The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 66
EJECTMENT

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 66

EJECTMENT

66.011 Common-law ejectment abolished.

66.021 Ejectment.

66.031 Verdict and judgment.

66.041 Betterment, petition.

66.051 Betterment, answer.

66.061 Betterment, trial and verdict.

66.071 Betterment, judgment for plaintiff.

66.081 Betterment, judgment for defendant.

66.091 Betterment, payment by plaintiff.

66.101 Betterment, payment by defendant.

66.011 Common-law ejectment abolished.—In ejectment it is not necessary to have any fictitious parties. Plaintiff may bring action directly against the party in possession or claiming adversely.

History.—s. 1, ch. 999, 1859; RS 1511; GS 1966; RGS 3234; CGL 5040; s. 21, ch. 67-254.

Note.—Former s. 70.01.

66.021 Ejectment.—

(1) RIGHT OF ACTION.—A person with a superior right to possession of real property may maintain an action of ejectment to recover possession of the property.

(2) JURISDICTION.—Circuit courts have exclusive jurisdiction in an action of ejectment.

(3) NOTICE.—A plaintiff may not be required to provide any presuit notice or presuit demand to a defendant as a condition to maintaining an action under this section.

(4) LANDLORD NOT A DEFENDANT.—When it appears before trial that a defendant in an action of ejectment is in possession as a tenant and that his or her landlord is not a party, the landlord must be made a party before further proceeding unless otherwise ordered by the court.

(5) DEFENSE MAY BE LIMITED.—A defendant in an action of ejectment may limit his or her defense to a part of the property mentioned in the complaint, describing such part with reasonable certainty.

(6) WRIT OF POSSESSION; EXECUTION TO BE JOINT OR SEVERAL.—When plaintiff recovers in an action of ejectment, he or she may have one writ for possession and for damages and costs or, at his or her election, may have separate writs for possession and for damages and costs.

(7) CHAIN OF TITLE.—The complaint and the answer must include a statement setting forth, chronologically, the chain of title upon which the party will rely at trial. Copies of each instrument identified in the statement must be attached to the complaint or answer. The statement must include the names of the grantors and the grantees, the date that each instrument was recorded, and the book and page or the instrument number for each recorded instrument. If a party relies on a claim or right without color of title, the statement must specify how and when the claim originated and the facts on which the claim is based. If defendant and plaintiff claim under a common source, the statement need not deraign title before the common source.

(8) TESTING SUFFICIENCY.—If either party seeks to test the legal sufficiency of any instrument or court proceeding in the chain of title of the opposite party, the party must do so before trial by motion setting up his or her objections with a copy of the instrument or court proceedings attached. The motion must be disposed of before trial. If either party determines that he or she will be unable to maintain his or her claim by reason of the order, that party may so state in the record and final judgment shall be entered for the opposing party.

(9) OPERATION.—This section is cumulative to other existing remedies and may not be construed to limit other remedies that are available under the laws of this state.

History.—s. 21, ch. 67-254; s. 348, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 2018-94.

66.031 Verdict and judgment.—

(1) VERDICT.—A verdict for plaintiff shall state the quantity of the estate of plaintiff, and describe the land by metes and bounds, lot number or other certain description.

(2) JUDGMENT.—The judgment awarding possession shall state the quantity of the estate and give a description of the land recovered in like manner.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 3244, 1881; RS 1515; GS 1970; RGS 3238; CGL 5046; s. 21, ch. 67-254.

Note.—Former s. 70.05.

66.041 Betterment, petition.—If a judgment of eviction is rendered against defendant, within 60 days thereafter, or if he or she has appealed, within 20 days after filing the mandate affirming the judgment, defendant may file in the court in which the judgment was rendered a petition setting forth that:

(1) Defendant had been in possession and that he or she or those under whom defendant validly derived had permanently improved the value of the property in controversy before commencement of the action in which judgment was rendered;

(2) Defendant or those under whom defendant validly derives held the property at the time of such improvement under an apparently good legal or equitable title derived from the English, Spanish, or United States Governments or this state; or under a legal or equitable title plain and connected on the records of a public office or public offices; or under purchase at a regular sale made by an executor, administrator, guardian or other person by order of court; and

(3) When defendant made the improvements or purchased the property improved, he or she believed the title which he or she held or purchased to the land thus improved to be a good and valid title. The petition shall demand that the value of the improvements be assessed and compensation awarded to defendant therefor.

