and take his or her receipt for the same, which receipt, when filed with the Department of Financial Services, shall release such state attorney from any further liability to the state upon the claims receipted for; and the state attorney receiving the claims shall be liable in all respects for the same, as provided against state attorneys in s. 17.20.
History.s. 4, ch. 1413, 1863; RS 1353; GS 1782; RGS 3018; CGL 4754; s. 11, ch. 25035, 1949; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 119, ch. 95-147; s. 79, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 27.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 27.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 27.08


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 27.08
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 27.08.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE HALATEK, v. D., 592 B.R. 86 (Bankr. E.D. N.C. 2018)

. . . Association Dues $ 14.58 10th Judicial District Dues 4.17 Wake County Bar Dues 6.25 NC State Bar Dues 27.08 . . .

TMK IPSCO, v. UNITED STATES,, 222 F. Supp. 3d 1306 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2017)

. . . For all other exporters not individually investigated, Commerce assigned a subsidy rate of 27.08%. . . .

CASTELLANO, v. K. SHINSEKI,, 25 Vet. App. 146 (Vet. App. 2011)

. . . Id. at 360 (citing VA Manual, M21-1, paras. 5.25, 27.08). . . .

In UAL CORPORATION, v. U. S. BNY HSBC USA, 346 B.R. 456 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2006)

. . . The final section of Article XXVII, § 27.08, is the provision in dispute in this proceeding. . . . (United Trial Ex. 25 at 10 (no adverse impact on GARBs from the dispute over § 27.08) and at 17 (§ 27.08 . . . Although the City argues to the contrary, § 27.08 of the AUA is a cross-default clause. . . . (AUA, § 27.08(b).) . . . Indeed, § 27.08 can be seen as effectively terminating the AUA. . . .

MERCIER, J. v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, La La, 395 F.3d 693 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . The resolution cited as authority for the sale of the parcel Wisconsin Statute § 27.08. . . . Wisconsin Statute § 27.08 provides in pertinent part: (2) The board of park commissioners is empowered . . . Stat. § 27.08(2)(c). . . . .

In FIRSTENERGY CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION To, 316 F. Supp. 2d 581 (N.D. Ohio 2004)

. . . Defendants Alexander, Marsh, and Wagner respectively sold 27.08%, 80.55%, and 38.57% of their owned shares . . .

In IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. a IKON, 277 F.3d 658 (3d Cir. 2002)

. . . $34.625 a share on April 21, 1998, to close at $25.25 a share on April 22, 1998 — a one-day decline of 27.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. F. O CONNOR A., 158 F. Supp. 2d 697 (E.D. Va. 2001)

. . . See 2B O’Mal-ley, Grenig & Lee, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 27.08 (5th ed.2000). . . .

ASHLEY CREEK PHOSPHATE CO. a v. CHEVRON, 129 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (D. Utah 2000)

. . . In 1992, Ashley Creek estimated its costs to be $36.11 per ton with a margin of error ranging from $27.08 . . .

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC. v. CITY OF MARSHFIELD, WISCONSIN, 203 F.3d 487 (7th Cir. 2000)

. . . . §§ 27.08(2)(c), 62.23(5), 62.23(17)(b). . . .

L. LOSEE, v. MASCHNER,, 113 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (S.D. Iowa 1998)

. . . Scott could have collected twice that sum, or $27.08 for the two filing fees. . . .

In MOCCO, MOCCO v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY,, 222 B.R. 440 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1998)

. . . only the Marshall’s valuation service to arrive at a price per square foot for the outbuildings of $27.08 . . . the local multiplier of 1.24 is applied to the building costs raising the cost per square foot from $27.08 . . .

In HEALTHCO INTERNATIONAL, INC. A. BRANDT, Jr. v. HICKS, MUSE CO. INC., 208 B.R. 288 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1997)

. . . In re Morse Tool, Inc.), 148 B.R. 97, 133 (Bankr.D.Mass.1992); See, e.g., Queenan, supra note 26, § 27.08 . . .

