Cases from cite.case.law:

J. PREYER, v. EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY,, 241 So. 3d 284 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . The underlying action to apportion funds pursuant to section 73.101, Florida Statutes, remains pending . . .

RYAN, v. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, a, 157 So. 3d 417 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . 2 and the trial court should have adjudicated the City’s lien claims under the authority of section 73.101 . . .

LEITERMAN, v. JOHNSON,, 60 F. Supp. 3d 166 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 301-73.101, the Agency uses the Fed-Traveler travel system to plan, book, track, approve, and request . . .

CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, v. JANOTS, P., 101 So. 3d 864 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 73.101, Florida Statutes expressly provides that the court entering a taking order “shall determine . . . interested parties with respect to the amount awarded for each parcel and the method of apportionment.” § 73.101 . . . 2 and the trial court should have adjudicated the City’s hen claims under the authority of section 73.101 . . .

In GARRISON- ASHBURN, L. C., 253 B.R. 700 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2000)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 50-73.29, 50-73.99, 50-73.101, 50-73.102. See also VA. . . .

COLLINS COMPANY, INC. a a a v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, a, 38 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (M.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . See Jacksonville, FL, Code § 73.101(a). . . .

SARASOTA COUNTY, a v. EX Ex,, 645 So. 2d 7 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . . § 73.101, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

K- MART CORPORATION, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 636 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Florida Dep’t of Transp., 611 So.2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); § 73.101, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

GULF PROPERTIES OF ALABAMA, INC. v. B. BOWER, W. L., 625 So. 2d 992 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . order appealed and remand with directions to enter an order of distribution in accordance with section 73.101 . . .

JACK BAKERY SERVICES, INC. v. WESTERN TREATS MEAT MARKET, INC., 530 So. 2d 447 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . effect upon Jack Bakery’s entitlement to its fair share of the deposit to be determined at the section 73.101 . . .

CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a v. CYPEN R. M. N. A. D. F. D. No., 454 So. 2d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . petitioner upon the deposit of the condemnation award into the trial court’s registry in 1976, see § 73.101 . . .

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, v. L. ALLEN,, 447 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . The proceeding referred to in the last sentence of the above quote is that set out in section 73.101, . . . This constituted the value of its leasehold interest for which section 73.101 provides that the judge . . .

COLUMBIA SUSSEX CORPORATION, INC. v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 425 So. 2d 90 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . A verdict on damages was entered after which appellant moved for apportionment pursuant to Section 73.101 . . .

GRIESER, v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 371 So. 2d 164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . protecting his interest against conflicting claims in the supplemental proceeding contemplated by Section 73.101 . . . Compare Section 73.101, Florida Statutes (1977), with Section 73.12, Florida Statutes (1951). .See Major . . .

J. HATCH M. Jr. v. MINOT,, 369 So. 2d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Section 73.101. . . .

A. VALLS G. v. ARNOLD INDUSTRIES, INC. PEERLESS INVESTMENT CORPORATION, v. ARNOLD INDUSTRIES, INC., 328 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . § 73.101 (1975). . . .

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a v. CASINO REALTY, INC., 313 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 1975)

. . . Section 73.101 entitled “Form of Judgment” which provides, “Form of judgment. — The judgment shall recite . . .

CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, A., 293 So. 2d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . Petersburg, Florida, in the above cause, pursuant to the provisions of Section 73.101, Florida Statutes . . . At the point where the judgment for a condemnation award is entered, Section 73.101 provides in part: . . . The statute under which that case was decided read somewhat differently than the current Section 73.101 . . .

E. J. SALLAS, v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT a B. S., 220 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . § 73.101, F.S.A. . State Road Department v. Hartsfield (Fla.App.1968), 216 So.2d 61. . . . .

D. PLANTE v. CANAL AUTHORITY a, 218 So. 2d 243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . § 73.101, F.S.A. . Orange State Oil Co. v. . . .

STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT a v. HARTSFIELD,, 216 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Section 73.101, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides that where there are conflicting claims to the amount . . . verdict fixing the compensation to be paid for the entire parcel condemned as a whole, Section F.S. 73.101 . . .

INTERCOASTAL DRYDOCK, INC. a v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT,, 203 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

. . . of his leasehold interest to be determined and apportioned by the trial judge, as provided for in § 73.101 . . .

DADE COUNTY v. MENDOZA,, 28 Fla. Supp. 141 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1967)

. . . final judgment when such matters are ordinarily resolved upon motion in accordance with provisions of §73.101 . . .

G. CARTER, v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT,, 189 So. 2d 793 (Fla. 1966)

. . . . § 73.101 (1965), F.S.A.] as it read prior to August 4, 1965: “73.12 Form of Judgment.- — The judgment . . .

UNITED STATES v. T. W. DEER,, 131 F. Supp. 319 (E.D. Wash. 1955)

. . . Sec. 835 and CFR Title 49, Secs. 73.58(a) (b) (c) and 73.101.” . . .