History.—RS 1516; GS 1971; RGS 3239; CGL 5047; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 21, ch. 67-254; s. 349, ch. 95-147.

Note.—Former s. 70.06.

66.051 Betterment, answer.—The plaintiff in the judgment of eviction may file written defenses to the petition within 20 days after service of the petition.

History.—RS 1517; GS 1972; RGS 3240; CGL 5048; s. 14, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 21, ch. 67-254.

Note.—Former s. 70.07.

66.061 Betterment, trial and verdict.—If an answer is filed, trial shall be on the issues made. If no answer is filed, trial shall be ex parte, but defendant is required to prove every allegation of the petition. If the jury (or if a jury is waived, the court) finds in favor of defendant, it shall assess:

(1) The value of the land at the time of the assessment, irrespective of the improvements put upon the land by defendant or those under whom he or she derives, and if any, the injury done to the land by defendant or those under whom he or she derives.

(2) The value of the permanent improvements at the time of the assessment.

(3) The injury, if any, done to the land by defendant or those under whom he or she derives.

(4) The value of the use of the land by defendant between the time of the judgment in ejectment and the time of the assessment or if defendant has been evicted from or has surrendered the premises, from the time of the judgment to the time of the surrender or eviction. The findings shall be specified separately on each of these matters.

History.—RS 1518; GS 1973; RGS 3241; CGL 5049; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 21, ch. 67-254; s. 350, ch. 95-147.

Note.—Former s. 70.08.

66.071 Betterment, judgment for plaintiff.—On rendition of the verdict the clerk shall ascertain whether the balance of the last three assessments (that is, of the value of the improvements, the extent of the injury and the value of the use of land), is in favor of plaintiff or defendant and ascertain the amount of the balance; if the verdict is in favor of plaintiff, judgment shall be rendered against defendant for costs, whether the balance of the assessments is in favor of plaintiff or defendant; but if the balance of the assessments is in favor of plaintiff, he or she shall have a judgment for costs in addition to the judgment for the balance.

History.—RS 1519; GS 1974; RGS 3242; CGL 5050; s. 21, ch. 67-254; s. 351, ch. 95-147.

Note.—Former s. 70.09.

66.081 Betterment, judgment for defendant.—If the verdict is in favor of defendant and the balance of assessments is also in defendant’s favor, a judgment for costs shall be entered against plaintiff, and a further judgment that unless plaintiff pays or secures as hereinafter provided the amount of the balance of assessments against him or her within 20 days, defendant may pay or secure to plaintiff the value of the land as assessed.

History.—RS 1520; GS 1975; RGS 3243; CGL 5051; s. 21, ch. 67-254; s. 352, ch. 95-147.

Note.—Former s. 70.10.

66.091 Betterment, payment by plaintiff.—The plaintiff may pay the balance in cash or may give defendant a bond with surety to be approved by the clerk, conditioned to pay said balance in two equal annual installments, with interest at 6 percent per annum to defendant. If plaintiff shall pay the sum within 20 days, or if the payment of the bond is received, satisfaction of the judgment shall be entered and all rights conferred on defendant by the judgment terminate.

History.—RS 1521; GS 1976; RGS 3244; CGL 5052; s. 21, ch. 67-254.

Note.—Former s. 70.11.

66.101 Betterment, payment by defendant.—If plaintiff does not pay or secure the sum within 20 days, within 20 days thereafter defendant may pay to plaintiff the value of the land as assessed or give plaintiff a bond with surety, to be approved by the clerk, conditioned to pay plaintiff the value in two equal annual installments, with 6 percent interest; or if plaintiff fails to pay the bond given by him or her when it becomes due, for 20 days after the expiration of the time fixed in the bond for payment, defendant shall again have the privilege of paying to plaintiff in cash the value of the land assessed. On the payment of the sum to plaintiff at any of the times hereinbefore mentioned, title to the land shall vest in defendant and plaintiff or those holding under him or her shall give defendant a deed to the land, tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances, and if defendant has been evicted from or has surrendered the property, it shall be restored to him or her by order of court on motion.

History.—RS 1522; GS 1977; RGS 3245; CGL 5053; s. 21, ch. 67-254; s. 353, ch. 95-147.

Note.—Former s. 70.12.

