Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 48.193 (2025)
Acts subjecting person to jurisdiction of courts of state.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
48.193 Acts subjecting person to jurisdiction of courts of state.—
(1)(a) A person, whether or not a citizen or resident of this state, who personally or through an agent does any of the acts enumerated in this subsection thereby submits himself or herself and, if he or she is a natural person, his or her personal representative to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state for any cause of action arising from any of the following acts:
1. Operating, conducting, engaging in, or carrying on a business or business venture in this state or having an office or agency in this state.
2. Committing a tortious act within this state.
3. Owning, using, possessing, or holding a mortgage or other lien on any real property within this state.
4. Contracting to insure a person, property, or risk located within this state at the time of contracting.
5. With respect to a proceeding for alimony, child support, or division of property in connection with an action to dissolve a marriage or with respect to an independent action for support of dependents, maintaining a matrimonial domicile in this state at the time of the commencement of this action or, if the defendant resided in this state preceding the commencement of the action, whether cohabiting during that time or not. This paragraph does not change the residency requirement for filing an action for dissolution of marriage.
6. Causing injury to persons or property within this state arising out of an act or omission by the defendant outside this state, if, at or about the time of the injury, either:
a. The defendant was engaged in solicitation or service activities within this state; or
b. Products, materials, or things processed, serviced, or manufactured by the defendant anywhere were used or consumed within this state in the ordinary course of commerce, trade, or use.
7. Breaching a contract in this state by failing to perform acts required by the contract to be performed in this state.
8. With respect to a proceeding for paternity, engaging in the act of sexual intercourse within this state with respect to which a child may have been conceived.
9. Entering into a contract that complies with s. 685.102.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, an order issued, or a penalty or fine imposed, by an agency of another state is not enforceable against any person or entity incorporated or having its principal place of business in this state if the other state does not provide a mandatory right of review of the agency decision in a state court of competent jurisdiction.
(2) A defendant who is engaged in substantial and not isolated activity within this state, whether such activity is wholly interstate, intrastate, or otherwise, is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state, whether or not the claim arises from that activity.
(3) Service of process upon any person who is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state as provided in this section may be made by personally serving the process upon the defendant outside this state, as provided in s. 48.194. The service shall have the same effect as if it had been personally served within this state.
(4) If a defendant in his or her pleadings demands affirmative relief on causes of action unrelated to the transaction forming the basis of the plaintiff’s claim, the defendant shall thereafter in that action be subject to the jurisdiction of the court for any cause of action, regardless of its basis, which the plaintiff may by amendment assert against the defendant.
(5) Nothing contained in this section limits or affects the right to serve any process in any other manner now or hereinafter provided by law.
History.—s. 1, ch. 73-179; s. 3, ch. 84-2; s. 3, ch. 88-176; s. 3, ch. 93-250; s. 281, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 2013-164; s. 2, ch. 2016-207.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,386
cases (313 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2002).
Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2002). “[7] See § 48.193(1) (stating that "[a]ny person .”
Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall, 39 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 2010). “The website promises to contact individual consumers with certain information (“We will contact you if a lawsuit is being considered or has been filed which you may want to be a party to”), e-mail victims to contact other victims and attorneys interested in pursuing class action…”
Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462 (1985). “Fla. Stat. § 48.193 (1)(g) (Supp. 1984). The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, sitting in diversity, relied on this provision in exercising personal jurisdiction over a Michigan resident who allegedly had breached a franchise agreement with a…”
Leon v. Cont'l AG, 301 F. Supp. 3d 1203 (S.D. Fla. 2017). “Fla. Stat. § 48.193 (1)(a)(1). 2. Committing a tortious act within [Florida] Fla.”
Banco De Los Trabajadores v. Cortez Moreno, 237 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). “Procedural Background In addition to pleading these case-specific facts, Cortez’s second amended complaint also tracked the statutory language of the relevant portions of Florida’s long-arm jurisdiction statute (section 48.193 of the Florida Statutes (2015)).”
