Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 56.26 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 56.26 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 56.26

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 56
FINAL PROCESS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 56.26
56.26 Executions; mandamus to force levy and sale.When an officer holds an unsatisfied execution and refuses to levy on property liable thereunder and on which it is his or her duty to levy or having levied, refuses to advertise and sell the property levied on, the judgment creditor is entitled to an alternative writ of mandamus requiring the officer to levy such execution or advertise and sell the property levied on, or both, as the case may be.
History.s. 1, ch. 4914, 1901; GS 1635; RGS 2839; CGL 4526; s. 1, ch. 61-330; s. 11, ch. 67-254; s. 306, ch. 95-147; s. 15, ch. 2016-33.
Note.Former s. 55.49.

F.S. 56.26 on Google Scholar

F.S. 56.26 on Casetext

Amendments to 56.26


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 56.26
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 56.26.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF, v. TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, 760 F.3d 297 (3d Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 34:11-56.26(5). . . . Ann. § 34:11-56.26(9). . . . Ann. § 34:11-56.26(4). . . .

PKF MARK III INC. E. P. L. A. v. FOUNDATION FOR FAIR CONTRACTING St. a k a G. P. FFC LLC, 496 F. App'x 260 (3d Cir. 2012)

. . . . §§ 34:11-56.25; 34:11-56.26(9); 34:11-56.28; 34:11-56.30. . . .

R. I. INC. d b a a a a v. McCARTHY, NJDOL NJDOL E. NJDOL, 483 F. App'x 745 (3d Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 34:11-56.26(9). . . .

In A. MADERA, A. v. Co., 363 B.R. 718 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2007)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.26 (2d ed.1988). . . .

In COMPUTER PERSONALITIES SYSTEMS, INC. v. Ho, 362 B.R. 669 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2006)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.26 (2d ed.1988). . . .

FRANK BROS. INC. v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, EEO, 409 F.3d 880 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . . §§ 34;11-56.25, -56.26 (New Jersey); N.M. Stat. Ann. § 13-4-11 (New Mexico); N.Y. Lab. . . .

In P. SHEPPARD, P. M. v. GMAC, 299 B.R. 753 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2003)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.26 (2d ed.1988). . . .

CALIFORNIANS FOR SAFE AND COMPETITIVE DUMP TRUCK TRANSPORTATION v. E. MENDONCA W. Jr. W. AFL- CIO,, 152 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 11-56.26 (West 1997); Wis. Stat. § 66.293 (West 1998). . . . .

DUNLAP, v. ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS,, 996 F. Supp. 962 (N.D. Cal. 1998)

. . . . § 794; 3) violation of the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, California Civil Code § 56.26 . . .

In M. BUCKLES, THORP LOAN AND THRIFT CO. d b a ITT v. M. BUCKLES,, 189 B.R. 752 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1995)

. . . . §§ 56.001-56.26. . . . The Plaintiff did not violate the Minnesota Regulated Loan Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 56.001-56.26, in connection . . .

In LORD, LORD v. NEUMANN,, 179 B.R. 429 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1995)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 56.26 (2d ed. 1988). . . .

B. FOUTZ, v. UNITED STATES, 860 F. Supp. 788 (D. Utah 1994)

. . . Amount Item Assessed 1966 $ 1,305.95 Tax 65.30 Negligence Penalty 1,939.12 Interest 1967 1,125.10 Tax 56.26 . . .

ARMSTRONG, v. A. ALLAIN, C. ROBINSON, v. STEWART,, 893 F. Supp. 1320 (C.C.S.D. Miss. 1994)

. . . districts where blacks comprised 50 + % of the student population, 76.83% of black voters voted “yes” and 56.26% . . .

R. WARD, v. COLUMBUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA,, 782 F. Supp. 1097 (E.D.N.C. 1991)

. . . 1972, the effects of the long history of disfranchisement were apparent in Columbus County as only 56.26% . . .

In E. MITCHELL C. E. MITCHELL C. v. UNITED STATES, 109 B.R. 434 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 1989)

. . . Mertens Law of Fed Income Tax § 56.26 at 107-108 (1988). Sansom v. . . .

BERLANTI, v. BODMAN, s, 780 F.2d 296 (3d Cir. 1985)

. . . Section 34:11-56.26(9) of the New Jersey Statutes Annotated defines "prevailing wage” as "the wage rate . . . N.J.Stat.Ann. § 34:11-56.26(9) (West 1965). . . .

BACKLUND, a f a k a a v. S. BARNHART, 778 F.2d 1386 (9th Cir. 1985)

. . . Wicker, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.26-1, at 56-1549 (2d ed. 1985). . . .

ZIMZORES a k a v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION,, 778 F.2d 264 (5th Cir. 1985)

. . . Id. 11 56.26-1 at 56-1550 (footnotes omitted). . . .

E. STEPHENSON v. CALPINE CONIFERS II, LTD. a, 652 F.2d 808 (9th Cir. 1981)

. . . See 6 Moore Federal Practice, p. 56-1549, H 56.26-1 (2nd ed. 1976), Sonnenblick-Goldman Corp. v. . . .

EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK No. v. DANIEL HALE WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY,, 473 F. Supp. 656 (N.D. Ill. 1979)

. . . See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 56.26[3] (2d ed. 1976). This suit is dismissed. So ordered. . . . .

T. BANG, Jr. G. O. H. W. v. CHASE, F. C. W., 442 F. Supp. 758 (D. Minn. 1977)

. . . Supp,1977); Iowa Code §§ 56.18-56.26 (Supp. 1977); Ky.Rev.Stat. §§ 118.015, 141.071-141.073 (Cum.Supp . . .

D. HODGSON, v. DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS STORE, INC., 333 F. Supp. 65 (N.D. Fla. 1971)

. . . 69 Total $ 213.20 Lynn Bryan Paul 3/27/69-4/17/69 18, 54, 55 & 54 $23.34 1st week $70.00 thereafter 56.26 . . .

GOERZ v. BARSTOW, 148 F. 562 (5th Cir. 1906)

. . . April 19, 1897, said Kennickell sold and conveyed % interest in said 56.26 acres to G. H. . . .