The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 51
SUMMARY PROCEDURE

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 51

SUMMARY PROCEDURE

51.011 Summary procedure.

51.011 Summary procedure.—The procedure in this section applies only to those actions specified by statute or rule. Rules of procedure apply to this section except when this section or the statute or rule prescribing this section provides a different procedure. If there is a difference between the time period prescribed in a rule and in this section, this section governs.

(1) PLEADINGS.—Plaintiff’s initial pleading shall contain the matters required by the statute or rule prescribing this section or, if none is so required, shall state a cause of action. All defenses of law or fact shall be contained in defendant’s answer which shall be filed within 5 days after service of process. If the answer incorporates a counterclaim, plaintiff shall include all defenses of law or fact in his or her answer to the counterclaim and shall serve it within 5 days after service of the counterclaim. No other pleadings are permitted. All defensive motions, including motions to quash, shall be heard by the court prior to trial.

(2) DISCOVERY.—Depositions on oral examination may be taken by any party at any time. Other discovery and admissions may be had only on order of court setting the time for compliance. No discovery postpones the time for trial except for good cause shown or by stipulation of the parties.

(3) JURY.—If a jury trial is authorized by law, any party may demand it in any pleading or by a separate paper served not later than 5 days after the action comes to issue. When a jury is in attendance at the close of pleading or the time of demand for jury trial, the action may be tried immediately; otherwise, the court shall order a special venire to be summoned immediately. If a special venire be summoned, the party demanding the jury shall deposit sufficient money with the clerk to pay the jury fees which shall be taxed as costs if he or she prevails.

(4) NEW TRIAL.—Motion for new trial shall be filed and served within 5 days after verdict, if a jury trial was had, or after entry of judgment, if trial was by the court. A reserved motion for directed verdict shall be renewed within the period for moving for a new trial.

(5) APPEAL.—Notice of appeal shall be filed and served within 30 days from the rendition of the judgment appealed from.

History.—s. 7, ch. 67-254; s. 23, ch. 73-333; s. 5, ch. 87-405; s. 292, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 51 on Google Scholar

F.S. 51 on Casetext

Amendments to 51

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 51

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S250.51 - PUBLIC PEACE - INSULT BY WORD SIGN GESTURE ORGANIZED MILITARY - M: F

S817.51 - FRAUD-SWINDLE - OBTAIN GROCERIES WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD - M: S

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See The Federalist No. 51, p. 349 (J. Cooke ed. 1961) (J. Madison); Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. . . . The Federalist No. 51, at 349. . . . The Federalist No. 51, at 349. . . .

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Maryland , 254 U.S. 51, 57, 41 S.Ct. 16, 65 L.Ed. 126 (1920) (concluding that federal postal officials . . . California , 283 U.S. 423, 451, 51 S.Ct. 522, 75 L.Ed. 1154 (1931) ("The United States may perform its . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Kneip , 430 U.S. 584, 97 S.Ct. 1361, 51 L.Ed.2d 660 (1977). . . . Kneip , 430 U.S. 584, 586, 588, n. 4, 97 S.Ct. 1361, 51 L.Ed.2d 660 (1977) ; see Solem , 465 U.S., at . . . Kneip , 430 U.S. 584, 97 S.Ct. 1361, 51 L.Ed.2d 660 (1977), and South Dakota v. . . . Kneip , 430 U.S. 584, 604, 97 S.Ct. 1361, 51 L.Ed.2d 660 (1977) ; see supra, at 2484 - 2487. . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Goldfarb , 430 U.S. 199, 202-204, 213-217, 97 S.Ct. 1021, 51 L.Ed.2d 270 (1977) (plurality opinion); . . . Gilleo , 512 U.S. 43, 51-53, 114 S.Ct. 2038, 129 L.Ed.2d 36 (1994) (explaining that an appropriate "solution . . .

