Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 73.101 (2025)
Form of judgment.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
73.101 Form of judgment.—The judgment shall recite the verdict in full and shall state that the estate or interest in the property described in the petition and sought to be appropriated by the petitioner shall vest in the petitioner upon the payment of, or securing by deposit of money, the amount found by the verdict of the jury. Where there are conflicting claims to the amount awarded for any parcel, the court, upon appropriate motion, shall determine the rights of the interested parties with respect to the amount awarded for each parcel and the method of apportionment, together with the disposition of any other matters arising from the taking.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases, 1966–2018 · leading case: City of Boynton Beach v. Janots, 101 So. 3d 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
City of Boynton Beach v. Janots, 101 So. 3d 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). “101, Florida Statutes expressly provides that the court entering a taking order “shall determine the rights of the interested parties with respect to the amount awarded for each parcel and the method of apportionment.”
Div. Of Admin., State, Dept of Transp. v. Allen, 447 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). “The proceeding referred to in the last sentence of the above quote is that set out in section 73.101, Florida Statute (1981), which provides: Form of judgment The judgment shall recite the verdict in full and shall state that the estate or interest in the property described in…”
Carter v. State Road Dep't, 189 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1966). “59-450, § 1 at 1491 [now Fla. Stat. § 73.101 (1965), F.S.A.] as it read prior to August 4, 1965: "73.”
K-mart Corp. v. St. Dept. of Transp., 636 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). “1st DCA 1991); § 73.101, Fla. Stat. (1993). [1] In apportioning the proceeds, the trial court must make an equitable distribution which reflects the respective values of the fee and leasehold interests.”
State Road Dep't v. Hartsfield, 216 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968). “Section 73.101, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides that where there are conflicting claims to the amount awarded for any par *65 cel, the court, upon appropriate motion, shall determine the rights of the interested parties with respect to the amount awarded for each parcel and…”
Sallas v. State Road Dep't, 220 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969). “[4] F.S. § 73.101, F.S.A. [5] State Road Department v.”
Hatch v. Minot, 369 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). “Section 73.101. In this case the parties agree that their rights to the sum which was deposited in the registry of the court are governed by the terms of the mortgage instrument.”
City of Fort Lauderdale v. Casino Realty, Inc., 313 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 1975). “Section 73.101 entitled "Form of Judgment" which provides, "Form of judgment.”
Sarasota Cnty. v. Ex, 645 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). “In a typical inverse condemnation action, the landowner files an action alleging that it holds title to the property and that the county has committed acts that substantially interfere with the owner's property rights.”
Valls v. Arnold Indus., Inc., 328 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). “Fla. Stat. § 73.101 (1975). At this hearing, the court must consider the value of each interest in the property, but the sum of the several awards to the parties cannot exceed the total amount of the condemnation verdict.”
City of St. Petersburg v. Div. of Admin., State Dep't of Transp., 293 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). “Petersburg, Florida, in the above cause, pursuant to the provisions of Section 73.101, Florida Statutes.” Following the hearing, the court entered an order determining the City was entitled to be paid for only a lot clearing assessment in the amount of .”
Plante v. Canal Auth., 218 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969). “F.S. § 73.101, F.S.A. . Orange State Oil Co.”
— 73.101(a) — 1 case
Collins & Co., Inc. v. City of Jacksonville, 38 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (M.D. Fla. 1998).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.