Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 27.52 (2025)
Determination of indigent status.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes: through the 2025 Regular Session (some sections already show 2026 laws)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
27.52 Determination of indigent status.—
(1) APPLICATION TO THE CLERK.—A person seeking appointment of a public defender under s. 27.51 based upon an inability to pay must apply to the clerk of the court for a determination of indigent status using an application form developed by the Florida Clerks of Court Operations Corporation with final approval by the Supreme Court.
(a) The application must include, at a minimum, the following financial information:
1. Net income, consisting of total salary and wages, minus deductions required by law, including court-ordered support payments.
2. Other income, including, but not limited to, social security benefits, union funds, veterans’ benefits, workers’ compensation, other regular support from absent family members, public or private employee pensions, reemployment assistance or unemployment compensation, dividends, interest, rent, trusts, and gifts.
3. Assets, including, but not limited to, cash, savings accounts, bank accounts, stocks, bonds, certificates of deposit, equity in real estate, and equity in a boat or a motor vehicle or in other tangible property.
4. All liabilities and debts.
5. If applicable, the amount of any bail paid for the applicant’s release from incarceration and the source of the funds.
The application must include a signature by the applicant which attests to the truthfulness of the information provided. The application form developed by the corporation must include notice that the applicant may seek court review of a clerk’s determination that the applicant is not indigent, as provided in this section.
(b) An applicant shall pay a $50 application fee to the clerk for each application for court-appointed counsel filed. The applicant shall pay the fee within 7 days after submitting the application. If the applicant does not pay the fee prior to the disposition of the case, the clerk shall notify the court, and the court shall:
1. Assess the application fee as part of the sentence or as a condition of probation; or
2. Assess the application fee pursuant to s. 938.29.
(c) Notwithstanding any provision of law, court rule, or administrative order, the clerk shall assign the first $50 of any fees or costs paid by an indigent person as payment of the application fee. A person found to be indigent may not be refused counsel or other required due process services for failure to pay the fee.
(d) All application fees collected by the clerk under this section shall be transferred monthly by the clerk to the Department of Revenue for deposit in the Indigent Criminal Defense Trust Fund administered by the Justice Administrative Commission, to be used as appropriated by the Legislature. The clerk may retain 2 percent of application fees collected monthly for administrative costs from which the clerk shall remit $0.20 from each application fee to the Department of Revenue for deposit into the General Revenue Fund prior to remitting the remainder to the Department of Revenue for deposit in the Indigent Criminal Defense Trust Fund.
(e)1. The clerk shall assist a person who appears before the clerk and requests assistance in completing the application, and the clerk shall notify the court if a person is unable to complete the application after the clerk has provided assistance.
2. If the person seeking appointment of a public defender is incarcerated, the public defender is responsible for providing the application to the person and assisting him or her in its completion and is responsible for submitting the application to the clerk on the person’s behalf. The public defender may enter into an agreement for jail employees, pretrial services employees, or employees of other criminal justice agencies to assist the public defender in performing functions assigned to the public defender under this subparagraph.
(2) DETERMINATION BY THE CLERK.—The clerk of the court shall determine whether an applicant seeking appointment of a public defender is indigent based upon the information provided in the application and the criteria prescribed in this subsection.
(a) An applicant, including an applicant who is a minor or an adult tax-dependent person, is indigent if the applicant’s income is equal to or below 200 percent of the then-current federal poverty guidelines prescribed for the size of the household of the applicant by the United States Department of Health and Human Services or if the person is receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families-Cash Assistance, poverty-related veterans’ benefits, or Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
1. There is a presumption that the applicant is not indigent if the applicant owns, or has equity in, any intangible or tangible personal property or real property or the expectancy of an interest in any such property having a net equity value of $2,500 or more, excluding the value of the person’s homestead and one vehicle having a net value not exceeding $5,000.
2. Notwithstanding the information that the applicant provides, the clerk may conduct a review of the property records for the county in which the applicant resides and the motor vehicle title records of the state to identify any property interests of the applicant under this paragraph. The clerk may evaluate and consider the results of the review in making a determination under this subsection. If the review is 1conducted, the clerk shall maintain the results of the review in a file with the application and provide the file to the court if the applicant seeks review under subsection (4) of the clerk’s determination of indigent status.
(b) Based upon its review, the clerk shall make one of the following determinations:
1. The applicant is not indigent.
2. The applicant is indigent.
(c)1. If the clerk determines that the applicant is indigent, the clerk shall submit the determination to the office of the public defender and immediately file the determination in the case file.