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, v. BOOKING. COM B. V., 140 S. Ct. 2298 (U.S. 2020)

. . . McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 12:51 (5th ed. 2019) (discussing terms that are "a generic . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Maynard , 430 U.S. 705, 717, 97 S.Ct. 1428, 51 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977). . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . this Court have recently taken the position that this rule from Marks , 430 U.S. 188, 97 S.Ct. 990, 51 . . . significant role in some hospitals' decisions to deny admitting privileges. 250 F.Supp.3d at 48-49, 51 . . . applicant getting the required covering physician," including Doe 3's similar experience. 250 F.Supp.3d at 51 . . . , 49 ; see id., at 51-53 ; App. 200-202. . . . United States , 430 U.S. 188, 193, 97 S.Ct. 990, 51 L.Ed.2d 260 (1977), as the narrowest position supporting . . . Ferreira , 13 How. 40, 51-52, 14 L.Ed. 40 (1852) ; Owings v. . . . United States , 430 U.S. 188, 193, 97 S.Ct. 990, 51 L.Ed.2d 260 (1977). . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . The Federalist No. 51, p. 349 (J. Cooke ed. 1961) (J. Madison). . . . Hamilton); see also id ., No. 51, at 350. . . . Id ., No. 51, at 350. . . . Brief for Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae 51. We are not persuaded. . . . interest of ensuring "a continuous policy" "free from the effect" of "changing [White House] incumbency." 51 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Pedreiro , 349 U.S. 48, 51-52, 75 S.Ct. 591, 99 L.Ed. 868 (1955) (interpreting 1952 Immigration and Nationality . . . Baker , 203 U.S. 174, 179-181, 27 S.Ct. 135, 51 L.Ed. 142 (1906) (quoting resolution). . . .

C. LIU, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (U.S. 2020)

. . . force disgorgement of that gain"); see also Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment § 51 . . . No matter the label, this "profit-based measure of unjust enrichment," Restatement (Third) § 51, Comment . . . Goodyear , 9 Wall. at 804 ; see also Restatement (Third) § 51, Comment h , at 216 (reciting the general . . . called 'disgorgement' or 'accounting.' " 2 Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment § 51 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id. , at 51, 103 S.Ct. 2856. While the factual setting is different here, the error is the same. . . . full "without any consideration whatsoever" of a forbearance-only policy, State Farm , 463 U.S. at 51 . . . Id. , at 51, 103 S.Ct. 2856. . . . State Farm , 463 U.S. at 51, 103 S.Ct. 2856. . . . Asimow, Interim-Final Rules: Making Haste Slowly, 51 Admin. L. Rev. 703, 708 (1999). . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 283 U.S. 25, 26, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931). . . . United States , 283 U.S. 25, 26, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931). . . . II. 51 Solon also made regulations for the government of the other sex. 1846 Ecclesiologist Feb. 41 The . . .

ANDRUS v. TEXAS, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (U.S. 2020)

. . . hours from San Antonio to tell the jury ... that people change their behavior when they use drugs." 51 . . . out that Andrus "heard [his] mama testify," and that she "didn't say anything about selling drugs." 51 . . . , he had the words "murder weapon" tattooed on his hands and a smoking gun tattooed on his forearm. 51 . . .

J. THOLE, v. U. S. BANK N. A, 140 S. Ct. 1615 (U.S. 2020)

. . . At last count, the PBGC's "net accumulated financial deficit" was "over $51 billion" and its "exposure . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Act of Aug. 7, 1789, 1 Stat. 51, n. (a ). . . . Act of Aug. 7, 1789, 1 Stat. 51, n. . . . Id., at 51. . . . Id., at 51, n. (a ), and 53. . . . See, e.g. , 1 Stat. 51-52, and n. . . .

BANISTER, v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1698 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Baker , 203 U.S. 174, 181, 27 S.Ct. 135, 51 L.Ed. 142 (1906).) . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . California , 283 U.S. 359, 367, 51 S.Ct. 532, 75 L.Ed. 1117 (1931) ). . . .

GEORGIA, v. PUBLIC. RESOURCE. ORG, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1498 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See, e.g. , OCGA §§ 51-1-1, 53-4-2 (2019). . . . Brown , 34 Neb. 232, 234, 51 N.W. 839, 840 (1892) ("It is an unwritten rule of this court that members . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . App. 28-29, 51. . . . See Brief for Professors of Second Amendment Law et al. as Amici Curiae 10-12; see also App. 51, 56, . . .

ROMAG FASTENERS, INC. v. FOSSIL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1492 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Horluck's, Inc. , 51 F.2d 357, 359 (W.D. . . . Wade , 461 U.S. 30, 38-51, 103 S.Ct. 1625, 75 L.Ed.2d 632 (1983) ( 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ); Morissette v. . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. A. CHRISTIAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Abilene Cotton Oil Co. , 204 U.S. 426, 446, 27 S.Ct. 350, 51 L.Ed. 553 (1907) ). . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 430 U.S. 188, 97 S.Ct. 990, 51 L.Ed.2d 260 (1977), for determining the holding of a decision . . . United States , 430 U.S. 188, 193, 97 S.Ct. 990, 51 L.Ed.2d 260 (1977). . . . Rev. 1, 3, 43-51 (2016) ; Mooney, Remembering 1857, 87 Ore. L. Rev. 731, 778, n. 174 (2008). . . . of the Constitution or obliviate its undisputed unanimity requirement. 430 U.S. 188, 97 S.Ct. 990, 51 . . .

