Cases from cite.case.law:

FL HOMES LLC v. KOKOLIS, TRUSTEE OF TOULA KOKOLIS REVOCABLE TRUST FL LLC,, 271 So. 3d 6 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . initial mortgage foreclosure lawsuit, so that such unrecorded interests were discharged by section 48.23 . . . foreclosure action "forever discharged" the property from all unrecorded interests and liens under section 48.23 . . . Under section 48.23, the nullifying impact of the lis pendens statute on unrecorded property interests . . . turns on the prosecution of the lawsuit "to a judicial sale of the property." § 48.23(1)(d), Fla. . . . the property is superior to that of appellants; our holding is that appellee may not rely on section 48.23 . . .

LB JUDGMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, v. R. BOSCHETTI,, 271 So. 3d 115 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . Section 48.23, Florida Statutes (2018), governs notices of lis pendens and the prerequisites for filing . . . Section 48.23(3) specifies that when, as here, the underlying lawsuit is not founded on a "duly recorded . . . Damages for Wrongful Lis Pendens-Attorneys' Fees We repeat the text of section 48.23(3) as it relates . . . Further, section 48.23(2) limits the notices of lis pendens in the present case to a term of one year . . . Section 48.23(4), Florida Statutes (2018), also specifies that the one-year term of the existing notices . . .

VILLAMIZAR, v. LUNA CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC,, 260 So. 3d 355 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 48.23, Florida Statutes (2017), governs notices of lis pendens. . . . ." § 48.23(1)(a) (emphasis provided). . . . Moreover, section 48.23(2) specifies that a notice of lis pendens "is not effectual for any purpose beyond . . .

UNITED STATES v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT NORTH COLLINS STREET, ARLINGTON, TEXAS v. v., 901 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 48.23(3) ). . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. GUERRA,, 254 So. 3d 521 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . See § 48.23(3), Fla. Stat. (2017) ; Am. Legion Cmty. Club v. . . . Hence, as required by section 48.23(3), the trial court adjudicated Rodriguez's motion as if Guerra's . . . notice of lis pendens was a temporary injunction. § 48.23(3), Fla. . . .

NATIONAL AMERICAN HOME, LLC, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, FOR AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST, 242 So. 3d 1144 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . the mortgage foreclosure and sale, because the notice of lis pendens had expired, pursuant to section 48.23 . . . Warner, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur. 48.23 Lis pendens.- (1)(a) An action in any of the state . . .

BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. v. MIRABELLA OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a LLC, HSBC USA, A- v. LLC,, 238 So. 3d 405 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . ." § 48.23(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (2012) ; accord Westburne Supply, Inc. v. Cmty. . . . . 1st DCA 1987) ("The principal purpose of filing a notice of lis pendens, as manifested in section 48.23 . . . Therefore, section 48.23 barred the association's separate foreclosure action, and the association's . . . Section 48.23(1)(d) formerly allowed only twenty days for intervention. . . .

ORTIZ, v. WEISS,, 227 So. 3d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 48.23(3), Fla. . . .

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, f k a LLC, v. M. WHITE,, 222 So. 3d 603 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . The Motion primarily relied upon section 48.23(l)(d), Florida Statutes (2016). . . . Section 48.23(l)(d), Florida Statutes, provides in part that the recording of a notice of lis pendens . . . It was the Homeowner’s position that section 48.23(l)(d), Florida Statutes, barred the Bank from separately . . . The lower court’s ruling was based upon a misinterpretation of section 48.23(l)(d), Florida Statutes. . . . Section 48.23(l)(d), Florida Statutes, only acts to preclude enforcement of liens unrecorded at the time . . .

CARLISLE, v. U. S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, FOR HARBORVIEW TRUST FUND,, 225 So. 3d 893 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 48.23(l)(d), Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .

BANKERS LENDING SERVICES, INC. v. REGENTS PARK INVESTMENTS, LLC,, 225 So. 3d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . circumstance, rejecting “the interpretation that the statutory reference to injunctions [in section 48.23 . . . specific performance and was not based on a “duly recorded instrument,” Regents was required by section 48.23 . . .