Caiazzo v. Am. Royal Arts Corp., 73 So. 3d 245 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). “Section 48.193, Florida Statutes, is Florida’s long-arm statute and addresses both specific and general jurisdiction.”
Gubarev v. Buzzfeed, Inc., 253 F. Supp. 3d 1149 (S.D. Fla. 2017). “In their Motion to Dismiss, Defendants argue that this Court does not have personal jurisdiction over Defendants because: (1) there is no’ statutory basis for exercising personal jurisdiction pursuant to Florida’s long-arm statute, Fla. Stat. § 48.193 , and (2) exercising…”
Goltv, Inc. v. Fox Sports Latin Am. Ltd., 277 F. Supp. 3d 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2017). “See Fla. Stat. §§ 48.193 (1)-(2). The Amended Complaint asserts only-specific personal jurisdiction over- Conme-bol and Full Play.”
Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1989). “In essence, the court below held that the requisite minimum contacts are built into section 48.193. Otherwise, the statute would be held unconstitutional.”
Acquadro v. Bergeron, 851 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 2003). “Section 48.193 does not, as petitioners argue, distinguish among the universe of possible torts.”
Gen. Cigar Holdings, Inc. v. Altadis, S.A., 205 F. Supp. 2d 1335 (S.D. Fla. 2002). “§ 48.193, Fla.Stat. (2002). The statute provides in relevant part: (1) Any person, whether or not a citizen or resident of this state, who personally or through an agent does any of the acts enumerated in this subsection thereby submits himself or herself .”
MeterLogic, Inc. v. Copier Solutions, Inc., 126 F. Supp. 2d 1346 (S.D. Fla. 2000). “Jurisdiction must exist under Florida’s long arm statute (Fla.Stat. § 48.193) and under Fourteenth Amendment due process analysis.”
— 48.193(1) — 147 cases
Caiazzo v. Am. Royal Arts Corp., 73 So. 3d 245 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). “Section 48.193, Florida Statutes, is Florida’s long-arm statute and addresses both specific and general jurisdiction.”
Acquadro v. Bergeron, 851 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 2003). “Section 48.193 does not, as petitioners argue, distinguish among the universe of possible torts.”
Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2002). “[7] See § 48.193(1) (stating that "[a]ny person .”
Allerton v. State Dept. of Ins., 635 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall, 39 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 2010). “The website promises to contact individual consumers with certain information (“We will contact you if a lawsuit is being considered or has been filed which you may want to be a party to”), e-mail victims to contact other victims and attorneys interested in pursuing class action…”
— 48.193(1)(6)(b) — 1 case
Saft Am., Inc. v. Jabil Circuit (Guangzhou) LTD (M.D. Fla. 2019).
— 48.193(1)(A)(1) — 1 case
Floridians for Solar Choice, Inc. v. PCI Consultants, Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2020).
— 48.193(1)(a) — 217 cases
Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2002). “[7] See § 48.193(1) (stating that "[a]ny person .”
Banco De Los Trabajadores v. Cortez Moreno, 237 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). “Procedural Background In addition to pleading these case-specific facts, Cortez’s second amended complaint also tracked the statutory language of the relevant portions of Florida’s long-arm jurisdiction statute (section 48.193 of the Florida Statutes (2015)).”
Bank of Wessington v. Winters Gov't SEC. Corp., 361 So. 2d 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).
Citizens State Bank v. Winters Govern. Sec. Corp., 361 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).
Fincantieri-Cantieri Navali Italiani S.P.A. v. Yuzwa, 241 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).
— 48.193(1)(a)(1) — 65 cases
RG Golf Warehouse, Inc. v. Golf Warehouse, Inc., 362 F. Supp. 3d 1226 (M.D. Fla. 2019).
Abdo v. Abdo, 263 So. 3d 141 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).
Leon v. Cont'l AG, 301 F. Supp. 3d 1203 (S.D. Fla. 2017). “Fla. Stat. § 48.193 (1)(a)(1). 2. Committing a tortious act within [Florida] Fla.”
St. Johns Vein Ctr., Inc. v. StreamlineMD LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 1047 (M.D. Fla. 2018).
