Florida Statute 56.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 56
FINAL PROCESS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 56.10

56.10 Executions against corporate judgment debtors; receivership.—If an execution cannot be satisfied in whole or in part for lack of property of the corporate judgment debtor subject to levy and sale, on motion of the judgment creditor the circuit court in chancery within whose circuit such corporate judgment debtor is or has been doing business, or in which any of its effects are found, may sequestrate the property, things in action, goods and chattels of the corporate judgment debtor for the purpose of enforcing the judgment, and may appoint a receiver for the corporate judgment debtor. A receiver so appointed is subject to the rules prescribed by law for receivers of the property of other judgment debtors. His or her power shall extend throughout the state.

History.—s. 1, ch. 1870, 1872; RS 1211; GS 1641; RGS 2845; CGL 4532; s. 11, ch. 67-254; s. 300, ch. 95-147; s. 7, ch. 2016-33.

Note.—Former s. 55.24.

F.S. 56.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 56.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 56.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 56.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 56.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 56.10

Total Results: 19

VERONICA ROSS-WILLIAMS, etc. v. LINDA LEALI, RECEIVER

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-04-27T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: 2, 2021, Casa Financial, pursuant to sections 56.10 and 56.29 of the Florida Statutes, filed a post-judgment…that the receivership is authorized by sections 56.10 and 56.29. While this receivership order gives … receiver pursuant to the authority of section 56.10, 3 in a post-judgment proceeding supplementary initiated…power shall extend throughout the state. § 56.10, Fla. Stat. (2021). 4 Section 56.29 describes …authorizes a receivership created pursuant to section 56.10 to continue beyond the satisfaction of the outstanding

Survivors Charter v. Sch. Bd. of Palm Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-07-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 968 So. 2d 39

Snippet: the State Board of Education pursuant to § 228.056(10)(c), F.S. This section K does not apply to this…updates the statutory reference from section 228.056(10)(c) to section 1002.33(8). Furthermore, the charters

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1998-07-31T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Section 228.056(19), Fla. Stat. 14 Section 228.056(10)(f), Fla. Stat. 15 Technical Assistance Note No

State v. Siegel

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-08-02T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 679 So. 2d 1201

Snippet: electrical bill for Siegel's trailer was $56.10 for March, and $138.38 in April. Comparison data

Warshall v. Price

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-04-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 617 So. 2d 751, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4158, 1993 WL 113421

Snippet: to the satisfaction of a judgment. See also, § 56.10, Fla.Stat. (1987). Courts have long recognized that

Warten v. CAGUAS CENTRAL FED. SAV. BK.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-09-25T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 567 So. 2d 42

Snippet: herein was otherwise fully authorized by Sections 56.10, 56.29(9), Florida Statutes (1989). See Banco Indus

Warten v. Caguas Central Federal Savings Bank of Puerto Rico

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-09-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 567 So. 2d 42

Snippet: herein was otherwise fully authorized by Sections 56.-10, 56.29(9), Florida Statutes (1989). See Banco Indus

Spiegel v. Williams

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1989-07-06T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 545 So. 2d 1360

Snippet: M. Rhodes, Couch Cyclopedia of Insurance Law §§ 56:10, 56:16 (rev. ed. 1983). Therefore, the result reached

Gusow v. A.B.C. Electrical Contractors, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-05-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 524 So. 2d 1109

Snippet: ” Cf. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice (2nd ed.) Sec. 56.10, Op. 2054. See also: McClendon v. Key, 209 So.2d

Caribbean Ship Chandler, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-03-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 523 So. 2d 642

Snippet: the permit application and sections 2-56.1 to 2-56.10, Code of Metropolitan Dade County (1959), provide

Brown v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-05-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 470 So. 2d 56, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1346, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14351

Snippet: Glickstein, Hersey, Walden 29 May 1985 470 So. 2d 56, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1346, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14351

Dodson v. Holy Cross Hospital, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-05-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 470 So. 2d 56, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1962, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14352

Snippet: Glickstein, Hersey, Walden 29 May 1985 470 So. 2d 56, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1962, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14352

Mercedes-Benz of Na v. Dept. of Mv

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-07-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 455 So. 2d 404

Snippet: quot;Franchise Practices Act," sections 56:10-1 56:10-10, New Jersey *406 Statutes (1971),[1] to … law (§ 56:10-6) was a defense to the action to compel. MBNA also asserted that section 56:10-9, New Jersey….J.Stat. § 56:10-9 to an action to compel franchise transfer pursuant to N.J.Stat. § 56:10-6 is wholly… section 56:10-6. Moreover, it is absolutely clear that a franchisor can raise section 56:10-9 as a defense…compel a franchise transfer pursuant to section 56:10-6, New Jersey Statutes (1971). In Count II, Fifth

Dept. of M. Veh., Etc v. Mercedes-Benz, Etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-12-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 408 So. 2d 627

Snippet: was entered into.[1] The New Jersey Code, section 56:10-6, provided in pertinent part as follows: The franchisor

In re Florida Board of Bar Examiners

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1980-11-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 397 So. 2d 590

Snippet: the Board has not previously considered. Section 56 10. For each examination administration entered after

McClendon v. Key

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-04-17T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 209 So. 2d 273

Snippet: 908, 912. 6 Moore's Federal Practice, 2d, § 56.10 (1965). The record on appeal fails to contain Hart

Curley v. Finest Homes, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1964-10-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 167 So. 2d 739

Snippet: ” Cf. 6 Moore’s Federal Practice (2nd ed.) Sec. 56.10, p. 2054. From the foregoing it does not affirmatively

Street v. Miami National Bank

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1959-05-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 111 So. 2d 673

Snippet: recovered a judgment against the corporation for $56,010.47. An involuntary petition in bankruptcy had been

Benson v. First Tr. Svgs. Bk., as Trustee

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1931-05-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 142 So. 887, 105 Fla. 135, 134 So. 493

Snippet: loaned, $11,500.00, making a total of $18,132.56. At 10 per cent. per annum the amount of interest on