Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 56.25 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 56.25 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 56.25

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 56
FINAL PROCESS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 56.25
56.25 Execution sale; bill of sale or deed.When a sale is made under an execution, the officer making the sale shall execute and deliver to the purchaser a deed or bill of sale to the property on payment of the purchase money and the cost of the deed or bill of sale.
History.s. 6, Feb. 17, 1833; RS 1205; GS 1634; RGS 2838; CGL 4525; s. 11, ch. 67-254.
Note.Former s. 55.48.

F.S. 56.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 56.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 56.25


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 56.25
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 56.25.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE GRAVEL, In In, 601 B.R. 873 (Bankr. Vt. 2019)

. . . a monthly statement that included old charges (an NSF fee of $30 and a property inspection fee of $56.25 . . .

WILLIAMS, v. EPIC SECURITY CORP., 358 F. Supp. 3d 284 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . client, the Damages Spreadsheet lists "La May" as Etienne's only worksite, for which he is seeking $56.25 . . .

COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. UNLIMITED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC,, 353 F. Supp. 3d 904 (D. Haw. 2018)

. . . Moore et. al., Moore's Federal Practice § 56.25 (3d ed. 2015) ("If a claim or defense is predicated on . . .

STRAGAPEDE, v. CITY OF EVANSTON,, 215 F. Supp. 3d 708 (N.D. Ill. 2016)

. . . Dolezel to bill 56.25 hours in this case”). . . .

D. A. NOLT, INC. v. LOCAL UNION NO. UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS, WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS No. No. No. No. No. No. No., 661 F. App'x 200 (3d Cir. 2016)

. . . Ann. 34:11-56.25, et seq., required Nolt to pay its employees a “prevailing wage” that included both . . .

IN RE GRAVEL, In In, 556 B.R. 561 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2016)

. . . a monthly statement that included old charges (ah NSF fee of $30 and a property inspection fee of $56.25 . . .

IN RE J. MOCELLA A., 552 B.R. 706 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2016)

. . . The Court finds that all of these services are compensable except: (i) $56.25 attributed to neither attorney . . . that reasonable attorney fees relating to the Motion for Contempt are $17,750.00 ($19,206.25 less $56.25 . . .

IN RE DPH HOLDINGS CORP. LP, Co. L. P. LLC, Re, LP, LP, III LP, AG L. P. LLC, v. PLC LLP, DPH, 553 B.R. 20 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practiob ¶ 56.25[l][a] (3d ed.2015); see also Am. Home. Assur. Co. v. . . .

DANCY, v. McGINLEY,, 141 F. Supp. 3d 231 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . The Court therefore concludes that Kim expended 56.25 reasonable hours, and an additional 10.5 travel . . .

G. OSTERWEIL, v. R. BARTLETT, III,, 92 F. Supp. 3d 14 (N.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Defendant further contends that the 56.25 hours Plaintiffs attorneys spent preparing Plaintiffs brief . . .

NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF, v. TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, 760 F.3d 297 (3d Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 34:11-56.25, et seq. . . . Id. § 34:11-56.25; see also Best v. . . .

ARCO CAPITAL CORPORATIONS LTD. v. DEUTSCHE BANK AG,, 949 F. Supp. 2d 532 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . In total, Gramercy purchased a total of $56.25 million of the Class G and Class G Notes during the First . . .

In GULF STATES LONG TERM ACUTE CARE OF COVINGTON, LLC,, 487 B.R. 713 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2013)

. . . (“Team Rehab”) (56.25%); Jamestown Healthcare Properties, L.L.C. (18.75%); Apex Group, II, L.L.C. (10% . . .

PKF MARK III INC. E. P. L. A. v. FOUNDATION FOR FAIR CONTRACTING St. a k a G. P. FFC LLC, 496 F. App'x 260 (3d Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 34:11-56.25; 34:11-56.26(9); 34:11-56.28; 34:11-56.30. . . .