Banco De Los Trabajadores v. Cortez Moreno, 237 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). “Procedural Background In addition to pleading these case-specific facts, Cortez’s second amended complaint also tracked the statutory language of the relevant portions of Florida’s long-arm jurisdiction statute (section 48.193 of the Florida Statutes (2015)).”
— 48.193(1)(a)(2) — 93 cases
Leon v. Cont'l AG, 301 F. Supp. 3d 1203 (S.D. Fla. 2017). “Fla. Stat. § 48.193 (1)(a)(1). 2. Committing a tortious act within [Florida] Fla.”
Volt, LLC v. Volt Lighting Grp. LLC, 369 F. Supp. 3d 1241 (M.D. Fla. 2019).
Gubarev v. Buzzfeed, Inc., 253 F. Supp. 3d 1149 (S.D. Fla. 2017). “In their Motion to Dismiss, Defendants argue that this Court does not have personal jurisdiction over Defendants because: (1) there is no’ statutory basis for exercising personal jurisdiction pursuant to Florida’s long-arm statute, Fla. Stat. § 48.193 , and (2) exercising…”
Abdo v. Abdo, 263 So. 3d 141 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).
Estes v. Rodin, 259 So. 3d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).
— 48.193(1)(a)(3) — 6 cases
Aluia v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc., 205 So. 3d 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).
Banco De Los Trabajadores v. Cortez Moreno, 237 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). “Procedural Background In addition to pleading these case-specific facts, Cortez’s second amended complaint also tracked the statutory language of the relevant portions of Florida’s long-arm jurisdiction statute (section 48.193 of the Florida Statutes (2015)).”
Wright v. CrossCountry Mortg., LLC (M.D. Fla. 2024).
Corp. Real Est. Solutions, LLC v. Boyd Watterson Asset Mgmt., LLC (S.D. Fla. 2022).
Pro Music Rights, LLC v. Meijer, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2021).
— 48.193(1)(a)(4) — 5 cases
The Schumacher Grp. of Delaware, Inc. v. Fritz Dictan, Etc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).
Giuliani v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd. (S.D. Fla. 2021).
Taylor v. The MultiPlan Network (M.D. Fla. 2022).
Pac. Life Ins. Co. v. U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n (S.D. Fla. 2023).
USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).
— 48.193(1)(a)(6) — 16 cases
Leon v. Cont'l AG, 301 F. Supp. 3d 1203 (S.D. Fla. 2017). “Fla. Stat. § 48.193 (1)(a)(1). 2. Committing a tortious act within [Florida] Fla.”
S. Wall Prods., Inc. v. Steven E. Bolin & Deborah Bolin, 251 So. 3d 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).
Patt v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2023).
MPS Monitor S.R.L. v. Oberon Americas, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2025).
Tire Grp. Int'l, LLC v. Jiangsu Gen. Sci. Tech. Co., Ltd, & Gen. Rubber (Thailand) Co., Ltd. (S.D. Fla. 2026).
— 48.193(1)(a)(6)(a) — 4 cases
Trepko, Inc. v. Golden West Trading, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2021).
Williams v. 3rd Home Ltd. (M.D. Fla. 2021).
Patt v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2023).
Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. v. Core Dev. Grp. LLC (S.D. Fla. 2024).
— 48.193(1)(a)(6)(b) — 6 cases
Patt v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2023).
Almond v. Coloplast A/S (M.D. Fla. 2021).
Sims v. BMW of North Am. LLC (M.D. Fla. 2023).
Saft Am., Inc. v. Jabil Circuit (Guangzhou) LTD (M.D. Fla. 2019).
Knepfle v. J & P Cycles, LLC (M.D. Fla. 2019).
— 48.193(1)(a)(7) — 32 cases
Abdo v. Abdo, 263 So. 3d 141 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).
RG Golf Warehouse, Inc. v. Golf Warehouse, Inc., 362 F. Supp. 3d 1226 (M.D. Fla. 2019).