F.S. 66 on Google Scholar

F.S. 66 on Casetext

Amendments to 66

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 66

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S298.66 - DAMAGE PROP-PUBLIC - DAMAGE DESTROY IMPEDE DISTRICT WATER FLOW - F: T

S298.66 2 - DAMAGE PROP - RENUMBERED. SEE REC #7035 - F: T

S298.66 3 - DAMAGE PROP-PUBLIC - DAMAGE DESTROY IMPEDE DISTRICT WATER FLOW - F: T

S327.66 1 - HEALTH-SAFETY - VIOLATE GASOLINE ON VESSEL LAW - M: S

S372.66 - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 6740 - M: S

S372.66 - CONSERVATION-LICENSE-STAMP - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 6741 - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CALVARY CHAPEL DAYTON VALLEY v. SISOLAK,, 140 S. Ct. 2603 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Pear , 183 Mass. 242, 248, 66 N.E. 719, 722 (1903). . . .

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . No. 502, 22d Cong., 1st Sess. 64, 66-67 (1832). . . . The Federalist No. 66, p. 401 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961) (A. Hamilton). . . . The Federalist No. 66, at 401-402. . . . Rumely , 345 U.S. at 44, 73 S.Ct. 543 (quoting Child Labor Tax Case , 259 U.S. 20, 37, 42 S.Ct. 449, 66 . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Corrigan , 257 U.S. 312, 342, 42 S.Ct. 124, 66 L.Ed. 254 (1921). For example, in Eberle v. . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . .2d 510 (1987) (internal quotation marks omitted); Board of Ed. of Westside Community Schools (Dist. 66 . . . Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, Art. 4, reprinted in Everson , 330 U.S. at 66 . . .

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, v. BOOKING. COM B. V., 140 S. Ct. 2298 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Tr. of Oral Arg. 66. See also id. , at 42-43, 55. . . . Id. , at 66. . . . App. 66. . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Charles , 476 U.S. 54, 66, 106 S.Ct. 1697, 90 L.Ed.2d 48 (1986). . . . United States , 532 U.S. 59, 65-66, 121 S.Ct. 1276, 149 L.Ed.2d 197 (2001). . . . Id., at 87 ; see also id., at 65-66. . . . standards and will not improve the safety of abortion in Louisiana." 250 F.Supp.3d at 64 ; see id., at 64-66 . . . Brief for Respondent 60-66. That, however, is not this case. . . . Swint , 456 U.S. 273, 287, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) (similar); see also 9C C. . . . Acts & Resolves no. 57, §§ 1, 3, pp. 64-66; 1848 Va. Acts, Tit. . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See § 2, 1 Stat. 65-66. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . In re Yamashita , 327 U.S. 1, 9, 66 S.Ct. 340, 90 L.Ed. 499 (1946). . . . U.S. 48, 51-52, 75 S.Ct. 591, 99 L.Ed. 868 (1955) (interpreting 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, 66 . . . Kahanamoku , 327 U.S. 304, 307-308, 324, 66 S.Ct. 606, 90 L.Ed. 688 (1946). . . .

C. LIU, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Warner Holding Co. , 328 U.S. 395, 66 S.Ct. 1086, 90 L.Ed. 1332 (1946), the Court interpreted a section . . . Id. , at 398, 66 S.Ct. 1086. . . . Id. , at 398-399, 66 S.Ct. 1086. . . . Porter , 328 U.S. at 398, 66 S.Ct. 1086. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . b)(9) bars review of claims arising from "action[s]" or "proceeding[s] brought to remove an alien." 66 . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 449 U.S. 424, 430, 101 S.Ct. 698, 66 L.Ed.2d 633 (1981). . . . Phillips 66 Co. , 915 F.3d 328, 338 (CA5 2019) (Ho, J., concurring). 3 The opinion of the Court intimates . . . In 1952, the new Constitution for Puerto Rico, which was approved by Congress, 66 Stat. 327, prohibited . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . L. 82-336, 66 Stat. 69 (emphasis added). Similar language appears in a host of other statutes. . . .

ANDRUS v. TEXAS, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (U.S. 2020)

. . . In addition, Tran picked Andrus out of a photo array, 46 Tr. 66, 69-70, and testified at trial that the . . . the words "murder weapon" tattooed on his hands and a smoking gun tattooed on his forearm. 51 Tr. 65-66 . . .

