Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 50 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 50 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 50

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 50
LEGAL AND OFFICIAL ADVERTISEMENTS
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 50
CHAPTER 50
LEGAL AND OFFICIAL ADVERTISEMENTS
50.011 Publication of legal notices.
50.021 Publication when no newspaper in county.
50.0211 Internet website publication.
50.031 Newspapers in which legal notices and process may be published.
50.0311 Publication of advertisements and public notices on a publicly accessible website and governmental access channels.
50.041 Proof of publication; uniform affidavits required.
50.051 Proof of publication; form of uniform affidavit.
50.061 Amounts chargeable.
50.0711 Court docket fund; service charges; publications.
50.011 Publication of legal notices.Whenever by statute an official or legal advertisement or a publication or notice in a newspaper or on a governmental agency website has been or is directed or permitted in the nature of or in lieu of process, or for constructive service, or in initiating, assuming, reviewing, exercising, or enforcing jurisdiction or power, or for any purpose, including all legal notices and advertisements of sheriffs and tax collectors, such legislation, whether existing or repealed, means either of the following:
(1) A publication in a newspaper printed and published periodically at least once a week, containing at least 25 percent of its words in the English language, available to the public generally for the publication of official or other notices and customarily containing information of a public character or of interest or of value to the residents or owners of property in the county where published, or of interest or of value to the general public, which:
(a) Has an audience consisting of at least 10 percent of the households in the county or municipality, as determined by the most recent decennial census, where the legal or public notice is being published or posted, by calculating the combination of the total of the number of print copies reflecting the day of highest print circulation, of which at least 25 percent of such print copies must be delivered to individuals’ home or business addresses, as certified biennially by a certified independent third-party auditor, and the total number of online unique monthly visitors to the newspaper’s website from within the state, as measured by industry-accepted website analytics software. The newspaper must also be sold, or otherwise available to the public, at no less than 10 publicly accessible outlets. For legal and public notices published by nongovernmental entities, the newspaper’s audience in the county or municipality where the project, property, or other primary subject of the notice is located must meet the 10 percent threshold; or
(b) Is entered or qualified to be admitted and entered as periodical class mail at a post office in the county where published.
(2) A publication on a publicly accessible website under s. 50.0311.
History.s. 2, ch. 3022, 1877; RS 1296; GS 1727; s. 1, ch. 5610, 1907; RGS 2942; s. 1, ch. 12104, 1927; CGL 4666, 4901; s. 1, ch. 63-387; s. 6, ch. 67-254; s. 21, ch. 99-2; s. 1, ch. 2021-17; s. 1, ch. 2022-103.
Note.Former s. 49.01.
50.021 Publication when no newspaper in county.When any law, or order or decree of court, directs advertisements to be made in a county and there is no newspaper published in the county, the advertisement may be published on a publicly accessible website as provided in s. 50.0311 or made by posting three copies thereof in three different places in the county, one of which shall be at the front door of the courthouse, and by publication in the nearest county in which a newspaper qualified under this chapter is published.
History.RS 1297; GS 1728; RGS 2943; CGL 4667; s. 6, ch. 67-254; s. 2, ch. 2021-17; s. 2, ch. 2022-103.
Note.Former s. 49.02.
50.0211 Internet website publication.
(1) This section applies to legal notices that must be published in accordance with this chapter unless otherwise specified.
(2) If a governmental agency publishes a legal notice in the print edition of a newspaper, each legal notice must be published on the newspaper’s website on the same day that the printed notice appears in the newspaper, at no additional charge, in a separate web page titled “Legal Notices,” “Legal Advertising,” or comparable identifying language. A link to the legal notices web page shall be provided on the front page of the newspaper’s website that provides access to the legal notices. If there is a specified size and placement required for a printed legal notice, the size and placement of the notice on the newspaper’s website must optimize its online visibility in keeping with the print requirements. The newspaper’s web pages that contain legal notices must present the legal notices as the dominant and leading subject matter of those pages. The newspaper’s website must contain a search function to facilitate searching the legal notices. A fee may not be charged, and registration may not be required, for viewing or searching legal notices on a newspaper’s website if the legal notice is published in a newspaper.
(3)(a) If a legal notice is published in the print edition of a newspaper, the newspaper publishing the notice shall place the notice on the statewide website established and maintained as an initiative of the Florida Press Association as a repository for such notices located at the following address: www.floridapublicnotices.com.
(b) A legal notice placed on the statewide website created under this subsection must be:
1. Accessible and searchable by party name and case number.
2. Published for a period of at least 90 consecutive days after the first day of publication.
(c) The statewide website created under this subsection shall maintain a searchable archive of all legal notices published on the publicly accessible website for 18 months after the first day of publication. Such searchable archive shall be provided and accessible to the general public without charge.
History.s. 1, ch. 2012-212; s. 1, ch. 2014-210; s. 3, ch. 2021-17; s. 3, ch. 2022-4; s. 3, ch. 2022-103.
