Florida Statute 68.103 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 68
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 68.103

68.103 Unconstitutionality or unenforceability of fund limitations.—If any of the limitations on the use of funds received or allocated under this act is found to violate the Constitution of the United States or the State Constitution or otherwise found to be unenforceable:

(1) The entire act shall be null and void.

(2) All appropriations made for the purposes of this act and not expended are repealed.

(3) All unspent funds received by any entity pursuant to this act or the act appropriating funds for the purpose of this act shall be returned to the department for transfer to the treasury to the credit of the fund from which they were appropriated.

(4) No further funds appropriated for the purposes of this act shall be distributed or expended.

History.—s. 10, ch. 2002-288.

F.S. 68.103 on Google Scholar

F.S. 68.103 on Casetext

Amendments to 68.103

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 68.103

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 68.103.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 68.103

Total Results: 6

and SC14-1952 Jean Claude Noel v. State of Florida and Jean Claude Noel v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-21

Citation: 191 So. 3d 370

Snippet: pay it.” Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 667-68, 103 S.Ct. 2064, 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983). *377In Bearden

Noel v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-11-27

Citation: 127 So. 3d 769, 2013 WL 6182407, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18880

Snippet: the defendant’s failure to pay. See id. at 667-68, 103 S.Ct. 2064 (distinguishing willful and non-willful

State v. Colitto

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-05-17

Citation: 929 So. 2d 654, 2006 WL 1329544

Snippet: reliable way'." [c.o.] Gates, 462 U.S. at 267-68, 103 S.Ct. 2317 (White, J., concurring). Gates receded

Cruller v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-01-24

Citation: 808 So. 2d 201, 2002 WL 87367

Snippet: transaction. See Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359, 367-68, 103 S.Ct. 673, 74 L.Ed.2d 535 (1983). Thus, this Court

Bryan v. First National Bank of Wauchula

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-12-20

Citation: 217 So. 2d 129, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4612

Snippet: PIERCE, Judge. This is an appeal from a final judgment ■against appellants N. G. Bryan and Lillian Y. Bryan, his wife, and John J. Nedza, defendants below, in a quiet title action. During the pendency of a prior mortgage foreclosure action by the appellee First National Bank of Wauchula, a U. S. corporation, plaintiff below, against the Bryans and after a final judgment had been entered for the bank, but prior to the clerk’s sale, the Bryans executed and delivered to their attorney Nedza, as his

Donch v. City of Miami

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-10-01

Citation: 214 So. 2d 503, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4993

Snippet: PER CURIAM. By this appeal, the appellants [plaintiffs in the trial court] seek review of an adverse final judgment wherein the trial court held valid a City of Miami zoning classification of appellants’ property. They sought a change from residential to multiple family. The property involved is located along Biscayne Bay in the southern portion of the City of Miami. It is a rectangular parcel, generally lying in a northwesterly-southeasterly direction between South Bay-shore Drive and Biscayne