J. LOMAX, v. ORTIZ- MARQUEZ,, 140 S. Ct. 1721 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See App. 65-66. . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . L. 600, §§ 2, 3, 64 Stat. 319; see Act of July 3, 1952, 66 Stat. 327; A. . . . Porto Rico , 258 U.S. 298, 309, 42 S.Ct. 343, 66 L.Ed. 627 (1922) ; Reid v. . . . arguing that the Insular Cases support reversal on the Appointments Clause issue); Brief for UTIER 64-66 . . . Act of July 3, 1950, ch. 446, §§ 1, 2, 64 Stat. 319; see also Act of July 3, 1952, 66 Stat. 327. . . . "shall become effective" only when Puerto Rico "declare[s] in a formal resolution its acceptance." 66 . . .

BANISTER, v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1698 (U.S. 2020)

. . . During that time, Banister filed his Rule 59(e) motion, but he did not file his appeal until 66 days . . .

LUCKY BRAND DUNGAREES, INC. v. MARCEL FASHIONS GROUP, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1589 (U.S. 2020)

. . . McCurry , 449 U.S. 90, 94, 101 S.Ct. 411, 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980) ; see Parklane Hosiery , 439 U.S. at . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Causby , 328 U.S. 256, 267, 66 S.Ct. 1062, 90 L.Ed. 1206 (1946) ). Johnson v. . . . Leavitt , 543 U.S. 631, 636-638, 125 S.Ct. 1172, 161 L.Ed.2d 66 (2005) (rejecting the Government's argument . . . Will , 449 U.S. 200, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980) ; United States v. . . .

GEORGIA, v. PUBLIC. RESOURCE. ORG, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1498 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Fritz , 449 U.S. 166, 177, n. 10, 101 S.Ct. 453, 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980). . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See, e.g. , id. , at 65-66. . . .

COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII, v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND,, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Reg. 7216 (2003), with 66 Fed. Reg. 3018 (2001). . . .

ROMAG FASTENERS, INC. v. FOSSIL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1492 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Armbrecht , 327 U.S. 392, 395, 66 S.Ct. 582, 90 L.Ed. 743 (1946). . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Duxbury, The Nature and Authority of Precedent 65-66 (2008). Mandel v. . . . New York , 399 U.S. 66, 123, n. 9, 90 S.Ct. 1886, 26 L.Ed.2d 437 (1970) (Harlan, J., dissenting); see . . . Louisiana , 449 U.S. 871, 101 S.Ct. 209, 66 L.Ed.2d 90 (1980) ; Hodges v. . . .

KANSAS, v. GLOVER, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . amounted to "only a hunch" that Glover was engaging in criminal activity. 308 Kan. 590, 591, 422 P.3d 64, 66 . . . Cortez , 449 U.S. 411, 417-418, 101 S.Ct. 690, 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981) ; see also Terry v. . . . Cortez , 449 U.S. 411, 417, 101 S.Ct. 690, 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981), on "facts that do not constitute probable . . .

CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY, v. FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., 140 S. Ct. 1081 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Ford Motor Co. , 285 Ill.App.3d 250, 257, 220 Ill.Dec. 790, 674 N.E.2d 61, 66 (1996). . . .

K. KAHLER, v. KANSAS, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Bethel , 275 Kan. 456, 66 P.3d 840 (2003) ). . . . Id. , at 473, 66 P.3d at 851. . . . Bethel , 275 Kan. 456, 472, 66 P.3d 840, 850 (2003) (holding that Kansas law provides for "no consideration . . . State , 117 Nev. 548, 576, 27 P. 3d 66, 84-85 (2001). . . . Bethel , 275 Kan. 456, 465-471, 66 P.3d 840, 847-850 (2003) (accepting Kansas's view that "moral blameworthiness . . .

GUERRERO- LASPRILLA, v. P. BARR, v. P., 140 S. Ct. 1062 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See 66 Stat. 163, as amended, 8 U. S. C. § 1101 et seq . . . . App. 33; Record in No. 18-1015, p. 66. . . . Swint , 456 U.S. 273, 289, n. 19, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) )). . . . Swint , 456 U.S. 273, 289, n. 19, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) ); but see ante , at 1068 - 1069 . . .

KANSAS, v. GARCIA v. v., 140 S. Ct. 791 (U.S. 2020)

. . . foundation of our laws on immigration and naturalization is the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 66 . . .

E. RODRIGUEZ, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 140 S. Ct. 713 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Ash , 422 U.S. 66, 84, 95 S.Ct. 2080, 45 L.Ed.2d 26 (1975), and state law is well equipped to handle . . .