50.031 Newspapers in which legal notices and process may be published.If a governmental agency publishes a legal notice in a newspaper, no notice or publication required to be published in the nature of or in lieu of process of any kind, nature, character, or description provided for under any law of the state, whether heretofore or hereafter enacted, and whether pertaining to constructive service, or the initiating, assuming, reviewing, exercising, or enforcing jurisdiction or power, by any court in this state, or any notice of sale of property, real or personal, for taxes, state, county, or municipal, or sheriff’s, guardian’s, or administrator’s or any sale made pursuant to any judicial order, decree, or statute or any other publication or notice pertaining to any affairs of the state, or any county, municipality, or other political subdivision thereof, shall be deemed to have been published in accordance with the statutes providing for such publication, unless the same shall have been published for the prescribed period of time required for such publication, in a newspaper which at the time of such publication shall have been in existence for 2 years and meets the requirements set forth in s. 50.011, or in a newspaper which is a direct successor of a newspaper which has been so published; provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall apply where in any county there shall be no newspaper in existence which shall have been published for the length of time above prescribed. No legal publication of any kind, nature, or description, as herein defined, shall be valid or binding or held to be in compliance with the statutes providing for such publication unless the same shall have been published in accordance with this section or s. 50.0311. Proof of such publication shall be made by uniform affidavit.
History.ss. 1-3, ch. 14830, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 4274(1); s. 7, ch. 22858, 1945; s. 6, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 74-221; s. 22, ch. 99-2; s. 4, ch. 2021-17; s. 4, ch. 2022-103.
Note.Former s. 49.03.
50.0311 Publication of advertisements and public notices on a publicly accessible website and governmental access channels.
(1) For purposes of this chapter, the term “governmental agency” means a county, municipality, school board, or other unit of local government or political subdivision in this state.
(2) For purposes of notices and advertisements required under s. 50.011, the term “publicly accessible website” means a county’s official website or other private website designated by the county for the publication of legal notices and advertisements that is accessible via the Internet. All advertisements and public notices published on a website as provided in this chapter must be in searchable form and indicate the date on which the advertisement or public notice was first published on the website.
(3) A governmental agency may use the publicly accessible website of the county in which it lies to publish legally required advertisements and public notices if the cost of publishing advertisements and public notices on such website is less than the cost of publishing advertisements and public notices in a newspaper.
(4) A governmental agency with at least 75 percent of its population located within a county with a population of fewer than 160,000 may use a publicly accessible website to publish legally required advertisements and public notices only if the governing body of the governmental agency, at a public hearing that has been noticed in a newspaper as provided in this chapter, determines that the residents of the governmental agency have sufficient access to the Internet by broadband service, as defined in s. 364.02, or by any other means, such that publishing advertisements and public notices on a publicly accessible website will not unreasonably restrict public access.
(5) A special district spanning the geographic boundaries of more than one county that satisfies the criteria for publishing and chooses to publish legally required advertisements and public notices on a publicly accessible website must publish such advertisements and public notices on the publicly accessible website of each county it spans. For purposes of this subsection, the term “special district” has the same meaning as in s. 189.012.
(6) A governmental agency that uses a publicly accessible website to publish legally required advertisements and public notices shall provide notice at least once per year in a newspaper of general circulation or another publication that is mailed or delivered to all residents and property owners throughout the government’s jurisdiction, indicating that property owners and residents may receive legally required advertisements and public notices from the governmental agency by first-class mail or e-mail upon registering their name and address or e-mail address with the governmental agency. The governmental agency shall maintain a registry of names, addresses, and e-mail addresses of property owners and residents who have requested in writing that they receive legally required advertisements and public notices from the governmental agency by first-class mail or e-mail.
(7) A link to advertisements and public notices published on a publicly accessible website shall be conspicuously placed:
(a) On the website’s homepage or on a page accessible through a direct link from the homepage.
(b) On the homepage of the website of each governmental agency publishing notices on the publicly accessible website or on a page accessible through a direct link from the homepage.
(8) A governmental agency that has a governmental access channel authorized under s. 610.109 may also include on its governmental access channel a summary of all advertisements and public notices that are published on a publicly accessible website.
(9) A public bid advertisement made by a governmental agency on a publicly accessible website must include a method to accept electronic bids.
History.s. 5, ch. 2022-103.
50.041 Proof of publication; uniform affidavits required.
(1) All affidavits made for the purpose of establishing proof of publication of public notices or legal advertisements shall be uniform throughout the state.
(2) Each such affidavit shall be printed upon white paper and shall be 81/2 inches in width and of convenient length, not less than 51/2 inches. A white margin of not less than 21/2 inches shall be left at the right side of each affidavit form and upon or in this space shall be substantially pasted a clipping which shall be a true copy of the public notice or legal advertisement for which proof is executed. Alternatively, the affidavit may be provided in electronic rather than paper form, provided the notarization of the affidavit complies with the requirements of s. 117.021.
(3) There may be a charge not to exceed $2 levied for the preparation and execution of each such proof of publication or affidavit.
History.s. 1, ch. 19290, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 4668(1); s. 1, ch. 63-49; s. 26, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 76-58; s. 2, ch. 2012-212; s. 5, ch. 2021-17.
Note.Former s. 49.04.
50.051 Proof of publication; form of uniform affidavit.The printed form upon which all such affidavits establishing proof of publication are to be executed shall be substantially as follows:

