Florida Statute 57.85 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 57
COURT COSTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 57.085

57.085 Deferral of prepayment of court costs and fees for indigent prisoners.—

(1) For the purposes of this section, the term “prisoner” means a person who has been convicted of a crime and is incarcerated for that crime or who is being held in custody pending extradition or sentencing.

(2) When a prisoner who is intervening in or initiating a judicial proceeding seeks to defer the prepayment of court costs and fees because of indigence, the prisoner must file an affidavit of indigence with the appropriate clerk of the court. The affidavit must contain complete information about the prisoner’s identity; the nature and amount of the prisoner’s income; all real property owned by the prisoner; all tangible and intangible property worth more than $100 which is owned by the prisoner; the amount of cash held by the prisoner; the balance of any checking, savings, or money market account held by the prisoner; the prisoner’s dependents, including their names and ages; the prisoner’s debts, including the name of each creditor and the amount owed to each creditor; and the prisoner’s monthly expenses. The prisoner must certify in the affidavit whether the prisoner has been adjudicated indigent under this section, certified indigent under s. 57.081, or authorized to proceed as an indigent under 28 U.S.C. s. 1915 by a federal court. The prisoner must attach to the affidavit a photocopy of the prisoner’s trust account records for the preceding 6 months or for the length of the prisoner’s incarceration, whichever period is shorter. The affidavit must contain the following statements: “I am presently unable to pay court costs and fees. Under penalty of perjury, I swear or affirm that all statements in this affidavit are true and complete.”

(3) Before a prisoner may receive a deferral of prepayment of any court costs and fees for an action brought under this section, the clerk of court must review the affidavit and determine the prisoner to be indigent.

(4) When the clerk has found the prisoner to be indigent but concludes the prisoner is able to pay part of the court costs and fees required by law, the court shall order the prisoner to make, prior to service of process, an initial partial payment of those court costs and fees. The initial partial payment must total at least 20 percent of the average monthly balance of the prisoner’s trust account for the preceding 6 months or for the length of the prisoner’s incarceration, whichever period is shorter.

(5) When the clerk has found the prisoner to be indigent, the court shall order the prisoner to make monthly payments of no less than 20 percent of the balance of the prisoner’s trust account as payment of court costs and fees. When a court orders such payment, the Department of Corrections or the local detention facility shall place a lien on the inmate’s trust account for the full amount of the court costs and fees, and shall withdraw money maintained in that trust account and forward the money, when the balance exceeds $10, to the appropriate clerk of the court until the prisoner’s court costs and fees are paid in full.

(6) Before an indigent prisoner may intervene in or initiate any judicial proceeding, the court must review the prisoner’s claim to determine whether it is legally sufficient to state a cause of action for which the court has jurisdiction and may grant relief. The court shall dismiss all or part of an indigent prisoner’s claim which:

(a) Fails to state a claim for which relief may be granted;

(b) Seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief;

(d) Is frivolous, malicious, or reasonably appears to be intended to harass one or more named defendants.

(7) A prisoner who has twice in the preceding 3 years been adjudicated indigent under this section, certified indigent under s. 57.081, or authorized to proceed as an indigent under 28 U.S.C. s. 1915 by a federal court may not be adjudicated indigent to pursue a new suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal without first obtaining leave of court. In a request for leave of court, the prisoner must provide a complete listing of each suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal brought by the prisoner or intervened in by the prisoner in any court or other adjudicatory forum in the preceding 5 years. The prisoner must attach to a request for leave of court a copy of each complaint, petition, or other document purporting to commence a lawsuit and a record of disposition of the proceeding.

(8) In any judicial proceeding in which a certificate of indigence has been issued to a prisoner, the court may at any time dismiss the prisoner’s action, in whole or in part, upon a finding that:

(a) The prisoner’s claim of indigence is false or misleading;

(b) The prisoner provided false or misleading information regarding another judicial or administrative proceeding in which the prisoner was a party;

(d) The prisoner’s action or a portion of the action is frivolous or malicious.

(9) In determining whether an action is frivolous or malicious, the court may consider whether:

(a) The prisoner’s claim has no arguable basis in law or fact;

(b) The prisoner’s claim reasonably appears intended solely to harass a party filed against;

(c) The prisoner’s claim is substantially similar to a previous claim in that it involves the same parties or arises from the same operative facts as a previous claim;

(d) The prisoner’s claim has little likelihood of success on its merits; or

(e) The allegations of fact in the prisoner’s claim are fanciful or not credible.

(10) With the exception of challenges to prison disciplinary reports, this section does not apply to a criminal proceeding or a collateral criminal proceeding.

History.—s. 2, ch. 96-106; s. 6, ch. 2003-1; s. 72, ch. 2003-402; s. 49, ch. 2004-265; s. 1, ch. 2025-81.