2. If the public defender is unable to provide representation due to a conflict pursuant to s. 27.5303, the public defender shall move the court for withdrawal from representation and appointment of the office of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel.
(d) The duty of the clerk in determining whether an applicant is indigent shall be limited to receiving the application and comparing the information provided in the application to the criteria prescribed in this subsection. The determination of indigent status is a ministerial act of the clerk and not a decision based on further investigation or the exercise of independent judgment by the clerk. The clerk may contract with third parties to perform functions assigned to the clerk under this section.
(e) The applicant may seek review of the clerk’s determination that the applicant is not indigent in the court having jurisdiction over the matter at the next scheduled hearing. If the applicant seeks review of the clerk’s determination of indigent status, the court shall make a final determination as provided in subsection (4).
(3) APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ON INTERIM BASIS.—If the clerk of the court has not made a determination of indigent status at the time a person requests appointment of a public defender, the court shall make a preliminary determination of indigent status, pending further review by the clerk, and may, by court order, appoint a public defender, the office of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel, or private counsel on an interim basis.
(4) REVIEW OF CLERK’S DETERMINATION.—
(a) If the clerk of the court determines that the applicant is not indigent, and the applicant seeks review of the clerk’s determination, the court shall make a final determination of indigent status by reviewing the information provided in the application against the criteria prescribed in subsection (2) and by considering the following additional factors:
1. Whether the applicant has been released on bail in an amount of $5,000 or more.
2. Whether a bond has been posted, the type of bond, and who paid the bond.
3. Whether paying for private counsel in an amount that exceeds the limitations in s. 27.5304, or other due process services creates a substantial hardship for the applicant or the applicant’s family.
4. Any other relevant financial circumstances of the applicant or the applicant’s family.
(b) Based upon its review, the court shall make one of the following determinations and, if the applicant is indigent, shall appoint a public defender, the office of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel, or, if appropriate, private counsel:
1. The applicant is not indigent.
2. The applicant is indigent.
(5) INDIGENT FOR COSTS.—A person who is eligible to be represented by a public defender under s. 27.51 but who is represented by private counsel not appointed by the court for a reasonable fee as approved by the court or on a pro bono basis, or who is proceeding pro se, may move the court for a determination that he or she is indigent for costs and eligible for the provision of due process services, as prescribed by ss. 29.006 and 29.007, funded by the state.
(a) The person must file a written motion with the court and submit to the court:
1. The completed application prescribed in subsection (1).
2. In the case of a person represented by counsel, an affidavit attesting to the estimated amount of attorney’s fees and the source of payment for these fees.
(b) The person shall arrange for service of a copy of the motion and attachments on the Justice Administrative Commission. The commission has standing to appear before the court to contest any motion to declare a person indigent for costs and may participate in a hearing on the motion by use of telephonic or other communication equipment.
(c) If the person did not apply for a determination of indigent status under subsection (1) in the same case and is not already liable for the application fee required under that subsection, he or she becomes liable for payment of the fee upon filing the motion with the court.
(d) In reviewing the motion, the court shall consider:
1. Whether the applicant applied for a determination of indigent status under subsection (1) and the outcome of such application.
2. The extent to which the person’s income equals or exceeds the income criteria prescribed in subsection (2).
3. The additional factors prescribed in subsection (4).
4. Whether the applicant is proceeding pro se.
5. When the applicant retained private counsel.
6. The amount of any attorney’s fees and who is paying the fees. There is a presumption that the applicant is not indigent for costs if the amount of attorney’s fees exceeds $5,000 for a noncapital case or $25,000 for a capital case in which the state is seeking the death penalty. To overcome this presumption, the applicant has the burden to show through clear and convincing evidence that the fees are reasonable based on the nature and complexity of the case. In determining the reasonableness of the fees, the court shall consider the amount that a private court-appointed attorney paid by the state would receive for providing representation for that type of case.
(e) Based upon its review, the court shall make one of the following determinations:
1. The applicant is not indigent for costs.
2. The applicant is indigent for costs.
(f) The provision of due process services based upon a determination that a person is indigent for costs under this subsection must be effectuated pursuant to a court order, a copy of which the clerk shall provide to counsel representing the person, or to the person directly if he or she is proceeding pro se, for use in requesting payment of due process expenses through the Justice Administrative Commission. Private counsel representing a person declared indigent for costs shall execute the Justice Administrative Commission’s contract for counsel representing persons determined to be indigent for costs. Private counsel representing a person declared indigent for costs may not receive state funds, either directly or on behalf of due process providers, unless the attorney has executed the contract required under this paragraph.
