Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 72 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 72 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 72

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 72
TAX MATTERS
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 72
CHAPTER 72
TAX MATTERS
72.011 Jurisdiction of circuit courts in specific tax matters; administrative hearings and appeals; time for commencing action; parties; deposits.
72.031 Actions under s. 72.011(1); parties; service of process.
72.041 Tax liabilities arising under the laws of other states.
72.011 Jurisdiction of circuit courts in specific tax matters; administrative hearings and appeals; time for commencing action; parties; deposits.—
(1)(a) A taxpayer may contest the legality of any assessment or denial of refund of tax, fee, surcharge, permit, interest, or penalty provided for under s. 125.0104, s. 125.0108, chapter 198, chapter 199, chapter 201, chapter 202, chapter 203, chapter 206, chapter 207, chapter 210, chapter 211, chapter 212, chapter 213, chapter 220, s. 379.362(3), chapter 376, s. 403.717, s. 403.718, s. 403.7185, s. 538.09, s. 538.25, chapter 550, chapter 561, chapter 562, chapter 563, chapter 564, chapter 565, chapter 624, or s. 681.117 by filing an action in circuit court; or, alternatively, the taxpayer may file a petition under the applicable provisions of chapter 120. However, once an action has been initiated under s. 120.56, s. 120.565, s. 120.569, s. 120.57, or s. 120.80(14)(b), no action relating to the same subject matter may be filed by the taxpayer in circuit court, and judicial review shall be exclusively limited to appellate review pursuant to s. 120.68; and once an action has been initiated in circuit court, no action may be brought under chapter 120.
(b) A taxpayer may not file an action under paragraph (a) to contest an assessment or a denial of refund of any tax, fee, surcharge, permit, interest, or penalty relating to the statutes listed in paragraph (a) until the taxpayer complies with the applicable registration requirements contained in those statutes which apply to the tax for which the action is filed.
(2)(a) An action may not be brought to contest an assessment of any tax, interest, or penalty assessed under a section or chapter specified in subsection (1) more than 60 days after the date the assessment becomes final. An action may not be brought to contest a denial of refund of any tax, interest, or penalty paid under a section or chapter specified in subsection (1) more than 60 days after the date the denial becomes final.
(b) The date on which an assessment or a denial of refund becomes final and procedures by which a taxpayer must be notified of the assessment or of the denial of refund must be established:
1. By rule adopted by the Department of Revenue;
2. With respect to assessments or refund denials under chapter 207, by rule adopted by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles;
3. With respect to assessments or refund denials under chapters 210, 550, 561, 562, 563, 564, and 565, by rule adopted by the Department of Business and Professional Regulation; or
4. With respect to taxes that a county collects or enforces under s. 125.0104(10) or s. 212.0305(5), by an ordinance that may additionally provide for informal dispute resolution procedures in accordance with s. 213.21.
(c) The applicable department or county need not file or docket an assessment or a refund denial with the agency clerk or county official designated by ordinance in order for the assessment or refund denial to become final for purposes of an action initiated under this chapter or chapter 120.
(3) In any action filed in circuit court contesting the legality of any tax, interest, or penalty assessed under a section or chapter specified in subsection (1), the plaintiff must:
(a) Pay to the applicable department or county the amount of the tax, penalty, and accrued interest assessed by the department or county which is not being contested by the taxpayer; and either
(b)1. Tender into the registry of the court with the complaint the amount of the contested assessment complained of, including penalties and accrued interest, unless this requirement is waived in writing by the executive director of the applicable department or by the county official designated by ordinance; or
2. File with the complaint a cash bond or a surety bond for the amount of the contested assessment endorsed by a surety company authorized to do business in this state, or by any other security arrangement as may be approved by the court, and conditioned upon payment in full of the judgment, including the taxes, costs, penalties, and interest, unless this requirement is waived in writing by the executive director of the applicable department or by the county official designated by ordinance.

Failure to pay the uncontested amount as required in paragraph (a) shall result in the dismissal of the action and imposition of an additional penalty in the amount of 25 percent of the tax assessed. Provided, however, that if, at any point in the action, it is determined or discovered that a plaintiff, due to a good faith de minimis error, failed to comply with any of the requirements of paragraph (a) or paragraph (b), the plaintiff shall be given a reasonable time within which to comply before the action is dismissed. For purposes of this subsection, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that if the error involves an amount equal to or less than 5 percent of the total assessment the error is de minimis and that if the error is more than 5 percent of the total assessment the error is not de minimis.