MONASKY, v. TAGLIERI, 140 S. Ct. 719 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Pérez-Vera, Explanatory Report in 3 Actes et documents de la Quatorzième session, p. 445, ¶66 (1982) . . . Pérez-Vera 445, ¶66. . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Malesko , 534 U.S. at 66, 122 S.Ct. 515. . . .

C. ROTKISKE, v. KLEMM,, 140 S. Ct. 355 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Armbrecht , 327 U.S. 392, 66 S.Ct. 582, 90 L.Ed. 743 (1946) ; Exploration Co. v. . . . Armbrecht , 327 U.S. 392, 397, 66 S.Ct. 582, 90 L.Ed. 743 (1946) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . . statutory presumption "read into every federal statute of limitation," Holmberg , 327 U.S. at 397, 66 . . . of the statute does not begin to run until the fraud is discovered.' " Holmberg , 327 U.S. at 397, 66 . . . Armbrecht , 327 U.S. 392, 66 S.Ct. 582, 90 L.Ed. 743 (1946), as equitable tolling decisions. . . .

EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT, v. BARR,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 974 (N.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . The Government filed an opposition, ECF Nos. 65, 66, and the Organizations filed a reply, ECF No. 67. . . .

ELHADY, v. H. KABLE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . MSJ Ex. 66 at 46-47. . . . MSJ Ex. 16 at 66, Amri, Pls.' MSJ Ex. 16 at 126, and Fares, Pls.' . . . MSJ Ex. 18 at 74-84, 148-49, 158-66. . . .

RUDLEY, M. D. B. v. LITTLE ROCK POLICE DEPARTMENT In In, 935 F.3d 651 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. 1765, 1765-66, 191 L.Ed.2d 856 (2015) ). . . .

V. CASSIDY, v. HALYARD HEALTH, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 474 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff was hired by Halyard as a Territory Manager on October 1, 2014, when he was 66 . . . Plaintiff was already 66 years old when he was hired in 2014, less than two years before he was fired . . .

UNITED STATES v. BAPTISTE,, 935 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 328 U.S. 750, 776, 66 S.Ct. 1239, 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946), for the proposition that "a nonconstitutional . . . Kotteakos , 328 U.S. at 776, 66 S.Ct. 1239. . . .

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST. LOUIS REGION, INC. P. D. O. M. S. C. I. F. A. C. O. G, v. L. PARSON,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 631 (W.D. Mo. 2019)

. . . Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 65-66 [106 S.Ct. 1697, 90 L.Ed.2d 48] (1986). . . .

U. S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. HUI FENG Of PC,, 935 F.3d 721 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . to expect profits solely from the efforts of the promoter or a third party." 328 U.S. 293, 298-99, 66 . . . Alaniz , 569 F.3d 1015, 1021 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Howey , 328 U.S. at 298-99, 66 S.Ct. 1100 ). . . . the promise of profits.' " Edwards , 540 U.S. at 396, 124 S.Ct. 892 (quoting Howey , 328 U.S. at 299, 66 . . .

BIRD, v. i DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DHS, R., 935 F.3d 738 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ricks , 449 U.S. 250, 252-54, 258, 101 S.Ct. 498, 66 L.Ed.2d 431 (1980) (holding that a professor's eventual . . .

FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. a a v. H. FRIEDMAN, UDT UDT, 935 F.3d 696 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Washington , 326 U.S. 310, 316-17, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945) ). . . .

SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL- DENVER, INC. v. M. AZAR II, U. S., 391 F. Supp. 3d 53 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . No. 17-235 (filed Feb. 2, 2017), ECF No. 1; Complaint ¶ 66(l ) ("H-Compl."), Select Specialty Hosp. . . . Mot."), ECF No. 66, is granted, and HHS's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment ("Def.' . . . Mem.) at 30, ECF No. 66; Def.'s Answer ¶¶ 9-11 ("S2-Answer"), Select II , Civ. . . . s Answer ("H-Answer") ¶¶ 8-10, 41, 66, Hillcrest , Civ. . . .

IN RE JUAREZ, v., 603 B.R. 610 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Land Bank of Spokane (In re Jorgensen) , 66 B.R. 104, 108-09 (9th Cir. BAP 1986) ). . . .

ALMANZA, v. UNITED STATES,, 935 F.3d 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 165-66 (Bordeaux Dep. Tr.). II. . . .

CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. v. TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. OWT ET Co., 935 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Prometheus Labs., Inc. , 566 U.S. 66, 70, 132 S.Ct. 1289, 182 L.Ed.2d 321 (2012). . . .