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, v. WEILER MIPC, LLC, a J. A., 227 So. 3d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . First, the Weilers argued that section 48.23, Florida Statutes (2014) (the notice of lis pendens statute . . . Relying upon the court records, the trial court ruled that section 48.23 “forever barred” Nationstar’ . . . Third, Nationstar contends that the trial court erred in finding that the effect of section 48.23 was . . .

LANDMARK AT CRESCENT RIDGE LP, v. EVEREST FINANCIAL, INC. a, 219 So. 3d 218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . actions for certiorari review and for injunctive relief, the causes are related in light of section 48.23 . . . discharge the recorded notice of lis pendens as the court would grant and dissolve injunctions.” § 48.23 . . .

OBER, v. TOWN OF LAUDERDALE- BY- THE- SEA, a, 213 So. 3d 954 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Importance and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court: WHETHER, PURSUANT TO SECTION 48.23 . . .

ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY, v. METROBANK S. A., 215 So. 3d 135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . -day intervention deadline (following re-cordation of Metrobank’s lis pendens) specified in section 48.23 . . .

OBER, v. TOWN OF LAUDERDALE- BY- THE- SEA a, 218 So. 3d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . This case involves the application of section 48.23, Florida Statutes (2014), the lis pendens statute . . . We hold that such liens are discharged by section 48.23(l)(d). . . . Section 48.23(1)(d) states, in pertinent part: [T]he recording of ... notice of lis pen-dens ... constitutes . . . A proper reading of section 48.23(l)(d) is,- as the Florida Land Title Association suggests, that “when . . .

B. PHILLIPS S. v. EPIC AVIATION, LLC,, 234 F. Supp. 3d 1174 (M.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . asserting that the lis pendens filed against the Property was improper and illegal under Florida Statute § 48.23 . . . Stat. § 48.23(3). (Doc. # 68, Second Affirmative Defense). . . . dissolve the lis pendens but failed to seek the posting of a statutory bond pursuant to Fla, Stat. § 48.23 . . .

PATINO, v. CITY OF PASADENA,, 230 F. Supp. 3d 667 (S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . from 2011 to 2015 and reported that the Hispanic share of Pasadena’s citizen voting-age population was 48.23% . . .

JALLALI, v. KNIGHTSBRIDGE VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., 211 So. 3d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Jallali relied on Quadomain, 103 So.3d at 978-80, and section 48.23, Florida Statutes (2012). . . . filing of lis pendens, we conclude that, even though the lien was inferior to the mortgage, section 48.23 . . . This Court quoted from section 48.23, Florida Statutes. Id. at 979. . . . Previously, language similar to that now appearing in section 48.23(l)(d) appeared in section 48.23(l . . . )(b), but the period of time for intervening was only twenty days. § 48.23(1 )(b), Fla. . . .

CITIBANK, N. A. I v. UNKNOWN HEIRS, E. s, 197 So. 3d 1214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 48.23(3), Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .

REGENTS PARK INVESTMENTS, LLC, v. BANKERS LENDING SERVICES, INC., 197 So. 3d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Santopietro, 792 So.2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), this Court cited the language of Florida Statute Section 48.23 . . .

WHITBURN, LLC, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 190 So. 3d 1087 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . We recognize that Florida's lis pendens statute, section 48.23, Florida Statutes (2012), is more than . . .

LINCOLN RD SB, LLC, v. DAXAN FL LLC,, 180 So. 3d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Concluding that the orders below correctly interpreted and applied the lis pendens statute, section 48.23 . . . Analysis Section 48.23(1), Florida Statutes (2014), provides: (l)(a) An action in any of the state or . . . on a duly recorded instrument.” 100 Lincoln argues that a later section of the same statute, section 48.23 . . . Conclusion Because we have concluded that the lis pendens was filed in compliance with section 48.23 . . .

BARNSDALE HOLDINGS, LLC, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 170 So. 3d 863 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . standing to appeal since it failed to intervene and was a non-party in the proceeding below); see also § 48.23 . . .