F.S. 57.085 on Google Scholar

F.S. 57.085 on CourtListener

Amendments to 57.085

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 57.085

Total Results: 180

Bush v. State

945 So. 2d 1207, 2006 WL 3741041

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2006 | Docket: 1399816

Cited 80 times | Published

proceeding or a collateral criminal proceeding." § 57.085(10), Fla. Stat. (2005). In order to give effect

Schmidt v. Crusoe

878 So. 2d 361, 2003 WL 1987971

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2003 | Docket: 755930

Cited 63 times | Published

pursuant to the Prisoner Indigency Statute. See § 57.085, Fla. Stat. (2002). Schmidt responded that he

Mitchell v. Moore

786 So. 2d 521, 2001 WL 359630

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2001 | Docket: 748406

Cited 34 times | Published

struck down the copy requirement portion of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1999) (hereinafter the Prisoner

Cason v. Crosby

892 So. 2d 536, 2005 WL 127191

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2005 | Docket: 2488471

Cited 33 times | Published

trust account. In 1996, the legislature enacted section 57.085, the prisoner indigency statute, in order to

Mobley v. McNeil

989 So. 2d 1215, 2008 WL 4067003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2008 | Docket: 1665561

Cited 18 times | Published

the circuit court imposed a lien pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes, on the appellant's inmate

State v. Raymond

906 So. 2d 1045, 2005 WL 1529691

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2005 | Docket: 1723048

Cited 15 times | Published

practice of the courts). At issue in Kalway was section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997), which required Kalway

Jackson v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

790 So. 2d 381, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 51, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 38, 2000 WL 33114471

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2001 | Docket: 1734492

Cited 13 times | Published

pauperis which complied with the requirements of section 57.085(7). In our opinion filed November 18, 1999

Jackson v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

790 So. 2d 381, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 51, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 38, 2000 WL 33114471

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2001 | Docket: 1734492

Cited 13 times | Published

pauperis which complied with the requirements of section 57.085(7). In our opinion filed November 18, 1999

Wagner v. McDonough

927 So. 2d 216, 2006 WL 1140910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2006 | Docket: 1764941

Cited 12 times | Published

this court noted that section 57.081, unlike section 57.085, does not contain statutory language authorizing

Baldwin v. Crosby

905 So. 2d 250, 2005 WL 1467912

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2005 | Docket: 2555740

Cited 12 times | Published

placed on his inmate trust account pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes, and the restoration of all

Hall v. State

752 So. 2d 575, 2000 WL 44045

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2000 | Docket: 1103195

Cited 12 times | Published

new prisoner indigency statute.[4]Id.; see also § 57.085(10), Fla. Stat. (1999). Further, it seems only

Burgess v. Crosby

870 So. 2d 217, 2004 WL 555259

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2004 | Docket: 1330548

Cited 9 times | Published

on the Florida Prisoner Indigency Statute, section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2002), and the similar federal

Kemp v. McDonough

955 So. 2d 635, 2007 WL 1238648

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2007 | Docket: 1186521

Cited 8 times | Published

imposition of a lien on his prisoner account under section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2006). For the reasons stated

Schmidt v. McDonough

951 So. 2d 797, 2006 WL 3740999

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2006 | Docket: 1280720

Cited 8 times | Published

comply with the prisoner indigency statute, section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2001), *799 he filed a motion

Geffken v. Strickler

778 So. 2d 975, 2001 WL 81761

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2001 | Docket: 1290478

Cited 8 times | Published

subject to the partial payment provisions of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1999) (hereinafter the Prisoner

Florida Parole Commission v. Spaziano

48 So. 3d 714, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1730, 2010 WL 4007636

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2010 | Docket: 2399313

Cited 7 times | Published

rephrased as follows: DOES THE EXEMPTION IN SECTION 57.085(10), FLORIDA STATUTES, APPLY TO ANY INMATE

Crosby v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

949 So. 2d 1181, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3032, 2007 WL 620969

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2007 | Docket: 1720008

Cited 7 times | Published

"collateral criminal proceeding" pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes (2005), there is no statutory

Drayton v. Moore

807 So. 2d 819, 2002 WL 384515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2002 | Docket: 1505633

Cited 7 times | Published

of Drayton's mandamus petition pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1999), the prisoner indigency

Reed v. Mims

711 So. 2d 169, 1998 WL 236215

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1998 | Docket: 1700428

Cited 7 times | Published

civil action as legally insufficient under section 57.085, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996). We affirm in

Kendrick v. McNeil

6 So. 3d 657, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1834, 2009 WL 536818

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2009 | Docket: 1666068

Cited 6 times | Published

imposed on Kendrick's trust account pursuant to section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes, when it was made to appear

Hall v. Knipp

982 So. 2d 1196, 2008 WL 2115673

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2008 | Docket: 1664922

Cited 6 times | Published

amended complaint with prejudice, all pursuant to section 57.085(6), Florida Statutes (2006). We affirm as to

Vickson v. Singletary

734 So. 2d 376, 1999 WL 190487

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1999 | Docket: 2488486

Cited 6 times | Published

indigency determination under section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997). Section 57.085 governs the waiver of prepayment

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

2 So. 3d 89, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 908, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 2089, 2008 WL 4876766

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2008 | Docket: 1644022

Cited 5 times | Published

pending extradition or-sentencing- — Pursuant- to § 57.085, Fla. Stat.,---I.hereby — apply for leave to proceed

Lopez v. McDonough

935 So. 2d 47, 2006 WL 2056418

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2006 | Docket: 1670985

Cited 5 times | Published

money maintained in the account as provided in section 57.085, Florida Statutes. He argues that, pursuant

Masiello v. Moore

739 So. 2d 1196, 1999 WL 546876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1999 | Docket: 2563974

Cited 5 times | Published

disciplinary proceedings) for failure to comply with section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997). We agree with the

Kalway v. State

730 So. 2d 861, 1999 WL 266363

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1999 | Docket: 1646714

Cited 5 times | Published

alia, that the requirement made necessary by section 57.085, Florida Statutes, is procedural and thus unconstitutional

Hampton v. McDonough

967 So. 2d 317, 2007 WL 2805948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2007 | Docket: 11897

Cited 4 times | Published

the trial court imposed a lien pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2006), on appellant's inmate

