47.071

Jurisdiction over navigable waters.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

47.071 Jurisdiction over navigable waters.—When the territorial jurisdiction of a court extends to one bank of any navigable water, such court has jurisdiction across such navigable water from shore to shore. If the territorial jurisdiction of different courts, whether of the same county or not, extends to the opposite bank of any navigable water, such courts have concurrent jurisdiction across said navigable water from shore to shore.

History.—RS 1002; GS 1387; RGS 2583; CGL 4223; s. 3, ch. 67-254.

Note.—Former s. 46.06.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1975–1988 · leading case: BD. OF TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL v. Walker Ranch

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

BD. OF TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL v. Walker Ranch (1986) fladistctapp · cites it 4× “[5] Walker's argument concerning the administrative and policing problems that would arise due to the exposure of the land if the low water mark were not the county boundary is rebutted by section 47.071, Florida Statutes (1985), [6] which provides for concurrent jurisdiction…”

Lightsey v. Williams (1988) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “[2] Section 47.071, Florida Statutes (1987).”

Hendry Corp. v. State Bd. of Trustees of Int. Imp. Tr. F. (1975) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “*455 We reject the appellee's contention that the common law local action rule is overridden by Fla. Stat. § 47.071 [2] which confers jurisdiction in the Hillsborough County Circuit Court, concurrent with the court in Manatee County, from shore to shore of Tampa Bay.”

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Magee (1980) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “ANSTEAD, Judge, dissenting: Although I am sympathetic with the result reached by the majority, it is difficult to square that result with the provisions of Chapter 47, the venue statute, and specifically Section 47.071 thereof which provides: Jurisdiction over navigable waters.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.