MJK PARTNERS, LLC, F. F. F. v. HUSMAN,, 877 F. Supp. 2d 596 (N.D. Ill. 2012)

. . . Any profits from the investment would be split, 56.25% to Ohadi and 43.75% to Husman. . . .

J. STARNES, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, C. v. S. v. D. Sr. v., 680 F.3d 417 (4th Cir. 2012)

. . . The parties agreed MidCoast would buy all of Tarcon’s stock for an amount equal to Tarcon’s cash less 56.25 . . . This figure meant the Former Shareholders would contribute 56.25 percent of Tar-con’s presumed 2003 tax . . .

R. I. INC. d b a a a a v. McCARTHY, NJDOL NJDOL E. NJDOL, 483 F. App'x 745 (3d Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 34:11-56.25 et seq.). . . .

CARMEL CARMEL PC, v. DELLIS CONSTRUCTION, LTD., 858 F. Supp. 2d 43 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . Carmel spent 56.25 hours on the opposition and billed $15,565. Additionally, Mr. . . .

In J K FARMS, INC. d b a MS LLC, v. J K d b a MS, 458 B.R. 636 (Bankr. D.D.C. 2011)

. . . 78.75 3/17/10 32.50 7/14/10 $ 90.00 3/31/10 $13.76* 7/19/10 11.25 4/9/10 33.75 7/21/10 22,50 4/15/10 56.25 . . . 7.62* 5/19/10 33.75 12/9/10 22.50 5/14/10 32.50 12/13/10 32.50 5/27/10 11.53* 12/31/10 10.32* 6/4/10 56.25 . . .

MEYERS, v. HEFFERNAN E., 740 F. Supp. 2d 637 (D. Del. 2010)

. . . private cause of action for underpayment of the wages required by the Prevailing Wage Act, N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.25 . . .

TURNER, v. MURPHY OIL USA, INC., 582 F. Supp. 2d 797 (E.D. La. 2008)

. . . Hingle’s 56.25 hours are for the review of pleadings and for attendance at hearings. . . .

REBMAN v. FOLLETT HIGHER EDUCATION GROUP, INC., 575 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (M.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . Rebman was paid only $56.25 for his used copy of College Algebra. $0.12 less than 50% of the retail price . . .

WILLIAMSON, v. STATE, 974 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . did not object when the State represented to Judge Cobb that Williamson’s sentence could range from 56.25 . . .

In COCHENER,, 360 B.R. 542 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . motion and possible hearing 1.30 97.50 5/15/2006 DC Research issues under 9011 raised by Barry 0.75 56.25 . . .

LIMANTOUR, v. CRAY INCORPORATED, E. J. R. J. W., 432 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (W.D. Wash. 2006)

. . . The defendants did so when the share price was between $52.88 and $56.25, but the share price rose to . . .

D. CARRUTHERS, LLC, LLC, v. FLAUM, LLC, ABC LLC, A. P. LLC, H. d b a d b a F. B., 388 F. Supp. 2d 360 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Carruthers was to be the controlling member of both Springhawk and Summerhawk with a 56.25% ownership . . .

M. CRITCHLOW, v. FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,, 377 F. Supp. 2d 337 (W.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . hours, as opposed to 7.3 hours by Cala-brese-I will reduce Pheterson’s time by fifteen percent, to 56.25 . . .

FRANK BROS. INC. v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, EEO, 409 F.3d 880 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . . §§ 34;11-56.25, -56.26 (New Jersey); N.M. Stat. Ann. § 13-4-11 (New Mexico); N.Y. Lab. . . .

A. LEVINE, Ph. D. v. GONZALEZ, M. D. H. s H. s P. A., 901 So. 2d 969 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . from the date hereof, in accordance with the procedures contained in Florida Statute §§ 56.21, 56:22, 56.25 . . .

MASCOL, v. E L TRANSPORTATION, INC., 387 F. Supp. 2d 87 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Angel Torres’ pay stubs show a rate of $9.50 per hour for 51.5 hours worked (12/07/02-12/13/02) and for 56.25 . . .

