Florida Statute 61.011 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 61
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; SUPPORT; TIME-SHARING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 61.011

61.011 Dissolution in chancery.—Proceedings under this chapter are in chancery.

History.—s. 1, Oct. 31, 1828; RS 1477; GS 1925; RGS 3188; CGL 4980; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 16, ch. 67-254; s. 2, ch. 71-241.

Note.—Former s. 65.01.

F.S. 61.011 on Google Scholar

F.S. 61.011 on Casetext

Amendments to 61.011

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 61.011

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 61.011.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 61.011

Total Results: 20

Harrell v. Friend

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-05-08

Snippet: work equity in chapter 61 proceedings. See § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (2004) (“Proceedings under this

Haslauer v. Haslauer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-06

Snippet: execution. See § 61.16(2), Fla. Stat.; but cf. § 61.11, Fla. Stat. (authorizing a writ of bodily attachment

SAM SHRIVASTAVA, VENN THERAPEUTICS, LLC AND SANDIP PATEL v. CAC PHARMA INVESTMENTS LLC, AND C & J HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-06

Snippet: void their investments pursuant to section 517.061(11)(a)5. We conclude that the claims alleged

SAM SHRIVASTAVA, VENN THERAPEUTICS, LLC AND SANDIP PATEL v. CAC PHARMA INVESTMENTS LLC, AND C & J HEALTHCARE INVESTMENTS, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-06

Snippet: void their investments pursuant to section 517.061(11)(a)5. We conclude that the claims alleged

BRADLEY ENGLE v. MICHELLE K. ENGLE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-07-03

Snippet: opposed to the strict rule of law." (citing § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (1995))). Foreclosing a litigant from

Chittim v. Chittim

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-11-29

Citation: 230 So. 3d 966

Snippet: as opposed to the strict rule of law” (citing § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (1995)).

Chittim v. Chittim

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-06-30

Snippet: fairness as opposed to the strict rule of law" (§ 61.011, Fla. Stat. (1995)).

Martinez v. Martinez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-05-19

Citation: 219 So. 3d 259, 2017 WL 2200228, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7183

Snippet: action is an action in equity. See § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (2015) (“Proceedings under this chapter

Rieder v. Rieder

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-08-17

Citation: 197 So. 3d 1258, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12366, 2016 WL 4375425

Snippet: payments with injunctions, see, e.g., § 61.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2015), the injunctive relief provided

Horton v. Horton

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-11-16

Citation: 179 So. 3d 459, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17156, 2015 WL 7135729

Snippet: n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (citing in part section 61.11 and explaining that “[tjhis decision is without

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-03-26

Citation: 173 So. 3d 19, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 163, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 583, 2015 WL 1343088

Snippet: transportation of the individual pursuant to Section 61.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes. PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE

Jarrard v. Jarrard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-01-07

Citation: 157 So. 3d 332, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 107, 2015 WL 72356

Snippet: process of appellate review. See § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (2012). 8 . Philip J

Lori A. Ford v. Michael Withers Ford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-11-26

Citation: 153 So. 3d 315, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19525

Snippet: Guidy, 106 Fla. 94, 142 So. 818 (1932)); accord § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (2012) (proceedings under Chapter 61

In Re Amendments to the Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-02

Citation: 50 So. 3d 595, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 701, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 2053, 2010 WL 4878865

Snippet: the law and satisfies the requirements of section 61.11, Florida Statutes (2010). The amendments to existing

Bieda v. Bieda

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-08-11

Citation: 42 So. 3d 859, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11724, 2010 WL 3154834

Snippet: state whether it was entered pursuant to section 61.11(1), Florida Statutes (2009), which provides for

Nourachi v. First American Title Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-08-06

Citation: 44 So. 3d 602, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11440, 2010 WL 3056602

Snippet: when a statute imposes the duty. See, e.g., § 517.061(11)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (2008) (dealing with sale of

Schneider v. Schneider

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-03-10

Citation: 32 So. 3d 151, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2930, 2010 WL 785814

Snippet: fairness as opposed to the strict rule of law. See § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (1995) ("Proceedings under this chapter

Vitt v. Rodriguez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-06-15

Citation: 960 So. 2d 47, 2007 WL 1709535

Snippet: fairness as opposed to the strict rule of law. See § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (1995) ("Proceedings under this chapter

Rinkor v. Brborich

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-04-11

Citation: 957 So. 2d 661, 2007 WL 1062520

Snippet: this portion of the order that we reverse. Section 61.11(1), Florida Statutes (2006) provides for the issuance

Oxenberg v. Oxenberg

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-07-19

Citation: 937 So. 2d 166, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11924, 2006 WL 2001131

Snippet: The injunction was entered pursuant to Section 61.11, Florida Statutes (2005). We affirm on the authority