NAME OF COUNTY

STATE OF FLORIDA

COUNTY OF  :

Before the undersigned authority personally appeared  , who on oath says that he or she is   of   County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a   in the matter of   in the   Court, was published on the publicly accessible website of   County, Florida, or in a newspaper by print in the issues of   on   (date)  .

Affiant further says that the website or newspaper complies with all legal requirements for publication in chapter 50, Florida Statutes.

Sworn to and subscribed before me this   day of  ,   (year)  , by  , who is personally known to me or who has produced   (type of identification)   as identification.

  (Signature of Notary Public)  

  (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public)  

  (Notary Public)  

History.s. 2, ch. 19290, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 4668(2); s. 6, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 93-62; s. 291, ch. 95-147; s. 23, ch. 99-2; s. 3, ch. 99-6; s. 6, ch. 2021-17; s. 6, ch. 2022-103.
Note.Former s. 49.05.
50.061 Amounts chargeable.
(1) The publisher of any newspaper publishing any and all official public notices or legal advertisements shall charge therefor the rates specified in this section without rebate, commission or refund.
(2) The charge for publishing each such official public notice or legal advertisement shall be 70 cents per square inch for the first insertion and 40 cents per square inch for each subsequent insertion, except that government notices required to be published more than once, the cost of which is paid for by the government and not paid in advance by or allowed to be recouped from private parties, may not be charged for the second and successive insertions at a rate greater than 85 percent of the original rate.
(3) Where the regular established minimum commercial rate per square inch of the newspaper publishing such official public notices or legal advertisements is in excess of the rate herein stipulated, said minimum commercial rate per square inch may be charged for all such legal advertisements or official public notices for each insertion, except that government notices required to be published more than once, the cost of which is paid for by the government and not paid in advance by or allowed to be recouped from private parties, may not be charged for the second and successive insertions at a rate greater than 85 percent of the original rate.
(4) A governmental agency publishing an official public notice or legal advertisement may procure publication by soliciting and accepting written bids from newspapers published in the county, in which case the specified charges in this section do not apply.
(5) If the public notice is published in the print edition of a newspaper, the publishing of the notice on the newspaper’s website pursuant to s. 50.0211(2) must be done at no additional charge.
(6) All official public notices and legal advertisements shall be charged and paid for on the basis of 6-point type on 6-point body, unless otherwise specified by statute.
(7) Any person violating this section, either by allowing or accepting any rebate, commission, or refund, commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(8) Failure to charge the rates prescribed by this section shall in no way affect the validity of any official public notice or legal advertisement and shall not subject same to legal attack upon such grounds.
History.s. 3, ch. 3022, 1877; RS 1298; GS 1729; RGS 2944; s. 1, ch. 12215, 1927; CGL 4668; ss. 1, 2, 2A, 2B, ch. 20264, 1941; s. 1, ch. 23663, 1947; s. 1, ch. 57-160; s. 1, ch. 63-50; s. 1, ch. 65-569; s. 6, ch. 67-254; s. 15, ch. 71-136; s. 35, ch. 73-332; s. 1, ch. 90-279; s. 3, ch. 2012-212; s. 2, ch. 2014-210; s. 7, ch. 2021-17; s. 7, ch. 2022-103.
Note.Former s. 49.06.
50.0711 Court docket fund; service charges; publications.
(1) The clerk of the court in each county may establish a court docket fund for the purpose of paying the cost of publication of the fact of the filing of any civil case in the circuit court of the county by the style and of the calendar relating to such cases. This court docket fund shall be funded by $1 mandatory court cost for all civil actions, suits, or proceedings filed in the circuit court of the county. The clerk shall maintain such funds separate and apart, and the proceeds from this court cost shall not be diverted to any other fund or for any purpose other than that established in this section. The clerk of the court shall dispense the fund to the designated publicly accessible website publisher or record newspaper in the county on a quarterly basis.
(2) If a judicial circuit publishes legal notices in a newspaper, a newspaper qualified under the terms of s. 50.011 shall be designated as the record newspaper for such publication by an order of the majority of the judges in the judicial circuit in which such county is located, and such order shall be filed and recorded with the clerk of the circuit court for such county. The designated record newspaper may be changed at the end of any fiscal year of the county by a majority vote of the judges of the judicial circuit of the county ordering such change 30 days prior to the end of the fiscal year, notice of which order shall be given to the previously designated record newspaper.
(3) The publicly accessible website publisher or publishers of any designated record newspapers receiving payment from this court docket fund shall publish, without additional charge, the fact of the filing of any civil case, suit, or action filed in such county in the circuit. Such publication shall be in accordance with a schedule agreed upon between the website publisher or record newspaper and the clerk of the court in such county.
(4) The publicly accessible website publisher or publishers of any designated record newspapers receiving revenues from the court docket fund established in subsection (1) shall, without charge, accept legal advertisements for the purpose of service of process by publication under s. 49.011(4), (10), and (11) when such publication is required of persons authorized to proceed as indigent persons under s. 57.081.
History.s. 46, ch. 2004-265; s. 8, ch. 2022-103.

