Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 63.82 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 63.082 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 63.082 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 63.082

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 63
ADOPTION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 63.082
63.082 Execution of consent to adoption or affidavit of nonpaternity; family social and medical history; revocation of consent.
(1)(a) Consent to an adoption or an affidavit of nonpaternity shall be executed as follows:
1. If by the person to be adopted, by oral or written statement in the presence of the court or by being acknowledged before a notary public and in the presence of two witnesses.
2. If by an agency, by affidavit from its authorized representative.
3. If by any other person, in the presence of the court or by affidavit acknowledged before a notary public and in the presence of two witnesses.
4. If by a court, by an appropriate order or certificate of the court.
(b) A minor parent has the power to consent to the adoption of his or her child and has the power to relinquish his or her control or custody of the child to an adoption entity. Such consent or relinquishment is valid and has the same force and effect as a consent or relinquishment executed by an adult parent. A minor parent, having executed a consent or relinquishment, may not revoke that consent upon reaching the age of majority or otherwise becoming emancipated.
(c) A consent or an affidavit of nonpaternity executed by a minor parent who is 14 years of age or younger must be witnessed by a parent, legal guardian, or court-appointed guardian ad litem.
(d) The notice and consent provisions of this chapter as they relate to the father of a child do not apply in cases in which the child is conceived as a result of a violation of the criminal laws of this or another state or country, including, but not limited to, sexual battery, unlawful sexual activity with certain minors under s. 794.05, lewd acts perpetrated upon a minor, or incest.
(2) A consent that does not name or otherwise identify the adopting parent is valid if the consent contains a statement by the person consenting that the consent was voluntarily executed and that identification of the adopting parent is not required for granting the consent.
(3)(a) The department must provide a family social and medical history form to an adoption entity that intends to place a child for adoption. Forms containing, at a minimum, the same information as the forms promulgated by the department must be attached to the petition to terminate parental rights pending adoption and must contain biological and sociological information or information as to the family medical history regarding the minor and the parents. This form is not required for adoptions of relatives, adult adoptions, or adoptions of stepchildren, unless parental rights are being or were terminated pursuant to chapter 39. The information must be filed with the court in the termination of parental rights proceeding.
(b) A good faith and diligent effort must be made to have each parent whose identity is known and whose consent is required interviewed by a representative of the adoption entity before the consent is executed. A summary of each interview, or a statement that the parent is unidentified, unlocated, or unwilling or unavailable to be interviewed, must be filed with the petition to terminate parental rights pending adoption. The interview may be excused by the court for good cause. This interview is not required for adoptions of relatives, adult adoptions, or adoptions of stepchildren, unless parental rights are being or were terminated pursuant to chapter 39.
(c) If any person who is required to consent is unavailable because the person cannot be located, an affidavit of diligent search required under s. 63.088 shall be filed.
(d) If any person who is required to consent is unavailable because the person is deceased, the petition to terminate parental rights pending adoption must be accompanied by a certified copy of the death certificate. In an adoption of a stepchild or a relative, the certified copy of the death certificate of the person whose consent is required may be attached to the petition for adoption if a separate petition for termination of parental rights is not being filed.
(4)(a) An affidavit of nonpaternity may be executed before the birth of the minor; however, the consent to an adoption may not be executed before the birth of the minor except in a preplanned adoption pursuant to s. 63.213.
(b) A consent to the adoption of a minor who is to be placed for adoption may be executed by the birth mother 48 hours after the minor’s birth or the day the birth mother is notified in writing, either on her patient chart or in release paperwork, that she is fit to be released from the licensed hospital or birth center, whichever is earlier. A consent by any man may be executed at any time after the birth of the child. The consent is valid upon execution and may be withdrawn only if the court finds that it was obtained by fraud or duress.
(c) If the minor to be adopted is older than 6 months of age at the time of the execution of the consent, the consent to adoption is valid upon execution; however, it is subject to a revocation period of 3 business days.
(d) The consent to adoption or the affidavit of nonpaternity must be signed in the presence of two witnesses and be acknowledged before a notary public who is not signing as one of the witnesses. The notary public must legibly note on the consent or the affidavit the date and time of execution. The witnesses’ names must be typed or printed underneath their signatures. The witnesses’ home or business addresses must be included. The person who signs the consent or the affidavit has the right to have at least one of the witnesses be an individual who does not have an employment, professional, or personal relationship with the adoption entity or the prospective adoptive parents. The adoption entity must give reasonable advance notice to the person signing the consent or affidavit of the right to select a witness of his or her own choosing. The person who signs the consent or affidavit must acknowledge in writing on the consent or affidavit that such notice was given and indicate the witness, if any, who was selected by the person signing the consent or affidavit. The adoption entity must include its name, address, and telephone number on the consent to adoption or affidavit of nonpaternity.
(e) A consent to adoption being executed by the birth parent must be in at least 12-point boldfaced type and shall contain the following recitation of rights:

