64.011
Jurisdiction.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
64.011 Jurisdiction.—All actions for partition are in chancery.
History.—s. 1, Mar. 14, 1844; RS 1490; GS 1939; RGS 3202; CGL 4994; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 19, ch. 67-254.
Note.—Former s. 66.01.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1972–2025 · leading case: Bucacci v. Boutin
Bucacci v. Boutin (2006)
“§ 64.011, Fla. Stat. (2001). Thus, argues Bucacci, Boutin is constrained by paragraph eight of the joint venture agreement either to: (1) sell his interest in the property to a third party if he can find someone to buy it; or (2) continue to pay half of the expenses of the…”
McFall v. TRUBEY (2008)
“§ 64.011, Fla. Stat. (2003). Statutes of limitations are not generally applied in equity actions.”
Rankin v. Rankin (1972)
“" (Now §§ 64.011-64.091). It therefore appears that where the appropriate pleadings for partition have been included in the complaint for divorce the chancellor may proceed to partition such property even though it is held by the entireties.”
Haddad v. Hester (2007)
“" [6] See §§ 64.011-091, Fla. Stat. (2005). [7] Although not necessary to reach our conclusion, we note that this Court's recent decision in Bucacci v.”
In re Damerau (2015)
“§ 64.011 , et seq. No rulings have been made in that Adversary Proceeding.”
Briner v. Briner (1983)
“§ 64.011, Fla.Stat. (1981). See Condrey v.”
Marks v. Stein (2015)
“Marks appeals two separate orders, the issue that we are called upon to decide in these consolidated cases is the same: Whether the trial court erred when it departed from the provisions in the earlier partition judgment and imposed an expedited bidding process that was neither…”
Ambrose v. Rayne (1982)
“On remand, the appellant will, of course, be required to proceed in accordance with Section 64.011, Florida Statutes (1979), et seq.”
MYRA BLEW v. MICHAEL BLEW (2023)
“2d DCA 2015) (citing § 64.011 Fla. Stat. (2013)); see also Willard v.”
Megan Cauble v. Gregory Kaczmarski (2025)
“See § 64.011, Fla. Stat. (2019). Following a partition sale, the trial court is charged with first determining each owner’s percentage of ownership and then 4 proportionally distributing the partition proceeds.”
Foxx v. Foxx (1983)
“Upon remand and partition of the property should a complaint for partition-conforming with Section 64.011, Florida Statutes, be filed, the trial court shall make special provision for her to recoup those expenditures over and above her one-half interest in that property.”
Burney v. Burney (1990)
“§§ 64.011, 64.051, Fla.Stat. (1987); Terra Ceia Estates v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.