Cases from cite.case.law:

TAYLOR, v. LUTZ,, 134 So. 3d 1146 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . the rate of $50 per month, in addition to his ongoing obligations of $500 per month for alimony, and $61.55 . . .

ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, v. ALABAMA, v., 989 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

. . . her district, but that the final plan increased the black voting-age population in her district from 61.55 . . .

TRISHAN AIR, INC. LLC, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 635 F.3d 422 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 61.55. Arlington/Roe & Company (A/R) acted as the insurance broker for Trishan. . . . that he could not provide a pilot warranty limited to the basic requirements listed in 14 C.F.R. § 61.55 . . . See 14 C.F.R. § 61.55. . . . .

YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 94 Fed. Cl. 678 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . . § 61.55(a)(2)(iv)), and “ample” record evidence of the government’s intention to “ ‘pursue co-disposal . . .

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 93 Fed. Cl. 337 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . . § 61.55; Joint Stip. ¶ 18. . . .

BOSTON EDISON COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, Co. v., 93 Fed. Cl. 105 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . . § 61.55(a) (classifying radioactive waste based on the radionuclide concentration in specific types . . .

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, v. UNITED STATES,, 91 Fed. Cl. 9 (Fed. Cl. 2009)

. . . . § 61.55(a)(2). . . . .

YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, v. v., 83 Fed. Cl. 1268 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 61.55(a)(2). . . . waste in a disposal site licensed pursuant to this part are approved by the Commission. 10 C.F.R. § 61.55 . . .

YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, v. v., 536 F.3d 1268 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 61.55(a)(2). . . . waste in a disposal site licensed pursuant to this part are approved by the Commission. 10 C.F.R. § 61.55 . . .

PACIFIC GAS ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 73 Fed. Cl. 333 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . (citing 10 C.F.R. § 61.55(a)(2)(iv)). . . . such waste in a disposal site licensed pursuant to this part are approved by the [NRC].” 10 C.F.R. § 61.55 . . . Section 61.55 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations classifies waste for land disposal facilities . . . . 10 C.F.R. § 61.55. . . . . May 18, 1988, and final rule, issued May 25, 1989, rebut plaintiff's interpretation of 10 C.F.R. § 61.55 . . .

YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 73 Fed. Cl. 249 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . that exceed the limits established by the [NRC] for class C radioactive waste, as defined by section 61.55 . . . The Rule amended 10 C.F.R. § 61.55(a)(2)(iv) ‘Waste Classification” to provide that GTCC waste “must . . .

PACIFIC GAS ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 70 Fed. Cl. 766 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . radioactive waste that exceeds the concentration limits of radionuclides established for Class C waste in § 61.55 . . .

NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, v. ABRAHAM, Of, 271 F. Supp. 2d 1260 (D. Idaho 2003)

. . . . § 61.55, or must meet such alternative requirements for waste classification and characterization as . . .

INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. v. UNITED STATES, 57 Fed. Cl. 88 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . . § 61.55. . . . .

In I. BERSCHEID G. I. v., 309 B.R. 5 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2002)

. . . balance of $42,657.30 (as of October 21, 2002), and a family size of four, would be required to pay $61.55 . . . this increase in family size, Berseheid’s monthly repayment amount under the ICRP would decrease from $61.55 . . .

SUGARMAN, v. VILLAGE OF CHESTER,, 213 F. Supp. 2d 304 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Second, New Windsor argues that the 61.55 hours logged by Bergstein and Ullrich doing legal and factual . . .

UNITED STATES v. ELCOM LTD. a k a Co., 203 F. Supp. 2d 1111 (N.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright, § 1.10 [A] at 1-61.55 to 1-61.56. . . .

SMITH, v. M. BEASLEY, C. ABLE, v. H. WILKINS, H. Jr., 946 F. Supp. 1174 (D.S.C. 1996)

. . . Those changes produced a new black majority district with 64.71% BPOP and 61.55% BVAP. . . .

In W. PARNES, M. PARNES, v. W. PARNES, MBNA AMERICA, v. W. PARNES,, 200 B.R. 710 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . Because he paid only $61.55 per quarter, he believed the policy was a term life policy with no cash surrender . . .

A. SULLIVAN, v. YOUNG BROTHERS AND COMPANY INCORPORATED,, 893 F. Supp. 1148 (D. Me. 1995)

. . . Couch, Cyclopedia of Insurance Law § 61.55-61.57 (1983). . . .

CONCERNED CITIZENS OF NEBRASKA CCN v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NRC NDEC US USE, 970 F.2d 421 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . . §§ 61.7(b), 61.55 (1992); Neb.Admin.R. & Regs. tit. 194, ch. 5, § 006 (1987). . . .

DOUCETTE, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 785 F. Supp. 1056 (D. Me. 1992)

. . . The calculation for attorneys’ fees are as follows: Crotteau: 123.1 hours-4-2 = 61.55 hours per Defendant . . . Ouelette: 33.9 hours — 2 = 16.95 hours per Defendant Total fee award payable by State Defendant: Crotteau: 61.55 . . . = $1,695.00 Total attorneys’ fees: 7,850.00 Total fee award payable by Federal Defendant: Crotteau: 61.55 . . .

STATE OF NEW YORK, v. UNITED STATES D. M. K. Co. Co., 942 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1991)

. . . Federal Government) that consists of or contains class A, B, or C radioactive waste as defined by section 61.55 . . .

D. WEIR D. v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, TV, 811 F.2d 1387 (10th Cir. 1987)

. . . Couch, Cyclopedia of Insurance Law § 61.55 (2d ed.1983); 73 Am.Jur.2d Subrogation § 23 (1974). . . .

DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 627 F.2d 489 (D.C. Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 61.55(f). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PHILLIPSBURG NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY B., 306 F. Supp. 645 (D.N.J. 1969)

. . . five largest, including the four just mentioned plus Nazareth National Bank and Trust Company, hold 61.55% . . . This change is from the pre-merger five largest banks concentration of 61.55% to a post-merger five largest . . .

ROBERTSON v. ROBERTSON, 12 Fla. Supp. 126 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1957)

. . . .$ 12.50 Sheriff’s fee ....... 6.75 Telephone calls ...... 61.55 Hargrave’s Secret Service— Investigation . . .

J. B. E. M., 25 Fla. 53 (Fla. 1889)

. . . advertising, $6.................. 16.00 Tax for 1809...................................................... 61.55 . . .