KANSAS, v. GLOVER, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Texas , 443 U.S. 47, 51-52, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). . . . The reasonable suspicion inquiry "falls considerably short" of 51% accuracy, see United States v. . . .

KANSAS, v. GARCIA v. v., 140 S. Ct. 791 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Levine , 555 U.S. 555, 590, 129 S.Ct. 1187, 173 L.Ed.2d 51 (2009) (THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment . . .

HOLGUIN- HERNANDEZ, v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 762 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Proc. 51(b). . . . Proc. 51(b), a party ordinarily brings to the court's attention his objection to a contrary decision. . . . The rulemakers, in promulgating Rule 51, intended to dispense with the need for formal "exceptions" to . . . Rule 51(a) ; see also Advisory Committee's 1944 Notes on Fed. Rule Crim. Proc. 51, 18 U.S.C. . . . Rule 51(b) (a party may "infor[m] the court" of its position either "when the court ruling or order is . . .

E. RODRIGUEZ, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 140 S. Ct. 713 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Bess , 357 U.S. 51, 55, 78 S.Ct. 1054, 2 L.Ed.2d 1135 (1958) ). . . .

MONASKY, v. TAGLIERI, 140 S. Ct. 719 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Hague International Child Abduction Convention; Text and Legal Analysis, 51 Fed. Reg. 10503 (1986). . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Carlson , 446 U.S. at 51, 100 S.Ct. 1468 (Rehnquist, J., dissenting) ("The policy questions at issue . . .

BRANCH, v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR RELATIONS,, 140 S. Ct. 858 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 19-51 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

M. LIPSCHULTZ, v. CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES MN LLC,, 140 S. Ct. 6 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Levine , 555 U.S. 555, 586, 129 S.Ct. 1187, 173 L.Ed.2d 51 (2009) (THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment . . .

ELHADY, v. H. KABLE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . No. 304 at 51]. . . .

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 935 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Citizen , 491 U.S. at 446-51, 109 S.Ct. 2558. The D.C. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MCADORY,, 935 F.3d 838 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Enomoto , 400 F.3d 744, 750-51 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc) (per curiam) ("In [a prior case], the [issue . . .

SCHINK, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 935 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Scores between 51 and 60 indicate moderate difficulty in functioning, whereas scores between 61 and 70 . . .

F. SHARPE, v. UNITED STATES,, 935 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Maine , 532 U.S. 742, 750-51, 121 S.Ct. 1808, 149 L.Ed.2d 968 (2001) (setting forth factors that "typically . . .

L. SMITH, v. SHARP,, 935 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hopewell administered the WAIS-III to Smith in January 2003, and obtained a Verbal IQ interval of 51- . . .

EDMO, v. CORIZON, INC. Al v. Al, 935 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 51 F.3d 834, 838 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). . . .

RAY, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, v. As, 935 F.3d 703 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . prevailing view" that the state-treasury factor is "generally accorded ... dispositive weight"); id. at 51 . . .

SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL- DENVER, INC. v. M. AZAR II, U. S., 391 F. Supp. 3d 53 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . S1-AR at 849-51. . . .

ARTHREX, INC. v. SMITH NEPHEW, INC., 935 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at col. 5 ll. 41-42, 51-57. . . .

ALMANZA, v. UNITED STATES,, 935 F.3d 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 51. . . .

NICHOLSON J. H. a J. N. G. a v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES a a, 935 F.3d 685 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wright , 430 U.S. 651, 673-74, 97 S.Ct. 1401, 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977). . . .

GALDERMA LABORATORIES L. P. S. A. S. A. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 582 (D. Del. 2019)

. . . DX-16 at 2:51-62. The cited passage is inapposite. . . . PX-3 at 24:18-31, 24:51-64. . . .

SEMPLE, a a k a a v. GRISWOLD, Be USA A., 934 F.3d 1134 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Maynard , 430 U.S. 705, 714, 97 S.Ct. 1428, 51 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977). . . .

J. GENZER, v. JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY,, 934 F.3d 1156 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . See id. at 51, ¶ 15, 62-63. . . .