CONSENT TO ADOPTION

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SELECT AT LEAST ONE PERSON WHO DOES NOT HAVE AN EMPLOYMENT, PROFESSIONAL, OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE ADOPTION ENTITY OR THE PROSPECTIVE ADOPTIVE PARENTS TO BE PRESENT WHEN THIS AFFIDAVIT IS EXECUTED AND TO SIGN IT AS A WITNESS. YOU MUST ACKNOWLEDGE ON THIS FORM THAT YOU WERE NOTIFIED OF THIS RIGHT AND YOU MUST INDICATE THE WITNESS OR WITNESSES YOU SELECTED, IF ANY.

YOU DO NOT HAVE TO SIGN THIS CONSENT FORM. YOU MAY DO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING INSTEAD OF SIGNING THIS CONSENT OR BEFORE SIGNING THIS CONSENT:

1. CONSULT WITH AN ATTORNEY;

2. HOLD, CARE FOR, AND FEED THE CHILD UNLESS OTHERWISE LEGALLY PROHIBITED;

3. PLACE THE CHILD IN FOSTER CARE OR WITH ANY FRIEND OR FAMILY MEMBER YOU CHOOSE WHO IS WILLING TO CARE FOR THE CHILD;

4. TAKE THE CHILD HOME UNLESS OTHERWISE LEGALLY PROHIBITED; AND

5. FIND OUT ABOUT THE COMMUNITY RESOURCES THAT ARE AVAILABLE TO YOU IF YOU DO NOT GO THROUGH WITH THE ADOPTION.

IF YOU DO SIGN THIS CONSENT, YOU ARE GIVING UP ALL RIGHTS TO YOUR CHILD. YOUR CONSENT IS VALID, BINDING, AND IRREVOCABLE EXCEPT UNDER SPECIFIC LEGAL CIRCUMSTANCES. IF YOU ARE GIVING UP YOUR RIGHTS TO A NEWBORN CHILD WHO IS TO BE IMMEDIATELY PLACED FOR ADOPTION UPON THE CHILD’S RELEASE FROM A LICENSED HOSPITAL OR BIRTH CENTER FOLLOWING BIRTH, A WAITING PERIOD WILL BE IMPOSED UPON THE BIRTH MOTHER BEFORE SHE MAY SIGN THE CONSENT FOR ADOPTION. A BIRTH MOTHER MUST WAIT 48 HOURS FROM THE TIME OF BIRTH, OR UNTIL THE DAY THE BIRTH MOTHER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED IN WRITING, EITHER ON HER PATIENT CHART OR IN RELEASE PAPERS, THAT SHE IS FIT TO BE RELEASED FROM A LICENSED HOSPITAL OR BIRTH CENTER, WHICHEVER IS SOONER, BEFORE THE CONSENT FOR ADOPTION MAY BE EXECUTED. ANY MAN MAY EXECUTE A CONSENT AT ANY TIME AFTER THE BIRTH OF THE CHILD. ONCE YOU HAVE SIGNED THE CONSENT, IT IS VALID, BINDING, AND IRREVOCABLE AND CANNOT BE INVALIDATED UNLESS A COURT FINDS THAT IT WAS OBTAINED BY FRAUD OR DURESS.