J. B. J. INVESTMENT OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC. v. W. MASLANKA,, 163 So. 3d 726 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 48.23(2), Fla. Stat. (2013). . . . In addition, section 48.23(2), Florida Statutes (2013) imposes a «good cause requirement for extending . . . pendens can be damaging, courts have interpreted the statutory reference to injunctions in section 48.23 . . .

NIKOOIE, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N. A., 183 So. 3d 424 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . barred by its predecessor’s (GMAI’s) “untimely intervention” under the lis pendens statute, section 48.23 . . . Adhin addressed the question of whether section 48.23(l)(b) is procedural or substantive in its effect . . . The Fifth District concluded that the bar is substantive in its effect and that section 48.23(l)(b) is . . . On such a record, we agree with the trial court’s conclusion that section 48.23(l)(b) did not bar GMAI . . . intervene was denied and that its motion to intervene was untimely under the lis pendens statute, section 48.23 . . .

NOBE BAY HOLDINGS, LLC, v. GARCIA, M. D., 140 So. 3d 693 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . As the Florida Supreme Court held in Medical Facilities, “in situations governed by section 48.23(3), . . .

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. BEVANS,, 138 So. 3d 1185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . In support, Striding cites section 48.23(b), Florida Statutes (2012), which reads, in pertinent part: . . . This common law exception was modified in part by section 48.23(b), but, as explained above, the modification . . .

U. S. BANK NAT. ASSN a k a U. S. v. QUADOMAIN CONDOMINUM ASSOCIATION, INC., 103 So. 3d 977 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . notices of lis pendens are afforded even more power than they are at common law by virtue of section 48.23 . . . withdrawal, or discharge of the notice does not affect the validity of any unrecorded interest or lien. § 48.23 . . . attempt to enforce mechanic’s lien recorded after lis pendens notice was filed was barred by section 48.23 . . . fees, it was statutorily required to intervene in the re-foreclosure action as prescribed in section 48.23 . . .

FIDELITY LAND TRUST COMPANY, LLC No. v. CENTEX HOME EQUITY COMPANY, LLC, n k a LLC,, 903 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (M.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . discharging unidentified unrecorded interests in certain real property pursuant to Florida Statute § 48.23 . . . Stat. § 48.23 does not bar enforcement of a recorded mortgage filed prior to the filing of a lis pendens . . .

BLUE STAR PALMS, LLC, LLC, v. LED TRUST, LLC, LLC, ASDM LLC, LLC,, 128 So. 3d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Analysis The pertinent part of the lis pendens statute, section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (2012), provides . . .

ABNER, v. JOHNSON,, 56 So. 3d 137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . to attorney’s fees under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410 as a sanction, and under section 48.23 . . . We agree with the purchaser that the trial court should have awarded fees under section 48.23. . . . reach the issue of whether the fees were properly imposed as a sanction because we hold that section 48.23 . . . Because section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (2005), does not require the posting of a bond prior to the . . . We therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying the purchaser attorney’s fees under section 48.23 . . .

BANK OF AMERICA, v. BANK OF SALEM III,, 48 So. 3d 155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 48.23(2), Fla. Stat. (2003). Neither party attempted to extend their lien. . . . See § 48.23(2), Fla. Stat. (2003). Bank of Salem did not attempt to renew or revive the lien. . . .

ADHIN, v. FIRST HORIZON HOME LOANS,, 44 So. 3d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . The trial court denied intervention, concluding Appellants’ motion was untimely under section 48.23(l . . . Appellants contend that section 48.23(l)(b), a lis pendens statute allowing the holders of unrecorded . . . Appellants sought rehearing, arguing that section 48.23(l)(b) unconstitutionally conflicts with Florida . . . See § 48.23, Fla. Stat. (2008); see also Taylor, 944 So.2d at 497; Henry P. . . . Similarly, section 48.23(l)(b) acts as a statute of repose. . . . Specifically, section 48.23(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2008), provides: 48.23. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 20 So. 3d 379 (Fla. 2009)

. . . The amendment to the form is in response to recent enactment of section 48.23(l)(c), Florida Statutes . . . This form was substantially rewritten due to the amendments to section 48.23, Florida Statutes (2009) . . . , Section 48.23 provides that the notice must contain the names of all of the parties, the name of the . . .