In HEALTHCO INTERNATIONAL, INC. A. BRANDT, Jr. v. HICKS, MUSE CO. INCORPORATED,, 195 B.R. 971 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1996)

. . . concerning dividends received by shareholder); 4 Chapter 11 Theory and Practice: A Guide to Reorganization § 27.08 . . .

GRUPKE d b a v. LINDA LORI SPORTSWEAR, INC. Co., 921 F. Supp. 987 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 27.08[1][b] (3d ed. 1995). . . .

NO FEAR, INC. v. IMAGINE FILMS, INC., 930 F. Supp. 1381 (C.D. Cal. 1995)

. . . See Rogers, 875 F.2d at 999; see also McCarthy on Trademarks § 27.08[2][g], n. 59. . . .

AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. WINBACK AND CONSERVE PROGRAM, INC. a G. AT T, 42 F.3d 1421 (3d Cir. 1994)

. . . See, e.g., 3 McCarthy on Trademarks § 27.08[1](c) at 27-90 (“A variation on the false advertising prong . . .

GORDON AND BREACH SCIENCE PUBLISHERS S. A. STBS, GMBH, v. AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, 859 F. Supp. 1521 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . See McCarthy on Trademarks § 27.08[2], . . . .

M. HAYES, v. BROWN,, 4 Vet. App. 353 (Vet. App. 1993)

. . . See VA Manual, M21-1, ¶¶ 5.25, 27.08. . . .

MAGNOLIA BAR ASSOCIATION, INC. v. LEE, M. E. L. L. D. L. Jr. R., 793 F. Supp. 1386 (S.D. Miss. 1992)

. . . District 1 (Central) 887,966 414,478 46.68% 623,064 263,205 42.24% District 2 (Southern) 869,885 235,601 27.08% . . . the Southern District has a total population of 869,885, and a total black population of 235,601, or 27.08 . . .

EWING, v. MONROE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI,, 740 F. Supp. 417 (N.D. Miss. 1990)

. . . 25,591 29.70% 70.30% Voting Age Population (VAP) Total 22,813 Black 6,179 White/Other % Black 16,504 27.08% . . .

U. S. PHILIPS CORP. v. WINDMERE CORPORATION,, 861 F.2d 695 (Fed. Cir. 1988)

. . . The model 1320, however, was introduced at a distributor price of $27.08, which was approximately 31 . . .

CONDON, v. R. BOWEN, BRODNER, v. R. BOWEN,, 853 F.2d 66 (2d Cir. 1988)

. . . case would be at the hourly rate of $40.51 and in the Brodner case it would be at the hourly rate of $27.08 . . .

EAST JEFFERSON COALITION FOR LEADERSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT, v. PARISH OF JEFFERSON,, 691 F. Supp. 991 (E.D. La. 1988)

. . . In Robert Hamilton’s bid for the District 2 seat, he received 21.11% (27.08%) of the black vote and 3.83% . . .

EAST- BIBB TWIGGS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, v. MACON- BIBB PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION,, 662 F. Supp. 1465 (M.D. Ga. 1987)

. . . (Amended May 14, 1984, ZA84-05-01) Section 27.08. Compliance with application. . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. JONES UNITED STATES v. M. PFEISTER, 621 F. Supp. 383 (E.D. Ark. 1985)

. . . 99 S.Ct. 1220, 59 L.Ed.2d 458 (1979); Devitt and Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instruction § 27.08 . . .

In D. COLLINS, a k a JACK MASTER, INC. d b a J. J. L. D. v. D. COLLINS, a k a, 28 B.R. 244 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1983)

. . . debtor presented a check to his bank for the amount of $3,500 when his account showed a balance of only $27.08 . . .

In O. TORRENS, SOUTHEAST FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, v. O. TORRENS, 7 B.R. 229 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1980)

. . . His account balance at that time was only $27.08. . . .

UNITED STATES v. S. BASKES,, 649 F.2d 471 (7th Cir. 1980)

. . . agreed upon instruction was borrowed from 2 Devitt & Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 27.08 . . .

BLACKBURN v. L. GOODWIN, J. COLE, v. L. GOODWIN, J., 608 F.2d 919 (2d Cir. 1979)

. . . See 3 Davis, Administrative Law § 27.08, at 586 (1958). . . .

In W. GROSE, 592 F.2d 1161 (C.C.P.A. 1979)

. . . 22.99 3.868 25 s 23.34 3.811 12 w 24.13 3.688 10 w 25.20 3.534 17 M 25.76 3.458 10 w 26.75 3.332 6 vw 27.08 . . .

COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, v. SECRETARY OF INTERIOR NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. SECRETARY OF INTERIOR M., 562 F.2d 1368 (2d Cir. 1977)

. . . Finally, Donkin’s estimate of peak production was based on an assumed field life of 27.08 to 30 years . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. ROSENSTENGEL,, 323 F. Supp. 499 (E.D. Mo. 1971)

. . . Rule 27.08 provides that if a defendant has been convicted of a felony he must be personally present . . .

P. LEBER, v. CANAL ZONE CENTRAL LABOR UNION METAL TRADES COUNCIL, AFL- CIO,, 383 F.2d 110 (5th Cir. 1967)

. . . ; Jaffe, Judicial Control of Administrative Action 157 (1965); Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 27.08 . . . Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice & Procedure, § 515; 3 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise (1958), § 27.08 . . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 27.08, p. 600, n. 48. . . . .

DREDGE CORPORATION, v. J. PENNY, C. DREDGE CORPORATION, v. E. J. PALMER, E. Jr., 338 F.2d 456 (9th Cir. 1964)

. . . Shaughnessy, 349 U.S. 48, 53, 75 S.Ct. 591, 99 L.Ed. 868; 3 Davis, Administrative Law, § 27.08, pages . . .

L. TODD v. JOINT APPRENTICESHIP COMMITTEE OF STEEL WORKERS OF CHICAGO No., 223 F. Supp. 12 (N.D. Ill. 1963)

. . . I also cite 3 Davis, Administrative Law Section 27.08. . . .

SCHUETZLE, v. D. DUBA, O. N. Al, 201 F. Supp. 754 (D.S.D. 1962)

. . . Grimes Packing Co., 337 U.S. 86, 69 S.Ct. 968, 93 L.Ed. 1231 and 3 Davis Administrative Law Section 27.08 . . .

ESTRADA, De v. P. AHRENS,, 296 F.2d 690 (5th Cir. 1961)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 27.08 at 596 (1958). . . . . Davis Administrative Law Treatise § 27.08, at 587 (1958). . . . .

INSURANSHARES CORPORATION OF DELAWARE v. NORTHERN FISCAL CORPORATION,, 42 F. Supp. 126 (E.D. Pa. 1941)

. . . credit for the 76,920 shares) is, therefore: $314,223.90 The plaintiff in making allowance for the 27.08% . . . above net loss (reduced by the agreed counsel fee of %) to the other assets of Insuranshares, and took 27.08% . . . their sum], the value of the unknowns may be exactly determined. (1) Ratio: The 76,920 shares represent 27.08% . . .

KEYSTONE STEEL WIRE CO. v. KOKOMO STEEL WIRE CO., 1 F.2d 790 (7th Cir. 1924)

. . . . — -From July 1, 1915, to November 30, 1915, $27.08 per G. T. f. o. b. Peoria. . . .

KEYSTONE STEEL WIRE CO. v. KOKOMO STEEL WIRE CO., 275 F. 794 (7th Cir. 1921)

. . . Prices and terms, from July 1, 1915, to November 30,' 1915, §27.08 g. t. [gross ton] f. o. b. . . .