GALDERMA LABORATORIES L. P. S. A. S. A. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 582 (D. Del. 2019)

. . . DX-16 at 2:66-3:8. McDaniel discloses every element of the claimed treatment method. . . . employing ... topically-applied ivermectin," id. at 1:5-7; "ivermectin is ... applied to skin," id. at 2:66 . . . the inflammatory lesions of papulopustular rosacea" ("applied to skin affected by rosacea," id. at 2:66 . . . "ivermectin is formulated into a cosmetically-accept[a]ble topical lotion, cream, or gel," id. at 2:66 . . . DX-16 at 2:66-3:1; PX-1 at 24:21-23; PX-2 at 28:44-46; PX-3 at 24:20-21. . . .

COMPERE, v. NUSRET MIAMI, LLC, d b a a, 391 F. Supp. 3d 1197 (S.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 1261, 1265-66 (M.D. Fla. 2019). . . .

J. GENZER, v. JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY,, 934 F.3d 1156 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Coombes , 66 Okla. 126, 166 P. 1072, 1074 (1917) ; Render v. . . .

DIVERSE POWER, INC. v. CITY OF LAGRANGE, GEORGIA,, 934 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . See https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/1995/statutes/statutes/66/076; see also Br. for Petitioners, Hallie . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Howards , 566 U.S. 658, 665-66, 132 S. Ct. 2088, 2094, 182 L.Ed.2d 985 (2012). . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Will , 491 U.S. at 66, 109 S.Ct. 2304. . . . Hood , 327 U.S. 678, 682-83, 66 S.Ct. 773, 90 L.Ed. 939 (1946) ); Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. v. . . . Symczyk , 569 U.S. 66, 72, 133 S.Ct. 1523, 185 L.Ed.2d 636 (2013) ); see also Friends of the Earth, Inc . . . Hood , 327 U.S. 678, 682-83, 66 S.Ct. 773, 90 L.Ed. 939 (1946) ). " ' "[C]onstitutional insubstantiality . . . Bell , 327 U.S. at 683, 66 S.Ct. 773. . . . Garnett , 258 U.S. 130, 136, 42 S.Ct. 217, 66 L.Ed. 505 (1922) (emphases added); see also Hawke v. . . .

PARKER, v. LANDRY,, 935 F.3d 9 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Garfinkle, 632 F.2d 163, 165-66 (1st Cir. 1980) (per curiam). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CUEVAS- LOPEZ,, 934 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Op. at 1065-66. Like the majority's other arguments, this one too is meritless. . . .

GUPTA, v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC,, 934 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. of Chicago , 110 Ill.App.3d 492, 66 Ill.Dec. 160, 442 N.E.2d 586, 591 (1982) ). . . .

SAM K. v. SAUL,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 874 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . born on September 24, 1949 (R. 180), and was 61 at the time he alleges he became disabled, and nearly 66 . . .

UNITED STATES v. F GARO- BENJAM N, 392 F. Supp. 3d 280 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Tineo-González, 893 F.3d 64, 66 (1st Cir. 2018) (affirming denial of suppression motion "filed well after . . .

UNITED STATES v. CANO,, 934 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cortez , 449 U.S. 411, 417-18, 101 S.Ct. 690, 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981) )). . . . electronic devices carries with it a significant expectation of privacy," Cotterman , 709 F.3d at 965-66 . . .

SENNE v. KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. LLC LLC LP St. LLC LLC LLC LLC L. P. L. P. LLC LLC L. P. AZPB L. P. P LLC LLC LP LLP LLC LLC,, 934 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Clemens , 328 U.S. 680, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515 (1946) and recently expanded upon in Tyson Foods . . . Id . at 687-88, 66 S.Ct. 1187. . . . Id. at 688, 66 S.Ct. 1187. Mt. . . . Clemens , 328 U.S. at 688, 66 S.Ct. 1187. . . . Clemens , 328 U.S. at 687, 66 S.Ct. 1187. V. . . . Nadeau , 215 Cal. 362, 364-66, 10 P.2d 63 (1932), overruled in part by Reich v. . . . See Loranger , 215 Cal. at 364-66, 10 P.2d 63. . . .

IN RE SWEARINGEN,, 935 F.3d 415 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Abdelmalik , 273 S.W.3d 61, 66 (Mo. App. 2008) ; State v. Scott , 97 So.3d 1046, 1052 (La. Ct. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN,, 935 F.3d 43 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Califano , 978 F.2d 65, 66 (2d Cir. 1992) (uncertainty whether sentencing judge erroneously believed . . .