STRATEGIC EMPOWERMENT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SOUTH DADE REALTY, INC., 14 So. 3d 260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . affect, or in any way encumber the cash proceeds of a real estate closing that has yet to occur', see § 48.23 . . .

In GALLO, A., 573 F.3d 433 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 48.23 (2008). . . . Furthermore, Florida Statute § 48.23(l)(a) (2008) states: No action in any of the state or federal courts . . . Stat. § 48.23 (West July 1, 2009). . . . .

In GALLO, A., 573 F.3d 433 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 48.23 (2008). . . . Furthermore, Florida Statute § 48.23(1)(a) (2008) states: We do not believe that this language allows . . . Stat. § 48.23 (West July 1, 2009). . . . .

In MOODY S CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, 612 F. Supp. 2d 397 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Moody’s lost $13.92 per share from 62.15 on February 3, 2006 (the first day of the class period) to $48.23 . . .

In J. WHITEHEAD, III,, 399 B.R. 570 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 48.23, and applicable case law, I find the Notices of Lis Pendens to have effectuated a transfer . . . Although Nemeroff filed the Lis Pendens Notices pursuant to Florida Statute § 48.23, the Trustee disputes . . . State. § 48.23(l)(b). . . .

McMILLAN MIAMI, LLC. v. KRYSTAL CAPITAL MANAGERS, LLC., 1 So. 3d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Globe Props., Inc., 944 So.2d 302 (Fla.2006), the Florida Supreme Court concluded that section 48.23 . . . Because section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (2005), does not require the posting of a bond prior to the . . .

HAVEN CENTER, INC. v. MERUELO,, 995 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 48.23(3), Fla.Stat. (2005). . . . provision making it dependent upon the continued effectiveness or term of the lis pendens; nor does section 48.23 . . .

G. LEVIN v. LANG,, 994 So. 2d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . § 48.23(3), Fla. Stat. (2004); Med. Facilities Dev., Inc. v. . . .

B. OLESH, v. GREENBERG,, 978 So. 2d 238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . The above analysis does not end the inquiry in the instant case, however, because section 48.23(2), Florida . . . absent a trial court’s exercise of discretion in extending the time limitation “as justice requires.” § 48.23 . . . Stat. (2006); see also § 48.23(3), Fla. . . . Although the record does not indicate that Olesh filed a motion to extend the time under section 48.23 . . .

NICKERSON v. WATERMARK MARINA OF PALM CITY, L. L. C. a, 978 So. 2d 187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (2006), provides, with respect to actions that are not founded on . . . However, we agree with the Nickersons’ position: the language of section 48.23(3), allowing courts to . . .

DE LA FUENTE, v. ADRIAN DEVELOPERS CORP. a, 967 So. 2d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . When an action is not founded on a duly recorded instrument, sections 48.23(2)-(3), Florida Statutes . . . Section 48.23(3) states that, when the pleading does not show that the action is founded on a duly recorded . . . may control and discharge a notice of lis pendens as the courts may grant and dissolve injunctions. § 48.23 . . . Section 48.23(2) provides that a notice of lis pendens, which is not founded on a duly recorded instrument . . . authority to extend the effect of the notice beyond one year on reasonable notice and for good cause. § 48.23 . . . I find this contention supported by the plain language of section 48.23 of the Florida Statutes. . . . Section 48.23 of the Florida Statutes (2006) reads, in relevant part: (l)(a) No action in any of the . . . control and discharge the notice of lis pendens as the court may grant and dissolve injunctions. § 48.23 . . . this statute would render inoperative the phrase, “from the commencement of the action” in section 48.23 . . . Hickory Lakes of Brandon, Inc., 458 So.2d 45, 47 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)(“We do not interpret [section 48.23 . . .

NU- VISION, LLC, v. CORPORATE CONVENIENCE, INC., 965 So. 2d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 48.23, Fla. Stat. (2006); Chiusolo v. Kennedy, 614 So.2d 491 (Fla.1993). . . .

