Florida Statute 30.1 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 30
SHERIFFS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 30.01

30.01 Bond of sheriffs; small counties.—In each county of the state having a population of 150,000 or less according to the last state census, the sheriff shall give bond as required by the board of county commissioners of the county, to be filed with the clerk of the circuit court and be conditioned upon the faithful discharge of the duties of his or her office. When a sheriff is appointed to fill a vacancy, a bond may not be a prerequisite to succession in office; however, if the county commission requires a bond for the office of sheriff, the commission shall allow a period of 10 days after the effective date of the appointment in which the bond may be provided.

History.—ss. 1, 4, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 1237; GS 1666; RGS 2871; CGL 4568; s. 1, ch. 17754, 1937; s. 1, ch. 20719, 1941; ss. 10, 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 171, ch. 95-147; s. 14, ch. 95-312; s. 10, ch. 98-34.

F.S. 30.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.01 on CourtListener

Amendments to 30.01

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 30.01

Total Results: 24

United States v. Banks

347 F.3d 1266, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 21197, 2003 WL 22383612

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 20, 2003 | Docket: 39748

Cited 44 times | Published

officer before posting bond (which distinguishes § 30.1, cmt. n. 4(h)). While providing a false name and

Holland v. Mayes

19 So. 2d 709, 155 Fla. 129, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 486

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1944 | Docket: 3267136

Cited 40 times | Published

sheriff responsible for their negligent acts. Section 30.01, same statutes, requires the sheriff to post

United States v. Winton Gardiner

955 F.2d 1492, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5046, 1992 WL 41269

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 23, 1992 | Docket: 1093600

Cited 37 times | Published

basis for application of this provision”); U.S.S.G. § 30.1, appl. note 1 (1990) ("A defendant’s denial of

Hard Candy, LLC v. Anastasia Beverly Hills, Inc.

921 F.3d 1343

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 23, 2019 | Docket: 14983633

Cited 33 times | Published

5 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 30:1 (5th ed. 2018) [hereinafter "McCarthy"] (describing

United States v. Ralph Reginald Cain

881 F.2d 980, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12005, 1989 WL 90077

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 11, 1989 | Docket: 648132

Cited 32 times | Published

obstructed the administration of justice under § 30.1. Accordingly he may not have been entitled to a

Metropolitan Dade County v. Dillon

305 So. 2d 36

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1974 | Docket: 2518527

Cited 30 times | Published

appellees introduced two county ordinances, Section 30-1(46) and 30-27 of the Metropolitan Dade County

F.W.F., Inc. v. Detroit Diesel Corp.

494 F. Supp. 2d 1342, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48953, 2007 WL 1875785

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2007 | Docket: 2518704

Cited 20 times | Published

resorting to extrinsic evidence. 11 LORD, supra, § 30:1 (footnotes omitted). When applying the rules of

Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Demario

661 So. 2d 319, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9369, 1995 WL 521106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1995 | Docket: 1526360

Cited 20 times | Published

DCA 1993)(quoting Manual on Complex Litigation 2d § 30.1 (1985)). That is so because the granting of class

Barton-Malow Co. v. Bauer

627 So. 2d 1233, 1993 WL 496041

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1993 | Docket: 1553240

Cited 10 times | Published

in the case." Manual on Complex Litigation 2d, § 30.1 (1985) (1-Pt. 2 Moore's Federal Practice (Sam C

Alford v. Finch

155 So. 2d 790

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 1963 | Docket: 1517460

Cited 10 times | Published

establish refuges is defined by Article IV, Section 30 (1), Florida Constitution,[11] which prescribes

CENTRAK NAT. BANK OF MIAMI v. Central Bancorp., Inc.

411 So. 2d 358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1982 | Docket: 1697074

Cited 8 times | Published

124 (1975). We find no provision in 12 U.S.C.A. § 30[1] or any other section of the National Banking Act

Perlman v. Prudential Ins. Co.

686 So. 2d 1378, 1997 WL 20519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1997 | Docket: 1676223

Cited 5 times | Published

and Policy § 2 (1981); 5 Couch on Insurance 2d § 30:1 (Rev. ed 1984); see also Leggett v. Missouri State

Ek v. Department of Children and Family

948 So. 2d 54, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 183, 2007 WL 57571

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2007 | Docket: 1769649

Cited 4 times | Published

father abandoned the child within the meaning of section 30.01(1), Florida Statutes (2004), by failing to provide

B.J. v. Department of Children & Families

190 So. 3d 191, 2016 WL 1578492, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 2016 | Docket: 3055576

Cited 2 times | Published

significantly impaired.,., 5 .Fla. Stat. § 30.01(15)(f): "Child who is found to be dependent” means

James Farmer v. State of Florida

268 So. 3d 1009

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2019 | Docket: 15013083

Cited 1 times | Published

5 50 U.S.C. § 3803. 6 See Ala. Code § 30-1-5 (2018); Alaska Stat. § 20.05.171 (2018); Ariz

Mucktaru Kemokai v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 2, 2023 | Docket: 67846551

Published

guilty of larceny.” Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 30(1). The statute merges, into one statutory

Edwin R. Banks v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 2022 | Docket: 63397425

Published

1395pp(a)(2); see also 42 C.F.R. § 411.404; MCPM ch. 30, § 30.1. That makes it even more speculative that Banks’s

State of Florida v. Brian K. McKenzie

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2021 | Docket: 60416614

Published

2000))); Philip J. Padovano, Florida Civil Practice § 30:1 (2021 ed.) (“Mandamus is a 1. It stands

United States v. Bryan Evan Singer

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 26, 2020 | Docket: 17297983

Published

illegal shipments prior to exportation.” 15 C.F.R. § 30.1(b). The Department of Homeland Security, Customs

M.M. v. State

187 So. 3d 300, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3352, 2016 WL 830365

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2016 | Docket: 60254036

Published

manufacture, ornament, or use.” Texas Penal Code -Ann, § 30.01(2) (West 1974).. Milton argued that he did not

M.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 2016 | Docket: 3045467

Published

manufacture, ornament, or use.” Texas Penal Code Ann. § 30.01(2) (West 1974). Milton argued that he did not violate

In re Florida Board of Bar Examiners

397 So. 2d 590, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4464

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 1980 | Docket: 64582181

Published

RULE-4-V ARTICLE II REGISTRATION OF LAW STUDENTS Section 30 1. Every person intending to apply for admission

Goldstein v. State

223 So. 2d 354, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5659

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1969 | Docket: 64510113

Published

very Chapter 30 itself, more particularly in Section 30-1(55): ‘Traffic. Pedestrians, ridden or herded

Florio v. State

192 So. 2d 289, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4614

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1966 | Docket: 64498768

Published

ordered. . The Code of Metropolitan Dade County, § 30-1(34) defines police officer as follows: “Every officer