(g) Costs shall be reimbursed at the rates established under ss. 27.425 and 27.5305. To receive reimbursement of costs, either directly or on behalf of due process providers, private counsel representing a person declared indigent for costs shall comply with the procedures and requirements under this chapter governing billings by and compensation of private court-appointed counsel.
(h) The court may not appoint an attorney paid by the state based on a finding that the defendant is indigent for costs if the defendant has privately retained and paid counsel.
(i) A defendant who is found guilty of a criminal act by a court or jury or enters a plea of guilty or nolo contendere and who received due process services after being found indigent for costs under this subsection is liable for payment of due process costs expended by the state.
1. The attorney representing the defendant, or the defendant if he or she is proceeding pro se, shall provide an accounting to the court delineating all costs paid or to be paid by the state within 90 days after disposition of the case notwithstanding any appeals.
2. The court shall issue an order determining the amount of all costs paid by the state and any costs for which prepayment was waived under this section or s. 57.081. The clerk shall cause a certified copy of the order to be recorded in the official records of the county, at no cost. The recording constitutes a lien against the person in favor of the state in the county in which the order is recorded. The lien may be enforced in the same manner prescribed in s. 938.29.
3. If the attorney or the pro se defendant fails to provide a complete accounting of costs expended by the state and consequently costs are omitted from the lien, the attorney or pro se defendant may not receive reimbursement or any other form of direct or indirect payment for those costs if the state has not paid the costs. The attorney or pro se defendant shall repay the state for those costs if the state has already paid the costs. The clerk of the court may establish a payment plan under s. 28.246 and may charge the attorney or pro se defendant a one-time administrative processing charge under s. 28.24(27)(c).
(6) DUTIES OF PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN.—A nonindigent parent or legal guardian of an applicant who is a minor or an adult tax-dependent person shall furnish the minor or adult tax-dependent person with the necessary legal services and costs incident to a delinquency proceeding or, upon transfer of such person for criminal prosecution as an adult pursuant to chapter 985, a criminal prosecution in which the person has a right to legal counsel under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Florida. The failure of a parent or legal guardian to furnish legal services and costs under this section does not bar the appointment of legal counsel pursuant to this section, s. 27.40, or s. 27.5303. When the public defender, the office of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel, a private court-appointed conflict counsel, or a private attorney is appointed to represent a minor or an adult tax-dependent person in any proceeding in circuit court or in a criminal proceeding in any other court, the parents or the legal guardian shall be liable for payment of the fees, charges, and costs of the representation even if the person is a minor being tried as an adult. Liability for the fees, charges, and costs of the representation shall be imposed in the form of a lien against the property of the nonindigent parents or legal guardian of the minor or adult tax-dependent person. The lien is enforceable as provided in s. 27.561 or s. 938.29.
(7) FINANCIAL DISCREPANCIES; FRAUD; FALSE INFORMATION.—
(a) If the court learns of discrepancies between the application or motion and the actual financial status of the person found to be indigent or indigent for costs, the court shall determine whether the public defender, office of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel, or private attorney shall continue representation or whether the authorization for any other due process services previously authorized shall be revoked. The person may be heard regarding the information learned by the court. If the court, based on the information, determines that the person is not indigent or indigent for costs, the court shall order the public defender, office of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel, or private attorney to discontinue representation and revoke the provision of any other authorized due process services.
(b) If the court has reason to believe that any applicant, through fraud or misrepresentation, was improperly determined to be indigent or indigent for costs, the matter shall be referred to the state attorney. Twenty-five percent of any amount recovered by the state attorney as reasonable value of the services rendered, including fees, charges, and costs paid by the state on the person’s behalf, shall be remitted to the Department of Revenue for deposit into the Grants and Donations Trust Fund of the applicable state attorney. Seventy-five percent of any amount recovered shall be remitted to the Department of Revenue for deposit into the General Revenue Fund.
History.—s. 3, ch. 63-409; s. 1, ch. 70-57; s. 4, ch. 73-334; s. 1, ch. 77-99; s. 1, ch. 77-378; s. 8, ch. 79-164; s. 3, ch. 80-376; s. 1, ch. 81-273; s. 139, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 96-232; s. 4, ch. 97-107; s. 28, ch. 97-271; s. 6, ch. 98-280; s. 3, ch. 2001-122; s. 16, ch. 2003-402; s. 9, ch. 2004-265; s. 3, ch. 2005-236; s. 6, ch. 2007-62; s. 4, ch. 2008-111; s. 8, ch. 2010-162; s. 31, ch. 2012-30; s. 1, ch. 2012-100; s. 3, ch. 2012-123; s. 5, ch. 2019-58; s. 4, ch. 2020-2; s. 14, ch. 2021-116; s. 1, ch. 2024-153.