SUAREZ v. KMD CONSTRUCTION, INC., 965 So. 2d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Florida’s lis pendens statute provides, in pertinent part, as follows: 48.23 Lis pendens.— (2) No notice . . . control and discharge the notice of lis pendens as the court may grant and dissolve injunctions. § 48.23 . . . was a “consensual lien” involved, that was “not determinative” for the Avalon court because section 48.23 . . .

FLORIDA WEST REALTY PARTNERS, LLC, v. MDG LAKE TRAFFORD, LLC,, 975 So. 2d 479 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Florida West also recorded a notice of lis pendens (hereafter, lis pendens) pursuant to section 48.23 . . . The court may impose such terms for the extension of time as justice requires. § 48.23(2). . . . Even if there is a fair nexus here, section 48.23(2) specifically imposes a good cause requirement that . . . See § 48.23(3); Rodriguez v. Banco Indus. de Venez., C.A., 576 So.2d 870, 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). . . .

PERDOMO, v. A. CABRERA,, 963 So. 2d 736 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . .” § 48.23(3), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . control and discharge the notice of lis pendens as the court may grant and dissolve injunctions.” § 48.23 . . .

NESS RACQUET CLUB, LLC, v. RENZI HOLDINGS, INC., 959 So. 2d 758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Lis pendens in Florida is governed by section 48.23 of the Florida Statutes. . . . Avalon Park Assoc., Inc., 760 So.2d 1132, 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000Xciting § 48.23(2), Fla. Stat.). . . .

OZ, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., 953 So. 2d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . the name of a defendant, did not provide constructive notice of Oz’s claims in violation of section 48.23 . . . Section 48.23, Florida Statutes (2005), governs lis pendens, and subsection (l)(a) provides that: No . . . Consistent with the statutory requirements of section 48.23, this Court held in Joge Invs., Inc. v. . . . .2d 752, 755 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)(holding that the notice of lis pendens failed to comply with section 48.23 . . . of an action is fatal to the lis pendens and contrary to the express language contained in section 48.23 . . .

CARRAN, v. MORGAN, d b a a, 510 F. Supp. 2d 1053 (S.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . With respect to a lis pendens, section 48.23(3) of Florida Statutes applies when a complaint does not . . . Stat. § 48.23(3). . . .

TAYLOR, v. T. STECKEL,, 944 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 48.23 of the Florida Statutes expressly confers control over notices of lis pendens on the courts . . . instrument, the statute authorizes the courts to extend the effect of the notice beyond one year. § 48.23 . . . Hickory Lakes of Brandon, Inc., 458 So.2d 45, 47 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (concluding that section 48.23(2) . . . lis pendens can be damaging, courts have interpreted the statutory reference to injunction in section 48.23 . . .

S AND T BUILDERS, v. GLOBE PROPERTIES, INC., 944 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 2006)

. . . . § 48.23(3), Fla. Stat. (2005) (emphasis supplied). . . . We have interpreted the statutory reference to injunctions in section 48.23(3) of the Florida Statutes . . . See § 48.23(3), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . . Therefore, pursuant to the authorizing language in section 48.23 of the Florida Statutes, we conclude . . . See § 48.23(3), Fla. . . .

MU IZ A. v. CRYSTAL LAKE PROJECT, LLC,, 947 So. 2d 464 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The trial court further found that the lis pendens statutorily expired on March 12, 2005 per section 48.23 . . . See § 48.23(2), Fla. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WOODS, 436 F. Supp. 2d 753 (E.D.N.C. 2006)

. . . . § 48.23 (2005); S.C.Code. Ann. § 15-11-10 (2005). . . .

F. DEGUZMAN, v. BALSINI,, 930 So. 2d 752 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . notice of lis pen-dens filed in this case failed to comply with the statutory requirements of section 48.23 . . . pendens is procedurally defective if it fails to contain all of the required information under section 48.23 . . .

LOIDL, v. I E GROUP, INC. a W. J., 927 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The Third District apparently based its decision on the language in section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes . . . Although the legislature created section 48.23(3) to allow a .trial court to control and discharge a . . .