IF YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR CONSENT WAS OBTAINED BY FRAUD OR DURESS AND YOU WISH TO INVALIDATE THAT CONSENT, YOU MUST:

1. NOTIFY THE ADOPTION ENTITY, BY WRITING A LETTER, THAT YOU WISH TO WITHDRAW YOUR CONSENT; AND

2. PROVE IN COURT THAT THE CONSENT WAS OBTAINED BY FRAUD OR DURESS.

This statement of rights is not required for the adoption of a relative, an adult, a stepchild, or a child older than 6 months of age. A consent form for the adoption of a child older than 6 months of age at the time of the execution of consent must contain a statement outlining the revocation rights provided in paragraph (c).

(5) A copy or duplicate original of each consent signed in an action for termination of parental rights pending adoption must be provided to the person who executed the consent to adoption. The copy must be hand delivered, with a written acknowledgment of receipt signed by the person whose consent is required at the time of execution. If a copy of a consent cannot be provided as required in this subsection, the adoption entity must execute an affidavit stating why the copy of the consent was not delivered. The original consent and acknowledgment of receipt, or an affidavit stating why the copy of the consent was not delivered, must be filed with the petition for termination of parental rights pending adoption.
(6)(a)1. The Legislature finds that there is a compelling state interest in ensuring that a child involved in chapter 39 proceedings is served in a way that minimizes his or her trauma, provides safe placement, maintains continuity of bonded placements, and achieves permanency as soon as possible.
2. The Legislature finds that the use of intervention in dependency cases for the purpose of adoption has the potential to be traumatic for a child in the dependency system and that the disruption of a stable and bonded long-term placement by a change of placement to a person or family with whom the child has no bond or connection may create additional trauma.
3. The Legislature finds that the right of a parent to determine an appropriate placement for a child who has been found dependent is not absolute and must be weighed against other factors that take the child’s safety, well-being, and best interests into account.
4. It is the intent of the Legislature to reduce the disruption of stable and bonded long-term placements that have been identified as prospective adoptive placements.
(b) If a parent executes a consent for adoption of a child with an adoption entity or qualified prospective adoptive parents and the child is under the supervision of the department, or otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the dependency court as a result of the entry of a shelter order, a dependency petition, or a petition for termination of parental rights pursuant to chapter 39, the adoption consent is valid, binding, and enforceable by the court. For the purposes of this subsection, a consent to adoption of a child with an adoption entity or qualified prospective adoptive parents is valid if executed during the pendency of the chapter 39 proceeding up to and including the 30th day after the filing of the petition for termination of parental rights pursuant to s. 39.802.
(c) Upon execution of the consent of the parent, the adoption entity may file a motion to intervene and change placement of the child in the dependency case as a party in interest and must provide the court that acquired jurisdiction over the child, pursuant to the shelter order or dependency petition filed by the department, a copy of the preliminary home study of the prospective adoptive parents selected by the parent or adoption entity and any other evidence of the suitability of the placement. The preliminary home study must be maintained with strictest confidentiality within the dependency court file and the department’s file. A preliminary home study must be provided to the court in all cases in which an adoption entity has been allowed to intervene pursuant to this section.
(d)1. If an adoption entity files a motion to intervene and change placement of the child in the dependency case in accordance with this chapter, the dependency court must promptly grant an evidentiary hearing to determine whether:
a. The adoption entity has filed the required documents to be allowed to intervene;
b. The preliminary home study is adequate and provides the information required to make a best interests determination; and
c. The change of placement of the child is in the best interests of the child.
2. Absent good cause or mutual agreement of the parties, the final hearing on the motion to intervene and change placement of the child must be held within 30 days after the filing of the motion, and a written final order shall be filed within 15 days after the hearing.
(e) If the child has been in his or her current placement for at least 9 continuous months or 15 of the last 24 months immediately preceding the filing of the motion to intervene, and that placement is a prospective adoptive placement, there is a rebuttable presumption that the placement is stable and that it is in the child’s best interests to remain in that current stable placement. The court shall grant party status to the current caregiver who is a prospective adoptive placement for the limited purpose of filing motions and presenting evidence pursuant to this subsection. This limited party status expires upon the issuance of a final order on the motion to intervene and change of placement of the child. To rebut the presumption established in this paragraph, the intervening party must prove by clear and convincing evidence that it is in the best interests of the child to disrupt the current stable prospective adoptive placement using the factors set forth in paragraph (f) and any other factors that the court deems relevant.
(f) At a hearing to determine whether it is in the best interests of a child to change placement to the prospective adoptive parents selected by the parent or adoption entity, the court shall consider and weigh all relevant factors, including, but not limited to:
1. The permanency offered by both the child’s current placement and the prospective adoptive placement selected by the parent or adoption entity;
2. The established bond between the child and the current caregiver with whom the child is residing if that placement is a prospective adoptive placement;
3. The stability of the prospective adoptive placement in which the child has been residing, which must be presumed stable if the placement meets the requirements of paragraph (e), as well as the desirability of maintaining continuity of placement;
4. The importance of maintaining sibling relationships, if possible;