Dr. an Q. Le v. Tralongo, LLC, 239 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).
Woodruff-Sawyer & Co. v. Ghilotti, 255 So. 3d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).
Erie Ins. Exch. v. Larose, 202 So. 3d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).
— 48.193(1)(a)(9) — 9 cases
Lienemann v. Cruise Ship Excursions, Inc., 349 F. Supp. 3d 1269 (S.D. Fla. 2018).
Giuliani v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd. (S.D. Fla. 2021).
Barham v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (S.D. Fla. 2021).
Trepko, Inc. v. Golden West Trading, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2021).
Worth Grp., Inc. v. Morales (S.D. Fla. 2023).
— 48.193(1)(a)(b) — 1 case
Carter v. Est. of Rambo, 925 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
— 48.193(1)(b) — 142 cases
Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2002). “[7] See § 48.193(1) (stating that "[a]ny person .”
Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall, 39 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 2010). “The website promises to contact individual consumers with certain information (“We will contact you if a lawsuit is being considered or has been filed which you may want to be a party to”), e-mail victims to contact other victims and attorneys interested in pursuing class action…”
Acquadro v. Bergeron, 851 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 2003). “Section 48.193 does not, as petitioners argue, distinguish among the universe of possible torts.”
Kountze v. Kountze, 996 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).
Arch Aluminum & Glass Co., Inc. v. Haney, 964 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).
— 48.193(1)(c) — 13 cases
Hobbs v. Don Mealey Chevrolet, Inc., 642 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
McRae v. JD/MD, Inc., 511 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1987).
Marshall v. Marshall, 988 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
Beta Real Corp. v. Graham, 839 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
Forrest v. Forrest, 839 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
— 48.193(1)(d) — 15 cases
Meyer v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n, 492 So. 2d 1314 (Fla. 1986).
Washington Capital Corp. v. MILANDCO, 695 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Dollar Sys., Inc. v. Elvia, 863 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
Hobbs v. Don Mealey Chevrolet, Inc., 642 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
Strickland Ins. Grp. v. Shewmake, 642 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
— 48.193(1)(e) — 32 cases
Mouzon v. Mouzon, 458 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
Weiler v. Weiler, 861 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
Heineken v. Heineken, 683 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
Schroeder v. Schroeder, 430 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).
State, Dept. of Health v. Wright, 489 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
— 48.193(1)(f) — 39 cases
Washington Capital Corp. v. MILANDCO, 695 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Jones v. Jack Maxton Chevrolet, Inc., 484 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Kravitz v. Gebrueder Pletscher, Etc., 442 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Aetna Life & Cas. Co. v. Therm-O-Disc, Inc., 511 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 1987).
Dean v. Johns, 789 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
— 48.193(1)(f)(1) — 2 cases
Wendt v. Horowitz, 822 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2002). “[7] See § 48.193(1) (stating that "[a]ny person .”
Citicorp Ins. Brokers v. Charman, 635 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
— 48.193(1)(f)(2) — 19 cases
Aetna Life & Cas. Co. v. Therm-O-Disc, Inc., 488 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Blumberg v. Steve Weiss & Co., Inc., 922 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
WCTU Ry. Co. v. Szilagyi, 511 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Conley v. Boyle Drug Co., 570 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1990).
Pub. Gas Co. v. Weatherhead Co., 409 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 1982).
— 48.193(1)(f)(l) — 1 case
Murphy v. Repub. Health Corp., 645 F. Supp. 124 (S.D. Fla. 1986).
— 48.193(1)(g) — 106 cases
Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1989). “In essence, the court below held that the requisite minimum contacts are built into section 48.193. Otherwise, the statute would be held unconstitutional.”
Engineered Storage Sys., Inc. v. Nat'l Partitions & Interiors, Inc., 415 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Washington Capital Corp. v. MILANDCO, 695 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Unger v. Pub. Entry Serv., 513 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
Lacy v. Force v. Corp., 403 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
— 48.193(1)(g)(2) — 1 case
Bradford White Corp. v. Aetna Ins. Co., 372 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
— 48.193(1)(h) — 3 cases
Munnerlyn v. Wingster, 825 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
Keveloh v. Carter, 699 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).