Terry v. McDonough

935 So. 2d 81, 2006 WL 2190527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2006 | Docket: 1245075

Cited 4 times | Published

excluded from the prisoner indigency statute (section 57.085, Florida Statutes). Id. at 367. In Cason v

Davidson v. Crosby

883 So. 2d 866, 2004 WL 2093264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2004 | Docket: 266128

Cited 4 times | Published

limited to the question of the applicability of section 57.085, Florida Statutes, in determining a complainant's

Stanley v. Moore

744 So. 2d 1160, 1999 WL 982976

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1999 | Docket: 493166

Cited 4 times | Published

he failed to comply with the provisions of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997), which governs determinations

Toney v. Courtney

191 So. 3d 505, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6566, 2016 WL 1718869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2016 | Docket: 60255187

Cited 3 times | Published

circuit court’s dismissal with prejudice under section 57.085(6), Florida Statutes (2014), of his first-amended'

Brown v. McNeil

22 So. 3d 741, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17263, 2009 WL 3817867

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2009 | Docket: 1639633

Cited 3 times | Published

has no arguable basis in law or fact. See *743 § 57.085(9)(a), Fla. Stat. Appellant's argument that the

Muhammad v. Crosby

922 So. 2d 236, 2006 WL 42335

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2006 | Docket: 2550313

Cited 3 times | Published

Indigency Statute, section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes (2004). This was error. Section 57.085(10) specifically

Osterback v. Turner

837 So. 2d 604, 2003 WL 340843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2003 | Docket: 537823

Cited 3 times | Published

pre-trial screening procedures set forth in section 57.085(6), Florida Statutes (2001). Because the trial

Ponton v. Moore

744 So. 2d 1159, 1999 WL 979480

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1999 | Docket: 1199374

Cited 3 times | Published

indigency affidavit and related papers required by section 57.085, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996). Attaching correspondence

Gonzalez v. Moore

743 So. 2d 158, 1999 WL 930214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1999 | Docket: 2588171

Cited 3 times | Published

indigency" and other documents required by section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997). On March 18, 1998

Marquart v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

701 So. 2d 674, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13309, 1997 WL 730706

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1997 | Docket: 2553048

Cited 3 times | Published

failure to comply with the requirements of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1996), which took effect

Ferenc v. State

697 So. 2d 1262, 1997 WL 414268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1997 | Docket: 1777535

Cited 3 times | Published

pauperis, the trial court apparently relied on section 57.085(8), Florida Statutes (1995), which authorizes

Spradley v. Spradley

213 So. 3d 1042, 2017 WL 913632, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3034

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2017 | Docket: 4615266

Cited 2 times | Published

civil action as legally insufficient under section 57.085(6), Florida Statutes (2015). In his complaint

Michael A Crews, Secretary, etc. v. Samuel Strother

209 So. 3d 595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2014 | Docket: 1310543

Cited 2 times | Published

mandamus petition *596 asserted that section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes, allows DOC to withdraw

James v. Goryl

62 So. 3d 1225, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8453, 2011 WL 2268954

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2011 | Docket: 340407

Cited 2 times | Published

there when he fell down the stairs. Pursuant to section 57.085(6), Florida Statutes (2009), the trial court

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

27 So. 3d 124, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 546, 2010 WL 255984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2010 | Docket: 1664367

Cited 2 times | Published

dismissed Appellant’s complaint as frivolous under section 57.085(8)(d). This timely appeal followed. We find

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

27 So. 3d 124, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 546, 2010 WL 255984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2010 | Docket: 1664367

Cited 2 times | Published

dismissed Appellant’s complaint as frivolous under section 57.085(8)(d). This timely appeal followed. We find

Ghent v. State

27 So. 3d 121, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 141, 2010 WL 99121

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2010 | Docket: 1664932

Cited 2 times | Published

printout of his inmate trust account pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2006). From the summary

McNeil v. Cox

997 So. 2d 343, 2008 WL 5083513

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2008 | Docket: 1379013

Cited 2 times | Published

requirements of the prisoner indigency statute, section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2005). The court denied

Craft v. Holloway

975 So. 2d 620, 2008 WL 583679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2008 | Docket: 1727332

Cited 2 times | Published

court's dismissal of his complaint pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes. The order found insufficient

Smith v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

974 So. 2d 1110, 2007 WL 4561543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2007 | Docket: 2516519

Cited 2 times | Published

to comply with filing fee requirements under section 57.085, Florida Statutes. The appellants are prison

PENINSULAR PROPERTIES v. City of Bradenton

965 So. 2d 160, 2007 WL 2188342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2007 | Docket: 1509280

Cited 2 times | Published

court could make an indigency determination. See § 57.085(7), Fla. Stat. (1997). Our supreme court decided

Stokes v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

948 So. 2d 75, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 489, 2007 WL 120003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2007 | Docket: 1773654

Cited 2 times | Published

account. The lien was imposed on the authority of section 57.085, Florida Statutes, after petitioner filed his

Scott v. McDonough

946 So. 2d 1161, 2006 WL 3740794

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2006 | Docket: 1771271

Cited 2 times | Published

appellant's inmate trust account, pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes. Appellant's mandamus action

Reddick v. McDonough

938 So. 2d 595, 2006 WL 2738884

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2006 | Docket: 2527348

Cited 2 times | Published

filing fee pursuant to section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes (2005). See § 57.085(10), Fla. Stat. (2005);

Jackson v. McDonough

28 So. 3d 61, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14816, 2006 WL 2527244

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2006 | Docket: 1652502

Cited 2 times | Published

to the Florida Prisoner Indigency Statute, section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2005), an inmate who brings