5. The reasonable preferences and wishes of the child, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient maturity, understanding, and experience to express a preference;
6. Whether a petition for termination of parental rights has been filed pursuant to s. 39.806(1)(f), (g), or (h); and
7. What is best for the child.
(g)1. If after consideration of all relevant factors, including those set forth in paragraph (f), the court determines that the home study is adequate and provides the information necessary to make a determination that the prospective adoptive parents are properly qualified to adopt the child and that the change of placement is in the best interests of the child, the court must order the change of placement to the prospective adoptive placement selected by the parent or adoption entity, under the supervision of the adoption entity.
2. The order must allow for a reasonable period of time to transition placement in accordance with a transition plan developed by the department in consultation with the current caregivers, the prospective adoptive parent, and the guardian ad litem, if one is appointed.
3. The transition plan must be developed to minimize the trauma of removal from his or her current placement and take the needs of each child into account, including each child’s age, relationships, bonds, and preferences.
4. The adoption entity must thereafter provide monthly supervision reports to the department until finalization of the adoption. If the child has been determined to be dependent by the court, the department must provide information to the prospective adoptive parents at the time they receive placement of the dependent child regarding approved parent training classes available within the community. The department must file with the court an acknowledgment of the prospective adoptive parents’ receipt of the information regarding approved parent training classes available within the community.
(h) The adoption entity is responsible for keeping the dependency court informed of the status of the adoption proceedings at least every 90 days from the date of the order changing placement of the child until the date of finalization of the adoption.
(i) The parent who is a party to the dependency case must be provided written notice of his or her right to participate in a private adoption plan, including written notice of the factors identified in paragraph (f). This written notice must be provided with the petition for dependency filed pursuant to s. 39.501, in the order that adjudicates the child dependent issued pursuant to s. 39.507, in the order of disposition issued pursuant to s. 39.521, in the order that approves the case plan issued pursuant to s. 39.603, and in the order that changes the permanency goal to adoption issued pursuant to s. 39.621.
(7) If a person is seeking to revoke consent for a child older than 6 months of age:
(a) The person seeking to revoke consent must, in accordance with paragraph (4)(c), notify the adoption entity in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, within 3 business days after execution of the consent. As used in this subsection, the term “business day” means any day on which the United States Postal Service accepts certified mail for delivery.
(b) Upon receiving timely written notice from a person whose consent to adoption is required of that person’s desire to revoke consent, the adoption entity must contact the prospective adoptive parent to arrange a time certain for the adoption entity to regain physical custody of the minor, unless, upon a motion for emergency hearing by the adoption entity, the court determines in written findings that placement of the minor with the person who had legal or physical custody of the child immediately before the child was placed for adoption may endanger the minor or that the person who desires to revoke consent is not required to consent to the adoption, has been determined to have abandoned the child, or is otherwise subject to a determination that the person’s consent is waived under this chapter.
(c) If the court finds that the placement may endanger the minor, the court shall enter an order continuing the placement of the minor with the prospective adoptive parents pending further proceedings if they desire continued placement. If the prospective adoptive parents do not desire continued placement, the order must include, but need not be limited to, a determination of whether temporary placement in foster care, with the person who had legal or physical custody of the child immediately before placing the child for adoption, or with a relative is in the best interests of the child and whether an investigation by the department is recommended.
(d) If the person revoking consent claims to be the father of the minor but has not been established to be the father by marriage, court order, or scientific testing, the court may order scientific paternity testing and reserve ruling on removal of the minor until the results of such testing have been filed with the court.
(e) The adoption entity must return the minor within 3 business days after timely and proper notification of the revocation of consent or after the court determines that revocation is timely and in accordance with the requirements of this chapter upon consideration of an emergency motion, as filed pursuant to paragraph (b), to the physical custody of the person revoking consent or the person directed by the court. If the person seeking to revoke consent claims to be the father of the minor but has not been established to be the father by marriage, court order, or scientific testing, the adoption entity may return the minor to the care and custody of the mother, if she desires such placement and she is not otherwise prohibited by law from having custody of the child.
(f) Following the revocation period described in paragraph (a), consent may be set aside only when the court finds that the consent was obtained by fraud or duress.
(g) An affidavit of nonpaternity may be set aside only if the court finds that the affidavit was obtained by fraud or duress.
(h) If the consent of one parent is set aside or revoked in accordance with this chapter, any other consents executed by the other parent or a third party whose consent is required for the adoption of the child may not be used by the parent whose consent was revoked or set aside to terminate or diminish the rights of the other parent or third party whose consent was required for the adoption of the child.
History.s. 8, ch. 73-159; s. 17, ch. 77-147; s. 2, ch. 78-190; s. 2, ch. 91-99; s. 7, ch. 92-96; s. 14, ch. 2001-3; s. 15, ch. 2003-58; s. 10, ch. 2008-151; s. 13, ch. 2012-81; s. 9, ch. 2013-15; s. 2, ch. 2016-71; s. 1, ch. 2023-257.