Hollowell v. Tamburro, 991 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
— 48.193(2) — 232 cases
Banco De Los Trabajadores v. Cortez Moreno, 237 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). “Procedural Background In addition to pleading these case-specific facts, Cortez’s second amended complaint also tracked the statutory language of the relevant portions of Florida’s long-arm jurisdiction statute (section 48.193 of the Florida Statutes (2015)).”
Trs. of Columbia Univ. v. Ocean World, S.A., 12 So. 3d 788 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
Caiazzo v. Am. Royal Arts Corp., 73 So. 3d 245 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). “Section 48.193, Florida Statutes, is Florida’s long-arm statute and addresses both specific and general jurisdiction.”
Gadea v. Star Cruises, Ltd., 949 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
Garris v. Thomasville-Thomas Cnty. Humane Soc'y, Inc., 941 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
— 48.193(3) — 17 cases
Mouzon v. Mouzon, 458 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
Paola A. Alvardo-Fernandez v. Matthew Mazoff, 151 So. 3d 8 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).
Conley v. Boyle Drug Co., 570 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 1990).
Joyce Bros. Storage & Van Co. v. Piechalak, 343 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Soule v. Rosasco-Soule, 386 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
— 48.193(4) — 3 cases
Baggett v. Walsh, 510 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
Lampe v. Hoyne, 652 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
Palmer v. Palmer, 353 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
— 48.193(5) — 1 case
Blackmon v. Blackmon, 487 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
— 48.193(6)(a) — 1 case
Williams v. 3rd Home Ltd. (M.D. Fla. 2021).
— 48.193(a) — 4 cases
Parrish v. AmSouth Bank, N.A., 657 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
Miot v. Kechijian, 830 F. Supp. 1460 (S.D. Fla. 1993).
Beaubien v. Cambridge Consol., Ltd., 652 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
Core Indus., Inc. v. Agostinelli, 591 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
— 48.193(a)(1) — 2 cases
Rana v. Flynn, 823 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
Uniters North Am., LLC v. ServeCo Int'l, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2022).
— 48.193(a)(2) — 1 case
PeopleShare, LLC v. Vogler (S.D. Fla. 2022).
— 48.193(a)(7) — 1 case
Arthrex, Inc. v. Hilton (M.D. Fla. 2022).
— 48.193(b) — 10 cases
Smith v. Trans-Siberian Orchestra, 728 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (M.D. Fla. 2010).
Metnick & Levy, P.A. v. Seuling, 123 So. 3d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
Beaubien v. Cambridge Consol., Ltd., 652 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
RENAISSANCE HEALTH v. Resveratrol Partners, 982 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
Rensin v. State, Off. of the Attorney Gen., Dep't of Legal Affairs, 18 So. 3d 572 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
— 48.193(d) — 1 case
Ash v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 991 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (S.D. Fla. 2013).
— 48.193(e) — 1 case
Arnstein v. Arnstein, 422 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
— 48.193(f) — 1 case
Koch v. Royal Wine Merchants, Ltd., 847 F. Supp. 2d 1370 (S.D. Fla. 2012).
— 48.193(f)(2) — 1 case
Arkansas Glass Container Corp. v. Hackett, 412 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
— 48.193(g) — 8 cases
Corporacion Aero Angeles, S.A. v. Fernandez, 69 So. 3d 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).
Caribe & Panama Invs. v. Christensen, 375 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Air Turbine Tech., Inc. v. Atlas Copco AB, 235 F. Supp. 2d 1287 (S.D. Fla. 2002).
Beaubien v. Cambridge Consol., Ltd., 652 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
Kenco Signs & Awning Div., Inc. v. CDC, 813 So. 2d 913 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001).
— 48.193(i)(a) — 1 case
Keston v. FirstCollect, Inc., 523 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (S.D. Fla. 2007).
— 48.193(l) — 1 case
Singer v. Unibilt Dev. Co., 43 So. 3d 784 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).