SCRIMO, v. LEE,, 935 F.3d 103 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Mantello, 333 F.3d 51, 59 (2d Cir. 2003) (confirming that "[t]his test applies post-AEDPA"). . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. at 550-51. . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Indiana , 191 U.S. 138, 149, 24 S.Ct. 51, 48 L.Ed. 125 (1903). . . . , 208 U.S. 192, 197, 28 S.Ct. 275, 52 L.Ed. 450 (1908) ; see also Smith , 191 U.S. at 149, 24 S.Ct. 51 . . . Smith , 191 U.S. at 149, 24 S.Ct. 51. . . . McMillan , 466 U.S. 48, 51, 104 S.Ct. 1577, 80 L.Ed.2d 36 (1984) (per curiam)). . . . Sprague , 282 U.S. 716, 731, 51 S.Ct. 220, 75 L.Ed. 640 (1931) ). . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Br. at 51. . . . Counsel later asked the jury to award $51 million in damages for pain and suffering-$1 million for every . . . App'x 39, 51 (6th Cir. 2012) (unpublished). . . . Alley , 71 F.3d 347, 350-51 (10th Cir. 1995). . . . Br. at 51 (citation omitted). The record does not support this summary. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BEGAY,, 934 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hill , 890 F.3d 51, 56 (2d Cir. 2018), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 139 S. Ct. 844, 202 L. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SHAYOTA, v., 934 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . application does not "depend[ ] upon the law of Evidence." 541 U.S. at 50, 124 S.Ct. 1354 ; see also id. at 51 . . . See id. at 51, 124 S.Ct. 1354 ("Leaving the regulation of out-of-court statements to the law of evidence . . .

UNITED STATES v. STAHLMAN,, 934 F.3d 1199 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gladish, 536 F.3d 646, 650-51 (7th Cir. 2008) (concluding district court should have allowed expert to . . .

BIONDO, v. KALEDIA HEALTH, d b a, 935 F.3d 68 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Jan. 1, 2017) No. 51; Def.'s Reply Mem. of Law at 7-10, No. 15-CV-362 (S.D.N.Y. . . .

MYMAIL, LTD. v. OOVOO, LLC, IAC, 934 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . See, e.g. , '863 patent col. 4 ll. 51-55, col. 9 ll. 17-19, col. 11 ll. 25-43, col. 13 ll. 16-19, col . . . Id. col. 12 ll. 50-51 ("MOT is not, however, an acronym for anything meaningful."); see generally id. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS, 934 F.3d 804 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). . . .

SENNE v. KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. LLC LLC LP St. LLC LLC LLC LLC L. P. L. P. LLC LLC L. P. AZPB L. P. P LLC LLC LP LLP LLC LLC,, 934 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Oracle Corp. , 51 Cal. 4th 1191, 1202-03, 127 Cal.Rptr.3d 185, 254 P.3d 237 (2011). . . . their work in California, and the defendant contended the laws of plaintiffs' home states governed. 51 . . . Sullivan , 51 Cal. 4th at 1194-95, 127 Cal.Rptr.3d 185, 254 P.3d 237. . . . Sullivan , 51 Cal. 4th at 1201-02, 127 Cal.Rptr.3d 185, 254 P.3d 237. . . . See 51 Cal. 4th at 1202-03, 127 Cal.Rptr.3d 185, 254 P.3d 237. . . . Oracle Corp. , 51 Cal.4th 1191, 127 Cal.Rptr.3d 185, 254 P.3d 237 (2011), and the parties do not dispute . . . noted, interstate truck drivers by definition perform some of their work out of state. 153 P.3d at 848-51 . . .

NALPROPION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC., 934 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. col. 8. ll. 47-51. . . . Id. col. 6 ll. 32-51. . . . Ther. 419-22 (1985), J.A. 8948-51 ("Atkinson"). U.S. . . .

MENAKER, v. HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY,, 935 F.3d 20 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . . ¶ 51). . . .

HAWKINS v. I- TV DIGITALIS TAVKOZLESI ZRT. f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V. v. i- TV f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V., 935 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . injunction, Borsy convened a meeting of i-TV's shareholders and issued new shares to DIGI kft., giving it a 51% . . .

UNITED STATES v. GLENN,, 935 F.3d 313 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Youngblood , 488 U.S. 51, 109 S.Ct. 333, 102 L.Ed.2d 281 (1988). . . .

