Florida Statute 28.35 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 28
CLERKS OF THE CIRCUIT COURTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 28.35

28.35 Florida Clerks of Court Operations Corporation.—

(1)(a) The Florida Clerks of Court Operations Corporation is created as a public corporation organized to perform the functions specified in this section and s. 28.36. All clerks of the circuit court shall be members of the corporation and hold their position and authority in an ex officio capacity. The functions assigned to the corporation shall be performed by an executive council pursuant to the plan of operation approved by the members.

(b)1. The executive council shall be composed of eight clerks of the court elected by the clerks of the courts for a term of 2 years, with two clerks from counties with a population of fewer than 100,000, two clerks from counties with a population of at least 100,000 but fewer than 500,000, two clerks from counties with a population of at least 500,000 but fewer than 1 million, and two clerks from counties with a population of 1 million or more. The executive council shall also include, as ex officio members, a designee of the President of the Senate and a designee of the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shall designate one additional member to represent the state courts system.

2. Members of the executive council of the corporation are subject to ss. 112.313(1)-(8), (10), (12), and (15); 112.3135; and 112.3143(2). For purposes of applying ss. 112.313(1)-(8), (10), (12), and (15); 112.3135; and 112.3143(2) to activities of executive council members, members shall be considered public officers and the corporation shall be considered the members’ agency.

(c) The corporation shall be considered a political subdivision of the state and shall be exempt from the corporate income tax. The corporation is not subject to chapter 120.

(d) The functions assigned to the corporation under this section and ss. 28.36 and 28.37 are considered to be for a valid public purpose.

(2) The duties of the corporation shall include the following:

(a) Adopting a plan of operation including a detailed budget for the corporation.

(b) Conducting the election of an executive council as required in paragraph (1)(b).

(c)1. Recommending to the Legislature changes in the amounts and distribution of the various court-related fines, fees, service charges, and costs established by law to ensure reasonable and adequate funding of the clerks of the court in the performance of their court-related functions.

2. If the number of judges under s. 26.031 or s. 34.022 is increased, the corporation shall:

a. Develop a formula to be used to estimate the total cost associated with clerk support for circuit and county judges statewide.

b. Make a recommendation for consideration by the Legislature on any need for additional funding using the formula approved in sub-subparagraph a.

(d) Developing and certifying a uniform system of workload measures and applicable workload standards for court-related functions as developed by the corporation and clerk workload performance in meeting the workload performance standards. These workload measures and workload performance standards shall be designed to facilitate an objective determination of the performance of each clerk in accordance with minimum standards for fiscal management, operational efficiency, and effective collection of fines, fees, service charges, and court costs. The corporation shall develop the workload measures and workload performance standards in consultation with the Legislature. When the corporation finds a clerk has not met the workload performance standards, the corporation shall identify the nature of each deficiency and any corrective action recommended and taken by the affected clerk of the court. For quarterly periods ending on the last day of March, June, September, and December of each year, the corporation shall notify the Legislature of any clerk not meeting workload performance standards and provide a copy of any corrective action plans. Such notifications must be submitted no later than 45 days after the end of the preceding quarterly period. As used in this subsection, the term:

1. “Workload measures” means the measurement of the activities and frequency of the work required for the clerk to adequately perform the court-related duties of the office as defined by the membership of the Florida Clerks of Court Operations Corporation.

2. “Workload performance standards” means the standards developed to measure the timeliness and effectiveness of the activities that are accomplished by the clerk in the performance of the court-related duties of the office as defined by the membership of the Florida Clerks of Court Operations Corporation.

(e) Entering into a contract with the Department of Financial Services for the department to audit the court-related expenditures of individual clerks pursuant to s. 17.03.

(f) Approving the proposed budgets submitted by clerks of the court pursuant to s. 28.36. The corporation must ensure that the total combined budgets of the clerks of the court do not exceed the total estimated revenues from fees, service charges, court costs, and fines for court-related functions available for court-related expenditures as determined by the most recent Revenue Estimating Conference, plus the total of unspent budgeted funds for court-related functions carried forward by the clerks of the court from the previous county fiscal year, plus the balance of funds remaining in the Clerks of the Court Trust Fund after the transfer of funds to the General Revenue Fund required pursuant to s. 28.37(4)(b), and plus any appropriations for court-related functions. The corporation may amend any individual clerk of the court budget to ensure compliance with this paragraph and must consider performance measures, workload performance standards, workload measures, and expense data before modifying the budget. As part of this process, the corporation shall:

1. Calculate the minimum amount of revenue necessary for each clerk of the court to efficiently perform the list of court-related functions specified in paragraph (3)(a). The corporation shall apply the workload measures appropriate for determining the individual level of review required to fund the clerk’s budget.

2. Prepare a cost comparison of similarly situated clerks of the court, based on county population and numbers of filings, using the standard list of court-related functions specified in paragraph (3)(a).

