Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 35.26 (2025)
Marshal of district court; appointment; duties.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
35.26 Marshal of district court; appointment; duties.—
(1) Each of the district courts of appeal shall appoint a marshal who shall hold office during the pleasure of the court.
(2) He or she shall have the power to execute the process of the court throughout the state, and in any county may deputize the sheriff or a deputy sheriff for such purpose.
(3) The marshal shall, under the direction of the district court of appeal be custodian of the headquarters occupied by the court and shall perform such other duties as directed by the court.
(4) The marshal and his or her assistants shall be the conservators of the peace in the headquarters of the district court of appeal, or in any building in which the district court of appeal is sitting, and shall apprehend, without warrant, any person disturbing the peace and deliver that person to the appropriate law enforcement officer of the municipality or county in which further proceedings may be held according to law.
(5) The marshal and his or her assistants shall attend and successfully complete a minimum standards training program approved by the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission within the Department of Law Enforcement.
History.—s. 1, ch. 57-248; s. 2, ch. 80-145; s. 5, ch. 83-167; s. 204, ch. 95-147; s. 4, ch. 95-325.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Raulerson v. State of Florida (Fla. 1st DCA 2025).
Raulerson v. State of Florida (Fla. 1st DCA 2025). “(providing that “all judicial officers in this state shall be conservators of the peace”); compare § 35.26, Fla. Stat. (making the marshal and deputy marshals for the district court of appeal “conservators of the peace” where the court “is sitting”; authorizing apprehension of,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.