D. CARRUTHERS, LLC, LLC, v. FLAUM, LLC, ACB LLC, LJM LLC, ABC LLC, A. P. LLC, H. d b a d b a, 365 F. Supp. 2d 448 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . However, according to the complaint, Carruthers was to be controlling members of Springhawk, with a 56.25% . . .

TFWS, INC. t a v. SCHAEFER,, 315 F. Supp. 2d 775 (D. Md. 2004)

. . . Beringer White Zinfandel 45.06 69.94 56.25 20. Seagram’s 7 65.94 100.74 71.94 21. . . .

La GRASTA, La La v. FIRST UNION SECURITIES, INC., 358 F.3d 840 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . On April 7, 2000, the stock reached what would be a monthly high of $56.25. . . .

BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, v. T. EDWARDS,, 849 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . In contrast, execution sales, undertaken pursuant to sections 56.21 through 56.25, Florida Statutes ( . . .

BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC. v. LORENZO d b a DJ IRV, 255 F. Supp. 2d 795 (M.D. Tenn. 2003)

. . . files for Horton Frank (1.5 hours) Routine secretarial services 50% deduction for clerical tasks ($56.25 . . .

SHELTRY, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 247 F. Supp. 2d 169 (D. Conn. 2003)

. . . was acting within the actual or apparent scope of his employment or authority, 4 Couch on Insurance § 56.25 . . .

CASTILLO, v. STATE, 835 So. 2d 306 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . The trial court denied the motion and sentenced Castillo to 56.25 months imprisonment to be followed . . .

BOURNE, a BOURNE v. E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INC., 189 F. Supp. 2d 482 (S.D.W. Va. 2002)

. . . Bourne was dermally exposed to 56.25 milligrams of Benlate with each use, Dr. . . . Howard concluded that the weight of 5% of the benomyl present in the UK gallon was 56.25 milligrams, . . .

VANCE, v. STATE, 796 So. 2d 1286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . The judge explained to Vance that the minimum sentence he could receive would be 56.25 months under the . . .

In GLOBAL OCEAN CARRIERS LIMITED,, 251 B.R. 31 (Bankr. D. Del. 2000)

. . . exit financing requires that the Debtors have collateral equal to 125% of the $45 million loan or $56.25 . . .

In R. PIERCE, Jr., 190 F.3d 586 (D.C. Cir. 1999)

. . . Abrams re: Wilson sentencing” 4/21/93 $75.00 “review Queenan indictment” 9/17/93 -Ge-to CO cn $56.25 . . .

BLACKMAN, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, v., 59 F. Supp. 2d 37 (D.D.C. 1999)

. . . On January 5, 1999, plaintiffs’ counsel billed $56.25 to review a scheduling order issued by the Court . . . Similarly, plaintiffs’ counsel has billed $56.25 for a telephone call with the Special Master to set . . .

CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 70 F. Supp. 2d 832 (N.D. Ill. 1998)

. . . hr .75 $50 RJ O’Brien $275-$310/hr 281.5 $78,515 DB Johnson $280/hr 1.75 $490 BA Sanders $75/hr .75 $56.25 . . .

ABOU- KHADRA, v. G. BSEIRANI, AGB G. BSEIRANI, AGB v. T. MAHSHIE,, 971 F. Supp. 710 (N.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Hours: 2231.25 25.75 0.75 1991 Pees: $226,507.50 2,218.75 1990 PARTNERS: Pfohl 0 0.5 0.75 $150.00 $ 56.25 . . .

DYNAMICS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, v. WHX CORPORATION SB, 967 F. Supp. 59 (D. Conn. 1997)

. . . issued and outstanding shares of DCA common stock at $55/share (this offer was subsequently raised to $56.25 . . . After the filing of the motion, on June 2, 1997, CTS increased its cash tender offer from $56/share to $56.25 . . . with the DCA Board on June 4, 1997 (after CTS had increased its cash price offer from $55/share to $56.25 . . .

EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, a a a a s a v. CHRISTOPHER, E. G. A., 942 F. Supp. 597 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996)

. . . without other record support: Listed Date '• Name Amount 2/24/92 [Gunther] $ 675.00 3/3/92 [Gunther] 56.25 . . . 1,800.00 10/21/92 [Gunther] 225.00 11/9/92 [Gunther] 225.00 11/10/92 [Gunther] 562.50 11/11/92 [Gunther] 56.25 . . .

a a a a s a v. E. G. A., 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1221 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996)

. . . and without other record support: Date Name Listed Amount 2/24/92 [Gunther] 675.00 3/3/92 [Gunther] 56.25 . . . 1,800.00 10/21/92 [Gunther] 225.00 mm2 [Gunther] 225.00 11/10/92 [Gunther] 562.50 11/11/92 [Gunther] 56.25 . . .

MARTINEZ v. WEYERHAEUSER MORTGAGE COMPANY,, 959 F. Supp. 1511 (S.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . The documented courier services thus total only $56.25, leaving $8.75 in unaccounted for courier service . . . negating the presumption created by the courier receipts and the Fitch affidavit with respect to at least $56.25 . . .

COOPER, A Jr, v. PENTECOST, H J L W H E W J E, 77 F.3d 829 (5th Cir. 1996)

. . . The court found that Welch's reasonable attorney's fees were $11,400 (56.25 hours x $150/hour). . . .

BOWLING, v. PFIZER, INC., 922 F. Supp. 1261 (S.D. Ohio 1996)

. . . million 2000 $ 6.25 million $43.75 million 2001 $ 6.25 million $50.00 million 2002 $ 6.25 million $56.25 . . .

v., 104 T.C. 719 (T.C. 1995)

. . . proportion to the relative amounts of such income; i.e., apportionment to foreign source gross income: $56.25 . . . notice Pro rata Examples method method method method method $76.50 $76.50 Foreign source gross income $56.25 . . .

In JUNCO, INC. In PRESS, JONES WAECHTER, P. C. In SPRINGFIELD CONTRACTING CORPORATION,, 185 B.R. 215 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995)

. . . 2.72 $34 Finalize, Review and Sign Application for Compensation BIS 0.25 $90 $ 22.50 BLW 0.75 $75 $ 56.25 . . .

COOPER, v. HOPKINS,, 945 F. Supp. 940 (S.D. Miss. 1995)

. . . in order to reflect a reasonable expenditure of time, this court finds that Welch reasonably spent 56.25 . . .

C. MILLER, M. P. A. v. JACOBS AND GOODMAN, P. A., 639 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . that the remaining 75% of the fees would be divided among the parties, with 18.75% to appellants and 56.25% . . .

P. McGUIGAN, v. CAE LINK CORPORATION,, 155 F.R.D. 31 (N.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . mileage reimbursement of the server who is an employee of defendant’s firm and the separate charge of $56.25 . . .

WESTBURY PROPERTIES, INC. a GND a v. CARDILLO, a O., 638 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . See also § 56.25, Fla.Stat. (1991); 33 Fla.Jur.2d Judicial Sales § 34 (1982). . . .

In R. PRICE P., 143 B.R. 190 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1992)

. . . 06/14/89 REM .25 hours 160.00 40.00 06/16/89 MLS .50 hours 75.00 37.50 06/19/89 MLS .75 hours 75.00 56.25 . . .

EMPIRE OF AMERICA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, v. L. BRADY,, 776 F. Supp. 1571 (S.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . Investor Notes for $112,000.00 in principal, $67,-387.50 in accrued interest through December 13, 1989, $56.25 . . .

EWING, v. MONROE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI,, 740 F. Supp. 417 (N.D. Miss. 1990)

. . . Other 72.92% According to the 1980 census, the City of Aberdeen has a total population of 7184 of which 56.25% . . .