— 48.193(l)(a) — 88 cases
Caiazzo v. Am. Royal Arts Corp., 73 So. 3d 245 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). “Section 48.193, Florida Statutes, is Florida’s long-arm statute and addresses both specific and general jurisdiction.”
Goltv, Inc. v. Fox Sports Latin Am. Ltd., 277 F. Supp. 3d 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2017). “See Fla. Stat. §§ 48.193 (1)-(2). The Amended Complaint asserts only-specific personal jurisdiction over- Conme-bol and Full Play.”
Gen. Cigar Holdings, Inc. v. Altadis, S.A., 205 F. Supp. 2d 1335 (S.D. Fla. 2002). “§ 48.193, Fla.Stat. (2002). The statute provides in relevant part: (1) Any person, whether or not a citizen or resident of this state, who personally or through an agent does any of the acts enumerated in this subsection thereby submits himself or herself .”
Intego Software, LLC d/b/a Critical Alert v. Concept Dev., Inc., 198 So. 3d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).
Elandia Int'l, Inc. v. Ah Koy, 690 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 2010).
— 48.193(l)(a)(2) — 4 cases
Goltv, Inc. v. Fox Sports Latin Am. Ltd., 277 F. Supp. 3d 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2017). “See Fla. Stat. §§ 48.193 (1)-(2). The Amended Complaint asserts only-specific personal jurisdiction over- Conme-bol and Full Play.”
Rautenberg v. Falz, 193 So. 3d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).
BTG Pat. Holdings, LLC v. Bag2Go, GmbH, 193 F. Supp. 3d 1310 (S.D. Fla. 2016).
Mighty Men of God, Inc. v. World Outreach Church of Murfreesboro Tennessee, Inc., 102 F. Supp. 3d 1264 (M.D. Fla. 2015).
— 48.193(l)(a)(4) — 1 case
Brown v. Carnival Corp., 202 F. Supp. 3d 1332 (S.D. Fla. 2016).
— 48.193(l)(a)(6) — 3 cases
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v. Jones, 227 So. 3d 150 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).
Hinkle v. Cont'l Motors, Inc., 268 F. Supp. 3d 1312 (M.D. Fla. 2017).
Brown v. Bottling Grp., LLC, 159 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (M.D. Fla. 2016).
— 48.193(l)(a)(6)(a) — 1 case
TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Adams, 98 F. Supp. 3d 1243 (S.D. Fla. 2015).
— 48.193(l)(a)(6)(b) — 1 case
TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Adams, 98 F. Supp. 3d 1243 (S.D. Fla. 2015).
— 48.193(l)(a)(7) — 2 cases
Moro Aircraft Leasing, Inc. v. Int'l Aviation Mktg., Inc., 206 So. 3d 814 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).
Erie Ins. Exch. v. Larose, 202 So. 3d 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).
— 48.193(l)(a)(l) — 4 cases
Goltv, Inc. v. Fox Sports Latin Am. Ltd., 277 F. Supp. 3d 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2017). “See Fla. Stat. §§ 48.193 (1)-(2). The Amended Complaint asserts only-specific personal jurisdiction over- Conme-bol and Full Play.”
Brown v. Carnival Corp., 202 F. Supp. 3d 1332 (S.D. Fla. 2016).
Aronson v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc., 30 F. Supp. 3d 1379 (S.D. Fla. 2014).
Aegis Def. Servs., LLC v. Gilbert, 222 So. 3d 656 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).
— 48.193(l)(b) — 103 cases
Internet Solutions Corp. v. Marshall, 39 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 2010). “The website promises to contact individual consumers with certain information (“We will contact you if a lawsuit is being considered or has been filed which you may want to be a party to”), e-mail victims to contact other victims and attorneys interested in pursuing class action…”
Gen. Cigar Holdings, Inc. v. Altadis, S.A., 205 F. Supp. 2d 1335 (S.D. Fla. 2002). “§ 48.193, Fla.Stat. (2002). The statute provides in relevant part: (1) Any person, whether or not a citizen or resident of this state, who personally or through an agent does any of the acts enumerated in this subsection thereby submits himself or herself .”