S AND T BUILDERS, v. GLOBE PROPERTIES, INC., 909 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (2003), provides, with respect to actions not founded on a duly recorded . . .

SCHWARTZ, v. ESTATE OF SCHWARTZ,, 905 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 48.23(2), Florida Statutes (2003), provides, inter alia, that “[n]o notice of lis pendens is . . . complaint seeking to set aside fraudulent transfers was not “founded on a duly recorded instrument.” § 48.23 . . . contends- that the 1994 final judgment is a “duly recorded instrument” within the meaning of section 48.23 . . . pendens was no longer “effectual for any purpose” when Wife # 3 moved to declare it invalid in 2004. § 48.23 . . . arising from the 1994 judgment, it would then be “founded on a duly recorded instrument” within section 48.23 . . .

S. FISCHER A. Jr. A. Sr. A. Sr. v. M. FISCHER,, 873 So. 2d 534 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (2003), applies when the initial pleading does not show that the claim . . . In the case of a section 48.23(3) lis pendens, the court cannot dissolve the lis pendens if the proponent . . .

UNITED STATES v. WARD, a k a a k a v. v. G., 96 F. App'x 615 (10th Cir. 2004)

. . . : Davis’ PSR attributed 18 ounces of powder cocaine, one-half pound of marijuana, and approximately 48.23 . . .

VONMITSCHKE- COLLANDE v. KRAMER,, 841 So. 2d 481 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Although Section 48.23(2), Florida Statutes (2001) sets up such a time limitation as to actions founded . . . on instruments not “duly recorded”, as is the case here, section 48.23(4) provides that the one year . . . Section 48.23(2), Florida Statutes (2001) reads: "No notice of lis pendens is effectual for any purpose . . . The court may impose such terms for the extension of time as justice requires.” .Section 48.23(4), Florida . . .

BETSY ROSS HOTEL, INC. v. A. G. GLADSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC., 833 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Section 48.23, Florida Statutes (1999), which governs various matters surrounding notices of lis pendens . . . We remind the reader of the language of section 48.23 which requires that the instrument in question . . . If the legislature so intended it would have done just as well by not enacting section 48.23(3). . . . .

TAMPA BAY L. L. C. a v. LORELLO CYPRESS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a W. Jr., 821 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Jenne Corporation and that the notice of lis pendens failed to comply with the provisions of section 48.23 . . . Section 48.23(l)(a) requires that a notice of lis pendens contain “the names of the parties, the time . . . with the other facts contained in the notice, were sufficient to satisfy the requirements of section 48.23 . . .

In MARTIN, v. T., 278 B.R. 634 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Florida Statutes § 48.23 governs notices of lis pendens. . . . The duration of a notice of lis pendens is determined by Florida Statutes § 48.23(2) which provides: . . . Stat. § 48.23(2) (1994) (emphasis added). . . . Applying Florida Statutes § 48.23(2) the natural expiration of the Notice of Lis Pendens would have occurred . . .

In AUTO INTERNATIONAL REFRIGERATION, H. v., 275 B.R. 789 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . $223,327.75 0.05% 0.00 111.66 11/16/98 GO 00 1,043.24 $222,284.51 0.05% 0.00 111.14 11/17/98 CO 03 48.23 . . .

COPPENOLLE, v. FALCONE,, 802 So. 2d 462 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . bond because her complaint was founded on a “duly recorded document” within the meaning of section 48.23 . . .

GOLDEN SHORES PROPERTIES, LLC. v. SANTOPIETRO,, 792 So. 2d 644 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that “[w]hen the initial pleading does not show that . . .

SELIGMAN, v. NORTH AMERICAN MORTGAGE COMPANY, M. M., 781 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . valuable consideration and without notice, unless the same be recorded according to law However, section 48.23 . . . Cox, 57 Fla. 505, 49 So. 191 (1909), after citing to a prior similar version of section 48.23(1), the . . . a nullity on its face because it does not set forth the relief sought as to the property as section 48.23 . . .

ARYEH TRADING, v. TRIMFAST GROUP, INC., 778 So. 2d 336 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Avalon, a duly recorded instrument was necessary to maintain a lis pendens as of right, but section 48.23 . . .