3. Conduct an annual base budget review and an annual budget exercise examining the total budget of each clerk of the court. The review shall examine revenues from all sources, expenses of court-related functions, and expenses of noncourt-related functions as necessary to determine that court-related revenues are not being used for noncourt-related purposes. The review and exercise shall identify potential targeted budget reductions in the percentage amount provided in Schedule VIII-B of the state’s previous year’s legislative budget instructions, as referenced in s. 216.023(3), or an equivalent schedule or instruction as may be adopted by the Legislature.

4. Identify those proposed budgets containing funding for items not included on the standard list of court-related functions specified in paragraph (3)(a).

5. Identify those clerks projected to have court-related revenues insufficient to fund their anticipated court-related expenditures.

6. Use revenue estimates based on the official estimate for funds from fees, service charges, court costs, and fines for court-related functions accruing to the clerks of the court made by the Revenue Estimating Conference, as well as any unspent budgeted funds for court-related functions carried forward by the clerks of the court from the previous county fiscal year and the balance of funds remaining in the Clerks of the Court Trust Fund after the transfer of funds to the General Revenue Fund required pursuant to s. 28.37(4)(b), plus any appropriations for the purpose of funding court-related functions.

7. Identify pay and benefit increases in any proposed clerk budget, including, but not limited to, cost of living increases, merit increases, and bonuses.

8. Identify increases in anticipated expenditures in any clerk budget that exceeds the current year budget by more than 3 percent.

9. Identify the budget of any clerk which exceeds the average budget of similarly situated clerks by more than 10 percent.

For the purposes of this paragraph, the term “unspent budgeted funds for court-related functions” means undisbursed funds included in the clerks of the courts budgets for court-related functions established pursuant to this section and s. 28.36.

(g) Developing and conducting clerk education programs.

(h) Preparing and submitting a report to the Governor, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the chairs of the legislative appropriations committees by January 1 of each year on the operations and activities of the corporation and detailing the budget development for the clerks of the court and the end-of-year reconciliation of actual expenditures versus projected expenditures for each clerk of court.

(i) Annually preparing a budget request which, notwithstanding the provisions of chapter 216 and in accordance with s. 216.351, provides the anticipated amount necessary for reimbursement pursuant to s. 40.29(6). The request for the anticipated reimbursement amount shall be submitted in the form and manner prescribed by the Justice Administrative Commission. Such request is not subject to change by the Justice Administrative Commission, except for technical changes necessary to conform to the legislative budget instructions, and shall be submitted to the Governor for transmittal to the Legislature.

(3)(a) The list of court-related functions that clerks may fund from filing fees, service charges, court costs, and fines is limited to those functions expressly authorized by law or court rule. Those functions include the following: case maintenance; records management; court preparation and attendance; processing the assignment, reopening, and reassignment of cases; processing of appeals; collection and distribution of fines, fees, service charges, and court costs; processing of bond forfeiture payments; data collection and reporting; determinations of indigent status; improving court technology; and paying reasonable administrative support costs to enable the clerk of the court to carry out these court-related functions.

(b) The list of court-related functions that clerks may not fund from filing fees, service charges, costs, and fines includes:

1. Those functions not specified within paragraph (a).

2. Functions assigned by administrative orders which are not required for the clerk to perform the functions in paragraph (a).

3. Enhanced levels of service which are not required for the clerk to perform the functions in paragraph (a).

4. Functions identified as local requirements in law or local optional programs.

(4) The corporation shall be funded pursuant to a contract with the Chief Financial Officer. Funds shall be provided to the Chief Financial Officer for such purpose as appropriated by general law. Such funds shall be available to the corporation for the performance of the duties and responsibilities set forth in this section. The corporation shall participate in the Florida Retirement System for its eligible employees as provided in chapter 121. The corporation may hire staff and pay other expenses from such funds as necessary to perform the official duties and responsibilities of the corporation as described in this section.

(5) Certified public accountants conducting audits of counties pursuant to s. 218.39 shall report, as part of the audit, whether the clerks of the courts have complied with the requirements of this section and s. 28.36. In addition, each clerk of court shall forward a copy of the financial audit to the Florida Clerks of Court Operations Corporation. The Auditor General shall develop a compliance supplement for the audit of compliance with the budgets and applicable workload performance standards certified by the corporation.

History.—s. 36, ch. 2003-402; s. 23, ch. 2004-265; s. 2, ch. 2005-2; s. 2, ch. 2006-312; s. 9, ch. 2008-111; s. 3, ch. 2009-204; s. 3, ch. 2011-52; s. 6, ch. 2013-44; s. 1, ch. 2014-183; s. 3, ch. 2017-126; s. 4, ch. 2019-15; s. 2, ch. 2019-58; s. 8, ch. 2020-2; s. 5, ch. 2021-116; s. 2, ch. 2022-201; s. 4, ch. 2024-153.

