Cases from cite.case.law:

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 137 So. 3d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . § 38.04, Texas Penal Code (2002). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. ROBLES,, 557 F. App'x 355 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . Texas Penal Code section 38.04 — Evading Arrest or Detention — provides that “[a] person commits an offense . . . Section 38.04(a). . . . Because the plain text of section 38.04(a) “does not define separate offenses (or ‘allowable units of . . . See id. at 779 (“Under appellant’s construction of Article 38.04(a), therefore, a person would commit . . .

UNITED STATES v. HOOVER, III,, 548 F. App'x 300 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . in determining his prior conviction for evading arrest with a motor vehicle under Texas Penal Code § 38.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. STANDBERRY,, 546 F. App'x 381 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . the Texas offense of evading arrest or detention using a vehicle in violation of Texas Penal Code § 38.04 . . . Harrimon, 568 F.3d 531, 532-33, 536 (5th Cir.2009), we held that a § 38.04(b)(1) offense is a violent . . .

B. KEALOHA, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS U. S. i Co., 713 F.3d 521 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . Larson, 2 Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law § 38.04 (2011); Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. . . .

UNITED STATES v. VARGAS- SOTO,, 700 F.3d 180 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 38.04(b)(1). . . . We recently held that a conviction under Section 38.04(b)(1) is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § . . .

ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE, LLC, v. J. BURTLE,, 492 F. App'x 666 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . tracts of 40.69 acres and 20.24 acres, and Richard Watts is the trustee of a trust owning two tracts of 38.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HOUSTON,, 471 F. App'x 308 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . that his 2003 Texas offense of evading arrest or detention using a vehicle in violation of Section 38.04 . . . Harrimon, 568 F.3d 531, 532-33, 536 (5th Cir.2009), we held that a § 38.04(b)(1) offense is a violent . . . Penal Code Ann. § 38.04(b)(1) (2003), he argues that the elements of his offense did not include any . . .

SOTELO- SOTO, v. H. HOLDER, Jr. U. S., 463 F. App'x 300 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . his prior conviction for evading arrest or detention with a motor vehicle under Texas Penal Code § 38.04 . . . this court held that a Texas conviction for evading arrest or detention with a motor vehicle under § 38.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WHITFIELD,, 451 F. App'x 415 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . Penal Code § 38.04(b)(1) and (b)(2)(B) (2003). . . .

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY v. STONEBRIDGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,, 797 F. Supp. 2d 534 (E.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . performance of ‘professional services.’ ” 4 New Appleman Insurance Law Practice Guide §§ 38.05, 38.02, & 38.04 . . .

SYKES v. UNITED STATES, 564 U.S. 1 (U.S. 2011)

. . . . §38.04 (West 2011); Utah Code Ann. §76-8-305.5 (Lexis 2008). . . .

MARCUS SYKES, v. UNITED STATES, 180 L. Ed. 2d 60 (U.S. 2011)

. . . . § 38.04 (West 2011); Utah Code Ann. § 76-8-305.5 (Lexis 2008). . . .

GLENN DEFENSE MARINE ASIA PTE LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 97 Fed. Cl. 568 (Fed. Cl. 2011)

. . . AR Tab 38.04, at 17627. [* * *]. . . . AR Tab 38.04, at 17622; see AR Tab 30, at 11492. . . . AR Tab 38.04, at 17623-24; AR Tab 30, at 11639. II. . . . AR Tab 11, at 5910; AR Tab 38.04, at 17622. . . . AR Tab 11, at 5910; AR Tab 38.04, at 17622. . . .

UNITED STATES v. Du- BANKS,, 409 F. App'x 749 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . prior Texas conviction for evading arrest with a motor vehicle, in violation of Texas Penal Code § 38.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SANCHEZ- LEDEZMA,, 630 F.3d 447 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 38.04(b)(1) (West 2003). . . . While Harrimon concerned the analysis of section 38.04(b)(1) as a “violent felony” under a different . . . Discussion The sole question presented by this case is whether an offense under section 38.04(b)(1) of . . . In relevant part, the version of section 38.04 of the Texas Penal Code under which Sanchez-Ledezma was . . . Penal Code Ann. § 38.04 (West Supp.2010)). . . . .

BADEN- WINTERWOOD, v. LIFE TIME FITNESS INC., 729 F. Supp. 2d 965 (S.D. Ohio 2010)

. . . the following: I. 10 hours for 5 weeks The first 6 overtime hours: $12.68 x .5 = $6.34 x 6 hours = $38.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ASKEW,, 384 F. App'x 504 (7th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 38.04(a), (b)(1)). . . .

PULIDO- ALATORRE, v. H. HOLDER, Jr. U. S., 381 F. App'x 355 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . Penal Code § 38.04 is a CIMT; (3) whether he is eligible for cancellation of removal; (4) whether he . . . Penal Code 38.04(a), was a CIMT. . . . Section 38.04 of the Texas Criminal Code provides: (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally . . .

SKF USA INC. SKF S. A. SKF S. A. S. SKF SKF S. p. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 675 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . bearings from Germany, and 7.05% on ball bearings from Italy, would have been -13.17%, -25.38%, and -38.04% . . .

SKF USA SKF S. A. SKF S. A. S. SKF SKF S. p. A. v., 33 Ct. Int'l Trade 1866 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . bearings from Germany, and 7.05% on ball bearings from Italy, would have been -13.17%, -25.38%, and -38.04% . . .

UNITED STATES v. TYLER,, 580 F.3d 722 (8th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 38.04 (using the term “flees” without defining it); Utah Code Ann. § 41-6a-210 (requiring that the . . .