F.S. 63.082 on Google Scholar

F.S. 63.082 on CourtListener

Amendments to 63.082


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 63.082

Total Results: 61

Matter of Adoption of Doe

543 So. 2d 741, 1989 WL 36465

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1989 | Docket: 1420866

Cited 33 times | Published

adoption, that her consent is irrevocable under section 63.082(5), absent a showing of fraud or duress, whereas

In Re Adoption of CLW

467 So. 2d 1106, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1985 | Docket: 130673

Cited 16 times | Published

freely and voluntarily given is irrevocable, section 63.082(5), Florida Statutes (1983); In Re Cox, 327

In Re SNW

912 So. 2d 368, 2005 WL 2467056

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2005 | Docket: 1755613

Cited 9 times | Published

Adoption Miracles to intervene pursuant to section 63.082(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), we reverse

In Interest of JRG

624 So. 2d 273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1993 | Docket: 922212

Cited 9 times | Published

withdrawn only if obtained by fraud or duress). Cf. § 63.082(5), Fla. Stat. (1991); In re Adoption of Doe,

In Re Adoption of Cox

327 So. 2d 776

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1976 | Docket: 1716344

Cited 9 times | Published

This statute has been repealed and replaced by Section 63.082, Fla. Stat. (1973). [5] 111 So.2d 468 (Fla

Js v. Sa

912 So. 2d 650, 2005 WL 2292311

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2005 | Docket: 1755682

Cited 7 times | Published

that the mother executed a valid consent under section 63.082, Florida Statutes, and that the consent was

Yh v. Flh

784 So. 2d 565, 2001 WL 505254

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 2001 | Docket: 1743978

Cited 7 times | Published

of birthparents, and consents for adoption. See § 63.082(5), Fla.Stat. (1999) ("Consent may be withdrawn

In Re Adoption of PR McD.

440 So. 2d 57

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1983 | Docket: 1728502

Cited 7 times | Published

mere whim or because of a change of heart. Section 63.082(5), Florida Statutes (1981), provides that

Ambrose v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.

736 So. 2d 146, 1999 WL 445795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1999 | Docket: 1419728

Cited 6 times | Published

principles to the adoption setting"). [3] See § 63.082, Fla. Stat. (1985).

