The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 74
PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL TO EMINENT DOMAIN

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 74

PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTAL TO EMINENT DOMAIN

74.011 Scope.

74.021 Rights under this chapter; additional.

74.031 Declaration of taking; contents.

74.041 Process; service and publication.

74.051 Hearing on order of taking.

74.061 Vesting of title or interest sought.

74.071 Paying over funds in court.

74.081 Proceedings as evidence.

74.091 Effect of failure to pay final judgment.

74.101 Rights of housing authority after taking.

74.111 Drainage districts and housing authorities.

74.011 Scope.—In any eminent domain action, properly instituted by and in the name of the state; the Department of Transportation; any county, school board, municipality, expressway authority, regional water supply authority, transportation authority, flood control district, or drainage or subdrainage district; the ship canal authority; any lawfully constituted housing, port, or aviation authority; or any rural electric cooperative, telephone cooperative corporation, or public utility corporation, the petitioner may avail itself of the provisions of this chapter to take possession and title in advance of the entry of final judgment.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-369; ss. 23, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 69-300; s. 1, ch. 78-422; s. 1, ch. 83-113; s. 55, ch. 90-136; s. 4, ch. 90-303; s. 9, ch. 91-265; s. 1, ch. 2002-183; s. 51, ch. 2006-60.

74.021 Rights under this chapter; additional.—The right to take possession and title in advance of final judgment in eminent domain actions, as provided by this law, shall be in addition to any right, power or authority conferred by laws of the state under which proceedings may be conducted and shall not be construed as abrogating, limiting or modifying any such right, power or authority.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-369.

74.031 Declaration of taking; contents.—Those having the right to take possession and title in advance of the entry of final judgment in eminent domain actions, as provided by law, may file, either with the petition or at any time prior to the entry of final judgment, a declaration of taking signed by the petitioner, or its duly authorized agent or attorney, stating that the property sought to be appropriated is thereby taken for the use set forth in the petition. The petitioner shall make a good faith estimate of value, based upon a valid appraisal of each parcel in the proceeding, which shall be made a part of the declaration of taking.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-369.

74.041 Process; service and publication.—

(1) Upon the filing of the declaration of taking, the clerk of the court shall issue a summons to show cause to the defendants, containing the names of all defendants named in the petition, notifying them that the petitioner will petition for an order of taking on a specified date. A copy of the summons to show cause and the declaration of taking shall be served upon all resident defendants in the manner provided by law for service of original process in eminent domain actions, and not less than 20 days prior to the date specified.

(2) If any defendant is alleged to be a nonresident of the state, or if the name or address of any defendant is alleged to be unknown, or if personal service cannot be had upon any defendant for any other reason, the clerk of the court shall cause the summons to show cause to be published one time, not less than 20 days prior to the date specified in the petition, in some newspaper published in the county; however, if the petitioner is a municipality and a newspaper is published therein, the summons shall be published in such a newspaper. The clerk shall mail a copy of the summons to show cause and the declaration of taking to each out-of-state defendant at the address set forth in the petition. The clerk shall file a certificate of mailing, which, together with proof of publication, shall constitute effective service as to these defendants. The failure of any party to receive the summons by mail shall not invalidate the proceedings of the court or any order made pursuant to this chapter.

(3) The petition date provided in this section may be combined with the summons to show cause and the published summons provided in s. 73.031, but in no event shall the petition date provided in this section be noticed for a date earlier than 1 day following the date specified in the summons to show cause and the published summons provided in s. 73.031 for the defendants to serve written defenses to the petition in eminent domain proceedings and, if a defendant requests, a hearing on the petition for order of taking.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-369, s. 1, ch. 70-286; s. 38, ch. 85-180.

