Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 64.011 (2025)

Jurisdiction.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

64.011 Jurisdiction.—All actions for partition are in chancery.

History.—s. 1, Mar. 14, 1844; RS 1490; GS 1939; RGS 3202; CGL 4994; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 19, ch. 67-254.

Note.—Former s. 66.01.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 12 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1972–2025 · leading case: Bucacci v. Boutin, 933 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Bucacci v. Boutin, 933 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). · cites it 3× “§ 64.011, Fla. Stat. (2001). Thus, argues Bucacci, Boutin is constrained by paragraph eight of the joint venture agreement either to: (1) sell his interest in the property to a third party if he can find someone to buy it; or (2) continue to pay half of the expenses of the…”

Mcfall v. Trubey, 992 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 64.011, Fla. Stat. (2003). Statutes of limitations are not generally applied in equity actions.”

Rankin v. Rankin, 258 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972). “" (Now §§ 64.011-64.091). It therefore appears that where the appropriate pleadings for partition have been included in the complaint for divorce the chancellor may proceed to partition such property even though it is held by the entireties.”

Haddad v. Hester, 964 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). “" [6] See §§ 64.011-091, Fla. Stat. (2005). [7] Although not necessary to reach our conclusion, we note that this Court's recent decision in Bucacci v.”

In re Damerau, 525 B.R. 799 (Bankr. S.D. Florida 2015). “§ 64.011 , et seq. No rulings have been made in that Adversary Proceeding.”

Briner v. Briner, 425 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). · cites it 2× “§ 64.011, Fla.Stat. (1981). See Condrey v.”

Marks v. Stein, 160 So. 3d 502 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). “Marks appeals two separate orders, the issue that we are called upon to decide in these consolidated cases is the same: Whether the trial court erred when it departed from the provisions in the earlier partition judgment and imposed an expedited bidding process that was neither…”

Ambrose v. Rayne, 412 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). · cites it 2× “On remand, the appellant will, of course, be required to proceed in accordance with Section 64.011, Florida Statutes (1979), et seq.”

Myra Blew v. Michael Blew (Fla. 4th DCA 2023). · cites it 2× “2d DCA 2015) (citing § 64.011 Fla. Stat. (2013)); see also Willard v.”

Megan Cauble v. Gregory Kaczmarski (Fla. 3d DCA 2025). “See § 64.011, Fla. Stat. (2019). Following a partition sale, the trial court is charged with first determining each owner’s percentage of ownership and then 4 proportionally distributing the partition proceeds.”

Foxx v. Foxx, 424 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). · cites it 2× “Upon remand and partition of the property should a complaint for partition-conforming with Section 64.011, Florida Statutes, be filed, the trial court shall make special provision for her to recoup those expenditures over and above her one-half interest in that property.”

Burney v. Burney, 561 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). “§§ 64.011, 64.051, Fla.Stat. (1987); Terra Ceia Estates v.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.