Elandia Int'l, Inc. v. Ah Koy, 690 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 2010).
Wiggins v. Tigrent, Inc., 147 So. 3d 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
Response Reward Sys., L.C. v. Meijer, Inc., 189 F. Supp. 2d 1332 (M.D. Fla. 2002).
— 48.193(l)(c) — 5 cases
Trs. of Columbia Univ. v. Ocean World, S.A., 12 So. 3d 788 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
Holt v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 32 So. 3d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
Blackmon v. Blackmon, 487 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Demos v. Landmark at Hillsboro Condo. Ass'n, 47 So. 3d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
Truelove v. Truelove, 488 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).
— 48.193(l)(d) — 12 cases
Atl. Lines, Ltd. v. M/V DOMBURGH, 473 F. Supp. 700 (S.D. Fla. 1979).
Virginia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dunford, 877 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).
Island Sea-Faris, Ltd. v. Haughey, 13 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
Ash v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 991 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (S.D. Fla. 2013).
Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frederick, 654 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
— 48.193(l)(e) — 13 cases
Rafaeil v. Rafaeil, 832 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Whatmore v. Babcock, 685 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
E.K. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 874 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Hurlock v. Hurlock, 703 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Gil v. Mendelson, 870 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
— 48.193(l)(f) — 25 cases
Response Reward Sys., L.C. v. Meijer, Inc., 189 F. Supp. 2d 1332 (M.D. Fla. 2002).
Bloom v. AH Pond Co., Inc., 519 F. Supp. 1162 (S.D. Fla. 1981).
Miller v. Berman, 289 F. Supp. 2d 1327 (M.D. Fla. 2003).
Prentice v. Prentice Colour, Inc., 779 F. Supp. 578 (M.D. Fla. 1991).
Musiker v. Projectavision, Inc., 960 F. Supp. 292 (S.D. Fla. 1997).
— 48.193(l)(f)(2) — 10 cases
Hatton v. Chrysler Canada, Inc., 937 F. Supp. 2d 1356 (M.D. Fla. 2013).
Tomashevsky v. Komori Printing Mach. Co., Ltd., 691 F. Supp. 336 (S.D. Fla. 1988).
Aero Mech. Elec. Craftsman v. Parent, 366 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
White v. Bombardier Corp., 313 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (N.D. Fla. 2004).
Identigene, Inc. v. Goff, 774 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
— 48.193(l)(f)(l) — 4 cases
Crowe v. Paragon Relocation Resources, Inc., 506 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (N.D. Fla. 2007).
Santos v. Sacks, 697 F. Supp. 275 (E.D. La. 1988).
Tomashevsky v. Komori Printing Mach. Co., Ltd., 691 F. Supp. 336 (S.D. Fla. 1988).
Riviere v. St. James Episcopal Church of Clayton, Georgia, Inc., 545 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
— 48.193(l)(g) — 67 cases
Metnick & Levy, P.A. v. Seuling, 123 So. 3d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
Moltz v. Seneca Balance, Inc., 606 F. Supp. 612 (S.D. Fla. 1985).
Elandia Int'l, Inc. v. Ah Koy, 690 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 2010).
Sierra Equity Grp., Inc. v. White Oak Equity Partners, LLC, 650 F. Supp. 2d 1213 (S.D. Fla. 2009).
Biloki v. Majestic Greeting Card Co., Inc., 33 So. 3d 815 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
— 48.193(l)(h) — 5 cases
Oldt v. Sides, 573 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Rafaeil v. Rafaeil, 832 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
E.K. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 874 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Larson-Jackson v. Neal, 551 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
Dep't of Revenue ex rel. G.J.W. v. B.E.F., 99 So. 3d 993 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).
— 48.193(lXa) — 1 case
Oriental Imports & Exports, Inc. v. Maduro & Curiel's Bank, 701 F.2d 889 (11th Cir. 1983).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.