WAL- MART STORES, INCORPORATED L. L. C. s v. TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION, 935 F.3d 362 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 550-51, 554. . . .

ZEHENTBAUER FAMILY LAND, LP LP v. CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, L. L. C. L. L. C. E P USA,, 935 F.3d 496 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lusenhop & Keller, supra , at 850-51. . . .

DOLLAR LOAN CENTER OF SOUTH DAKOTA, LLC, v. AFDAHL, LLC, v., 933 F.3d 1019 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . The customer was required to make weekly interest payments for 51 weeks (beginning in 2012, a period . . .

ROMO, v. P. BARR,, 933 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Whitaker , 914 F.3d 1249, 1250-51 (9th Cir. 2019) ; Gonzalez-Cervantes v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. BROWN, v. N., 934 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sinclair , 438 F.2d 50, 51 n.1 (5th Cir. 1971), and evaluates the evidence presented at trial . . . .

LILLY, v. CITY OF NEW YORK NYPD No. NYPD No., 934 F.3d 222 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Perdue, 559 U.S. at 550-51, 130 S.Ct. 1662 (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

IN RE MATTHEWS, In In In In III,, 934 F.3d 296 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 51, 52 (3d Cir. 2007). . . .

GOLDEN v. NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY v., 934 F.3d 302 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Hoboken , 196 N.J. 51, 951 A.2d 1017, 1032 (2008) (quoting Singer v. . . . See id. at 1150-51. . . . City of Hoboken , 196 N.J. 51, 951 A.2d 1017, 1032 (2008). . . .

YOUKHANNA v. CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS C., 934 F.3d 508 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 51, 53-54 (Page ID #2967, 2969-70). . . . Id. at 51 (Page ID #2967). Ms. . . .

IN RE J. SHENK, Sr. J. Sr. v. U. S., 603 B.R. 671 (Bankr. N.D. N.Y. 2019)

. . . Doc. 51. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERNANDEZ- MARTINEZ, v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v., 933 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 430 U.S. 188, 97 S.Ct. 990, 51 L.Ed.2d 260 (1977), and its direction to adopt the "narrowest . . .

SMITH, OSF v. OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,, 933 F.3d 859 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 1450-51 (vacating summary judgment). . . . Farmer , 81 F.3d at 1450-51 (district court abused discretion by denying Rule 56(d) motion that sought . . .

KELSAY, v. ERNST,, 933 F.3d 975 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 51. The maneuver-"like, a bear hug"-lifted Kelsay "off the ground." Id. at 98, 99. . . .

MCMICHAEL, v. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INCORPORATED RIGP DCL, L. L. C. USA,, 934 F.3d 447 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Mosley was 57 years old, and Kennedy was 51 years old. Their ages make discrimination less likely. . . .

UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON,, 934 F.3d 498 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51-52, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). . . . That was nearly double the recommended range of 51-63 months, far more than the modest increase here. . . .

M. RODEN, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 548 (S.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . LEXIS 28997, at *51 (E.D. Mich. . . .

IN RE ASCOT FUND LIMITED, a, 603 B.R. 271 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Barnet (In re Barnet ), 737 F.3d 238, 247-51 (2d Cir. 2013), provides that "only a person that resides . . .

NAUMOVSKI, v. NORRIS, 934 F.3d 200 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . App. 51. Ortiz v. Jordan , 562 U.S. 180, 188, 131 S. . . .

UNITED STATES EX REL. CHARTE v. AMERICAN TUTOR, INC. Jr. Sr., 934 F.3d 346 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . DHL Express (USA), Inc. , 742 F.3d 51, 54 (2d Cir. 2014) (citing United States ex rel. Pilon v. . . .

MARTINEAU, v. WIER, 934 F.3d 385 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 750-51, 121 S.Ct. 1808 (internal quotation marks omitted). . . . New Hampshire , 532 U.S. at 750-51, 121 S.Ct. 1808 (quoting Allen v. Zurich Ins. . . . of inconsistent court determinations" if she is not estopped in the district court. 532 U.S. at 750-51 . . .

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, v. HOSPIRA, INC. v. Dr. s Dr. s, 933 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Health Servs. of Crawford Cty., Inc. , 467 U.S. 51, 59, 104 S.Ct. 2218, 81 L.Ed.2d 42 (1984) ("Estoppel . . .

UNITED STATES v. NG LAP SENG, Ng, Ng W. C., 934 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . its government, and the character of those who exercise government authority"); The Federalist No. 51 . . . 'to influence any official act.' " Id. at 150-51 (quoting § 201(b)(1)(A) to identify quid pro quo at . . .