1Note.—As amended by s. 3, ch. 2012-123. The amendment by s. 1, ch. 2012-100, used the words “completed by the clerk” instead of the word “conducted.”
Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 27.52
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§27.52(7c)FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENTFALSE INFO TO DETERMINE CRIMINAL INDIGENCY
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 105
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 1984).
Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 1984). “At the sentencing proceeding the judge, in open court and before Jenkins and his counsel, imposed the costs. He then found Jenkins indigent and appointed the public defender to represent him on appeal.”
Enrique v. State, 408 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). “§ 27.52, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1980). [5] It is apparent that the court construed Castro's earlier statement that he did not have sufficient money to procure a low-cost attorney to mean that although he had the funds, he did not want to spend them.”
Everett v. State, 54 So. 3d 464 (Fla. 2010). “make inquiry into the financial status of the accused in a manner not inconsistent with the guidelines established by section 27.52, Florida Statutes. The accused shall respond to the inquiry under oath.”
Alexis v. State, 211 So. 3d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). “§ 27.52(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). 1 Payments of attorney’s fees for the services rendered by the public defender are governed by section 938.”
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Crim. Procedure, 26 So. 3d 534 (Fla. 2009). “853 (Motion for Postconviction DNA Testing) is amended to reflect that counsel may be appointed to assist the movant upon a determination *538 of indigency pursuant to section 27.52, Florida Statutes (2009). We decline to delete rule 3.”
Smith v. State, 699 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 1997). “[11] There was no demonstration of indigence as required by section 27.52, Florida Statutes (1989), for the presiding judge to have appointed counsel for Smith.”
Mills v. State, 177 So. 3d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). “Section 27.52, Florida Statutes (2010), provides in part: (1) APPLICATION TO THE CLERK.”
Brown v. State, 427 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). “§ 27.52, Fla. Stat. (1981). [1] After a jury trial, Brown was adjudged guilty and sentenced for burglary and two counts of petit theft.”
Florida Bar, 389 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 1980). “Make inquiry into the financial status of the accused in a manner not inconsistent with the guidelines established by section 27.52, Florida Statutes (1979). The accused shall respond to the inquiry under oath; (iii).”
In re Approval of Indigent Status Forms, 910 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 2005). “(amending § 27.52, Fla. Stat.); ch. 2005-236, § 35, Laws of Fla.”
Amendment to Florida Rule of Crim. Procedure 3.111(d)(2)-(3), 719 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 1998). “56, Florida Statutes; (B) make inquiry into the financial status of the accused in a manner not inconsistent with the guidelines established by section 27.52, Florida Statutes. The accused shall respond to the inquiry under oath; (C) require the accused to execute an affidavit…”
Martin v. State, 711 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). “We ordered a response and directed the parties to address whether the evidence that defendant had transferred assets and income to family members would support the denial of court appointed counsel under section 27.52, Florida Statutes (1997). Defendant has personally responded,…”
27.52(1): 7 cases
In re Approval of Indigent Status Forms, 910 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 2005). “(amending § 27.52, Fla. Stat.); ch. 2005-236, § 35, Laws of Fla.”
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Crim. Procedure, 26 So. 3d 534 (Fla. 2009). “853 (Motion for Postconviction DNA Testing) is amended to reflect that counsel may be appointed to assist the movant upon a determination *538 of indigency pursuant to section 27.52, Florida Statutes (2009). We decline to delete rule 3.”
Schmidt v. McDonough, 951 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 2006).
Mahone v. State, 39 So. 3d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Crim. Procedure, 900 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 2005).
27.52(1)(a): 1 case
Phoebe Flanagan v. State of Florida, 267 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).
27.52(1)(b): 9 cases
Donton v. State, 1 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
Bryan T. Robinson v. State, 256 So. 3d 217 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).
Carmichael v. State, 192 So. 3d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).
Tarek Mneimne v. State of Florida, 408 So. 3d 129 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025).
Roger Moore v. State of Florida, 307 So. 3d 770 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).
27.52(1)(d): 1 case
In re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Crim. Proc., 820 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 2002).