UNITED STATES v. COLLIER,, 331 F. App'x 309 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Harrimon, 568 F.3d 531, 532 (5th Cir.2009), which held that a violation of Texas Penal Code § 38.04(b . . .

UNITED STATES v. HARRIMON,, 568 F.3d 531 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: In this case we consider whether a violation of Texas Penal Code § 38.04(b) . . . for evading arrest or detention by use of a vehicle (“fleeing by vehicle”) in violation of section 38.04 . . . Penal Code 38.04(a). . . . Thus, in determining whether fleeing by vehicle as defined in Texas Penal Code § 38.04 is a violent felony . . . Section 38.04 of the Texas Penal Code provides that: (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRIESTLEY,, 269 F. App'x 349 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 38.04(a), (b)(1) (Vernon 2001). . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. Lt. A. STROCK, H. LLC,, 495 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . — each of which yields a different amount e.g., the estimated impacts for Sunshine Rock range from 38.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. LEE,, 188 F. App'x 326 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . Pen.Code § 38.04; Ester v. State, 151 S.W.3d 660, 664 (Tex.App.2004). . . .

CITY CRESCENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. UNITED STATES,, 71 Fed. Cl. 797 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . GSA under Supplemental Lease Agreement No. 4 were $30.27/square foot for a 10-year extension, and $38.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BATTIN,, 484 F. Supp. 2d 570 (W.D. Tex. 2006)

. . . . § 38.04(b)(1) (Vernon 2003). . . .

M. BARLOW, MONCEBAIZ, v. OWENS, II,, 400 F. Supp. 2d 980 (S.D. Tex. 2005)

. . . . § 38.04 (Vernon 2003) also makes it a misdemeanor to flee from a peace officer who is trying lawfully . . .

ENTERASYS NETWORKS, INC. v. GULF INSURANCE COMPANY, 364 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.N.H. 2005)

. . . Miller, Comprehensive GAAP Guide, at 38.04 (1979). Consove v. . . .

FLORES, v. CITY OF PALACIOS,, 381 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 38.04(a) (Vernon 2003). . . . suspect’s flight from a police officer generates probable cause to arrest the suspect under section 38.04 . . .

W. GOODSON, v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI B. J. F. V., 202 F.3d 730 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . Penal Code § 38.04(a). The parties dispute whether Goodson fled. . . . Goodson fled, Gaines and Perez would not have had probable cause to believe that Goodson was violating § 38.04 . . . Penal Code § 38.04(a). . . . .

GIPSON v. CALLAHAN, L. W. D., 18 F. Supp. 2d 662 (W.D. Tex. 1997)

. . . . § 38.04. . . . challenging his prosecution and conviction for Evading Arrest or Detention under Texas Penal Code § 38.04 . . .

HARPER, a v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, P., 21 F.3d 597 (5th Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 38.04 (Vernon Supp.1993). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MOORE,, 997 F.2d 30 (5th Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 38.04(a) (Vernon 1989). .The maximum penalty for evading arrest is six months plus a fine and the . . .

VITOL TRADING S. A. INC. v. SGS CONTROL SERVICES, INC., 680 F. Supp. 559 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . on the “hand blend” and measured the parcel A N + A content to be 48.26 per cent and parcel B to be 38.04 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 458 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 1984)

. . . That procedural requirement is a feature of sections 38.02, 38.04 and 38.10, Florida Statutes (1983), . . .

SIKES, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a, 429 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . That note provides: “This rule replaces the procedural parts of §§ 38.02, 38.04 and 38.10, F.S. and unifies . . .

H. CARTER, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., 691 F.2d 777 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . Article 38.04 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure states that except for legally mandated presumptions . . .

In ROCO CORPORATION, d b a CONSOVE, v. COHEN, d b a, 21 B.R. 429 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 1982)

. . . Miller, Comprehensive GAAP Guide, at 38.04 (1979). . . . Miller, Comprehensive GAAP Guide, at 38.04-05 (1979). . . .

SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. a v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, A., 464 F. Supp. 302 (C.D. Cal. 1979)

. . . amendment to the existing [antitrust] legislation.” 6 von Kalinowski Antitrust Laws & Trade Regulation § 38.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ESPINOZA, Jr., 481 F.2d 553 (5th Cir. 1973)

. . . Count one of the indictment charged Gonzales and Robelin, but not appellant, with distributing 38.04 . . .

In CAPITANO, Sr., 315 F. Supp. 105 (E.D. La. 1970)

. . . somewhat relaxed in view of the summary nature of the bankruptcy hearings, 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 38.04 . . .

ROSS TRUSTEES v. BERNHARD, 396 U.S. 531 (U.S. 1970)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 38.04 [1], n. 40. . . .

WHITAKER, v. HARVELL- KILGORE CORPORATION WHITAKER, v. HARVELL- KILGORE CORPORATION, 418 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1969)

. . . Republic Aviation Corp., 180 F.Supp. 31 (1959) ; 3 Frumer & Friedman, Product Liability § 38.04. . . . .

L. E. v., 51 T.C. 746 (T.C. 1969)

. . . [Bittker & Eustice, supra at 42] See generally 7 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, secs. 38.04 . . .

Co. v., 2 Ct. Cust. 444 (C.C.P.A. 1912)

. . . -importation, if the assessment be computed without deduction therefor, would be $38.04; that is to say . . . contains impurities which if it be classified as “clear almonds, shelled,” will cause the importer to pay $38.04 . . .