Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 63.064 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 63.064 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 63.064

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 63
ADOPTION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 63.064
63.064 Persons whose consent to an adoption may be waived.—The court may waive the consent of the following individuals to an adoption:
(1) A parent who has deserted a child without means of identification or who has abandoned a child.
(2) A parent whose parental rights have been terminated by order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
(3) A parent who has been judicially declared incompetent and for whom restoration of competency is medically improbable.
(4) A legal guardian or lawful custodian of the person to be adopted, other than a parent, who has failed to respond in writing to a request for consent for a period of 60 days or who, after examination of his or her written reasons for withholding consent, is found by the court to be withholding his or her consent unreasonably.
(5) The spouse of the person to be adopted, if the failure of the spouse to consent to the adoption is excused by reason of prolonged and unexplained absence, unavailability, incapacity, or circumstances that are found by the court to constitute unreasonable withholding of consent.
History.—s. 14, ch. 2003-58.

F.S. 63.064 on Google Scholar

F.S. 63.064 on Casetext

Amendments to 63.064


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 63.064
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 63.064.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 63.064

Total Results: 20

The State of Florida v. Robert Lee Wood

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-25T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Imaging, LLC v. Lyon Fin. Servs., Inc., 347 So. 3d 63, 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020).

Nelson Viera v. the State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-11T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Daniels v. State, 568 So. 2d 63, 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Royal v. State, 736 So. 2d

Curtis Parker v. Florida Dept. of Corr.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-11T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Imaging, LLC v. Lyon Fin. Servs., Inc., 347 So. 3d 63, 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (refusing to depart from precedent

Alma Sanchez v. Security First Insurance Company

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-06T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: Med. Imaging, LLC v. Lyon Fin. Servs., 347 So. 3d 63, 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020).

GREGORY A. DARST v. YARON DAVID D/B/A WEST COAST GROUP ENTERPRISES, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-02-14T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: Equity Trust. See Barnett v. Barnett, 705 So. 2d 63, 64 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) ("Florida Rule of Appellate

STATE OF FLORIDA v. ANDREW SCOTT CROSE

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-01-26T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: Imaging, LLC v. Lyon Fin. Servs., Inc., 347 So. 3d 63, 64 n.2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) ("Unless the Florida

HECTOR RIVAS v. PROFESSIONAL PROTECTION & INVESTIGATIONS AGENCY, INC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-03-22T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: 2012) (quoting Barnett v. Barnett, 705 So. 2d 63, 64 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)) (“[A] non-party in the lower

JOSE ALCAZAR v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-03-07T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: Imaging, LLC v. Lyon Fin. Servs., Inc., 347 So. 3d 63, 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (“Unless the Florida Supreme

ALL YEAR COOLING AND HEATING, INC. v. BURKETT PROPERTIES, INC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-02-14T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: parties.” James v. Gulf Life Ins. Co., 66 So. 2d 62, 63–64 (Fla. 1953). We read the contract as taking

Jon Douglas Parrish v. State Farm Florida Insurance Company

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2023-02-08T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: Aviation Auth. v. Nat’l Airlines, 63 So. 2d 61, 63-64 (Fla. 1953) (“Courts should attempt to give words

DANIELLA BECKER v. TIMOTHY BECKER

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-07-20T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Nat'l Bank of Broward Cnty., 256 So. 2d 63, 63–64 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971) (affirming service under similar

W.B., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-06-29T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: tests as unpredictable and subjective, id. at 63–64, and held that “[w]here testimonial evidence is

MARK WALLACE v. YANELIN TORRES-RODRIGUEZ

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-05-11T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: court’s opinion in Brown v. Hanger, 368 So. 2d 63, 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), where this court affirmed

LAW OFFICES OF KRAVITZ & GUERRA, P.A., etc. v. CECILIA BRANNON

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-02-08T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: 1995))); Atomic Tattoos, LLC v. Morgan, 45 So. 3d 63, 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (“An appellant who challenges

JAVIER ALONSO-LLAMAZARES, M.D. v. INTERNATIONAL DERMATOLOGY RESEARCH, INC., etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-01-18T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: discretion.” Atomic Tattoos, LLC v. Morgan, 45 So. 3d 63, 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Analysis To

ABM Industries, Inc. and ACE/ESIS v. Maritza Valencia

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-09-29T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Steinberg v. City of Tallahassee, 186 So. 3d 61, 63–64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (holding timely notice of conflicting

FLETCHER LEE SANDERS v. ULYSSES PETERSON- SANDERS

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-05-26T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: endangering his or her economic status.’” Id. at 63–64 (emphasis in original) (quoting Fortune v. Fortune

Charlaya Joanne Elaine Moore v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-08-23T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Gonzalez v. State, 627 So. 2d 63, 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). The jury’s verdict cannot be

SHERARD ADAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-07-24T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Confrontation Clause plainly meant to exclude.” 531 U.S. at 63-64. The majority opinion properly focuses on the

MYRDALIS DIAZ-RAMIREZ, M. D. v. DEPT. OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-07-03T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Wills v. Fla. Elections Comm'n, 955 So. 2d 61, 63–64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (holding that a law enforcement