74.051 Hearing on order of taking.—

(1) If a defendant requests a hearing pursuant to s. 74.041(3), said defendant may appear and be heard on all matters properly before the court which may be determined prior to the entry of the order of taking, including the jurisdiction of the court, the sufficiency of pleadings, whether the petitioner is properly exercising its delegated authority, and the amount to be deposited for the property sought to be appropriated. Any defendant failing to file a request for hearing shall waive any right to object to the order of taking, and title shall be vested in the petitioner, upon deposit as hereinafter provided, which date shall be the date of valuation.

(2) If a hearing is requested, the court shall make such order as it deems proper, securing to all parties the rights to which they may be entitled, not inconsistent with the provisions of this section. The court may make such orders in respect of encumbrances, liens, rents, taxes, assessments, insurance, amount of the good faith deposit, and other charges, if any, as shall be just and equitable. If the court finds that the petitioner is entitled to possession of the property prior to final judgment, it shall enter an order requiring the petitioner to deposit in the registry of the court such sum of money as will fully secure and fully compensate the persons entitled to compensation as ultimately determined by the final judgment. Said deposit shall not be less than the amount of the petitioner’s estimate of value, if the petitioner be the state or any agency thereof, any county, the city, or other public body; otherwise, double the amount of petitioner’s estimate of value.

(3) If a defendant requests a hearing pursuant to s. 74.041(3) and the petitioner is an electric utility that is seeking to appropriate property necessary for an electric generation plant, an associated facility of an electric generation plant, an electric substation, or a power line, it is the intent of the Legislature that the court, when practicable, conduct the hearing no more than 120 days after the petition is filed and issue its order of taking no more than 30 days after the conclusion of the hearing.

(4) The court may fix the time within which and the terms upon which the defendants shall be required to surrender possession to the petitioner, which time of possession shall be upon deposit for those defendants failing to file a request for hearing as provided herein. The order of taking shall not become effective unless the deposit of the required sum is made in the registry of the court. If the deposit is not made within 20 days from the date of the order of taking, the order shall be void and of no further effect. The clerk is authorized to invest such deposits so as to earn the highest interest obtainable under the circumstances in state or national financial institutions in Florida insured by the Federal Government. Ninety percent of the interest earned shall be allocated in accordance with the ultimate ownership in the deposit.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-369; s. 1, ch. 67-34; ss. 1, 3, ch. 67-370; s. 1, ch. 70-365; s. 2, ch. 82-117; s. 39, ch. 85-180; s. 1, ch. 2008-227; s. 1, ch. 2013-23.

74.061 Vesting of title or interest sought.—Immediately upon the making of the deposit, the title or interest specified in the petition shall vest in the petitioner, and the said lands shall be deemed to be condemned and taken for the use of the petitioner, and the right to compensation for the same shall vest in the persons entitled thereto. Compensation shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of chapter 73, except that interest shall be allowed at the same rate as provided in all circuit court judgments from the date of surrender of possession to the date of payment on the amount that the verdict exceeds the estimate of value set forth in the declaration of taking.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-369; ss. 1, 2, ch. 67-277; s. 28, ch. 73-333; s. 4, ch. 78-315.

74.071 Paying over funds in court.—At any time, prior to the entry of final judgment, and upon motion by the proper defendants, the court may direct that the sum of money set forth in the declaration of taking be paid forthwith to such defendants from the money deposited in the registry of the court. If the compensation awarded for the property by the final judgment shall exceed the amount withdrawn by the defendant, the court shall enter judgment against the petitioner for the deficiency. If the amount withdrawn exceeds the compensation awarded for the property by the final judgment, the court shall enter a judgment against such defendant for the excess, and such judgment shall be a lien against any of the defendant’s property except his or her homestead.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-369; s. 365, ch. 95-147.

74.081 Proceedings as evidence.—Neither the declaration of taking, nor the amount of the deposit, shall be admissible in evidence in any action.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-369.