DOWDY, v. CHARTER FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., 122 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (M.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . pendens in 1995, the government’s claim against the Lisa Lane property is barred pursuant to section 48.23 . . . Claim Under Florida Law The lis pendens statute on which the plaintiffs rely is codified at section 48.23 . . . Section 48.23(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . . Section 48.23(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . . Despite section 48.23(b)’s plain language, however, the United States Supreme Court has held that only . . .

HOTEL EUROPE, INC. v. AOUATE,, 766 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Section 48.23, Florida Statutes (1999), reads, in pertinent parts, as follows: (1)(a) No action in any . . . Aouate’s attempt to correct these procedural deficiencies does not satisfy the requirements of section 48.23 . . . Section 48.23(2)(a) does not allow the extension of a lis pendens for more than a year unless “the relief . . . complaint is not founded upon a recorded instrument or upon a statutory lien, as required by section 48.23 . . . Furthermore, we agree with Hotel Europe that even if section 48.23 allowed a lis pendens in this case . . .

AVALON ASSOCIATES OF DELAWARE LIMITED, v. AVALON PARK ASSOCIATES, INC., 760 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Lis pendens in Florida is governed by -section 48.23, Florida Statutes. . . . Thus section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes, is designed to moderate and to limit the common law effect of . . . Section 48.23 requires that the ac tion be founded on the recorded instrument. . . . with non-final appeals suggests potential inequities and a need for resolution of the discrepancy. . § 48.23 . . .

DONG VAN NGUYEN, v. DOBBS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, INC., 94 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (W.D. Mo. 2000)

. . . Dennis McMurray, another driver, averaged 48.23 hours per week. Both Guy and McMurray are white. . . .

THOMSON, v. THOMSON,, 751 So. 2d 103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . As the husband’s interest is not founded upon a duly recorded instrument, section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes . . .

UNITED STATES v. REGISTER, Jr., 182 F.3d 820 (11th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 48.23(l)("(a) No action in any of the state or federal courts in this state operates as a lis pendens . . .

JOGE INVESTMENTS, INC. f k a N. V. a f k a N. V. a v. MILLENNIUM CAPITAL, LLC, a, 724 So. 2d 728 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 48.23(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), requires that a notice of lis pendens contain “the names . . .

M. DECUBELLIS, v. RITCHOTTE,, 730 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 48.23, Florida Statutes (1997) defines the effect of a notice of lis pendens on rights in the . . . In relevant part, section 48.23 states that: [T]he filing for record of such notice of lis pendens shall . . .

In KISH, KISH, v. VERNIERO, C., 221 B.R. 118 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1998)

. . . from Ex parte Young ”); Modern Constitutional Law, Structure and Jurisdiction of Federal Courts, § 48.23 . . .

MOSS, v. ARCA DEVELOPMENT, INC., 687 So. 2d 70 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Under section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (1995), they are therefore entitled to maintain a lis pen-dens . . .

UNITED STATES, v. ST. PIERRE, St., 950 F. Supp. 334 (M.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . . § 48.23 (West 1994). . . .

SAILFISH POINT, INC. v. SAILFISH POINT OWNERS REPRESENTATIVES JAFFE,, 679 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . ownership of the property in question, the lis pen-dens goes beyond the notice provisions of section 48.23 . . . the property involved or to be affected, and a statement of the relief sought as to the property. § 48.23 . . . While a notice of lis pendens may be filed on personal property such as the Utility stock, see section 48.23 . . .

MEDICAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. LITTLE ARCH CREEK PROPERTIES, INC., 675 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 1996)

. . . is not based upon a duly recorded instrument or a construction lien and is thus governed by section 48.23 . . . We resolve this conflict by holding that in situations governed by section 48.23(3), it is within the . . . The court first turned to section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (1993), which governs a notice of lis pendens . . . See § 48.23(3). . . . A notice of lis pen-dens or actual notice filed on the public records, see § 48.23(l)(a), Fla. . . .