Matter of Adoption of Doe

524 So. 2d 1037, 1988 WL 23651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1988 | Docket: 372256

Cited 6 times | Published

Adoption of Cox, 327 So.2d 776 (Fla. 1976). [9] § 63.082(5), Fla. Stat. (1985); In re Adoption of Cox,

Y.H. v. F.L.H.

784 So. 2d 565, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 2001 | Docket: 64805229

Cited 5 times | Published

of birthparents, and consents for adoption. See § 63.082(5), Fla.Stat. (1999) (“Consent may be withdrawn

KC v. Adoption Services, Inc.

721 So. 2d 811, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15884, 1998 WL 874913

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1998 | Docket: 1323141

Cited 5 times | Published

executed consents pursuant to section 39.464(1) or section 63.082[2] may not challenge the child's subsequent

Farina v. City of Tampa, Fla.

874 F. Supp. 383, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19419, 1994 WL 741812

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1994 | Docket: 2372847

Cited 5 times | Published

entitlement to a judicial hearing pursuant to either § 63.082(5), Fla.Stat., or § 61.131, Fla.Stat., prior to

In Re Adoption of Baby Girl C

511 So. 2d 345, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1687

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1987 | Docket: 1338767

Cited 5 times | Published

the child, had validly revoked her consent. Section 63.082(5), Florida Statutes (1985), provides that

In Re JT

947 So. 2d 1212, 2007 WL 188243

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2007 | Docket: 1376526

Cited 4 times | Published

adoption is in J.T.'s best interest pursuant to section 63.082(6)(c), Florida Statutes (2006). The Department

Mlb v. Dept. of Hlt. & Rehab. Serv.

559 So. 2d 87

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1990 | Docket: 1751651

Cited 4 times | Published

psychological problems, in contravention of section 63.082(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1987).[3] We must

Hindman v. Bischoff

534 So. 2d 743, 1988 WL 115954

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1988 | Docket: 1295775

Cited 4 times | Published

finding that it was obtained by fraud or duress. § 63.082(5), Fla. Stat. (1985). In the absence of fraud

In Interest of IBJ

497 So. 2d 1265, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2205

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1986 | Docket: 1689644

Cited 4 times | Published

upon a showing of fraud or duress pursuant to section 63.082(5), Florida Statutes (1985), or if the consent

W.K. , M.K. & GUARDIAN AD LITEM v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES

230 So. 3d 905

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 6159000

Cited 3 times | Published

which placement would be better for the child. Section, 63.082(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2017), provides that

In re Adoption of K.A.G.

152 So. 3d 1271, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20849, 2014 WL 7331269

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 2014 | Docket: 60244726

Cited 3 times | Published

present evidence as to the factors articulated in section 63.082, Florida Statutes (2013), including Child’s

R.L. v. W.G.

147 So. 3d 1054, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13468, 2014 WL 4249679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2014 | Docket: 60243063

Cited 3 times | Published

custody” of the child to the prospective mother. § 63.082(6)(d), Fla. Stat. (2014). The mother’s choice

PK v. Department of Children and Families

927 So. 2d 131, 2006 WL 1039728

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2006 | Docket: 1761283

Cited 3 times | Published

adoption of her minor children filed pursuant to section 63.082(6) of Florida's Adoption Act. The Department

Adoption Miracles, LLC v. S.C.W.

912 So. 2d 368, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16035

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2005 | Docket: 64840609

Cited 3 times | Published

Adoption Miracles to intervene pursuant to section 63.082(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), we reverse

The Florida Bar v. Dove

985 So. 2d 1001, 2008 WL 2373903

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2008 | Docket: 1254395

Cited 2 times | Published

petition for adoption. (Bar Exhibit 32); contrary to § 63.082(3)(a), F.S. (2001), Respondent failed to obtain

Y.G., Mother of A.P., A Child v. Department of Children and Families

246 So. 3d 509

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2018 | Docket: 6384773

Cited 1 times | Published

II. CONSENT TO ADOPTION Section 63.082, Florida Statutes, governs proceedings related

F.R. v. Adoption of Baby Boy Born November 2, 2010

135 So. 3d 301, 2012 WL 1813520, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8019

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2012 | Docket: 60239541

Cited 1 times | Published

the mother’s allegation of duress based on section 63.082(7)(f), Florida Statutes (2010), and arising

D.T.S. v. J.M.