Flowers v. McDonough

932 So. 2d 617, 2006 WL 1805606

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2006 | Docket: 2573972

Cited 2 times | Published

"collateral criminal proceeding" pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes, the trial court improperly

Yasir v. McDonough

28 So. 3d 60, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8215, 2006 WL 1419271

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 2006 | Docket: 1652424

Cited 2 times | Published

Petitioner's inmate trust account pursuant *61 to section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2004). Petitioner filed

Cox v. Crosby

27 So. 3d 45, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 832, 2006 WL 176681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2006 | Docket: 1665076

Cited 2 times | Published

indigent for the appeal in accordance with section 57.085, Florida Statutes, and imposed a lien on his

Woullard v. Bishop

755 So. 2d 816, 2000 WL 461369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2000 | Docket: 2586054

Cited 2 times | Published

to comply with the indigency requirements of section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes. We grant the writ and

Harper v. Moore

737 So. 2d 1232, 1999 WL 560144

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 1999 | Docket: 700439

Cited 2 times | Published

withdrawals from the account as of January 8, 1998. Section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes (1997), authorizes DOC

Quigley v. Butterworth

708 So. 2d 270, 1998 WL 120217

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1998 | Docket: 542125

Cited 2 times | Published

96-106, Laws of Florida, and in particular, section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997). The circuit court

David Charles Sussman v. Department of Corrections

257 So. 3d 604

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2018 | Docket: 8048727

Cited 1 times | Published

it declined to adjudicate him indigent under section 57.085, Florida Statutes, and warned that he had thirty

Eric Green v. Calvin Cottrell

204 So. 3d 22, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 506, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2487

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2016 | Docket: 4487516

Cited 1 times | Published

he is a prisoner as that term is defined in section 57.085(1). However, whether the alleged attack at

Chartrand v. Parsons

164 So. 3d 117, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6845, 2015 WL 2129304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2015 | Docket: 60247908

Cited 1 times | Published

reviewed Chartrand’s complaint pursuant to section 57.085(6), Florida Statutes, and entered a final order

Garrick John v. Michael D. Crews, Secretary, etc.

149 So. 3d 149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2014 | Docket: 1443096

Cited 1 times | Published

that appellant was not indigent pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes, and was required to pay

John v. Department of Corrections

124 So. 3d 381, 2013 WL 5744428, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2013 | Docket: 60235469

Cited 1 times | Published

Circuit Court for Leon County correctly applied section 57.085, Florida Statutes, and, after reviewing copies

Franklin v. State

25 So. 3d 645, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20494, 2009 WL 5152593

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2009 | Docket: 2548656

Cited 1 times | Published

because it has no arguable basis in law or fact. See § 57.085(9)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). The writ of habeas corpus

Williams v. Florida Department of Corrections

18 So. 3d 609, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4450, 2009 WL 1272352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2009 | Docket: 60252136

Cited 1 times | Published

tribunal dismissing appellant’s claim pursuant to section 57.085(8), Florida Statutes, is reversed, and the

Maddrie v. Colton

998 So. 2d 668, 2009 WL 18723

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2009 | Docket: 1342413

Cited 1 times | Published

with the requirements of section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (2008). Section 57.085 provides for the deferral

Jones v. Joseph

989 So. 2d 744, 2008 WL 4148963

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2008 | Docket: 1665445

Cited 1 times | Published

comply with section 57.085, Florida Statutes, and dismissed the petition, pursuant to section 57.085(6), for

Harrison v. Department of Corrections

965 So. 2d 1276, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16262, 2007 WL 2981579

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2007 | Docket: 2506922

Cited 1 times | Published

"collateral criminal proceeding" pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes (2005), the circuit court

Simpkins v. McDonough

967 So. 2d 950, 2007 WL 2805640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2007 | Docket: 2569392

Cited 1 times | Published

should not have ordered the imposition of a section 57.085, Florida Statutes, lien for payment of court

Perez v. State

963 So. 2d 337, 2007 WL 2362341

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2007 | Docket: 1697321

Cited 1 times | Published

We write to again clarify the application of section 57.085, Florida Statutes. After Appellant's conditional

Ross v. Florida Parole Commission

962 So. 2d 1046, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12641, 2007 WL 2301403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2007 | Docket: 2547637

Cited 1 times | Published

gain-time or length of sentence, is exempt from section 57.085, Florida Statutes. See Cason v. Crosby, 892

Ross v. Florida Parole Commission

962 So. 2d 1046, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12641, 2007 WL 2301403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2007 | Docket: 2547637

Cited 1 times | Published

gain-time or length of sentence, is exempt from section 57.085, Florida Statutes. See Cason v. Crosby, 892

Gaines v. Florida Parole Commission

962 So. 2d 1040, 2007 WL 2301275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2007 | Docket: 480667

Cited 1 times | Published

proceed as an indigent below, but pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes, ordered that a lien be placed

Thomas v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

963 So. 2d 777, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10771, 2007 WL 2000272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2007 | Docket: 1328252

Cited 1 times | Published

inmate trust account records as required by section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2004). We reverse and remand

Ortiz v. McDonough

957 So. 2d 1256, 2007 WL 1295669

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2007 | Docket: 2588959

Cited 1 times | Published

Ortiz's petition to be frivolous pursuant to section 57.085(9), Florida Statutes (2005), and assessing

Jenkins v. State

957 So. 2d 20, 2007 WL 1093750

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2007 | Docket: 1679171

Cited 1 times | Published

proceeding, which is exempt from liens under section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes. The State argues that