LENNAR FLORIDA HOLDINGS, INC. v. FIRST FAMILY BANK,, 660 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . See § 48.23(3), Fla.Stat. (1993); Mohican Valley, Inc. v. . . .

THUNDER BASIN COAL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION, 56 F.3d 1275 (10th Cir. 1995)

. . . and plans for mine excavation, § 77.1101, roof control, § 75.220, and employee training, §§ 48.3 and 48.23 . . .

MEDICAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT, INC. a v. LITTLE ARCH CREEK PROPERTIES, INC. a, 656 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Florida Statutes section 48.23 governs the use of a lis pendens, and treats a lis pendens as one of two . . . exists where the underlying action is not founded on a duly recorded instrument or construction lien. § 48.23 . . . control and discharge the notice of lis pendens as the court may grant and dissolve injunctions.” § 48.23 . . . DCA 1989) (where a lis pendens is not founded upon a lawsuit involving a recorded instrument, section 48.23 . . . One of these reasons is based upon Florida Statutes section 48.23(3), and the other upon simple fairness . . . I concur with Judge Levy’s opinion and write only to point out the following: Section 48.23(3), Fla.Stat . . .

HONEY, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE,, 879 F. Supp. 615 (S.D. Miss. 1995)

. . . Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 48.23 (1994) (employer obtaining workers from labor service such . . .

BLISS, v. ERNST HOME CENTER, INC. a ERNST HOME CENTER,, 866 F. Supp. 1362 (D. Utah 1994)

. . . Larson's Workmen's Compensation § 48.23; see also Marlow v. . . .

ROGER HOMES CORP. v. PERSANT CONSTRUCTION CO., 637 So. 2d 5 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . The creation and maintenance of a lis pendens is controlled by section 48.23, Florida Statutes (1993) . . . be “founded upon a duly recorded instrument, or a mechanic’s lien claimed against the property.” § 48.23 . . . control and discharge the notice of lis pendens as the court may grant and dissolve injunctions.” § 48.23 . . . Furthermore, Persant is not entitled to a lis pendens based upon section 48.23(3), which allows a court . . .

THUNDER BASIN COAL CO. v. REICH, SECRETARY OF LABOR,, 510 U.S. 200 (U.S. 1994)

. . . and plans for mine evacuation, §77.1101, roof control, §75.220, and employee training, §§ 48.3 and 48.23 . . .

HAISFIELD, J. s v. ACP FLORIDA HOLDINGS, INC., 629 So. 2d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . See § 48.23(2), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . See § 48.23(4). In Hough v. . . .

BUCHANAN, v. W. SULLIVAN, Jr. a, 620 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . is likely to arise again upon remand, we call the attention of the court and the parties to sections 48.23 . . . of lis pendens has been filed; (3) if an injunction is proper, whether it is necessary under section 48.23 . . .

In HAISFIELD ENTERPRISES OF FLORIDA, PEABEY ASSOCIATES, ACP v. HAISFIELD, J. s a, 154 B.R. 803 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . The state court analogized the language in Fla.Stat § 48.23(3) governing the filing of a lis pen-dens . . .

CHIUSOLO, v. KENNEDY,, 614 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 1993)

. . . . § 48.23(3), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

A. GAY, v. GAY,, 604 So. 2d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . CLASSIFICATION OF PENDING ACTION Section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (1989), states: When the initial . . . We hold that the trial court was empowered to discharge the lis pendens under section 48.23(3) since . . .

FINKELSTEIN, v. B. FINKELSTEIN,, 603 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . . § 48.23(3), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . This court has held that under section 48.23(3) two consequences attach to the filing of a notice of . . .

CHIUSOLO, v. KENNEDY, 589 So. 2d 420 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . happen here or in Sparks, then the challenging party should have the burden of proof pursuant to section 48.23 . . . That is not the intent of section 48.23(3). . . . Section 48.23(3) only uses the reference to “granting and dissolving injunctions” by way of analogy. . . . See § 48.23(3), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . lis pen-dens is quashed, and this cause is remanded for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to section 48.23 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, v. REAL PROPERTY,, 588 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 1991)

. . . See § 48.23, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .