Florida Statute 35.2 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 35
DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 35.02

35.02 First Appellate District.—The First Appellate District is composed of the First, Second, Third, Eighth, and Fourteenth Judicial Circuits.

History.—s. 1, ch. 57-248; s. 1, ch. 65-294; s. 1, ch. 79-413; s. 5, ch. 2022-163.

F.S. 35.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 35.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 35.02

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 35.02

Total Results: 10

Grech v. Clayton County, GA

335 F.3d 1326, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13575, 2003 WL 21521761

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 7, 2003 | Docket: 397738

Cited 362 times | Published

State Patrol. See O.C.G.A. § 35-3-3 et seq. (GBI); § 35-2-30 et seq. (GSP). . See Hannah v. State, 212

United States v. Charles Gilbert Hardy and Buddy Huffman, Jr.

855 F.2d 753

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 4, 1988 | Docket: 618372

Cited 121 times | Published

violations of the criminal laws of this state.” O.C.G.A. § 35-2-32(b). I agree with the sentence on page 17 of

D.L. Day, Nick Ceh v. John T. Taylor, E. Joseph Shoen, U-Haul International, Inc., Republic Western Insurance Company, U-Haul Company of Pennsylvania, Inc., D.L. Day, P.C. Boyle, J.D. Swope v. John T. Taylor, E. Joseph Shoen, U-Haul International, Inc., Republic Western Insurance Company, U-Haul Company of Pennsylvania, Inc.

400 F.3d 1272

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 22, 2005 | Docket: 346960

Cited 105 times | Published

relationship. See 12 S. Williston, Williston on Contracts § 35:2 (4th ed.1999). We are not bound by the legal conclusions

Epps v. State

354 So. 2d 441

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1978 | Docket: 1682126

Cited 15 times | Published

by some affirmative fact." 15A C.J.S. Conspiracy § 35(2) (1967). For example, a defendant's contention

Doolin v. State

650 So. 2d 44, 1995 WL 25338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1995 | Docket: 1346566

Cited 4 times | Published

"act," with a citation to 15A C.J.S. Conspiracy § 35(2) (1967). The rule stated in C.J.S. correctly uses

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice v. Hallam

185 So. 3d 1284, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2870, 2016 WL 746293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2016 | Docket: 60253544

Published

Juvenile Det. Ctr. v. T.O., 684 So.2d 814 (Fla.1996); § 35.02, Fla. Stat. (2015).

D.L. Day v. John T. Taylor

400 F.3d 1272, 2005 WL 407410

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 22, 2005 | Docket: 398241

Published

S. Williston, Williston on Contracts § 35:2 (4th ed.1999). We are not bound by the legal conclusions

Eastern Airlines & GAB v. Griffin

654 So. 2d 1194, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3375, 1995 WL 141137

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1995 | Docket: 64756340

Published

diligence to ascertain them.” 83 C.J.S. Stipulations § 35(2), at 91 (1953). I have no quarrel with the decision

Alabama Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

22 F.3d 270

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 3, 1994 | Docket: 64016944

Published

issue is the regulation set forth at 18 C.F.R. § 35.2(c) (1993), which defines the term “filing date”

K.K.P. v. State

580 So. 2d 307, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4811, 1991 WL 85519

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1991 | Docket: 64658997

Published

Fourth, Eighth and Fourteenth Judicial Circuits. § 35.02, Fla.Stat. (1989). With certain exceptions not