In GREAT PLAINS PETROLEUM, INC. D. ARMSTRONG, v. HIGHLANDS OPERATING COMPANY, INC., 113 B.R. 570 (Bankr. D.N.D. 1990)

. . . Kostelecky 1 oil (56.25%). 8. Kostelecky A-l oil (56.25%). 9. McMann State 21-16 oil (28.70%). 10. . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. AMERICAN BOARD OF TRADE,, 719 F. Supp. 186 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . Zimmerman also sought remittance of $56.25. . . . the face value of the notes he was returning for reinvestment was $20,750, he sought remittance of $56.25 . . .

CURTIS MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. v. ACADEMY OF MOTION PICTURE ARTS AND SCIENCES,, 717 F. Supp. 1362 (S.D. Ind. 1989)

. . . Revenue): (# sold): (Revenue): 6/3/87 20 $ 112.50 6/14/87 30 $168.75 6/10/87 30 $168.75 9/1/87 10 $ 56.25 . . . 9/14/87 10 $ 56.25 10/29/87 20 $112.60 10 $ 56.25 1/7/88 10 $ 56.25 1/8/88 15 $ 84.85 1/18/88 40 $225.00 . . .

In FIRST SOFTWARE, CORPORATION,, 79 B.R. 108 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1987)

. . . Forty-four and 75/ioo hours were billed at $75 per hour, and 56.25 hours were billed by attorneys charging . . .

MERIDIAN, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES MERIDIAN, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 27 Fla. Supp. 2d 216 (Fla. Div. Admin. Hearings 1987)

. . . reasonable construction costs, indicates that nursing home construction costs range from a low average of $56.25 . . .

EASTER HOUSE, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES W. J., 663 F. Supp. 456 (N.D. Ill. 1987)

. . . 64.50 75 95 100 76,031.25 688.75 6,450.00 Steve Gistenson 33.25 75 2,493.75 Doug Stevens .75 8.50 75 95 56.25 . . .

BERLANTI, v. BODMAN, s, 780 F.2d 296 (3d Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 34:11-56.25-56.-46 (West 1965 & Supp.1985). . . .

J. AMMONS, Jr. H. A. M. A. Jr. v. DADE CITY, FLORIDA, F. D. L., 594 F. Supp. 1274 (M.D. Fla. 1984)

. . . cancellation of assessment liens — Felt-man’s study revealed that just a little more than one-half (56.25% . . . Lien $661,807.94 (100%) Amount of Assessments Which were Documented to Have Been Paid $372,287.87 (56.25% . . .

ESTATE OF CURRY, v. UNITED STATES, 706 F.2d 1424 (7th Cir. 1983)

. . . restrictions in the company’s articles - of incorporation — discounts which yielded a bottom line figure of $56.25 . . . to yield a $150 per share value for the 800 voting shares (totalling $120,000), as contrasted with $56.25 . . . liquidation value of the stock was $191 per share, but the jury ultimately found lesser values of $150 and $56.25 . . .

In FINE PAPER ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 98 F.R.D. 48 (E.D. Pa. 1983)

. . . Leraul (A) Hours Expended Leraul is an associate and the firm asks to be compensated for 56.25 hours . . .

J. SEACAT J. v. MESA PETROLEUM CO. a G- S Co., 561 F. Supp. 98 (D. Kan. 1983)

. . . Mesa’s net revenue interest in the Seaeat Lease is 56.25%. . . .

BRONSON, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CINCINNATI, HENSON, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CINCINNATI,, 550 F. Supp. 941 (S.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . Cincinnati School system during the relevant time period were as follows: 1978-79, 55.15%; 1979-80, 56.25% . . .

In AMPICILLIN ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 526 F. Supp. 494 (D.D.C. 1981)

. . . 25.00 5 125.00 Trahon 25.00 5 125.00 166.50 7,353.75 State of Texas Attorney Hours Rate Total Aaker 56.25 . . .

FEDERAL LEASING CORPORATION v. ROUTE CORPORATION, INC., 525 F. Supp. 1024 (E.D. Pa. 1981)

. . . obligated to make sixty payments in the amount of $993.75 a month; $937.50 was the monthly rental, and $56.25 . . .