33 So. 3d 106, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2010 | Docket: 60289930

Cited 1 times | Published

executed written consent that complies with section 63.082, Florida Statutes (2009). Section 63.089, Florida

C.G. v. Guardian Ad Litem Program

920 So. 2d 854, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2232, 2006 WL 398631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2006 | Docket: 64842388

Cited 1 times | Published

consent absent fraud or duress in its execution. Section 63.082(6)(a), Florida Statutes, provides: (6)(a) If

J.S. v. S.A.

912 So. 2d 650, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 14744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2005 | Docket: 64840646

Cited 1 times | Published

that the mother executed a valid consent under section 63.082, Florida Statutes, and that the consent was

TR v. Adoption Services, Inc.

724 So. 2d 1235, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 319, 1999 WL 18399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1999 | Docket: 1733863

Cited 1 times | Published

Statutes governs the procedures for adoption. Section 63.082(4), Florida Statutes (1997), provides that

K. M. G., Statewide v. Heart of Adoptions, Inc., Department of Children and Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2024 | Docket: 69435178

Published

Pursuant to a provision in the adoption statutes, section 63.082(6), Florida Statutes (2022), Heart of Adoptions

James Walsh, Attorney Ad Litem, on Behalf of A.K.P., a Minor Child, and Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office v. Department of Children and Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2024 | Docket: 69127385

Published

not have party status in an Adoption Entity’s section 63.082(6) intervention proceeding regarding the child’s

M.K. and JAMES WALSH, Attorney ad Litem, on behalf of A.P., a Minor Child v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2023 | Docket: 68042701

Published

alternatively she sought to intervene in the section 63.082(6), Florida Statutes (2022), proceedings regarding

R.P.M., Adoptive Parent and Elizabeth Berkowitz v. In The Matter of the Proposed Adoption of I.R.M.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2023 | Docket: 68103700

Published

Consent, which closely mirrors the language of section 63.082(4)(e), Florida Statutes (2021), regarding the

HEART OF ADOPTIONS, INC. v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2023 | Docket: 67774356

Published

after considering all the statutory factors, see § 63.082(6)(e), Fla. Stat. (2021), that the prospective

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM vs SARAH J. CAMPBELL, ADOPTION ENTITY, AND DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2022 | Docket: 66713620

Published

court allowed the intervention pursuant to section 63.082(6)(c), Florida Statutes (2021), and found the

M.J.G., THE MOTHER v. A. JULIA GRAVES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2022 | Docket: 61689390

Published

912 So.2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)[.] V. Section 63.082(4)(b), Florida Statutes, expressly provides

V.R., GRANDPARENT v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2021 | Docket: 60385575

Published

adoption of a minor with an adoption entity.” § 63.082(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2020). The father did so, and

J.G. v. Dep't of Children & Families

270 So. 3d 523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2019 | Docket: 64713210

Published

adoption. He further argues that pursuant to section 63.082(6)(g), he had the right to participate in Child's

J.G. v. Dep't of Children & Families

270 So. 3d 523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2019 | Docket: 64713209

Published

adoption. He further argues that pursuant to section 63.082(6)(g), he had the right to participate in Child's

W.K. , M.K. & GUARDIAN AD LITEM v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2017 | Docket: 6145375

Published

which placement would be better for the child. Section 63.082(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2017), provides that

E.Q. v. Florida Department of Children & Families

208 So. 3d 1258, 2017 WL 362540, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 733

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2017 | Docket: 4573214

Published

childrens’ paternal grandparents. Pursuant to section 63.082(6), Florida Statutes, the attorney representing

Department of Children and Families v. T.H. & C.H., Paternal Grandparents of etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2016 | Docket: 3046127

Published

R. with Appellees for adoption pursuant to section 63.082(6), Florida Statutes (2015), because we find

F.H. v. Department of Children & Families

182 So. 3d 908, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 428, 2016 WL 154725

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2016 | Docket: 60252833

Published

factual determinations and its application of section 63.082(6)(a)-(e), Florida' Statutes (2015). We also