Gibson v. McDonough

951 So. 2d 89, 2007 WL 737587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2007 | Docket: 1280448

Cited 1 times | Published

his prison inmate trust account, pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes. We deny, without discussion

Turner v. McDonough

949 So. 2d 1106, 2007 WL 460673

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2007 | Docket: 1374385

Cited 1 times | Published

explained that the purpose of the enactment of section 57.085, Florida Statutes, was "to discourage the filing

Aguilar v. McDonough

943 So. 2d 988, 2006 WL 3524405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2006 | Docket: 2590261

Cited 1 times | Published

"collateral criminal proceeding" pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida *989 Statutes, the trial court

Bush v. McDonough

943 So. 2d 986, 2006 WL 3524395

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2006 | Docket: 2540635

Cited 1 times | Published

"collateral criminal proceeding" pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes (2005), the circuit court

Collazo v. McDonough

943 So. 2d 816, 2006 WL 2956113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2006 | Docket: 534303

Cited 1 times | Published

circuit court order incorrectly relies upon section 57.085, Florida Statutes, to justify the imposition

Brown v. Crist

973 So. 2d 1152, 2006 WL 2505215

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2006 | Docket: 1851461

Cited 1 times | Published

" it was exempt from the lien provisions of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2005). See Schmidt v. Crusoe

Spaziano v. Florida Parole Commission

46 So. 3d 576, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9115, 2006 WL 1565289

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2006 | Docket: 2400126

Cited 1 times | Published

collateral criminal proceeding exempt from the section 57.085, Florida Statutes, prison lien provision. We

Rutledge v. McDonough

931 So. 2d 171, 2006 WL 1341266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2006 | Docket: 2587158

Cited 1 times | Published

"collateral criminal proceeding" pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes, the trial court improperly

Kolb v. Fusco

927 So. 2d 231, 2006 WL 1155165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2006 | Docket: 2559015

Cited 1 times | Published

an affidavit of indigency in compliance with section 57.085(2), Florida Statutes (2004). We affirm. Appellant

Wagner v. McDonough

930 So. 2d 710, 2006 WL 1140936

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 2006 | Docket: 152631

Cited 1 times | Published

tribunal in a civil proceeding, pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes. The order further directs

LG v. Department of Children and Families

917 So. 2d 1013, 2006 WL 20496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2006 | Docket: 2545093

Cited 1 times | Published

lien be placed on the appellant's funds under section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes. Because the specified

Small v. Crosby

877 So. 2d 911, 2004 WL 1621631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2004 | Docket: 331766

Cited 1 times | Published

his failure to pay a filing fee pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2004). Small's mandamus

Huffman v. Moore

778 So. 2d 411, 2001 WL 76315

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2001 | Docket: 2536610

Cited 1 times | Published

a determination as to whether, pursuant to section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes, the Department of Corrections

Wrisper v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

765 So. 2d 295, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10692, 2000 WL 1180161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2000 | Docket: 1177326

Cited 1 times | Published

writ of mandamus for failure to comply with section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes, to be certified as indigent

Pace v. State

763 So. 2d 375, 2000 WL 361942

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2000 | Docket: 2563641

Cited 1 times | Published

proceed on appeal in forma pauperis pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997). Because we find the

Browning v. Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2025 | Docket: 71154559

Published

Department of Corrections inmate trust account. See § 57.085(2), Fla. Stat. (2023). We affirm. Appellant’s

Miller v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2025 | Docket: 69651309

Published

petition based on a failure to comply with section 57.085, Florida Statutes; and (3) the lower court

Angel E. Gaston v. Lake County, Counseling and Development Center, Central Florida Psychological Consultants, Inc., Law Office of Michael A. Graves, Wanda T. Greene, Andrew L. Barthelony, Patrick J. Ward, W. Steven Saunders, and Howard H. Lawrence

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2025 | Docket: 69640883

Published

of Court determined Appellant indigent under section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes (2024). But rather

Lemuel L. Cooper v. Judge James M. Colaw

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2024 | Docket: 69369595

Published

the filing fee or seek indigent status under section 57.085, Florida Statutes). OSTERHAUS, C.J., and KELSEY

ANGEL E. GASTON v. NNN INVESTMENT ADVISORS

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2023 | Docket: 67316874

Published

complaint pursuant to mandatory prescreening under section 57.085(6), Florida Statutes (2022). The circuit court

Captain Romine, Sgt. T.J. Lingo, Julie L. Jones, Secretary of The Florida Department of Corrections, and Warden Coker v. Derrick Allen

262 So. 3d 855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2018 | Docket: 8462705

Published

mandamus seeks to compel the trial court to apply section 57.085(6), Florida Statutes (2017), to a complaint

Ruggirello v. Jones

202 So. 3d 935, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15951

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2016 | Docket: 60257318

Published

therefore subject to a hen for costs and fees under section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes. Ruggirello does not challenge

Grooms v. Department of Corrections

179 So. 3d 480, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17331, 2015 WL 7294565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2015 | Docket: 60251763

Published

proceeding exempt , from the lien requirement of section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes (2013), because it, was

Green v. Cottrell

172 So. 3d 1009, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13129, 2015 WL 5164938

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2015 | Docket: 60250002

Published

prisoner’s confinement.” § 95.11(5)(g), Fla. Stat. Section 57.085(1), Florida Statutes (2007), defines a “prisoner”

Magwood v. Florida Department of Corrections

175 So. 3d 311, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11424, 2015 WL 4554920

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 2015 | Docket: 60250544

Published

leave to proceed as an indigent pursuant to section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes. The circuit court was

