Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 28.22205 (2025)

Electronic filing process.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

28.22205 Electronic filing process.—Each clerk of court shall implement an electronic filing process. The purpose of the electronic filing process is to reduce judicial costs in the office of the clerk and the judiciary, increase timeliness in the processing of cases, and provide the judiciary with case-related information to allow for improved judicial case management. The Legislature requests that the Supreme Court set statewide standards for electronic filing to be used by the clerks of court to implement electronic filing. The standards should specify the required information for the duties of the clerks of court and the judiciary for case management. Revenues provided to counties and the clerk of court under s. 28.24(13)(e) for information technology may also be used to implement electronic filing processes.

History.—s. 16, ch. 2009-61; s. 6, ch. 2014-17; s. 5, ch. 2015-2; s. 7, ch. 2020-2; s. 15, ch. 2021-116.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2012 · leading case: In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 102 So. 3d 451 (Fla. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 102 So. 3d 451 (Fla. 2012). · cites it 4× “See § 28.22205, Fla. Stat. (2011). Also, as explained in this opinion, in adopting the mandatory e-filing rules, the Court has exempted self-represented parties and self-represented nonparties, including nonparty governmental or public agencies.”

State, Off. of Attorney Gen. v. Shore, 41 So. 3d 966 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). · cites it 2× “Contrary to the Clerk's assertions, section 28.22205, Florida Statutes (2009), does not provide for an absolute deadline by which the clerks of court must implement an electronic filing process.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.