Syfert Injury Law Firm

Willie J. Preyer, Mildred Preyer v. Emerald Coast Utililties Authority

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-05-03T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: underlying action to apportion funds pursuant to section 73.101, Florida Statutes, remains pending. The Court has

Preyer v. Emerald Coast Utilities Auth.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-05-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 241 So. 3d 284

Snippet: underlying action to apportion funds pursuant to section 73.101, Florida Statutes, remains pending. The Court has

Theodore Ryan v. City of Boynton Beach, etc., and Frank Janots

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-02-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 157 So. 3d 417, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1428

Snippet: City’s lien claims under the authority of section 73.101,” and remanded for further proceedings. City

City of Boynton Beach v. Janots

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-10-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 101 So. 3d 864, 2012 WL 4795639, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17445

Snippet: liens in Florida’s eminent domain laws. Section 73.101, Florida Statutes expressly provides that the court…each parcel and the method of apportionment.” § 73.101, Fla. Stat. (2010). This is because a “condemnation…City’s hen claims under the authority of section 73.101. Reversed and Remanded. HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ

Sarasota County v. Ex

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-08-03T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 645 So. 2d 7

Snippet: title, the county must pay just compensation. § 73.101, Fla. Stat. (1993). In a typical inverse condemnation

K-Mart Corp. v. ST. DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-04-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 636 So. 2d 131

Snippet: of Transp., 611 So.2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); § 73.101, Fla. Stat. (1993).[1] In apportioning the proceeds

Gulf Properties of Alabama, Inc. v. Bower

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-10-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 625 So. 2d 992, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10936, 1993 WL 433889

Snippet: order of distribution in accordance with section 73.101, Florida Statutes (1991), and the settlement reached

State v. Family Bank of Hallandale

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1993-07-01T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 623 So. 2d 474

Snippet: Attorney General's opinion. Op. Att'y Gen.Fla. 73-101 (1973). Although an opinion of the Attorney General…of the law merchant." Op.Att'y Gen.Fla. 73-101 at 162 (1973). This opinion has guided the course… negotiable instruments. See Op. Att'y.Gen. 73-101 (1973). Therefore, there was no meeting of the

Gallagher v. Motors Ins. Corp.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1992-07-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 605 So. 2d 62

Snippet: Western & Southern Life, 451 U.S. at 672-73, 101 S.Ct. at 2085. Accordingly, having determined that

State v. Family Bank of Hallandale

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-02-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 593 So. 2d 581, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 941, 1992 WL 21092

Snippet: 110 So. 837 (1926); authorities collected A.G.O. 073-101, Annual Report of the Attorney General, State of

Jack Bakery Services, Inc. v. Western Treats Meat Market, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1988-08-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 530 So. 2d 447, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2000, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3993, 1988 WL 89191

Snippet: of the deposit to be determined at the section 73.101, Florida Statutes, apportionment hearing eventually

City of Miami Beach v. Cypen

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-07-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 454 So. 2d 628, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14327

Snippet: into the trial court’s registry in 1976, see § 73.101, Fla.Stat. (1975), the trial court’s order is quashed

DIV. OF ADMIN., STATE, DEPT OF TRANSP. v. Allen

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-03-07T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 447 So. 2d 1383

Snippet: sentence of the above quote is that set out in section 73.101, Florida Statute (1981), which provides: Form of…value of its leasehold interest for which section 73.101 provides that the judge is to determine its value

Columbia Sussex Corp. v. Division of Administration, State of Florida Department of Transportation

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-12-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 425 So. 2d 90, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21956

Snippet: appellant moved for apportionment pursuant to Section 73.101, Florida Statutes. The trial court’s finding in

Grieser v. Division of Administration, State Department of Transportation

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1979-04-25T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 371 So. 2d 164, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14513

Snippet: supplemental proceeding contemplated by Section 73.101.2 The appellant draws support from Orange State…changed by the 1965 amendments. Compare Section 73.101, Florida Statutes (1977), with Section 73.12, Florida

Hatch v. Minot

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1979-03-13T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 369 So. 2d 974

Snippet: the method of apportionment of the award. Section 73.101. In this case the parties agree that their rights

Valls v. Arnold Industries, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1976-03-02T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 328 So. 2d 471

Snippet: which is awarded for each parcel. Fla. Stat. § 73.101 (1975). At this hearing, the court must consider

City of Fort Lauderdale v. Casino Realty, Inc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1975-02-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 313 So. 2d 649

Snippet: proceedings instituted after October 1, 1970. Section 73.101 entitled "Form of Judgment" which provides

Osepchook v. Gateway Insurance Company

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1974-07-05T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 298 So. 2d 169

Snippet: Business in the State of Florida, Appellee. No. 73-101. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District… found in F.S. Section 627.727, F.S.A. 73-101 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Grooms v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1974-07-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 297 So. 2d 350, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 10154

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. No. 73-101 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp Fla