F.S. 50 on Google Scholar

F.S. 50 on Casetext

Amendments to 50


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 50
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S50.061 7 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - PUBLISHER ACCEPT REBATE COMMISSION OR REFUND - M: S
S252.50 - HEALTH-SAFETY - VIOL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS EMERGENCY MGT - M: S
S327.50 - HEALTH-SAFETY - REMOVED - I: N
S327.50 3 - HEALTH-SAFETY - UNLAWFUL USE OF SIREN/FLASHING LIGHTS ON VES - M: S
S327.50 4 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL TO USE ENGINE CUT OFF DEVICE - M: S
S531.50 3a - FRAUD - UNAPPROVED INCORRECT WEIGHT MEASURES SUBSQ OFF - M: F
S531.50 3a - FRAUD - UNAPPROVED INCORRECT WEIGHT MEASURES 1ST OFF - M: S
S531.50 3b - FRAUD - USE REJECTED WEIGHT MEASURES WO AUTH SUBSQ OFF - M: F
S531.50 3b - FRAUD - USE REJECTED WEIGHT MEASURES WO AUTH 1ST OFF - M: S
S531.50 3b - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - DISPOSE WEIGHT MEASURES WO AUTH SUBSQ OFF - M: F
S531.50 3b - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - DISPOSE WEIGHT MEASURES WO AUTH 1ST OFF - M: S
S531.50 3c - FRAUD - RMV REJECT MARK WGT MEASURE WO AUTH SUBSQ OFF - M: F
S531.50 3c - FRAUD - RMV REJECT MARK WEIGHT MEASURE WO AUTH 1ST OFF - M: S
S534.50 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - DELETE INFRACTION - I: N
S562.50 - HEALTH-SAFETY - FURNISH LIQUOR HABITUAL DRUNKARD AFTER NOTICE - M: S
S562.50 - HEALTH-SAFETY - FURNISH LIQUOR HABITUAL DRUNK SUBSQ OFF - F: T
S585.50 - HEALTH-SAFETY - FEED UNSTERILIZED GARBAGE TO ANIMALS - M: S
S590.50 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REPEALED 1999-292 - F: T
S655.50 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - VIOL FL CTRL MONEY LAUND TERROR FINAN INST ACT - M: F
S655.50 10b1 - FRAUD - TRANSACT CURRENCY PATTERN 300 TO UND 20K DOLS - F: T
S655.50 10b2 - FRAUD - TRANSACT CURRENCY PATTERN 20K LESS 100K DOLS - F: S
S655.50 10b3 - FRAUD - TRANSACT CURRENCY PATTERN 100K DOLS OR MORE - F: F
S817.50 - FRAUD-SWINDLE - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 7867 - M: S
S817.50 1 - FRAUD-SWINDLE - FALSE REPORTS OF A COMMUNICABLE DISEASE - F: T



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

LITTLE, v. RECLAIM IDAHO,, 140 S. Ct. 2616 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Schaffer , 429 U.S. 1325, 1330, 97 S.Ct. 14, 50 L.Ed.2d 56 (1976) (Marshall, J., in chambers); see also . . . Schaffer , 429 U.S. 1325, 1330, 97 S.Ct. 14, 50 L.Ed.2d 56 (1976) (Marshall, J., in chambers) (concluding . . .

CALVARY CHAPEL DAYTON VALLEY v. SISOLAK,, 140 S. Ct. 2603 (U.S. 2020)

. . . A church, synagogue, or mosque, regardless of its size, may not admit more than 50 persons, but casinos . . . and certain other favored facilities may admit 50% of their maximum occupancy-and in the case of gigantic . . . It wishes to host worship services for about 90 congregants, a figure that amounts to 50% of its fire-code . . . that they are welcome to exceed, and in some cases far exceed, the 50-person limit imposed on places . . . a flat 50-person rule. . . . are held can seat hundreds of spectators, and under the directive, these facilities may admit up to 50% . . . Thus, while Calvary Chapel cannot admit more than 50 congregants even if families sit six feet apart, . . . spectators at a bowling tournament can sit together in groups of 50 provided that each group maintains . . . 50% occupancy cap to secular organizations like restaurants, bars, casinos, and gyms. . . . -person or 50% occupancy cap. . . .

P. BARR, v. PURKEY, 140 S. Ct. 2594 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Georgia , 429 U.S. 1301, 96 S.Ct. 3235, 50 L.Ed.2d 30 (1976) ] make it increasingly clear that the death . . .