M T, INCORPORATED W. C. v. FUEL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,, 518 F. Supp. 285 (D. Colo. 1981)

. . . parties shared the expenses of the 1-10 Unit Well as follows: Fuelco— 25%; McBride — 18.75%; and M & T — 56.25% . . . The parties agreed to share drilling costs 56.25% M & T, 25% Fuelco and 18.75% McBride. . . . Those interests are: 25% Fuelco; 18.75% McBride; 56.25% other parties [since 1976, M & T], Paragraph . . .

J. CERJAN, v. G. FASULA,, 539 F. Supp. 1226 (N.D. Ohio 1981)

. . . the ACLU, with 6 years experience, specializing in civil liberties and civil rights matters, bills 56.25 . . .

PETRO- CHEM MARKETING CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES, 602 F.2d 959 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . 63.4 percent as much as the services of Bucher Sr., and that the services of Gary Bucher were worth 56.25 . . .

PETRO- CHEM MARKETING CO. INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 221 Ct. Cl. 211 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . 63.4 percent as much as the services of Bucher Sr., and that the services of Gary Bucher were worth 56.25 . . .

In PENN CENTRAL SECURITIES LITIGATION, 416 F. Supp. 907 (E.D. Pa. 1976)

. . . $1,775.00 Philip Jones 1937 100 12 1,200.00 Howard Jacobs 1960 85 1 85.00 Arnold Gershon 1964 75 .75 56.25 . . .

LIPSCHUTZ, d b a Co. v. GORDON JEWELRY CORPORATION, 373 F. Supp. 375 (S.D. Tex. 1974)

. . . See 6 Moore, supra, ¶ 56.25 at 2856. . . .

REFRIGERATION ENGINEERING CORPORATION, v. FRICK COMPANY,, 370 F. Supp. 702 (W.D. Tex. 1974)

. . . parts to non-factors at approximately 70% of list and sells equipment to non-factors at approximately 56.25% . . .

v., 55 T.C. 483 (T.C. 1970)

. . . withdrawal petitioner received interest payments of $200 on October 7, 1965, $62.50 on November 8,1965, and $56.25 . . .

PENUEL, v. CENTRAL CRANE SERVICE,, 232 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 1970)

. . . injured after only four weeks of employment during which he had earned $27.50, $31.88, $60.00 and $56.25 . . . per hour for an eight-hour day, five-day work week, notwithstanding actual earnings of $60.00 and $56.25 . . .

EASTERN SCHOOL, A PARTNERSHIP CONSISTING OF FRANK SIMON, BENJAMIN EIZENMAN, OSCAR GOLDMAN, PHILLIP LASTER AND SAMUEL FRANK v. THE UNITED STATES, 180 Ct. Cl. 676 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . plaintiff added three weeks’ vacation pay of $93.75 each for the morning and afternoon sessions, and $56.25 . . .

W. WIRTZ, v. COMPANIA DE SERVICIOS ELECTRICOS, S. A. P. W. De S. A., 304 F. Supp. 697 (D.C.Z. 1967)

. . . 43.12 Aldama, Teodoro 16.26 Ambulo, Licurgo 59.70 Angeles, Ascanio A. 61.58 Arauz, Molina, Higinio 56.25 . . .

ARAGONA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 165 Ct. Cl. 382 (Ct. Cl. 1964)

. . . On May 1, you accepted the proposal for an increase of $56.25, stating that you had determined the amount . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN WARREN COUNTY, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, M., 224 F. Supp. 1017 (W.D. Pa. 1963)

. . . The assets of the Club consisted of (1) 56.25 acres in fee simple; (2) a public nine hole golf course . . .

C. CONNER, v. G. JORIS,, 241 F.2d 944 (C.C.P.A. 1957)

. . . 5 2.13 2.0 “21 14.1 5.2 21.8 13.1 14.3 “29 20.9 21.2 29.16 20.2 20.65 “45 37 34.6 45.75 31.9 34.4 “56.25 . . .

