Florida Statute 56.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 56
FINAL PROCESS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 56.10

56.10 Executions against corporate judgment debtors; receivership.—If an execution cannot be satisfied in whole or in part for lack of property of the corporate judgment debtor subject to levy and sale, on motion of the judgment creditor the circuit court in chancery within whose circuit such corporate judgment debtor is or has been doing business, or in which any of its effects are found, may sequestrate the property, things in action, goods and chattels of the corporate judgment debtor for the purpose of enforcing the judgment, and may appoint a receiver for the corporate judgment debtor. A receiver so appointed is subject to the rules prescribed by law for receivers of the property of other judgment debtors. His or her power shall extend throughout the state.

History.—s. 1, ch. 1870, 1872; RS 1211; GS 1641; RGS 2845; CGL 4532; s. 11, ch. 67-254; s. 300, ch. 95-147; s. 7, ch. 2016-33.

Note.—Former s. 55.24.

F.S. 56.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 56.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 56.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 56.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 56.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 56.10

Total Results: 16

VERONICA ROSS-WILLIAMS, etc. v. LINDA LEALI, RECEIVER

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-04-27

Snippet: 2, 2021, Casa Financial, pursuant to sections 56.10 and 56.29 of the Florida Statutes, filed a post-judgment

Survivors Charter v. Sch. Bd. of Palm Beach

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-07-11

Citation: 968 So. 2d 39, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10702

Snippet: the State Board of Education pursuant to § 228.056(10)(c), F.S. This section K does not apply to this

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1998-07-31

Snippet: Section 228.056(19), Fla. Stat. 14 Section 228.056(10)(f), Fla. Stat. 15 Technical Assistance Note No

State v. Siegel

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-08-02

Citation: 679 So. 2d 1201, 1996 WL 430859

Snippet: The electrical bill for Siegel's trailer was $56.10 for March, and $138.38 in April. Comparison data

Warshall v. Price

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-04-14

Citation: 617 So. 2d 751, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4158, 1993 WL 113421

Snippet: to the satisfaction of a judgment. See also, § 56.10, Fla.Stat. (1987). Courts have long recognized that

Warten v. Caguas Central Federal Savings Bank of Puerto Rico

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-09-25

Citation: 567 So. 2d 42, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7290

Snippet: herein was otherwise fully authorized by Sections 56.-10, 56.29(9), Florida Statutes (1989). See Banco Indus

Warten v. CAGUAS CENTRAL FED. SAV. BK.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-09-25

Citation: 567 So. 2d 42

Snippet: herein was otherwise fully authorized by Sections 56.10, 56.29(9), Florida Statutes (1989). See Banco Indus

Spiegel v. Williams

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-07-06

Citation: 545 So. 2d 1360, 1989 WL 75288

Snippet: M. Rhodes, Couch Cyclopedia of Insurance Law §§ 56:10, 56:16 (rev. ed. 1983). Therefore, the result reached

Gusow v. A.B.C. Electrical Contractors, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-05-11

Citation: 524 So. 2d 1109, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1129, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 1988 WL 44159

Snippet: ” Cf. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice (2nd ed.) Sec. 56.10, Op. 2054. See also: McClendon v. Key, 209 So.2d

Caribbean Ship Chandler, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-03-08

Citation: 523 So. 2d 642, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 614, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 922, 1988 WL 18585

Snippet: the permit application and sections 2-56.1 to 2-56.10, Code of Metropolitan Dade County (1959), provide

Mercedes-Benz of Na v. Dept. of Mv

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-07-11

Citation: 455 So. 2d 404

Snippet: Jersey "Franchise Practices Act," sections 56:10-1 56:10-10, New Jersey *406 Statutes (1971),[1] to

Dept. of M. Veh., Etc v. Mercedes-Benz, Etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-12-16

Citation: 408 So. 2d 627

Snippet: was entered into.[1] The New Jersey Code, section 56:10-6, provided in pertinent part as follows: The franchisor

In re Florida Board of Bar Examiners

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-11-20

Citation: 397 So. 2d 590, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4464

Snippet: the Board has not previously considered. Section 56 10. For each examination administration entered after

McClendon v. Key

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-04-18

Citation: 209 So. 2d 273

Snippet: 2d 908, 912. 6 Moore's Federal Practice, 2d, § 56.10 (1965). The record on appeal fails to contain Hart's

Curley v. Finest Homes, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-10-07

Citation: 167 So. 2d 739

Snippet: ” Cf. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice (2nd ed.) Sec. 56.10, p. 2054. From the foregoing it does not affirmatively

Street v. Miami National Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-05-07

Citation: 111 So. 2d 673, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2870

Snippet: recovered a judgment against the corporation for $56,010.47. An involuntary petition in bankruptcy had been