F.S. 28.35 on Google Scholar

F.S. 28.35 on Casetext

Amendments to 28.35

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 28.35

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 28.35.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 28.35

Total Results: 20

C. GIOVANNI MUENTES a/k/a CARLOS G. MUENTES and MICHELE RUIZ v. BRUCE ROSENWATER & ASSOCIATES, P.A.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-01-10T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: See Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wolfson, 299 So. 3d 28, 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (under the doctrine of noscitur

Florida Department of Revenue and Florida Department etc. v. Brenda Forman, in her official capacity as the Clerk etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-05-16T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: statute, are not constitutional requirements. See § 28.35(2)(d), Fla. Stat.; see also Citizens for Strong

Marcy Nicole Overstreet, Wife v. Dwayne Stanley Overstreet, Husband

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-04-25T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: illegitimacy. See Sullivan v. Sapp, 866 So. 2d 28, 35-37 (Fla. 2004) (detailing post-Beagle holdings

Louis Baccari v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-08-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 145 So. 3d 958, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13411, 2014 WL 4209227

Snippet: citation omitted); Crist v. Bretz, 487 U.S. 28, 35-36, 98 S.Ct. 2156, 57 L.Ed.2d 24 (1978) (“The reason

Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. United States

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-03-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 134 So. 3d 894, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 104, 2014 WL 959180, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 933

Snippet: certainly does not currently exist. See id. at 18-28, 35-40. Additionally, despite the Legislature’s and… caps and reduced malpractice premiums.” Id. at 28, 35. 13. See concurring in result op. at

Hall v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-06-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 118 So. 3d 847, 2013 WL 3014972, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9649

Snippet: ”) (relying on Leinberger v. Webster, 66 F.R.D. 28, 35 (E.D.N.Y.1975)) (“In sum, this is a Vermont case

Dennis v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-12-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 109 So. 3d 680, 2012 WL 6619282

Snippet: n. 12 (Fla.2006); Phillips v. State, 894 So.2d 28, 35 n. 6 (Fla.2004). Second, Dennis has failed to point

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2011-03-15T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 70-46 (1970). 15 See ss. 28.35 — 28.37, Fla. Stat. Florida

Hernandez v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-12-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 56 So. 3d 752, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 714, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 2083, 2010 WL 4977481

Snippet: When converted into metric units, one ounce equals 28.35 grams. See Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary

Nicholas v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-07-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 47 So. 3d 297, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10838, 2010 WL 2925114

Snippet: announcing a verdict. Crist v. Bretz, 437 U.S. 28, 35-36, 98 S.Ct. 2156, 57 L.Ed.2d 24 (1978) (footnote

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2008-01-30T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: Attorney General BM/tgh 1 I would note that section 28.35(4)(a), Florida Statutes, also ensures that the court-related

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2007-11-20T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: that compensation is provided by law.7 Section 28.35(4)(a), Florida Statutes, contains a limited list…In light of the language of sections 28.246 and 28.35, Florida Statutes, it is my opinion that the clerk…court costs, and fines" as provided in section 28.35(4)(a), Florida Statutes. Question Two In light of… of your second question is required. 1 Section 28.35(2)(c), Fla. Stat. 2 See Art. VIII, s. 1(d), Fla.

Morris v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2006-04-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 931 So. 2d 821

Snippet: direct appeal. See Phillips v. State, 894 So.2d 28, 35 & n. 6 (Fla.2004) (concluding that defendant

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 2006-01-16T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: list of court-related functions." 3 See s. 28.35(4)(b), Fla. Stat. 4 Section 925.08(1), Fla. Stat

In re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2005-10-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 913 So. 2d 545, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 672, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1987, 2005 WL 2456192

Snippet: Fla.1996); see also Sullivan v. Sapp, 866 So.2d 28, 35-38 (Fla.2004) (discussing this Court’s case law

Robinson v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2005-07-07T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 913 So. 2d 514

Snippet: on direct appeal, Phillips v. State, 894 So.2d 28, 35 n. 6 (Fla.2004), and this Court has repeatedly

Heggs v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-02-16T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 759 So. 2d 620

Snippet: See Ch. 95-184, §§ 26-27, at 1716-18. Sections 28-35. These sections amend various statutes relating …compensation for crime victims. See Ch. 95-184, §§ 28-35, at 1718-22. For example, section 28 amends section

Mangoni v. Temkin

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-09-25T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 679 So. 2d 1286

Snippet: child that the procedure had taken place. Id. at 28, 35. The court found that the doctor-patient relationship

Hyatt Corp. v. Howarth

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-05-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 678 So. 2d 823

Snippet: 1980) (quoting Leinberger v. Webster, 66 F.R.D. 28, 35 (E.D.N.Y.1975)), pet. for review denied, 399 So

Lund v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-08-15T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 658 So. 2d 679

Snippet: substantially amended this legislation. See Ch. 95-184, §§ 28-35, Laws of Florida. See generally Lincoln v. Florida