Syfert Injury Law Firm

MYRA BLEW v. MICHAEL BLEW

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-03-29

Snippet: 160 So. 3d 502, 506 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (citing § 64.011 Fla. Stat. (2013)); see also Willard v. Willard

Marks v. Stein

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-03-20

Citation: 160 So. 3d 502, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4025, 2015 WL 1259605

Snippet: governed by chapter 64, Florida Statutes (2013). § 64.011 (“All actions for partition are in chancery.”);

McFall v. TRUBEY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-10-03

Citation: 992 So. 2d 867, 2008 WL 4482578

Snippet: partition of real property is one in chancery. § 64.011, Fla. Stat. (2003). Statutes of limitations are

Haddad v. Hester

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-04-18

Citation: 964 So. 2d 707, 2007 WL 1136079

Snippet: resolve these issues among themselves." [6] See §§ 64.011-091, Fla. Stat. (2005). [7] Although not necessary

Bucacci v. Boutin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-06-14

Citation: 933 So. 2d 580, 2006 WL 1627456

Snippet: remedy sought by Boutin, is an action in equity. § 64.011, Fla. Stat. (2001). Thus, argues Bucacci, Boutin

Herron v. Dastic

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-04-07

Citation: 754 So. 2d 185, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4206, 2000 WL 356294

Snippet: Public Records of Volusia County, Florida; thence N 64° 11' 48” E along the Easterly prolongation of the Northerly

Burney v. Burney

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-06-12

Citation: 561 So. 2d 1364, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4352, 1990 WL 82103

Snippet: for partition of the jointly owned property. §§ 64.011, 64.051, Fla.Stat. (1987); Terra Ceia Estates v

Briner v. Briner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-01-19

Citation: 425 So. 2d 211, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18771

Snippet: which is the basis of all actions for partition. § 64.011, Fla.Stat. (1981). See Condrey v. Condrey, supra

Foxx v. Foxx

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-01-07

Citation: 424 So. 2d 947, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18413

Snippet: complaint for partition-conforming with Section 64.011, Florida Statutes, be filed, the trial court shall

Ambrose v. Rayne

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-04-21

Citation: 412 So. 2d 971, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19848

Snippet: required to proceed in accordance with Section 64.011, Florida Statutes (1979), et seq. Reversed and

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1981-04-14

Snippet: ch. 460, F.S.Accord AGO 056.40. Similarly, AGO 064-11 concluded that chiropractors were `recognized practitioners'

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-12-03

Snippet: the Attorney General, 1941-1942, p. 572, and AGO 064-11, also see Stich v. Independent Life and Accident

United States Steel Corp. v. Save Sand Key, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-06-12

Citation: 303 So. 2d 9, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4523

Snippet: authority to bring this action as authorized by Section 64.11, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., is untenable as to the

Rankin v. Rankin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-02-23

Citation: 258 So. 2d 489

Snippet: partition statute. See §§ 66.01-66.09, supra." (Now §§ 64.011-64.091). It therefore appears that where the appropriate

State ex rel. Dade County Optometric Ass'n v. Family Optical Service

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-04-16

Citation: 209 So. 2d 267, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5623

Snippet: plaintiff to bring this action pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 64.11, F.S.A. The alleged misleading advertising may not

Sarasota County Anglers Club, Inc. v. Burns

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-01-17

Citation: 193 So. 2d 691

Snippet: authority to bring this action as authorized by Section 64.11, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., is untenable as to the

Johnson v. S. A. M. Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-09-08

Citation: 167 So. 2d 757

Snippet: abate a public nuisance. See- *759§§ 823.01 and 64.11, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. However, it could not arbitrarily

City of Leesburg v. Knight

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-05-29

Citation: 164 So. 2d 547, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4294

Snippet: injunction suit brought by a relator under Secs. 64.11 and 64.13, Fla.Stat.1941, F.S.A., seeking to enjoin

Royster v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-05-19

Citation: 164 So. 2d 26, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4247

Snippet: PER CURIAM. The burden of appellant’s petition for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix in the trial court was that his self-employed counsel was inadequate. Pie appeals from a denial of his petition. Appellant presents nothing more than his conclusion that the counsel he employed was inadequate. Nothing short of a retrial of the case would satisfy such an allegation and we do not so construe the office of Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1. Everett v. State, Fla

Central Theatres, Inc. v. State ex rel. Braren

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-02-21

Citation: 161 So. 2d 558

Snippet: places or persons maintaining a public nuisance; § 64.11, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., specifically permits