(4)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), an action initiated in circuit court pursuant to subsection (1) shall be filed in the Second Judicial Circuit Court in and for Leon County or in the circuit court in the county where the taxpayer resides, maintains its principal commercial domicile in this state, or, in the ordinary course of business, regularly maintains its books and records in this state.
(b) Venue in an action initiated in circuit court pursuant to subsection (1) by a taxpayer that is not a resident of this state or that does not maintain a commercial domicile in this state shall be in Leon County. Venue in an action contesting the legality of an assessment or refund denial arising under chapter 198 shall be in the circuit court having jurisdiction over the administration of the estate.
(5) The requirements of subsections (1), (2), and (3) are jurisdictional.
(6) Any action brought under this chapter is not subject to the provisions of chapter 45 as amended by chapter 87-249, Laws of Florida, relating to offers of settlement.
History.—s. 11, ch. 81-178; s. 12, ch. 83-217; ss. 1, 9, ch. 84-170; s. 34, ch. 85-342; s. 10, ch. 87-99; s. 1, ch. 87-102; s. 2, ch. 87-198; s. 10, ch. 89-171; s. 100, ch. 90-136; s. 27, ch. 90-203; s. 2, ch. 91-112; s. 18, ch. 92-315; s. 2, ch. 92-320; s. 63, ch. 93-207; ss. 23, 29, ch. 94-353; s. 126, ch. 95-417; s. 48, ch. 96-397; s. 8, ch. 96-410; s. 24, ch. 98-342; s. 26, ch. 99-2; s. 9, ch. 2000-151; ss. 33, 58, ch. 2000-260; s. 38, ch. 2001-140; s. 4, ch. 2002-218; s. 182, ch. 2008-247; s. 2, ch. 2011-76.
72.031 Actions under s. 72.011(1); parties; service of process.—
(1) In any action brought in circuit court pursuant to s. 72.011(1), the person initiating the action shall be the plaintiff and the Department of Revenue shall be the defendant, except that for actions contesting an assessment or denial of refund under chapter 207 the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles shall be the defendant, for actions contesting an assessment or denial of refund under chapters 210, 550, 561, 562, 563, 564, and 565 the Department of Business and Professional Regulation shall be the defendant, and for actions contesting an assessment or denial of refund of a tax imposed under s. 125.0104 or s. 212.0305 by a county that has elected under s. 125.0104(10) or s. 212.0305(5), respectively, to administer the tax, the defendant shall be the county and the Department of Revenue. It shall not be necessary for the Governor and Cabinet, constituting the Department of Revenue, to be named as party defendants or named separately as individual parties; nor shall it be necessary for the executive director of the department to be named as an individual party.
(2) Service of process on the applicable department or county shall be perfected by service pursuant to s. 48.111, notwithstanding the provisions of s. 48.121.
History.—s. 12, ch. 81-178; s. 3, ch. 87-198; s. 6, ch. 91-112; s. 24, ch. 94-353; s. 42, ch. 96-397.
72.041 Tax liabilities arising under the laws of other states.—Actions to enforce lawfully imposed sales, use, and corporate income taxes and motor and other fuel taxes of another state may be brought in a court of this state under the following conditions:
(1) The state seeking to institute an action for the collection, assessment, or enforcement of a lawfully imposed tax must have extended a like courtesy to this state;
(2) Venue for any action under this section shall be the circuit court of the county in which the defendant resides;
(3) This section does not apply to the enforcement of tax warrants of another state unless the warrant has been obtained as a result of a judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction in the taxing state or unless the courts of the state seeking to enforce its warrant allow the enforcement of the warrants issued by the Department of Revenue pursuant to chapters 206, 212, 213, and 220; and
(4) All tax liabilities owing to this state or any of its subdivisions shall be paid first and shall be prior in right to any tax liability arising under the laws of other states.
History.—s. 45, ch. 85-342; s. 35, ch. 86-152; s. 101, ch. 90-136; s. 12, ch. 90-351; s. 86, ch. 91-112; s. 127, ch. 95-417; s. 3, ch. 2011-76.

F.S. 72 on Google Scholar

F.S. 72 on Casetext

Amendments to 72


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 72
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S253.72 2 - TRESPASSING - VIOL POSTED RESTRICTIONS LEASED STATE LANDS - M: S
S253.72 3 - CONSERVATION-FISH - HARVEST SHELLFISH 25 FT/PROTECTED BOUNDARIES - M: S
S316.72 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - SIMULATE COLOR OF BUS TO RESEMBLE SCH BUS - M: S
S327.72 - HEALTH-SAFETY - VIOLATE VESSEL REGULATIONS SAFETY LAW - M: S
S328.72 13 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - REMOVED - I: N
S601.72 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - VIOLATE FLORIDA CITRUS CODE OF 1949 - M: F

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 72

Total Results: 20

Wester v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-11-13T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: Id. at 781 (citing Masonoff v. State, 546 So. 2d 72, 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)). It was determined that the

Petro Welt Trading ges.M.B.h v. Edward Brinkmann

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-11-08T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: re Amends. to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510, 317 So. 3d 72, 74 (Fla. 2021) (adopting federal summary judgment