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . military assistance to a foreign country or international organization"); National Emergencies Act, 50 . . . emergency and activate over 100 statutory emergency powers); International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 . . . the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States"); Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . "[E]mployers with fewer than 50 employees are not required to provide" any form of health insurance, . . . This requirement does not apply to employers with fewer than 50 employees, 26 U.S.C. § 4980H(c)(2), or . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Leupp , 210 U.S. 50, 78, 28 S.Ct. 690, 52 L.Ed. 954 (1908) ; Gabel, supra , at 521-523. . . . Newdow , 542 U.S. 1, 49-50, 124 S.Ct. 2301, 159 L.Ed.2d 98 (2004) (THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Boren , 429 U.S. 190, 192, 97 S.Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976) ). . . . Id., at 50. • These requirements establish that admitting privileges serve no " 'relevant credentialing . . . Boren , 429 U.S. 190, 193, 97 S.Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976) ; Singleton v. . . . Doe 6, a board-certified OB/GYN practitioner with roughly 50 years' experience, provides only medication . . . Boren , 429 U.S. 190, 193, 97 S.Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976) (quoting Barrows v. . . . S. 190, 97 S.Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976), the sole appellant with a live claim at the time of decision . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Brief for Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae 50-53; Tr. of Oral Arg. 57-62. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Many applicants found to have a credible fear-about 50% over the same 10-year period-did not pursue asylum . . . Shauers , 574 U.S. 40, 50, 135 S.Ct. 521, 190 L.Ed.2d 422 (2014) (internal quotation marks and ellipsis . . . Mar. 28, 2019); GAO, Asylum: Additional Actions Needed To Assess and Address Fraud Risks 24 (GAO-16-50 . . . See Tr. of Oral Arg. 46-50. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. , 429 U.S. 252, 266, 97 S.Ct. 555, 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977). . . . Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. , 429 U.S. 252, 267, 97 S.Ct. 555, 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977). . . . See, e.g., State Farm , 463 U.S. at 50, 103 S.Ct. 2856 ("courts may not accept appellate counsel's post . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Gilbert , 429 U.S. 125, 143, 97 S.Ct. 401, 50 L.Ed.2d 343 (1976), the legislative history of Title VII's . . . courts might disregard its plain terms," ante , at 1749, but it has no qualms about disregarding over 50 . . . ; Prohibitions on Discrimination) • 49 U.S.C. § 47123(a) (Airport Improvement; Nondiscrimination) • 50 . . . U.S.C. § 3809(b)(3) (Selective Service System) • 50 U.S.C. § 4842(a)(1)(B) (Anti-Boycott Act of 2018 . . . Boren , 429 U.S. 190, 197-199, 97 S.Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976) ; Frontiero v. . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Indeed, for 50 years the "Federal Government has referred to the Trail" as a " 'unit' " of the National . . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

ANDRUS v. TEXAS, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (U.S. 2020)

. . . testimony that Andrus had been "good around [Davis]" during the 1-year period he had lived with Davis. 50 . . .

J. LOMAX, v. ORTIZ- MARQUEZ,, 140 S. Ct. 1721 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

J. THOLE, v. U. S. BANK N. A, 140 S. Ct. 1615 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . . Boren , 429 U.S. 190, 194-195, 97 S.Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976) (vendor who "independently" suffered . . . S. 190, 97 S.Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976). But both endorsed expansive views of standing. . . .

GE ENERGY POWER CONVERSION FRANCE SAS, CORP. SAS, v. OUTOKUMPU STAINLESS USA, LLC,, 140 S. Ct. 1637 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Porter , 9 How. 235, 242, 50 U.S. 235, 13 L.Ed. 119 (1850). Cf. Glidden Co. v. . . . Porter , 9 How. 235, 242, 50 U.S. 235, 13 L.Ed. 119 (1850). . . . Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered, 50 . . . Constitution, 50 Suffolk U. L. . . . Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico's Legal Status Reconsidered, 50 . . .

LUCKY BRAND DUNGAREES, INC. v. MARCEL FASHIONS GROUP, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1589 (U.S. 2020)

. . . suits-that is, where they share a " 'common nucleus of operative fact[s].' " Brief for Respondent 2, 27, 31, 50 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Boren , 429 U.S. 190, 193, 97 S.Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976), it has never provided a substantive justification . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . . the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 84 Stat. 1127, and the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 50 . . . 8623, 12622, 16014, 16512 ; 46 U.S.C. §§ 51504, 53106, 53206 ; 47 U.S.C. § 395 ; 49 U.S.C. § 5312 ; 50 . . . 1542 ; 42 U.S.C. §§ 290bb-38, 295h, 618, 5318a, 15093 ; 43 U.S.C. §§ 1356a, 1619 ; 46 U.S.C. § 53106 ; 50 . . .

GEORGIA, v. PUBLIC. RESOURCE. ORG, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1498 (U.S. 2020)

. . . West Publishing Co. , 27 F. 50, 57 (CC Minn. 1886) (citing English cases and treatises and concluding . . . See, e.g. , OCGA § 17-7-50 (2013) (case annotation summarizing facts and holdings of nine cases construing . . . Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 102, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976) (incorporating into the majority the Eighth . . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499 (1906) (acknowledging that . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . App. 50, 63. . . . App. 32, 49-50, 55. . . .

COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII, v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND,, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (U.S. 2020)

. . . If the pipe ends 50 miles from navigable waters and the pipe emits pollutants that travel with groundwater . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. A. CHRISTIAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . . The landowners estimate that their cleanup would cost Atlantic Richfield $50 to $58 million. . . . Neither phrase appears among the Act's list of over 50 defined terms. 42 U.S.C. § 9601. . . .

THRYV, INC. v. CLICK- TO- CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP,, 140 S. Ct. 1367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Boren , 429 U.S. 190, 97 S.Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976) ; Taylor v. . . . United States , 281 U.S. 276, 288, 50 S.Ct. 253, 74 L.Ed. 854 (1930) ; Thompson v. . . . United States , 281 U.S. 276, 50 S.Ct. 253, 74 L.Ed. 854 (1930), the Court stated that the Sixth Amendment . . . protects the right "that the verdict should be unanimous," id. , at 288, 50 S.Ct. 253. . . . Illinois , 567 U.S. 50, 132 S.Ct. 2221, 183 L.Ed.2d 89 (2012) ; J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. . . . United States , 281 U.S. 276, 288, 50 S.Ct. 253, 74 L.Ed. 854 (1930). Ibid. See also Andres v. . . .

