CopyCited 110 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1230, 101 A.L.R. Fed. 361, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1016
see 12 U.S.C. § 24 (Fifth); O.C.G.A. § 34-7-1 (1981), he had no constitutionally protected
CopyCited 64 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 721, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6631, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39, 028, 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1490, 1989 WL 42393
2 1. Salary Per Annum O.C.G.A. § 34-7-1 provides as follows: If a contract of employment
CopyCited 50 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 16 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1445, 30 Fed. R. Serv. 641, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10160, 1990 WL 76486
property interest in continued employment. Section 34-7-1 of the Official Code of Georgia provides:
CopyCited 46 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1040, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20982
employment will be considered "at will," see O.C.G.A. § 34-7-1 (1992),13 its impact is undercut by the lack
CopyCited 30 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 14 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 514, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12594, 1989 WL 88358
contract to the hospital in violation of O.C.G.A. § 34-7-1.” Id. at 589, 359 S.E.2d at 450. Wofford and
CopyCited 13 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 30 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1257, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9989, 2010 WL 1947011
Supp.2d 1358, 1376 (N.D.Ga.1998) (citing O.C.G.A. § 34-7-1). The district court did not err by granting
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1999 CCH OSHD 31, 868, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 16539, 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 778
“terminated at will by either party,” Ga.Code Ann. § 34-7-1, informs or . affects our analysis of this issue
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1999 WL 506716
wrongful termination. Id. See also Ga.Code. Ann. § 34-7-1 (providing that "[a]n indefinite hiring
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18975, 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40, 253, 2000 WL 1099171
termination. Id. See also Ga.Code. Ann. § 34-7-1 (providing that “[a]n indefinite hiring may be
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1993 WL 290930
employment will be considered “at will,” see O.C.G.A. § 34-7-1 (1992),13 its impact is undercut by the lack
CopyCited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
wrongful termination. Id. See also Ga. Code. Ann. § 34-7-1 (providing that “[a]n indefinite hiring may be
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Argued: May 16, 2023
Commercial Code: Practitioner Treatise Se- ries § 34:7 (6th ed. 2023); accord 51 Am. Jur. 2d Liens § 79
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
without due process of law.22 Pursuant to O.C. G.A. § 34-7-1, the court found that an indefinite hiring in
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
be terminated at will by either party, O.C.G.A. § 34-7-1, and an employer may discharge an at-will employee
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14546
...Thereafter, at a second meeting held on May 7, 1973, the resultant ordinance was submitted to the full five-member commission for final adoption and was unanimously passed. Now the difficulty arises herein because of ambiguities patent in the applicable provisions of the city code. Section 34.07(6) thereof provides for the public hearing aforesaid. Paragraph (d) of that subsection provides: “The public hearing shall be held and the city commission shall rule upon the proposed [annexation and zoning] at the conclusion of the public hearing:” (Italics ours.) The next following subsection, § 34.07(7), relating to the eventuality of protests, provides : “In case . . . of a protest against such [proposal] . . . [it] shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of three-fourths (}i) of the city commission.” (Italics ours.) Finally, the next succeeding subsection of § 34.07, i....
...more fully discuss later, we think he erred in concluding that a three-fourths vote was required at the conclusion of the public hearing, i. e., at the first stage. No matter what happened at that stage, and notwithstanding that subparagraph (d) of § 34.07(6) of the code, supra, provides that the city commission “shall rule” upon the proposed amendment or change “at the conclusion” thereof, such ruling would not be “effective” as an annexation or zoning in any event until it was reduced to ordinance as provided by subsection (8) of § 34.07, supra....
...d in ordinance form for final passage or adoption thereof at the second stage of the proceedings. The presence of a mere quorum and three *583 votes are all that is necessary for that purpose. 1 We now hold that the three-fourths vote required under § 34.07(7), supra, to make the annexation and zoning proposal “effective” must be of the full city commission....
CopyPublished | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
25 knowledge of incompetency.” O.C.G.A. § 34-7-20.28 “The appellate courts [of Georgia] have
CopyPublished | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal
...ocedures and administrative plans.” Fla, R. Jud. Admin. 2.215(b)(2) (emphasis added). Pursuant to section
26.49, Florida Statutes (2016), “[t]he sheriff of the county shall be the executive officer of the circuit court of the county.” See also §
34.07, Fla....