William J. Mitchell v. David W. Race

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-11-07T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: Condo. Ass’n v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 228 So. 3d 72, 73 (Fla. 2017) (dismissing a case because “the certified

Michael S. Peragine v. Platinum Rapid Funding Group, Ltd.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-11-06T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: In re Amends. to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510, 317 So. 3d 72, 75-76 (Fla. 2021) (“[W]hen opposing parties tell

Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois v. Rebecca L. Heikka

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-11-06T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: punitive damages, as is required pursuant to section 768.72, Florida Statutes (2022). 2 Therefore, the choices

Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois v. Rebecca L. Heikka

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-11-06T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: punitive damages, as is required pursuant to section 768.72, Florida Statutes (2022). 2 Therefore, the choices

Roosevelt Smith v. the State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-30T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: under rule 3.800(a). Ramirez v. State, 374 So. 3d 71, 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“A motion to correct illegal

Kac 2021-1, LLC, as Assignee for Johnny Smith v. American Homes 4 Rent Properties One, L L C

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-30T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: three-day notice of nonpayment of rent. See § 559.72, Fla. Stat. (2022). Because American Homes was required…to any violation of the provisions of section 559.72). American Homes owns the residential property rented…, KAC alleged American Homes violated section 559.72(5)2 by posting a three-day notice to the door of … underlying amended complaint. 2 Section 559.72 governs the collection of consumer debts and provides…specific-governs-over-general principle where sections 83.56 and 559.72(5) do not conflict. We do not reach this issue because

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lewis Gopher, Jr.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-30T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: or corporate liability for punitive damages. § 768.72(3), Fla. Stat. (2023). Accordingly, the circuit

Thomas Van Lent v. the Everglades Foundation, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-30T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: deprivation occurred. See Thomas v. Cromer, 276 So. 3d 69, 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“A trial court ‘provides due

Spencer T. Calvert v. Steven A. Aleckson and Jennifer Rae Aleckson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-25T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: complaint. See Falcone v. Laquer, 132 So. 3d 1171, 1171–72 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (holding that an appeal taken

Kayle B. Bates v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-10-24T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: So. 2d 594, 600-01 (Fla. 1957))); Gray v. State, 72 So. 3d 336, 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (same). That

Victor Herman Creech III and Kathryn Creech v. Joseph Santomassino and Michael P. Kenny, Jr.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-23T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 4th DCA 2023) (citation omitted). Section 768.72(1), Florida Statutes (2020), provides: In …allowed by the rules of civil procedure. § 768.72(1), Fla. Stat. (2020); see also Globe Newspaper Co…. 4th DCA 2023) (emphasis added). Section 768.72 further provides (in relevant part): (2) A… of persons exposed to such conduct. § 768.72(2), Fla. Stat. (2020). …others to show gross negligence under section 768.72(2)(b).” Id. In short, the Sixth District concluded

Onas E. Aliff, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Timothy Aliff v. Steven Weiss, M.D., P.A.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-16T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: contract. The motion for additur requested $1,933,024.72, which included an additional four days of post-default… judgment wherein it awarded Dr. Weiss $1,933,024.72 in damages on the breach of contract counterclaim

Will Utile v. the State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-16T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: resulting sentence.” Ramirez v. State, 374 So. 3d 71, 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022). Although the instant challenge

McLane Foodservice, Inc. v. Elizabeth Wool

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-16T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: is found in Chapter 768.72, Florida Statutes (2022). Specifically, 768.72(1) provides: (1) In…reasonable basis for recovery of such damages.” § 768.72(1), Fla. Stat.; see also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190(f…2d 518, 519 (Fla. 1995) (“[R]ead[ing] section 768.72 to create a substantive legal right not to be subject…intentional misconduct or gross negligence.” § 768.72(2), Fla. Stat. Instead, the gatekeeping function …of conduct, resulting in injury or damage.” § 768.72 (2)(a), Fla. Stat. “‘Gross negligence’ means that

Heritage Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Carmen A. Hernandez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-16T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: In re Amends. to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510, 317 So. 3d 72, 77 (Fla. 2021); In re Amends. to Fla. R. Civ. P

Progressive Specialty Insurance Company v. Florida Hospital Ocala, Inc. D/B/A Adventhealth Ocala A/A/O Sandra Thomas

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-14T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: treatment. Progressive paid Florida Hospital $2,377.72, and paid another medical provider $122.28, for a…Progressive, less Progressive’s payment of $2,377.72. See § 627.736(5)(a)1.b., Fla. Stat. (2019) (“The

LAD Commercial, LLC v. Eagle Trace at Vero Beach Homeowners' Association, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-02T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: services rendered for the three-year period. Id. at 571-72. While the estate argued on appeal that the judgment

IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company v. MSPA Claims 1, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-30T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 994 F.3d 869, 871–72 (7th Cir. 2021).