Dwayne E. Roberts v. State of Florida

172 So. 3d 478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2015 | Docket: 2671916

Published

mandamus proceeding — under the authority of section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes (2013). We conclude the

Ralph A. Thomas v. Department of Corrections

159 So. 3d 291, 2015 WL 926773

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2015 | Docket: 2639469

Published

which was exempt from the lien requirement of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2013). However, we find

Roy S. Whited v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

153 So. 3d 324

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2014 | Docket: 2610363

Published

trust account for court costs and fees, citing section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes. Whited filed a motion

Whited v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

145 So. 3d 951, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13090, 2014 WL 4159997

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2014 | Docket: 60242787

Published

v. Spaziano, 48 So.3d 714, 724 (Fla.2010); and § 57.085(10), Fla. Stat. Thus, we reverse the circuit court’s

Jonathan Lewis v. Florida Department of Corrections

143 So. 3d 1112, 2014 WL 3805666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 2014 | Docket: 748368

Published

directed appellant to comply with a portion of section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (2012), that has been

Smith v. Rutherford

162 So. 3d 14, 2014 WL 1028259, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3758

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2014 | Docket: 60247431

Published

appeal to be frivolous and filed in bad faith. See § 57.085(9), Fla. Stat. In addition, upon Appellant’s response

Brown v. Crews

120 So. 3d 1255, 2013 WL 4779616, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 2013 | Docket: 60233897

Published

it has no arguable basis in law or fact. See § 57.085(9)(a), Fla. Stat. Finally, Appellant has failed

Williams v. State

98 So. 3d 258, 2012 WL 4748161, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16880

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2012 | Docket: 60312265

Published

proceeding or a collateral criminal proceeding.” § 57.085(10). Therefore, because Williams is appealing

Newsome v. Geo Group, Inc.

82 So. 3d 1067, 2011 WL 5375053, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17785

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2011 | Docket: 60306047

Published

make payments for court costs and fees. Under § 57.085(5), Florida Statutes, “[w]hen the clerk has found

Houston v. GEO

73 So. 3d 323, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16980, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2011 | Docket: 303272

Published

aforesaid defendants. The trial judge, pursuant to section 57.085(6), Florida Statutes (2009)[1], reviewed Houston's

Lovette v. Florida Department of Health

49 So. 3d 326, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18357, 2010 WL 4909620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2010 | Docket: 60296728

Published

action is not a collateral criminal proceeding. See § 57.085, Fla. Stat. (2007); Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So

Jones v. Florida Parole Commission

48 So. 3d 704, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 578, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1732, 2010 WL 4007652

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2010 | Docket: 60296619

Published

by or on behalf of a prisoner as defined in section 57.085. Judicial history with regard to the application

Alexander v. State

43 So. 3d 193, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13624, 2010 WL 3564742

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2010 | Docket: 2561487

Published

requires him to pay fees and costs pursuant to section 57.085 of the Prisoner Indigency Statute. We treat

ROBENSON v. McNeil

39 So. 3d 350, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7701, 2010 WL 2219709

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2010 | Docket: 2409984

Published

appeal has no arguable basis in law or fact. See § 57.085(9)(a), Fla. Stat. The trial court committed no

Walker v. Ellis

28 So. 3d 91, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19994, 2009 WL 4908498

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2009 | Docket: 1652301

Published

summarily affirmed. The court correctly applied section 57.085, Florida Statutes, to find the action frivolous

Swint v. McNeil

17 So. 3d 898, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13782, 2009 WL 2970405

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2009 | Docket: 2557981

Published

reimbursement of the filing fee, pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes. As the Department of Corrections

Bullard v. McNeil

9 So. 3d 749, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4305, 2009 WL 1231020

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2009 | Docket: 60309079

Published

amount of court costs and fees pursuant to section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes. On August 30, 2006, however

Burris v. State

982 So. 2d 1248, 2008 WL 2220861

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2008 | Docket: 435529

Published

Strickler, 778 So.2d 975, 976 (Fla.2001). Section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes (2006), specifically

Clifton v. Florida Parole Commission

974 So. 2d 1208, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2458, 2008 WL 482342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2008 | Docket: 64853938

Published

“collateral criminal proceeding” pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes (2006), the circuit court

Gaines v. McDonough

968 So. 2d 95, 2007 WL 4105385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 20, 2007 | Docket: 1745382

Published

should not have ordered the imposition of a section 57.085, Florida Statutes, lien for the payment of

Calero v. McDonough

964 So. 2d 876, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14866, 2007 WL 2766681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2007 | Docket: 64852460

Published

“collateral criminal proceeding” pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes, and the trial court

Michael v. FLORIDA CORRECTIONS COMMISSION

966 So. 2d 982, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14388, 2007 WL 2681798

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2007 | Docket: 531206

Published

constituted a collateral criminal proceeding under section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes, the circuit court erred

Smith v. Florida Parole Commission

964 So. 2d 189, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12938, 2007 WL 2362347

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2007 | Docket: 64852133

Published

section 57.081, Florida Statutes, rather than section 57.085, Florida Statutes. See Wagner v. McDonough

Williams v. Florida Parole Commission

963 So. 2d 872, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12940, 2007 WL 2362344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2007 | Docket: 64852030

Published

“collateral criminal proceeding” pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes (2006), the circuit court

Mathis v. McDonough

957 So. 2d 95, 2007 WL 1385955

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2007 | Docket: 1918946

Published

the circuit court erred when, in reliance on section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2006), it imposed a lien