A. VAN BUSKIRK A. v. UNITED GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC. DCG LLC, DCG UGOC II, LLC, J. F. MCM LLC, LLC, F. F. W. Jr., 935 F.3d 49 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Dupont , 565 F.3d 56, 64-66 (2d Cir. 2009) (remanding so that the district court could resolve factual . . . Corp. , 66 F.3d 1500, 1514 (9th Cir. 1995) ("[A] district court, in its discretion, may impose costs . . .

UNITED STATES v. F GARO- BENJAM N, 392 F. Supp. 3d 242 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . Tineo-González, 893 F.3d 64, 66 (1st Cir. 2008) (affirming denial of suppression motion "filed well after . . .

NALPROPION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC., 934 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . The HPMC formulations range from 5% HPMC to 66% HPMC, and dissolution of these formulations was tested . . . naltrexone administered with bupropion as a "withdrawal attenuating agent," O'Malley col. 2 ll. 59-66 . . .

JIE FANG Li v. DIRECTOR UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, 935 F.3d 172 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Standard Oil Co. of Cal. , 449 U.S. 232, 239, 101 S.Ct. 488, 66 L.Ed.2d 416 (1980) ). . . .

HAWKINS v. I- TV DIGITALIS TAVKOZLESI ZRT. f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V. v. i- TV f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V., 935 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Washington , 326 U.S. 310, 316, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945). . . .

UNITED STATES v. PAWLAK,, 935 F.3d 337 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . McNealy , 625 F.3d 858, 865-66 (5th Cir. 2010), a defendant asserted that the factfinder was incapable . . .

WAL- MART STORES, INCORPORATED L. L. C. s v. TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION, 935 F.3d 362 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Swint , 456 U.S. 273, 292, 102 S.Ct. 1781, 72 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) ). . . . Clover Leaf Creamery Co. , 449 U.S. 456, 458, 101 S.Ct. 715, 66 L.Ed.2d 659 (1981), in which the court . . .

PIZZUTO, Jr. v. BLADES,, 933 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . "A score of 71, for instance, is generally considered to reflect a range between 66 and 76 ...." . . .

DOCTOR S ASSOCIATES, INC. v. ALEMAYEHU,, 934 F.3d 245 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Uber Techs., Inc. 868 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2017). I. Who Decides the Question of Consideration? . . .

HIGGS, v. UNITED STATES PARK POLICE,, 933 F.3d 897 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Justice , 767 F.2d 66, 70 (3d Cir. 1985) ; Willard v. . . .

OWNER OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC. L. B. L. LLC G. v. PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION S. PTC K. PTC T. PTC T. Sr. PTC N. PTC P. PTC R. PTC s, 934 F.3d 283 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Comm'n, 383 F.Supp.3d 353, 365-66 (M.D. Pa. . . .

RAM REZ- P REZ, v. P. BARR,, 934 F.3d 47 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Sessions, 881 F.3d 61, 66 (1st Cir. 2018). . . .

IRIDESCENT NETWORKS, INC. v. AT T MOBILITY, LLC,, 933 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. col. 1 l. 66-col. 2 l. 2. . . . Id. at col. 1 l. 66-col. 2 l. 5. . . .

ODDO, v. BIMBO BAKERIES U. S. A. INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 466 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . No. 66, 69.) I will deny BBUSA's Motion. I. . . . No. 66-3; Lennon Decl. ¶ 3, Doc. No. 66-5; Oddo Decl. ¶ 2, Doc. No. 66-4; see also Def.'s Mem. . . . No. 66-7.) . . . Nos. 66, 69.) III. . . . No. 66.) . . .

IN RE MIAMI METALS I, INC., 603 B.R. 727 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Capital Area Food Bank , 156 A.D.3d 662, 664, 66 N.Y.S.3d 501 (N.Y. App. . . .

COEUR D ALENE TRIBE, a v. W. HAWKS A., 933 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 665-66, 94 S.Ct. 772. . . .

JANJUA, v. NEUFELD, USCIS T. USCIS K. U. S. U. S. P. U. S., 933 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . McCurry , 449 U.S. 90, 95, 101 S.Ct. 411, 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980). . . .

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, v. HOSPIRA, INC. v. Dr. s Dr. s, 933 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Micron Separations, Inc. , 66 F.3d 1211, 1218 (Fed. . . .