BABB, v. WILKIE,, 140 S. Ct. 1168 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Doyle , 429 U.S. 274, 97 S.Ct. 568, 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). . . . Doyle , 429 U.S. 274, 287, 97 S.Ct. 568, 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). . . . Doyle , 429 U.S. 274, 285, 97 S.Ct. 568, 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977) (rejecting rule that "would require reinstatement . . . If, for example, an employer hires a 50-year-old person who passed a computer-aptitude test administered . . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

KANSAS, v. GLOVER, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY, v. FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., 140 S. Ct. 1081 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Von Lingen , 113 U.S. 40, 49-50, 5 S.Ct. 346, 28 L.Ed. 885 (1885) (a stipulation going to "substantive . . . Von Lingen , 113 U.S. 40, 50, 5 S.Ct. 346, 28 L.Ed. 885 (1885), I am not aware of a case in which this . . .

COMCAST CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN- OWNED MEDIA,, 140 S. Ct. 1009 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

K. KAHLER, v. KANSAS, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Holmes, The Common Law 50 (1881); see also ibid. . . .

DAVIS v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Lopez , 923 F.2d 47, 50 (1991) ( per curiam )). . . . Romeo , 385 Fed.Appx. 45, 49-50 (CA2 2010) ; United States v. . . .

GUERRERO- LASPRILLA, v. P. BARR, v. P., 140 S. Ct. 1062 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Brief for Respondent 49-50. . . .

L. ALLEN, v. A. COOPER, III,, 140 S. Ct. 994 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See State Defendants' Memorandum in No. 15-627 (EDNC), Doc. 50, p. 7. . . . See Brief for Petitioners 7-10, 47-50. . . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

KANSAS, v. GARCIA v. v., 140 S. Ct. 791 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . . Technology, and Policy 233 (NASA SP-4014 1970); see also McFall-Johnsen, Newspaper Front Pages From 50 . . .

HOLGUIN- HERNANDEZ, v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 762 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 552 U.S. 38, 49-50, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) (noting the District Court's . . .

SHULAR, v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 779 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Koray , 515 U.S. 50, 65, 115 S.Ct. 2021, 132 L.Ed.2d 46 (1995) ; Smith v. . . .

MCKINNEY, v. ARIZONA, 140 S. Ct. 702 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

MONASKY, v. TAGLIERI, 140 S. Ct. 719 (U.S. 2020)

. . . R., at 423, ¶50, 424 D. L. R. (4th), at 411, ¶50. . . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Tr. of Oral Arg. 50. . . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

WOLF, v. COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS,, 140 S. Ct. 681 (U.S. 2020)

. . . down to an inability to enforce its immigration goals, possibly in only the immediate term, in one of 50 . . . Its public-charge rule is set to go into effect in 49 of 50 States next week. . . .

MURRAY STREET ACQUISITION LLC, v. KUZMICH,, 140 S. Ct. 904 (U.S. 2020)

. . . 50 MURRAY STREET ACQUISITION LLC, Petitioner v. John KUZMICH, et al. . . .

C. ROTKISKE, v. KLEMM,, 140 S. Ct. 355 (U.S. 2019)

. . . United States , 535 U.S. 43, 49-50, 122 S.Ct. 1036, 152 L.Ed.2d 79 (2002). . . . Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. , 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. . . .

DERAFFELE, v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 217 (U.S. 2019)

. . . UNITED STATES No. 19-50 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. ROMERO, Jr., 935 F.3d 1124 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Oral Arg. at 3:50-4:10. . . .

ELHADY, v. H. KABLE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . MSJ Ex. 50 at ¶ 9; Pls.' MSJ Ex. 25 at 340:17-341:13, 343:21-344:14. . . .

KAMPSCHROER v. ANOKA COUNTY Le LLC, DPS, 935 F.3d 645 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . deputies, staff, investigators, employees or agents of the other governmental agencies; Entity Does (1-50 . . .

V. CASSIDY, v. HALYARD HEALTH, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 474 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . Anderson , 477 U.S. at 249-50, 106 S.Ct. 2505 (internal citations omitted). Walden v. . . .

ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, v. SANDOZ, INC., 935 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Br. 36; see id . at 36-49; and (2) the recited results are not "material to patentability," id . at 50 . . . ; see id . at 50-62. . . .

RIDGELL, v. CITY OF PINE BLUFF, A In, 935 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . P. 50(b), 59(e). . . . P. 50(a). . . . P. 50(b), and it is properly before us. . . .

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 935 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. at 1549-50 ; Akins , 524 U.S. at 20-25, 118 S.Ct. 1777 ; Pub. Citizen v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. TAYLOR, v., 935 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . , Leon , 468 U.S. at 922, 104 S.Ct. 3405, or on binding judicial precedent, Davis , 564 U.S. at 249-50 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BAPTISTE,, 935 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . and the tax preparers would divide the proceeds, with Baptiste often taking a cut of between 25% and 50% . . .

