Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 27.14 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 27.14 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 27.14

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 27
STATE ATTORNEYS; PUBLIC DEFENDERS; RELATED OFFICES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 27.14
27.14 Assigning state attorneys to other circuits.
(1) If any state attorney is disqualified to represent the state in any investigation, case, or matter pending in the courts of his or her circuit or if, for any other good and sufficient reason, the Governor determines that the ends of justice would be best served, the Governor may, by executive order filed with the Department of State, either order an exchange of circuits or of courts between such state attorney and any other state attorney or order an assignment of any state attorney to discharge the duties of the state attorney with respect to one or more specified investigations, cases, or matters, specified in general in the executive order of the Governor. Any exchange or assignment of any state attorney to a particular circuit shall expire 12 months after the date of issuance, unless an extension is approved by order of the Supreme Court upon application of the Governor showing good and sufficient cause to extend such exchange or assignment.
(2) If the statewide prosecutor in charge of the Office of Statewide Prosecution determines that he or she is not qualified to represent the state in any investigation, case, or matter pending in the courts of the state or if a court of competent jurisdiction disqualifies him or her from representing the state, the Governor may, by executive order filed with the Department of State, order an assignment of any state attorney to discharge the duties of such prosecutor with respect to one or more specified investigations, cases, or matters, generally described in the order. The assignment of any state attorney shall expire 12 months after the date of issuance, unless an extension is approved by order of the Supreme Court upon application of the Governor showing good and sufficient cause to extend such assignment.
(3) Whenever a state attorney is exchanged or assigned, he or she may designate one or more of his or her assistant state attorneys and state attorney investigators to perform the duties assigned under the executive order.
History.s. 2, ch. 5399, 1905; RGS 3009; CGL 4743; s. 1, ch. 69-1736; s. 4, ch. 73-334; s. 1, ch. 74-627; s. 1, ch. 75-193; s. 1, ch. 83-111; s. 2, ch. 85-179; s. 3, ch. 87-224; s. 123, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 96-256.

F.S. 27.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 27.14 on Casetext

Amendments to 27.14


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 27.14
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 27.14.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

AYALA, v. SCOTT,, 224 So. 3d 755 (Fla. 2017)

. . . petitions this Court for a writ of quo warranto, challenging Governor Rick Scott’s authority under section 27.14 . . . Florida Constitution to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed” and his authority under section 27.14 . . . Specifically, section 27.14(1), the constitutionality of which Ayala concedes, provides: If any state . . . application of the Governor showing good and sufficient cause to extend such exchange or assignment. § 27.14 . . . Stat. (2017). ’ Notwithstanding the Governor’s compliance with all of the requirements of section 27.14 . . . constitutes “good and sufficient reason” for the Governor to exercise his removal power under section 27.14 . . . Ayala, Governor Scott referenced article IV, section 1(a), of the Florida Constitution, and section 27.14 . . . authority to remove Ayala from her position under article IV, section 7, the Governor relies on section 27.14 . . . Section 27.14 traces its origin back to chapter 5399, Laws of Florida, § 2 (1905), in which the Legislature . . .

KINCAID, v. GOVERNMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 854 F.3d 721 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

. . . Code Criminal Procedure Ann. arts. 27.14, 45.044 (select misdemeanors); Utah Code Ann. § 77-7-21 (select . . .

ELKAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 180 F. Supp. 3d 1245 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2016)

. . . than fair value and issued an antidumping duty order assigning weighted-average dumping margins of 27.14% . . . The change increased Dongyuan’s weighted-average dumping margin from 27.14% to 36.59%, increased Superte . . .

DISABILITY RIGHTS NEW JERSEY, INC. A v. COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 796 F.3d 293 (3d Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 30:4-27.14; N.J. Ct. R. 4:74-7(e). . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. COUNTY OF MONTEREY,, 110 F. Supp. 3d 929 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . E at 27.14. . Cf. Armstrong v. Davis, 275 F.3d at 876. . Cf. Armstrong v. . . .

ELKAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 34 F. Supp. 3d 1369 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2014)

. . . analysis it used for the Preliminary Determination, Commerce assigned weighted-average dumping margins of 27.14% . . .

ARTISAN MANUFACTURING CORP. v. UNITED STATES,, 978 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2014)

. . . Commerce assigned weighted average dumping margins of 27.14% to Dongyuan and 39.87% to Superte/Zhaoshun . . .

CHEVRON U. S. A. INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 110 Fed. Cl. 747 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . Chevron's total equity finalization costs were $27.14 million, excluding legal costs and letters of credit . . .

In BLAST ENERGY SERVICES, INC. L. L. C., 396 B.R. 676 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . However, pursuant to Subsection 27.14 of both Contracts, the unpaid invoices that eventually led to contract . . .

In PETITION OF ALLEGRETTI F. R. C. P., 229 F.R.D. 93 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Practice § 27.14[1] ("[Rule 27’s] broad language directly reflects the equitable origins of the device . . .

In ALCATEL SECURITIES LITIGATION, 382 F. Supp. 2d 513 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Similarly, Alcatel Class A ADS declined by 8.8%, from $27.14 to $24.74 per share. (Id.) . . .

FOUNDATION FOR FAIR CONTRACTING, LTD. v. G M EASTERN CONTRACTING DOUBLE E, LLC,, 259 F. Supp. 2d 329 (D.N.J. 2003)

. . . changed as follows: Classification Original rate in 990001 Rate per LOI Carpenter, drywall Hangers $27.14 . . .

STATE v. A. GARCIA v., 774 So. 2d 21 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Pursuant to executive assignment, see § 27.14(1), Fla. . . . Jaen case, the State Attorney from the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit was appointed pursuant to section 27.14 . . .

A. DUMONT A. v. UNITED STATES, 80 F. Supp. 2d 576 (D.S.C. 2000)

. . . Ex. 27.14. . . .

BROWNING- FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF ILLINOIS, INC. v. TER MAAT,, 13 F. Supp. 2d 756 (N.D. Ill. 1998)

. . . distributed using Hengemihle’s methodology, this equates to 18.21 percent of the overall costs to BFI and 27.14 . . . discernable difference in the conduct of MIG and AAA as operators, the court allocates 13.57 percent ()4 of 27.14 . . .

In BEST PRODUCTS CO. INC., 168 B.R. 35 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . See Queen-an, § 27.14 at 27:38. . . .

In C. KOPPINGER M. d b a, 113 B.R. 588 (Bankr. D.N.D. 1990)

. . . Schmidt 3,439.14 Stark Ready Mix 27.14 Charles Svihl 105.37 Thurman Wolf 2,232.28 Norbert Zastoupil 460.97 . . . 294.37 Prairie Oil $47,832.86 Jim Schummer $ 91.97 Schwartz Ed Construction $ 21.20 Stark Ready Mix $ 27.14 . . .

In STEINBRECHER, STEINBRECHER, v. MID- PENN CONSUMER DISCOUNT CO., 110 B.R. 155 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1990)

. . . $115 63.0102% $1,425.35 (2) Loan of May 23, 1986 (a) Disclosures given to debtors $2,872.48 $4,423.52 27.14% . . .

EAST BIBB TWIGGS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, v. MACON- BIBB COUNTY PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION,, 706 F. Supp. 880 (M.D. Ga. 1989)

. . . See Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 4, particularly §§ 6.03, 23.14, 27.07, 27.12, 27.13, 27.14 and 27.15. . . .

EAST- BIBB TWIGGS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, v. MACON- BIBB PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION,, 662 F. Supp. 1465 (M.D. Ga. 1987)

. . . (See Section 27.14.) [6] If the proposed land use is located in a flood hazard district, application . . . Section 27.14. Appeals from acts or decisions of zoning enforcement officer. . . .

STATE v. E. FITZPATRICK,, 464 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 1985)

. . . Section 27.14, Florida Statutes (1981), provides for assignment of a state attorney from one circuit . . .

IN RE PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, 5 Fla. Supp. 2d 142 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1984)

. . . Moreover, Section 27.14, Florida Statutes (1983), provides that the Governor has the authority to assign . . . The specific reference to the word investigation in Section 27.14 and its ommission in the “particular . . .

E. FITZPATRICK, v. C. SMITH,, 432 So. 2d 89 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . See §§ 27.14, 27.16, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

STATE v. VISCITO,, 349 So. 2d 196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . On May 28, 1975 the Governor, pursuant to Section 27.14, Florida Statutes (1974), issued Executive Order . . .

UNITED STATES v. HAMMERMILL PAPER COMPANY,, 429 F. Supp. 1271 (W.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . shares of the highest 4, and highest 8, were as follows: 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 Top 4 27.06% 27.14% . . .