Lowery v. Florida Department of Corrections

957 So. 2d 93, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7301, 2007 WL 1385935

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2007 | Docket: 64850847

Published

collateral criminal proceeding within the meaning of section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes. Therefore, the circuit

Lane v. McDonough

954 So. 2d 713, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6043, 2007 WL 1173859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2007 | Docket: 64850305

Published

“collateral criminal proceeding” pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes, we agree with petitioner

Young v. McDonough

954 So. 2d 703, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5779, 2007 WL 1146574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2007 | Docket: 64850300

Published

thus was not subject to the lien provisions of section 57.085. See Wagner v. McDonough, 927 So.2d 216 (Fla

Drakes v. Florida Parole Commission

954 So. 2d 89, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5764, 2007 WL 1146451

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2007 | Docket: 175901

Published

not subject to the prisoner indigency lien of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2005). See Brooks, 948 So

Diaz v. McDonough

953 So. 2d 657, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4667, 2007 WL 934918

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2007 | Docket: 64850080

Published

“collateral criminal proceeding” pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes (2005), the circuit court

Weeks v. McDonough

950 So. 2d 484, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2704, 2007 WL 556929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2007 | Docket: 64849599

Published

“collateral criminal proceeding” pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes (2005), the circuit court

Austin v. McDonough

948 So. 2d 970, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2054, 2007 WL 489304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2007 | Docket: 64849159

Published

against Appellant’s trust account pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes. The trial court denied the

Reese v. McDonough

947 So. 2d 1286, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1515, 2007 WL 412499

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2007 | Docket: 64848810

Published

appropriate indigency documentation, as required by section 57.085(2), Florida Statutes (2003). In particular

Esquivel v. McDonough

946 So. 2d 104, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 99, 2007 WL 28461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2007 | Docket: 64848522

Published

of the costs and fees related to litigation, section 57.085(4), Florida Statutes (2004), provides: “The

Bowleg v. Florida Department of Corrections

949 So. 2d 1058, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21934, 2006 WL 3796485

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 2006 | Docket: 64849487

Published

“collateral criminal proceeding” pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes, the trial court improperly

Mobley v. McDonough

946 So. 2d 40, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20310, 2006 WL 3497246

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2006 | Docket: 64848504

Published

“collateral criminal proceeding” pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes (2005), the circuit court

Finn v. McDonough

943 So. 2d 295, 2006 WL 3486820

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2006 | Docket: 2531696

Published

against petitioner's trust account pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes. In the instant petition

Hill v. McDonough

946 So. 2d 1091, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20057, 2006 WL 3454788

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2006 | Docket: 64848608

Published

petition was untimely and an order by which a section 57.085 lien was placed on his inmate account in connection

McCray v. State

941 So. 2d 1262, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19583, 2006 WL 3371562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2006 | Docket: 64847836

Published

postconviction court erred in its application of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2005), because McCray’s

Gaffney v. McDonough

942 So. 2d 954, 2006 WL 3371586

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2006 | Docket: 841735

Published

"collateral criminal proceeding" pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes, we agree with petitioner

Simmons v. McDonough

941 So. 2d 1259, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19453, 2006 WL 3359226

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2006 | Docket: 64847833

Published

collateral criminal proceeding within the meaning of section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes, the trial court improperly

Kelly v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

941 So. 2d 521, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18672, 2006 WL 3207957

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2006 | Docket: 1523637

Published

petitioner's prison trust account pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes. Petitioner then filed a

O'Conner v. McDonough

939 So. 2d 177, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16528, 2006 WL 2827320

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2006 | Docket: 64847160

Published

against petitioner’s trust account pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes. The trial court denied mandamus

Grayer v. State

938 So. 2d 610, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15960, 2006 WL 2805155

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2006 | Docket: 64847073

Published

court might have imposed the lien pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes. The trial court specifically

LaTulip v. Department of Corrections

936 So. 2d 756, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14118, 2006 WL 2432291

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2006 | Docket: 64846351

Published

“collateral criminal proceeding” pursuant to section 57.085(10), Florida Statutes, the trial court improperly

McGee v. State, Florida Department of Corrections

935 So. 2d 62, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12828, 2006 WL 2095776

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2006 | Docket: 64845935

Published

requirement and lien provisions contained in section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2001). After Appellant violated

Stanley v. Berry

933 So. 2d 1219, 2006 WL 1888600

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2006 | Docket: 2562059

Published

provide an affidavit as to economic status. Section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2005), provides that an

Hartley v. McDonough

947 So. 2d 454, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 2006 WL 1566141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2006 | Docket: 64848686

Published

order which requires petitioner to comply with section 57.085, Florida Statutes, in order to proceed with

Hartley v. McDonough

947 So. 2d 454, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9127, 2006 WL 1566141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2006 | Docket: 64848686

Published

order which requires petitioner to comply with section 57.085, Florida Statutes, in order to proceed with

Johnson v. McDonough

931 So. 2d 213, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9126, 2006 WL 1565936

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2006 | Docket: 64845395

Published

argues that the circuit court erred in applying section 57.085, Florida Statutes, to his request for indigency

Rankin v. State

910 So. 2d 387, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14673, 2005 WL 2266600

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2005 | Docket: 64840315

Published

placing a lien on his inmate account pursuant to section 57.085(5), Florida Statutes (2004). The State concedes

Sanders v. Ruvin

907 So. 2d 1264, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12032, 2005 WL 1813046

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 2005 | Docket: 64839767

Published

Sanders submits the documents required under section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2004), i.e., an affidavit

Thomas v. State

904 So. 2d 502, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7282, 2005 WL 1162918

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2005 | Docket: 64839042

Published

erred in requiring appellant to comply with section 57.085, Florida Statutes. Collateral criminal proceedings

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

894 So. 2d 202, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 84, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 154, 2005 WL 242690

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2005 | Docket: 64836172

Published

pending extradition or sentencing. Pursuant to § 57.085, Fla. Stat., I hereby apply for leave to proceed

Esquivel v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

866 So. 2d 156, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1803, 2004 WL 305731

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2004 | Docket: 1274132

Published

without prepayment of costs in compliance with Section 57.085(2) or 57.081(1), Florida Statutes (2001)."