F.H. v. Dept. of Children and Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 2016 | Docket: 3027806

Published

factual determinations and its application of section 63.082(6)(a)-(e), Florida Statutes (2015). We also

In the Interest of I.B., a Child

142 So. 3d 919, 2014 WL 3375933

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2014 | Docket: 453317

Published

signing a consent in favor of the paternal aunt. Section '63.082(l)(a)3., Florida Statutes (2012), provides

Y.M. v. Home At Last Adoption Agency

93 So. 3d 1112, 2012 WL 3044277, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2012 | Docket: 60310440

Published

executed a consent to adoption pursuant to section 63.082, Florida Statutes (2010), effectively giving

Dts v. Jm

33 So. 3d 106, 2010 WL 1642789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2010 | Docket: 629291

Published

executed written consent that complies with section 63.082, Florida Statutes (2009). Section 63.089, Florida

Department of Children & Family Services v. Heart of Adoptions, Inc.

947 So. 2d 1212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2007 | Docket: 64848781

Published

adoption is in J.T.’s best interest pursuant to section 63.082(6)(c), Florida Statutes (2006). The Department

S.K.R. v. Department of Children & Family Services & Gift of Life Adoptions, Inc.

902 So. 2d 328, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8061, 2005 WL 1249208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2005 | Docket: 64838424

Published

uncle of the child. The motion relied upon section 63.082(6), Florida Statutes (2003).4 . The Legal Father

Caballero v. Robertson

737 So. 2d 1144, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8184, 1999 WL 396981

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1999 | Docket: 64789636

Published

consent affidavits for the adoption pursuant to section 63.082, Florida Statutes (1997). The statute requires

P.G. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

624 So. 2d 273, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7504

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1993 | Docket: 64742954

Published

withdrawn only if obtained by fraud or duress). Cf. § 63.082(5), Fla.Stat. (1991); In re Adoption of Doe, 543

In re Petition for Approval of Forms Pursuant to Rule 101.1(b) of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar

613 So. 2d 900, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 59, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 2166, 1992 WL 381759

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1992 | Docket: 64694088

Published

reflect changes in witnessing requirements in section 63.082, Florida Statutes (1991).2 Having considered

Onesko v. Adoption of B.M.O.

611 So. 2d 1283, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12411, 1992 WL 362138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1992 | Docket: 64693380

Published

the consent was obtained by fraud or duress.” § 63.-082(5), Fla.Stat. (1991). Although our decision in

M.L.B. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

559 So. 2d 87, 1990 WL 11792

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1990 | Docket: 64649330

Published

psychological problems, in contravention of section 63.-082(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1987).3 We must therefore

Doe v. Roe

543 So. 2d 741, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 201, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 327

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1989 | Docket: 64642693

Published

adoption, that her consent is irrevocable under section 63.082(5), absent a showing of fraud or duress, whereas

Roe v. Doe

524 So. 2d 1037, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 782, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1988 | Docket: 64634708

Published

Adoption of Cox, 327 So.2d 776 (Fla.1976). . § 63.082(5), Fla.Stat. (1985); In re Adoption of Cox, 327

E.H. v. K.S.

511 So. 2d 345, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1687, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9270

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1987 | Docket: 64628916

Published

the child, had validly revoked her consent. Section 63.082(5), Florida Statutes (1985), provides that

In re Adoption of M.Q.

475 So. 2d 1306, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2225, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15998

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1985 | Docket: 64614446

Published

irrevocable absent a showing of fraud or duress. § 63.082(5), Fla.Stat. (1988); In re Adoption by Cox, 327

Fowler v. Weeks

467 So. 2d 1106, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1115, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1985 | Docket: 64611567

Published

freely and voluntarily given is irrevocable, section 63.082(5), Florida Statutes (1983); In Re Cox, 327

In re Adoption of DeGroot

335 So. 2d 845, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 13950

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1976 | Docket: 64554616

Published

and father do not meet the requirements of Section 63.-082(2) Florida Statutes; (2) no notice was given