REYES, v. FISCHER, J. X., 934 F.3d 97 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Fischer forecloses the argument that the defendants' response to Earley I was reasonable. 879 F.3d at 51 . . . Id. at 51 ; see Betances, 837 F.3d at 172 ("That the defendants [Fischer, Annucci, and Tracy] eventually . . . Id. at 51-52. The facts of Hassell closely correspond to the facts in this case. . . . defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity during the relevant period, see Hassell , 879 F.3d at 50-51 . . .

MOGARD, v. CITY OF MILBANK,, 932 F.3d 1184 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Velger , 429 U.S. 624, 627-28, 97 S.Ct. 882, 51 L.Ed.2d 92 (1977). . . . Chambers County Comm'n , 514 U.S. 35, 51, 115 S.Ct. 1203, 131 L.Ed.2d 60 (1995). . . .

E. ANDREWS, v. SIRIUS XM RADIO INC., 932 F.3d 1253 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Spears , 570 U.S. 48, 51-52, 133 S.Ct. 2191, 186 L.Ed.2d 275 (2013). . . . conception of the DPPA's scope is consistent both with its clear purpose, see Maracich , 570 U.S. at 51 . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. HODGE, 933 F.3d 468 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rodriguez , 602 F.3d 346, 350-51 (5th Cir. 2010). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DURAN,, 934 F.3d 407 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . prisoner asserted that he had placed a notice of appeal in a prison mailing system in a timely manner. 51 . . . Craun , 51 F.3d 1043. . . .

P. DYER, v. VENTRA SANDUSKY, LLC,, 934 F.3d 472 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Pregis Innovative Packaging, Inc. , 600 F.3d 748, 750-51 (7th Cir. 2010). . . .

BOUCHER, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,, 934 F.3d 530 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . App. 51 (emphasis added). Based on these assumptions, the experts in 2013 concurred with Ms. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN, v. J., 932 F.3d 1011 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). . . .

LUXOTTICA GROUP, S. P. A. a v. AIRPORT MINI MALL, LLC, a d. b. a. LLC, a a. k. a. C. C., 932 F.3d 1303 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 848-51, 854, 102 S.Ct. 2182. . . . infringing pharmacists, the brand name manufacturer sued the generic manufacturers, id. at 846-47, 849-51 . . .

CHAVEZ, De E. De De De v. OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a, 933 F.3d 186 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . absent class members on notice of the need to file individual claims to protect their interests," id. at 51 . . . Compare In re Linerboard Antitrust Litig. , 223 F.R.D. 335, 348-51 (E.D. . . .

T. SCHMITT v. LAROSE,, 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Maryland , 380 U.S. 51, 85 S.Ct. 734, 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (1965). . . .

KORTRIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, TY v. INVESTCORP INVESTMENT ADVISERS LIMITED,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . (Trial Tr. at 51-53 (Taylor); Trial Tr. at 1225-26 (Popplewell); Trial Tr. at 664-65 (Vamvakas).) . . . (Trial Tr. at 148-51, 324-25 (Taylor); Trial Tr. at 466-67 (Munsell); Trial Tr. at 689-90 (Vamvakas); . . . (See Trial Tr. at 950-51 (Erdely).) Apart from his critiques of Dr. Gompers' testimony, Dr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DAVIS,, 932 F.3d 1150 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). . . .

AJINOMOTO CO. INC. v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, CJ CJ PT CJ CJ PT v. Co., 932 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. , col. 22, lines 51-67 (paragraph breaks and bold numbering added). . . .

ATEN INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD. v. UNICLASS TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD. Co. Co., 932 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . a keyboard, monitor, and mouse through a KVM switch, such as a keyboard shortcut. '141 patent at 2:51 . . .

J. DOHERTY, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 932 F.3d 978 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Neal, Cortina & Associates , 216 Ill.App.3d 51, 159 Ill.Dec. 551, 576 N.E.2d 220, 225 (1991) (describing . . .

ALONSO, LLP LLP S. v. J. WEISS, 932 F.3d 995 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Employment Security , 2016 IL 118562, ¶ 30-31, 401 Ill.Dec. 895, 51 N.E.3d 726 (defining "deliberate . . .

ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION, v. SOUTH JERSEY RESOURCES GROUP, LLC,, 933 F.3d 1209 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . sufficient because it was not distinct in explaining the grounds for objection as required by Rule 51 . . .