IN RE FIFTH AVENUE AND RELATED PROPERTIES, 934 F.3d 147 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . . & Related Props. , 830 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. 2016). . . . Id. at 66. . . .

UNITED STATES E. J. v. ASSA CO. LTD., 934 F.3d 185 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . . & Related Props. , 830 F.3d 66, 75 (2d Cir. 2016). . . .

KIRSCHENBAUM, v. ASSA CORPORATION, Co., 934 F.3d 191 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . . & Related Props. , 830 F.3d 66, 93 (2d Cir. 2016). . . .

UNITED STATES v. WALKER,, 934 F.3d 375 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 326 U.S. 455, 66 S.Ct. 233, 90 L.Ed. 198 (1946), the Supreme Court explained that "[t . . . Id. at 460, 66 S.Ct. 233 (emphasis added). . . .

UNITED STATES v. M. SWARTZ,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 199 (N.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . No. 66. . . . No. 66. . . .

AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, N. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 932 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 470 U.S. 451, 465-66, 105 S.Ct. 1441, 84 L.Ed.2d 432 (1985) (quoting with alterations Dodge v. . . . Id. at 465-66, 105 S.Ct. 1441. . . . Beckwith , 449 U.S. 155, 161, 101 S.Ct. 446, 66 L.Ed.2d 358 (1980). . . .

PILLAR DYNASTY LLC, v. NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., 933 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc. , 146 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 1998) ("We have held that an accounting for profits . . .

SIEGEL, s s v. HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC. HSBC USA, N. A. HBUS,, 933 F.3d 217 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at ¶¶ 66, 69. . . . participated in [a] scheme" to assist ARB in "circumvent[ing] monitoring by U.S. regulators," TAC ¶¶ 65-66 . . .

A. LAVITE, v. J. DUNSTAN,, 932 F.3d 1020 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Eisenhauer , 679 F.3d 957, 965-66 (7th Cir. 2012). . . .

UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON,, 932 F.3d 965 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Fessenden , 258 U.S. 254, 260, 42 S.Ct. 309, 66 L.Ed. 607 (1922) ("He may not complain if one sovereignty . . .

ALBANY AIRPORT HIE, LLC HIE LLC, v. HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 193 (N.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Co. of N.Y., 241 A.D.2d 66, 671 N.Y.S.2d 66 (1st Dep't 1998) ). . . .

KORTRIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, TY v. INVESTCORP INVESTMENT ADVISERS LIMITED,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . (Trial Tr. at 137, 147 (Taylor); Trial Tr. at 688, 837 (Vamvakas); see also Trial Tr. at 463-66 (Munsell . . .

A. JALUDI, v. CITIGROUP, 933 F.3d 246 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . See, e.g. , In re Klugh's Estate , 362 Pa. 166, 66 A.2d 822, 825 (1949) (holding that the appellant had . . .

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS,, 933 F.3d 605 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . § 3742(e) 's deference rule applies to guidelines that turn mostly on each case's facts, id. at 64-66 . . . Id. at 64-66, 121 S.Ct. 1276. . . . Ct. at 965-66. . . .

KODIAK OIL GAS USA INC. HRC LLC v. BURR S. EOG S., 932 F.3d 1125 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 565-66, 101 S.Ct. 1245. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRADO,, 933 F.3d 121 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Schermerhorn , 906 F.2d 66, 69-70 (2d Cir. 1990), or had an "effect on interstate commerce," see, e.g . . .

C. CORDARO, v. UNITED STATES, 933 F.3d 232 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. at 2365-66. . . .

CANT v. M. MOODY S. S., 933 F.3d 414 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Risjord , 449 U.S. 368, 379, 101 S.Ct. 669, 66 L.Ed.2d 571 (1981) ; 11 Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal . . .

FRYE, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., 933 F.3d 591 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , 66 F.3d 1119, 1122-23 (10th Cir. 1995), a slip-and-fall case filed against Wal-Mart . . .

INGRAM v. UNITED STATES, 932 F.3d 1084 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 66, 68 (8th Cir. 2009). On remand, the district court held an evidentiary hearing. . . .

UNITED STATES v. P. MAZZULLA, 932 F.3d 1091 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . DCD 164 at 265-66. . . .

WARREN, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,, 932 F.3d 378 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 753, 760-66 (5th Cir. 2018) (unpublished) (" Warren I "). . . .