McKire v. Crosby

864 So. 2d 1234, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 649, 2004 WL 221210

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2004 | Docket: 64827860

Published

provide the financial documentation required by section 57.085, Florida Statutes. The circuit court dismissed

Hett v. White

863 So. 2d 488, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 444, 2004 WL 88856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2004 | Docket: 64827503

Published

dismissing his mandamus petition pursuant to section 57.085(6), Florida Statutes (2003). Through the mandamus

Sawyer v. Goldberg

865 So. 2d 583, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 22, 2004 WL 32397

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2004 | Docket: 64828040

Published

statute specifically excludes state prisoners, section 57.085 does contain the procedure by which a prisoner

Hughes v. Weiss

870 So. 2d 87, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17546, 2003 WL 22715650

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 2003 | Docket: 64829613

Published

compliance with the Prisoner Indigency Statute, section 57.085(2), Florida Statutes (2003). Although Hughes’

Yasir v. Singletary

861 So. 2d 460, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16518, 2003 WL 22458877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2003 | Docket: 64826997

Published

Florida Department of Corrections. Pursuant to section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997), Yasir was required

Connelly v. Florida Parole Commission

826 So. 2d 432, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11573, 2002 WL 1842255

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2002 | Docket: 64817632

Published

fee or be certified as insolvent pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes. According to the order,

Sallano v. Miami-Dade County

816 So. 2d 208, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6164, 2002 WL 882059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2002 | Docket: 64815065

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 57.085(2), Fla. Stat. (2000); Urrutia v. Harrisburg County Police Dep’t

Knod v. Moore

805 So. 2d 50, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17871, 2001 WL 1614151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2001 | Docket: 64811751

Published

indigent in a civil case in the trial court under section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2001). We have, in the past

Williams v. Florida Parole Commission

801 So. 2d 292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17474, 2001 WL 1580307

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2001 | Docket: 64810661

Published

failing to comply with the requirements of section 57.085 without first affording to the party an opportunity

Ellis v. Russo

796 So. 2d 1210, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14129, 2001 WL 1186868

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2001 | Docket: 64809361

Published

PER CURIAM. Relying on section 57.085(9)(c), Florida Statutes (2000), the trial court dismissed appellant’s

Johnson v. Burns

804 So. 2d 345, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10363, 2001 WL 830580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2001 | Docket: 64811536

Published

and fees for indigent prisoners, pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1999). In his financial

Wright v. Moore

776 So. 2d 966, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16824, 2000 WL 1867507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2000 | Docket: 64803344

Published

writ of mandamus for failure to comply with section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes, to be certified as indigent

Rowe v. State

777 So. 2d 1010, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 17933, 2000 WL 1862863

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2000 | Docket: 64803589

Published

had either to comply with the requirements of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1999), or pay a filing fee

Mitchell v. Mitchell

771 So. 2d 1288, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15454, 2000 WL 1745082

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2000 | Docket: 64801921

Published

Mitchell’s failure to comply with subsection (7) of section 57.085, Florida Statutes — the statute that governs

Doss v. Florida Department of Corrections

770 So. 2d 207, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2000 | Docket: 64801337

Published

management order requiring compliance with section 57.085(7). The appellee moves for a relinquishment

Wilson v. Moore

767 So. 2d 1246, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11469, 2000 WL 1268816

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2000 | Docket: 64800622

Published

Management Order enforcing the requirement of section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997), a provision of

Butler v. State

761 So. 2d 448, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6664, 2000 WL 707460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2000 | Docket: 64798349

Published

“Inmate Affidavit of Indigen-cy Civil Proceedings F.S. 57.085,” which *449reflected no income or assets other

Vanderberg v. Moore

765 So. 2d 94, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5712, 2000 WL 574371

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 2000 | Docket: 64799652

Published

failed to supply in his previous filings under section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997). See Bandy v. Sheffield

Harry v. State

758 So. 2d 1187, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5462, 2000 WL 562074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2000 | Docket: 64797567

Published

corpus, finding that he failed to comply with section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997) which prescribes the

Coby v. Food World, Inc.

746 So. 2d 570, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16951, 1999 WL 1215607

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1999 | Docket: 64792850

Published

against a grocery store under the authority of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997). We reverse. As noted

Tooma v. Moore

743 So. 2d 1189, 1999 WL 982943

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1999 | Docket: 528002

Published

proceed with his suit as an indigent pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997). However, Appellant's

Rivera v. State

740 So. 2d 584, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10638, 1999 WL 594282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1999 | Docket: 64790673

Published

for Leon County for failure to comply with section 57.085 in order to obtain an order of insolvency or

Vickson v. Singletary

734 So. 2d 376, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 175, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 574

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1999 | Docket: 64788566

Published

indigency determination under section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997). Section 57.085 governs the waiver of prepayment

Bell v. Perry

686 So. 2d 795, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 225, 1997 WL 24915

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1997 | Docket: 64770471

Published

of prepayment of court costs and fees under section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1995). Under the statute