Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 30.02 (2025)
Bond of sheriffs; large counties.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
30.02 Bond of sheriffs; large counties.—In each county in the state having a population in excess of 150,000 according to the last state census, the sheriff shall give bond as required by the board of county commissioners, to be filed with the clerk of the circuit court and be conditioned upon the faithful discharge of the duties of his or her office. When a sheriff is appointed to fill a vacancy, a bond may not be a prerequisite to succession in office; however, if the county commission requires a bond for the office of sheriff, the commission shall allow a period of 10 days after the effective date of the appointment in which the bond may be provided.
History.—ss. 1, 4, ch. 3724, 1887; RS 1237; GS 1666; RGS 2871; CGL 4568; s. 1, ch. 17754, 1937; ss. 10, 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 172, ch. 95-147; s. 15, ch. 95-312; s. 11, ch. 98-34.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1982–2019 · leading case: State v. Hicks, 421 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1982).
State v. Hicks, 421 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1982). “Penal Code § 30.02 (1974); Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-202 (1978); Wash.”
Bonifay v. Dickson, 459 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). “WILLIAMS, as a good and valid fee simple title, free and clear of any and all rights, titles or claims of the Defendants named herein, and the said Defendants named herein, be and they are hereby, forever barred and foreclosed of all rights, titles, interests and claims in and…”
Drew v. State, 773 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 2000). “There, the court emphasized that the focus of the inquiry as to burglary should be on the "breaking of" or removing of things from an enclosed or interior area: Because "enter" is defined exactly the same for burglary of a building or habitation as it is for burglary of a…”
Roberts v. Gordy, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1231 (S.D. Fla. 2019). “]"); (DE 228 at 3 FN 3) (" '[W]riter's share' refers to the percentage of the income generated from the exploitation of the musical composition that is payable to the writer(s) of the musical composition, irrespective of who owns the copyright in such musical composition.”
Overstreet v. United States (M.D. Fla. 2019). “Penal Code § 30.02(a) (1983, 1986). At the time of sentencing, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals treated the Texas burglary statute as divisible, with § 30.”
Delgado v. State, 776 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 2000). “§ 30.02 (West 1994); Va.Code Ann. § 18.2-90 (Michie Supp.”
Davis v. State, 988 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). “Penal Code § 30.02(a)(1); De Albuquerque v. State, 712 S.”
— 30.02(a) — 1 case
Overstreet v. United States (M.D. Fla. 2019). “Penal Code § 30.02(a) (1983, 1986). At the time of sentencing, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals treated the Texas burglary statute as divisible, with § 30.”
— 30.02(a)(1) — 2 cases
Overstreet v. United States (M.D. Fla. 2019). “Penal Code § 30.02(a) (1983, 1986). At the time of sentencing, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals treated the Texas burglary statute as divisible, with § 30.”
Davis v. State, 988 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). “Penal Code § 30.02(a)(1); De Albuquerque v. State, 712 S.”
— 30.02(a)(2) — 1 case
Overstreet v. United States (M.D. Fla. 2019). “Penal Code § 30.02(a) (1983, 1986). At the time of sentencing, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals treated the Texas burglary statute as divisible, with § 30.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.