SCHINK, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 935 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . in reduction of agitation and minimal improvement in Schink's mood, and he assigned a GAF score of 50 . . . The same is true of the ALJ's suggestion that time periods like "50% of the work day or work week" were . . . The known GAF scores ranged from 50 to 60, reinforcing that Schink had at least moderate difficulty in . . . The term "extreme" was defined as "unable to function in this area over 50% of the work day or work week . . .

EDMO, v. CORIZON, INC. Al v. Al, 935 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 102, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976) (quotation omitted). . . .

IN RE CORPORATE RESOURCE SERVICES, INC. S. v., 603 B.R. 888 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . He also testified that he performed 50 to 100 analyses of business plans where companies were seeking . . .

RAY, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, v. As, 935 F.3d 703 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Doyle , 429 U.S. 274, 280, 97 S.Ct. 568, 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977) )). . . .

ARTHREX, INC. v. SMITH NEPHEW, INC., 935 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . See J.A. 1648-50. . . . J.A. 1649-50. . . .

CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. v. TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. OWT ET Co., 935 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at col. 1, ll. 31-50. . . .

PANAH, v. CHAPPELL,, 935 F.3d 657 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dow, 729 F.3d at 1049-50 (concluding that false testimony was material because "[t]he evidence against . . .

NICHOLSON J. H. a J. N. G. a v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES a a, 935 F.3d 685 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . responding to "the extreme emergency" of an active "gunfight in progress threaten[ing] the lives of the 50 . . .

GALDERMA LABORATORIES L. P. S. A. S. A. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 582 (D. Del. 2019)

. . . PX-1 at 1:50-54. All the asserted patents are listed in the Orange Book for Soolantra. . . . the ClearValue court found a prior art genus of 150 ppm or less anticipated the claim limitation of 50 . . .

COMPERE, v. NUSRET MIAMI, LLC, d b a a, 391 F. Supp. 3d 1197 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . A (ECF No. 50-1). . . . See Brock v. 50 Eggs, Inc. , No. 16-20294-CIV-LENARD/GOODMAN, 2016 WL 10933025, at *2 (S.D. Fla. . . . Certify") (ECF No. 40); Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Response ("Reply to Mot. to Certify") (ECF No. 50 . . .

J. MURRAY, M. D. a v. MAYO CLINIC, a M. D. M. D. M. D. M. D. M. D. M. D. M. D. a, 934 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of New York , 921 F.3d 337, 349-50 (2d Cir. 2019) ; Gentry v. E.W. Partners Club Mgmt. . . .

SEMPLE, a a k a a v. GRISWOLD, Be USA A., 934 F.3d 1134 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . apportionment as constitutional command would upset a well-functioning approach to districting that all 50 . . . total of 25,000 signatures, there had to be "signatures of 200 qualified voters from each of at least 50 . . . Junior College District, 397 U.S. 50, 54-55, 90 S.Ct. 791, 25 L.Ed.2d 45 (1970), the Court stated that . . . apportionment as constitutional command would upset a well-functioning approach to districting that all 50 . . .

J. GENZER, v. JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY,, 934 F.3d 1156 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hardridge , 31 Okla. 742, 123 P. 846, 849-50 (1911) (collecting cases); see also J.R. Watkins Med. . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. HOPPER,, 934 F.3d 740 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . the indictment, and returned a special verdict form finding that the conspiracy involved an amount of 50 . . . The jury returned a special verdict form finding that the conspiracy involved an amount of 50 grams or . . . Id. at 50; see U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) (providing that, "in the case of a jointly undertaken criminal . . . Appellee's Br. 50 n.6. . . .

RAWA, A. W. Jr. v. MONSANTO COMPANY, v., 934 F.3d 862 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . In doing so, plaintiffs claim, Monsanto implicitly misrepresented their value-by nearly 50 percent on . . . Since the claims correspond to a 50 percent refund for the consumers' affected purchases, the class administrator . . .

SCRIMO, v. LEE,, 935 F.3d 103 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . DiPippo , 27 N.Y.3d 127, 129, 50 N.E.3d 888 (2016). . . . also been accused of committing the same crime in a strikingly similar manner. 27 N.Y.3d 127, 139-41, 50 . . . Id. at 136, 50 N.E.3d 888 (emphasis in original). And in People v. . . .

SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR v. BRISTOL EXCAVATING, INC., 935 F.3d 122 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . tips received by employees to be counted by employers in determining whether they have fulfilled up to 50% . . . (Oral Arg. at 21:50-22:00.) . . .

STONE, v. TROY CONSTRUCTION, LLC, 935 F.3d 141 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . change at Troy that determined that per diems paid to employees that permanently resided less than 50 . . .

WOLFINGTON, v. RECONSTRUCTIVE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES II PC, a k a, 935 F.3d 187 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Schmidt , 770 F.3d at 249-50 ; id. at 254 (Rendell, J., dissenting). . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . . , Richard Fallon, Jr., et al., Hart and Wechsler's The Federal Courts and the Federal System 1047-50 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MCCLOUD, II,, 935 F.3d 527 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . And count eight alleged that McCloud and Clark distributed 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 429 U.S. 252, 262-63, 97 S.Ct. 555, 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977) ("It has long been clear that economic . . . Forssenius , 380 U.S. 528, 540, 85 S.Ct. 1177, 14 L.Ed.2d 50 (1965) ("Constitutional rights would be . . .

