Florida Statute 56.13 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 56
FINAL PROCESS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 56.13

56.13 Executions; forfeiture of forthcoming bond.—Should the execution remain unpaid, and the parties to the bond fail to produce such property by the day specified, said bond shall be returned to the court from which the execution issued, as forfeited; and the clerk, or the court if it has no clerk, shall enter up judgment forthwith against the sureties for the value fixed as aforesaid of the property so bonded, or if the value of the property exceed the amount of the execution, then for the amount of the execution, and execution shall issue therefor. Such proceedings shall not affect the liability of the principal upon the original judgment.

History.—s. 4, Mar. 15, 1844; RS 1193; GS 1622; RGS 2826; CGL 4513; s. 11, ch. 67-254.

Note.—Former s. 55.35.

F.S. 56.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 56.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 56.13

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 56.13

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 56.13.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 56.13

Total Results: 19

Scott Morris v. City of Cape Coral, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-05-07

Citation: 163 So. 3d 1174, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 237, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 987, 2015 WL 2095788

Snippet: improperly considered and relied on Resolution 56-13 (November 25, 2013). Specifically, the Property

In Re Implementation of Committee on Privacy & Court Records Recommendations—Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-11-03

Citation: 78 So. 3d 1045, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 3030, 2011 WL 5829543

Snippet: Privacy Committee Report, Recommendation Ten, at 56. [13] See Admin. Order AOSC06-20 at 19-20. Privacy

Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass'n v. Michael

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-03-03

Citation: 98 So. 3d 64, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2521, 2010 WL 711859

Snippet: services from June 7, 2002 to the present for $5,056.13; c. To settle the Michaels’ claim for future residential

Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-10-23

Citation: 997 So. 2d 1098, 36 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2540, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 849, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 2010, 2008 WL 4659374

Snippet: affect the substance of the statement. Id. at 55-56. [13] We have carefully considered the risk of constitutional

Herre v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-04-20

Citation: 617 So. 2d 390, 1993 WL 120397

Snippet: office by the deadline specified in Rule 12A-1.056.[13] The next inquiry under Marchetti and Grosso is

Andrade v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-07-17

Citation: 564 So. 2d 238, 1990 WL 98584

Snippet: (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 828, 85 S.Ct. 56, 13 L.Ed.2d 37 (1964); North v. State, 65 So.2d 77

Shriner v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-05-22

Citation: 386 So. 2d 525

Snippet: (1977). [10] TT 611. [11] TT 636. [12] TT 641-56. [13] See Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 98 S.Ct. 2954

Francis v. General Motors Corporation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-12-18

Citation: 287 So. 2d 146

Snippet: 126. See 6 Moore's Federal Practice, 2 Ed., § 56.13, wherein it is stated: "The well-settled rule is

Marvin Mitchell Studio, Inc. v. Al R. McFadyen Associates, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-12-17

Citation: 229 So. 2d 608, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6501

Snippet: by the bond and by Section 56.13, .Fla.Stat., 1967, F.S.A. Section 56.13, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., is

Visingardi v. Tirone

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-08-03

Citation: 178 So. 2d 135

Snippet: are indisputable. 6 Moore's Federal Practice, § 56.13 P. 2093 (2d ed. 1953). Whoever has the burden of

Matarese v. Leesburg Elks Club

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-01-15

Citation: 171 So. 2d 606

Snippet: are indisputable. 6 Moore's Federal Practice, § 56.13 P. 2093 (2d ed. 1953). Whoever has the burden of

John K. Brennan Co. v. Central Bank & Trust Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-05-13

Citation: 164 So. 2d 525, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4285

Snippet: rule 6 Moore's Federal Procedure, 2nd ed., Sec. 56.13, p. 2094, states: "(3). Concessions which a party

Yarborough v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-07-11

Citation: 114 So. 237, 94 Fla. 143

Snippet: the back of it. See Hathaway v. State, 32 Fla. 56, 13 So.2d Rep. 592; Padgett v. State, 64 Fla. 389,

Ellis v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-07-13

Citation: 86 Fla. 155, 97 So. 285

Snippet: error, was erroneous (Hathaway v. State, 32 Fla. 56, 13 South. Rep. 592; Hubbard v. State, 37 Fla. 156

Young v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-03-15

Citation: 85 Fla. 348, 96 So. 381

Snippet: defense of himself. Hathaway v. State, 32 Fla. 56, 13 *371South. Rep. 592; Hubbard v. State, 37 Fla.

Disney v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1916-12-19

Citation: 72 Fla. 492, 73 So. 598

Snippet: complained of by him. In the Hathaway case, 32 Fla. 56, 13 South. Rep. 592, the trial court added, to an instruction

Fine v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1915-11-19

Citation: 70 Fla. 412, 70 So. 379

Snippet: 9 South. Rep. 835; Hathaway v. State, 32 Fla. 56, 13 South. Rep. 592; Hubbard v. State, 37 Fla. 156

Padgett v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1912-06-15

Citation: 64 Fla. 389

Snippet: and our holding in Hathaway v. State, 32 Fla. 56, 13 South. Rep. 592. But *396be all this as it may

Hubbard v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1896-01-15

Citation: 37 Fla. 156

Snippet: 837, and cases cited; Hathaway vs. State, 32 Fla. 56, 13 South. Rep. 592; Adams vs. State, 34 Fla. 185,