27.52(2): 4 cases
Enrique v. State, 408 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). “§ 27.52, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1980). [5] It is apparent that the court construed Castro's earlier statement that he did not have sufficient money to procure a low-cost attorney to mean that although he had the funds, he did not want to spend them.”
Holmes v. State, 448 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
State v. D.V.S., 617 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
Off. of the Pub. Def. v. State, 714 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
27.52(2)(a): 3 cases
Behr v. Gardner, 442 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
Slater v. State, 356 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
Soeldner v. State, 941 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
27.52(2)(a)(2): 1 case
LaTorre v. State, 23 So. 3d 1265 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).
27.52(2)(b): 11 cases
Enrique v. State, 408 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). “§ 27.52, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1980). [5] It is apparent that the court construed Castro's earlier statement that he did not have sufficient money to procure a low-cost attorney to mean that although he had the funds, he did not want to spend them.”
Martin v. State, 711 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). “We ordered a response and directed the parties to address whether the evidence that defendant had transferred assets and income to family members would support the denial of court appointed counsel under section 27.52, Florida Statutes (1997). Defendant has personally responded,…”
Morgano v. State, 439 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
Vera v. State, 689 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
Haughwout v. Mellor, 870 So. 2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).
27.52(2)(b)(2): 1 case
Pittman v. State, 488 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
27.52(2)(c): 9 cases
Enrique v. State, 408 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). “§ 27.52, Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1980). [5] It is apparent that the court construed Castro's earlier statement that he did not have sufficient money to procure a low-cost attorney to mean that although he had the funds, he did not want to spend them.”
Morgano v. State, 439 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
DiBartolomeo v. State, 450 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
Martin v. State, 711 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). “We ordered a response and directed the parties to address whether the evidence that defendant had transferred assets and income to family members would support the denial of court appointed counsel under section 27.52, Florida Statutes (1997). Defendant has personally responded,…”
Pittman v. State, 488 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
27.52(2)(c)(1): 2 cases
Siplen v. State, 473 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
Pittman v. State, 488 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
27.52(2)(d): 5 cases
G.L.D. v. State, 442 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).
Z.F. v. State, 683 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
State v. D.V.S., 617 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
GLD v. State, 442 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
ZF v. State, 683 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
27.52(3): 3 cases
LaTorre v. State, 23 So. 3d 1265 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).
McDonnell v. Hasse, 553 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
Tundidor v. Ferro, 588 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
27.52(4): 2 cases
Odhiambo v. State, 337 So. 3d 381 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).
L.g. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 352 So. 3d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022).
27.52(4)(a): 1 case
Mansfield v. State, 16 So. 3d 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).
27.52(5): 5 cases
Kevin Watkins v. State of Florida, 159 So. 3d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).
Holt v. Keetley, 250 So. 3d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).
Charles D. Patten v. State, 204 So. 3d 977 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).
Julianne M. Holt, P.D. v. Michael Edward Keetley & State of Florida, No. 17-2157 (Fla. 2d DCA June 20, 2018).
Jachimski v. State, 162 So. 3d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).
27.52(5)(f): 1 case
Jamin Ryan Ford v. State of Florida, 385 So. 3d 155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024).
27.52(5)(h): 1 case
Just. Admin. Comm'n v. Ian Jackson, No. 3D2022-2082 (Fla. 3d DCA May 13, 2026).
27.52(6): 3 cases
Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juv. Procedure, 894 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 2005).
J.J.P. v. State, 219 So. 3d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).
J.J.P. v. State, No. 2D15-4869 (Fla. 2d DCA June 9, 2017).
27.52(l)(a): 1 case
Off. of the Pub. Def. v. State, 714 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
27.52(l)(b): 6 cases
Alexis v. State, 211 So. 3d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). “§ 27.52(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). 1 Payments of attorney’s fees for the services rendered by the public defender are governed by section 938.”
Mills v. State, 177 So. 3d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). “Section 27.52, Florida Statutes (2010), provides in part: (1) APPLICATION TO THE CLERK.”
Donton v. State, 1 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
Dabel v. State, 79 So. 3d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
In re Approval of Application for Determination of Indigent Status Form for Use by Clerks & Amendment to Florida Rule of Crim. Procedure 3.984, 5 So. 3d 662 (Fla. 2009).
27.52(l)(e)(l): 1 case
In re Approval of Application for Determination of Indigent Status Form for Use by Clerks & Amendment to Florida Rule of Crim. Procedure 3.984, 5 So. 3d 662 (Fla. 2009).
27.52(l)(f): 1 case
Hemesath v. State, 732 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.