AMERICAN- HAWAIIAN STEAMSHIP CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 132 Ct. Cl. 246 (Ct. Cl. 1955)

. . . basic valuation provided in General Order No. 37 for freighters built during the period 1914-1934 was $56.25 . . . Proposed valuation as of April 20,1944_ 56.25 4. . . . year was adopted and the application of that rate reduced the $75 basic valuation of April 1942 to $56.25 . . . The $56.25 scale of values established in General Order No. 37 represents a reduction of approximately . . .

AMERICAN- HAWAIIAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY, AS OWNER OF THE AMERICAN STEAMSHIP HAWAIIAN, v. THE UNITED STATES, 129 Ct. Cl. 365 (Ct. Cl. 1954)

. . . Defendant does not contend that, as applied to the Hawaiian,, the basic valuation of $56.25 per deadweight . . . ton per month), would provide both: (i) “a reasonable rate of return” of $5,625, representing 10% of $56.25 . . . per deadweight ton in April 1942 and that the depreciated value of such freighters in April 1944 was $56.25 . . .

COAT CORPORATION OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES, 105 F. Supp. 832 (Ct. Cl. 1952)

. . . Under the fourth counterclaim it is entitled to $56.25, and under the fifth it is entitled to $1,347.59 . . .

COAT CORPORATION OF AMERICA v. THE UNITED STATES, 123 Ct. Cl. 176 (Ct. Cl. 1952)

. . . Under the fourth counterclaim it is entitled to $56.25, and under the fifth it is entitled to $1,347.59 . . .

BROWN v. EASTERN STATES CORPORATION, 86 F. Supp. 887 (D. Md. 1949)

. . . Regis Paper Company Common Stock having a value of $56.25 and $4.43 in cash, or a total of $60.68. . . .

WHITE RIVER BURIAL ASS N v. THOMPSON,, 81 F. Supp. 18 (E.D. Ark. 1948)

. . . 21.66 1938 36.00 9.00 18.36 1939 38.00 9.50 17.10 1940 46.20 11.55 18.02 1941 52.50 13.13 17.33 1942 56.25 . . .

LUKENS STEEL CO. v. PERKINS, 107 F.2d 627 (D.C. Cir. 1939)

. . . Louis, Missouri. 56.0 — Kentucky; West Virginia; Phiadelphia; western Illinois. 56.25 — Central Ohio. . . .

THE BERWINDGLEN, 14 F. Supp. 992 (D. Mass. 1936)

. . . follows: The libel-ant on August 3, 1932, was an able seaman aboard the Berwindglen, receiving as a wage $56.25 . . .

H. v., 24 B.T.A. 1167 (B.T.A. 1931)

. . . compensation insurance premium and that the decedent received a dividend of $84 in 1924 and a dividend of $56.25 . . . In 1925 a dividend of $56.25 was received. . . .

GRACE T. MYTINGER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 4 B.T.A. 896 (B.T.A. 1926)

. . . deficiencies in income and profits taxes for the years 1919 and 1920 in the amounts of $879.09 and $4-56.25 . . .

COTTON CONCENTRATION CO., 4 B.T.A. 121 (B.T.A. 1926)

. . . On September 30, 1920, a fire occurred which entirely destroyed the west shed, 56.25 per cent of the . . . of the property destroyed, was arrived at on the basis of the total destruction of the west shed and 56.25 . . .

ROBERT M. DANFORD v. THE UNITED STATES, 62 Ct. Cl. 285 (Ct. Cl. 1926)

. . . $393.75, and the ■ monthly pay of a major of over 21 years’ service, $337.50, is a monthly difference of $56.25 . . .

KANTLEBERG v. G. M. STANDIFER CONST. CO., 7 F.2d 922 (D. Or. 1920)

. . . commission tho blank as requested, and received from it a. cheek for $20.77 on November 14th, and $56.25 . . .