T. AUSTIN v. STATE T. CHRISTIAN,, 310 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 1975)

. . . The pertinent statutes then in effect relating to assignments read as follows: “27.14 Assigning state . . . alternative to assign said Respondent as the State Attorney of the Second Judicial Circuit pursuant to F.S. 27.14 . . . This is clearly permitted by the first clause of Fla.Stat. § 27.14, F.S.A. In Johns v. . . . In the alternative, under Fla.Stat. § 27.14, F.S.A., the Governor could assign Austin as State Attorney . . . In summary, we hold that under the provisions of Fla.Stat. § 27.14 and § 27.15 (1973), F.S.A., the Governor . . .

STATE T. CHRISTIAN, v. T. AUSTIN, 302 So. 2d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . the ends of justice would best be served by the assignment of a State Attorney pursuant to Section 27.14 . . . The pertinent statutes are Florida Statutes 27.14, 27.15 and 27.16. . . . They provide in material part, as follows: “27.14 Assigning state attorneys to other circuits. — If any . . . The predecessor to F.S. 27.14, was Ch. 5399, Acts 1905, § 2, later 4743 C.G.L.1927. . . . Edward Austin to the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit pursuant to F.S. 27.14, the Court said: “An executive . . .

STATE T. CHRISTIAN, v. A. RUDD C., 302 So. 2d 821 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Section 27.14, Florida Statutes, provides: “Assigning state attorneys to other circuits. . . .

In EXECUTIVE ASSIGNMENT OF STATE ATTORNEY, 298 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 1974)

. . . Attorney Austin was assigned on the 4th day of March, 1974 and pursuant to Florida Statutes, Section 27.14 . . . Florida Statutes, Section 27.14, requires that such extension be approved by the Supreme Court of Florida . . . this Court to approve the continuation of State Attorney Austin’s special assignment under Section 27.14 . . . period allowed for such executive assignment by the Governor exclusively under the authority of Section 27.14 . . .

In ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR, 290 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1974)

. . . . § 27.14, F.S.A., regarding assignments by the governor of a state attorney outside of his jurisdiction . . .

UNITED STATES v. LANZA,, 341 F. Supp. 405 (M.D. Fla. 1972)

. . . discharge the duties of, or proceed to another circuit to assist, any other state attorney, Fla.Stat., §§ 27.14 . . .

STATE v. ALVAREZ STATE v. DELANO STATE v. MARCUS, STATE v. MARCUS, 258 So. 2d 24 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 27.14 as amended December 11,1969. . . .

FINCH, v. W. L. FITZPATRICK,, 254 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1971)

. . . . § 27.14, F.S.A., which reads as follows: “If any state attorney shall be disqualified to represent . . . says that the executive order of the Governor assigning Austin was not in accordance with Fla.Stat. § 27.14 . . . This executive order was an assignment under the provisions of Fla.Stat. § 27.14, F.S.A., quoted above . . . The respondent says that this requirement of Fla.Stat. § 27.14, F.S.A., is unconstitutional. . . . Stat. § 27.14, F.S.A., and the informations were filed within the 60-day period and in the “calendar . . .

GIAMO, v. STATE, 245 So. 2d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . . § 27.14, F.S.A. This point has been decided by this court adversely to appellant’s position. . . .

R. KIRK, Jr. v. BAKER,, 224 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1969)

. . . . § 27.14 (1967), F.S. A., transferred Honorable Gordon G. . . . The statute, Fla.Stat. § 27.14 (1967), F.S.A., implements this power and is clearly within the power . . . alia, that Judge King “determine the validity of the executive order of March 4, 1969, and Section 27.14 . . . State Attorneys refers specifically to cited cases and that said order was issued pursuant to Section 27.14 . . .

R. GODINE, D. v. LIBERTY SHOE CO., 271 F. Supp. 97 (D. Mass. 1967)

. . . patterns included in SBA’s Eauipment Security Agreement securing the second loan, and $48,870.99, or 27.14 . . .

C. DAVIS, B. v. BANK OF CLEARWATER, a, 190 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . December 22, 1964, and the Honorable Hayden Burns, dated May 3, 1965, under the provisions of Section 27.14 . . .

ADVISORY OPINION TO GOVERNOR, 152 Fla. 119 (Fla. 1942)

. . . Solicitor of the Criminal Court of Record for Palm Beach County, by analogy to the provisions of Section 27.14 . . .

LUCAS COUNTY v. JAMISON, 170 F. 338 (C.C.S.D. Iowa 1908)

. . . Receiver, is on the following fact’s: October 30, 1907, plaintiff deposited a check of $11.84 and one of $27.14 . . .