PARKER, v. LANDRY,, 935 F.3d 9 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Of P.R., 445 F.3d 50, 54 (1st Cir. 2006) ("Because the defendants previously had answered the amended . . . Toomey, 533 F.3d 50, 54 (1st Cir. 2008). . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Denial of Judgment as a Matter of Law under Rule 50(b)...990 a. . . . Id. at 11910; see also id. at 7449-50. . . . Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 104, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976) ; Lopez v. . . . Analysis By failing to raise the issue of qualified immunity in his Rule 50(a) or 50(b) motions, Sheriff . . . See id. at 1449-50. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SHAYOTA, v., 934 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Illinois , 476 U.S. 530, 549-50, 106 S.Ct. 2056, 90 L.Ed.2d 514 (1986) (Blackmun, J., dissenting) (concluding . . . , the Confrontation Clause's application does not "depend[ ] upon the law of Evidence." 541 U.S. at 50 . . .

GUPTA, v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC,, 934 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hotchkiss , 231 U.S. 50, 34 S.Ct. 20, 58 L.Ed. 115 (1913). . . . See 2 Williston on Contracts § 6:50 (4th ed. 2007) ; 1 Corbin on Contracts § 3:18 (rev. ed. 2018) ("Often . . .

SINGLETON, v. ARKANSAS HOUSING AUTHORITIES PROPERTY CASUALTY SELF- INSURED FUND, INC. BRK, 934 F.3d 830 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . capacity; Captain Dewan Lewis, individually and in his official capacity; and John and Jane Does, 1-50 . . . Carmichael , 526 U.S. 137, 149-50, 119 S.Ct. 1167, 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999) (cleaned up) (quoting Daubert . . . While Gray's affidavit says she woke up at 5:50 a.m., walked around to try to find the source of the . . .

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN, v. PIER IMPORTS, INCORPORATED W. H., 935 F.3d 424 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . For example, Pier 1 emphasized in its brief and at oral argument that approximately 50 percent of its . . . looming markdown risk because the company published ads announcing "extraordinary markdowns (up to 50% . . .

UNITED STATES v. PARKINS,, 935 F.3d 63 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . See App'x 249-50. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CANO,, 934 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 50 F.3d 1448, 1453 (9th Cir. 1995). . . .

MYMAIL, LTD. v. OOVOO, LLC, IAC, 934 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. col. 12 ll. 50-51 ("MOT is not, however, an acronym for anything meaningful."); see generally id. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS, 934 F.3d 804 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Stults , 575 F.3d 834, 849 (8th Cir. 2009), quoting Gall , 552 U.S. at 50, 128 S.Ct. 586. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MERRITT,, 934 F.3d 809 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . . §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more . . .

SENNE v. KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. LLC LLC LP St. LLC LLC LLC LLC L. P. L. P. LLC LLC L. P. AZPB L. P. P LLC LLC LP LLP LLC LLC,, 934 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Giants' affiliates involved a workday beginning at 6:30 AM on the day of a 1:00 PM away game, with a 50 . . . game lasted 2.5 hours and that the return trip to the training facility took the same amount of time-50 . . .

AMAZON. COM, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 934 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 564 U.S. 50, 68, 131 S.Ct. 2254, 180 L.Ed.2d 96 (2011) (alteration in original) (Scalia, J., concurring . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN,, 935 F.3d 43 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Rivers , 50 F.3d 1126, 1129-31 (2d Cir. 1995) (uncertainty whether sentencing judge relied on "erroneous . . .

UNITED STATES v. EUGENE,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 225 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . entered into the subject plea agreement because the agreed-upon sentence of 188 months is more than 50 . . .

A. CARVELLI, v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, M. R. Jr., 934 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . expanding its portfolio from approximately 350,000 loans with an unpaid principal balance of roughly $50 . . . And although Faris acknowledged that Ocwen would incur an expected $50 million in regulatory monitoring . . .

NALPROPION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC., 934 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Similarly, 25-50 mg of naltrexone was administered to an obese man in Example 3, and he reported losing . . . Id. col. 5 ll. 46-50. . . . That claim is drawn to about 5 mg to about 50 mg of naltrexone. . . . Thus, about 5 mg to 50 mg of naltrexone constitutes an amount effective to enhance the effect of bupropion . . .

UNITED STATES v. FELICIANOSOTO,, 934 F.3d 783 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . In that Verdict Form there was more than 50 grams in his possession with intent to distribute. . . . On the possession with intent to distribute count, the jury found that he was responsible for 50 grams . . .

ZEPEDA, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 935 F.3d 296 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . XVI, § 50. . . . XVI, § 50 (c). . . . XVI, § 50 (a)(6)(Q). . . . XVI, § 50 (a)(6)(Q)(ix) (emphasis added). . . . XVI, § 50 (a)(6)(Q)(x). . . .

WAL- MART STORES, INCORPORATED L. L. C. s v. TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION, 935 F.3d 362 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 429 U.S. 252, 266-68, 97 S.Ct. 555, 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977). Allstate , 495 F.3d at 160. . . .

DOLLAR LOAN CENTER OF SOUTH DAKOTA, LLC, v. AFDAHL, LLC, v., 933 F.3d 1019 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . substantially higher payment due the first week caused the loan portfolio's delinquency rate to exceed 50 . . .