Florida Statute 68.099 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 68
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 68.099

68.099 Funding.—In connection with funds received pursuant to this act, the department shall contract with a not-for-profit, charitable organization that meets the qualifications of s. 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code, as amended, that provides funding statewide for civil legal assistance to the poor for the administration, allocation, and distribution of any or all such funds in a manner consistent with the provisions of this act. Such contract shall provide that distribution of at least 80 percent of such funds shall be based annually by county on a per capita basis upon the number of persons in the county whose income is 125 percent or less of the then-current federal poverty guidelines of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. For purposes of this section, the source of data identifying the number of persons per county shall be the latest available figures of persons per county from the Bureau of the Census of the United States Department of Commerce. Such contract shall provide that up to 15 percent of such funds shall be distributed annually to statewide and regional not-for-profit legal aid organizations and that up to 5 percent of such funds shall be provided for administrative costs.

History.—s. 6, ch. 2002-288.

F.S. 68.099 on Google Scholar

F.S. 68.099 on Casetext

Amendments to 68.099

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 68.099

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 68.099.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 68.099

Total Results: 12

Woodel v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-05-01

Citation: 985 So. 2d 524, 2008 WL 1901425

Snippet: significant state interest. See Duren, 439 U.S. at 367-68, 99 S.Ct. 664. Woodel points out that there is no statutory

Gordon v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-11-26

Citation: 704 So. 2d 107, 1997 WL 730708

Snippet: exclusion of a distinctive group." Id., at 367-68, 99 S.Ct. at 670. [12] Gordon does not explain how

PALM HARBOR SP. FIRE CONTROL D. v. Kelly

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-12-03

Citation: 516 So. 2d 249, 1987 WL 2367

Snippet: over their students. Ambach v. Norwick, 441 U.S. 68, 99 S.Ct. 1589, 60 L.Ed.2d 49 (1979). Indeed, the business

Graham v. Ramani

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-05-01

Citation: 383 So. 2d 634

Snippet: citizenship is found in Ambach v. *638 Norwick, 441 U.S. 68, 99 S.Ct. 1589, 60 L.Ed.2d 49 (1979). At issue was

Milligan v. Milligan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-01-08

Citation: 217 So. 2d 368, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 7210

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

State v. Hughes

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-07-02

Citation: 212 So. 2d 65, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5252

Snippet: PER CURIAM. By notice of appeal, the State attempts to review an interlocutory order in a criminal matter pursuant to § 924.-071(1), Fla.Stat., 1967, F.S.A.1 The order in question purports to relate to the suppression of an admission by the defendant. If in fact there was an admission, it was not to the crime charged and, therefore, we find the order to be not appealable. Under such circumstances, the State urges us to consider and review the order by considering its notice of appeal as a petition

Meyer v. Nator Holding Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-08-03

Citation: 136 So. 636, 102 Fla. 689

Snippet: changing the rule. Jonas et al. vs. Burks, 87 Fla. 68, 99 So. 252; Merchant's and Mechanic's Bank vs. Sample

Nelson v. Ziegfeld

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-12-09

Citation: 131 So. 316, 100 Fla. 1433

Snippet: Struthers, 11 Iowa 459; Jonas v. Burkes 87 Fla. 68, 99 So. R. 252; Crackowaner et al., v. Carlton National

Cracowaner v. Carlton National Bank

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-10-28

Citation: 124 So. 275, 98 Fla. 792

Snippet: judgment against the other. Jonas v. Burks, 87 Fla. 68; 99 So. R. 252. Since, however, the liability of Winemiller

Merchants & Mechanics Bank v. Sample

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-10-23

Citation: 125 So. 1, 98 Fla. 759

Snippet: Bradford, 2 Fla. 508. In Jonas et al v. Burks, 87 Fla. 68, 99 So. R. 252, Mr. Justice ELLIS, speaking for the

Williams v. Sherry

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-12-05

Citation: 114 So. 849, 94 Fla. 998

Snippet: 85 So. 675; also Jonas et al. v. Burkes, 87 Fla. 68, 99 So. 252. Judgment affirmed. WHITFIELD, P. J., AND

Omohundro v. Wilkins

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1927-10-14

Citation: 114 So. 502, 94 Fla. 649

Snippet: final decree assessed the costs in the sum of $68.99 on which execution was issued and appellants equity