CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 399663
...ers protected under Rule 3.216(a), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, and Hamilton; see also McKinniss v. State,
439 So.2d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). We recognize that the County is no longer responsible for funding Rule 3.216 expert appointments, see §
29.019, Florida Statutes (2005), and that perhaps the Nolasco procedure will change. However, the changes did not take effect until July 1, 2004, after the Orders at issue in the instant case were entered. §
29.019, Fla....
...CONCLUSION The State's Petition for Certiorari is granted in part, the Writ of Prohibition is granted, and the matter remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. NOTES [1] We decline to address what the proper procedure should be in light of the changes to section 29.019, Florida Statutes, however, it seems if the State Attorney's office is the party receiving notice of the request for expert appointment, the purpose of Rule 3.216 is thwarted....
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14321
McQuillin, The Law of Municipal Corporations § 29.19 (3d Ed.1966)). As in the instant case the contract
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
AffirmedRobbie (1983)phrase: "affirmed by"