74.091 Effect of failure to pay final judgment.—Where an order of taking has been entered and deposit made, the failure of the petitioner to pay into the court the compensation ascertained by the jury shall not invalidate said judgment or the title of the petitioner, and such failure shall not authorize any person to molest, interfere with, enter or trespass upon said property; provided, however, persons lawfully entitled to compensation may sue out execution, in the event a timely appeal has not been filed, and such execution may be levied upon the property so condemned and any other property of the petitioner in the same manner as executions are levied in common-law actions.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-369.

74.101 Rights of housing authority after taking.—In any action in which any housing authority created under the laws of Florida has taken or may take possession of any real property in advance of final judgment therein, and the said petitioner has become irrevocably committed to pay the amount ultimately to be awarded as compensation, then it is lawful to expend moneys duly appropriated for that purpose in demolishing existing structures on said land, and in erecting buildings or public works thereon, or in improving said land or erecting and constructing buildings or works thereon, authorized by law to be constructed by any petitioner.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-369.

74.111 Drainage districts and housing authorities.—In any action instituted by a drainage or subdrainage district, or housing authority wherein the petitioner seeks to avail itself of the provisions of this chapter:

(1) Action under this chapter shall not be taken unless the chair or other legally constituted head of the petitioning authority empowered to acquire the land shall be of the opinion that the ultimate award probably will be within the limits of the authority’s ability to pay.

(2) It shall be lawful for the petitioner to expend moneys duly appropriated for the purpose of availing itself of the provisions of this chapter in going forward with the project for which the land was taken; provided that, in the opinion of the attorney representing the taking authority, the title has been vested in the authority taking, or all persons having an interest therein have been made parties to such proceeding and will be bound by the final judgment therein.

(3) No money shall be paid nor contracts made for payment for any construction or maintenance proposed by the petitioner under this chapter in excess of the amount specifically appropriated therefor by the Legislature of the state, or procured by and secured to the petitioner under contracts with private persons, firms, or corporations in accordance with the laws authorizing such taking authority to negotiate contracts with private persons, firms, or corporations, or by the issuance of bonds and other debentures pursuant to tax levies duly made, all in accordance with the law in such cases made and provided.

(4) The attorney representing the petitioner is authorized to stipulate or agree in behalf of the taking authority to exclude any property, or any part thereof, or any interest therein, that may have been, or may be taken by or on behalf of the authority taking by the declaration of taking, or otherwise.

History.—s. 4, ch. 65-369; s. 366, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 74 on Google Scholar

F.S. 74 on Casetext

Amendments to 74

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 74

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S253.74 - CONSERVATION - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 7829 - M: F

S253.74 - CONSERVATION - CONDUCT AQUACULTURE WO BOARD AUTHORITY - M: S

S372.74 - CONSERVATION - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 6608 - M: S

S601.74 - HEALTH-SAFETY - DELETE INFRACTION - I: N

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Association of American Railroads , 575 U.S. 43, 74, 135 S.Ct. 1225, 191 L.Ed.2d 153 (2015) (opinion . . . Id., at 74-75, 135 S.Ct. 1225. . . . Potts, Power of Legislative Bodies To Punish for Contempt, 74 U. Pa. L. . . . Association of American Railroads , 575 U.S. at 74, 135 S.Ct. 1225 (THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment . . .

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Scurlock , 347 U.S. 110, 117, 74 S.Ct. 403, 98 L.Ed. 546 (1954) (noting that "recognition of the constitutional . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Stat., Tit. 74, § 1221 (2019 Cum. . . . See id. , at 71-74. The Indian Territory was no exception. . . . Fulton , 74 Okla. 293, 157 P. 1151, 1152 (1916). . . .

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . App. to Pet. for Cert. in No. 19-267, p. 80a; App. 74. . . . App. 73-74. . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Perry Local Educators' Assn. , 460 U.S. 37, 45-46, 103 S.Ct. 948, 74 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983) (content-based . . .

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, v. BOOKING. COM B. V., 140 S. Ct. 2298 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See In re The Computer Store, Inc. , 211 U.S.P.Q. 72, 74-75 (TTAB 1981). . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Robins , 447 U.S. 74, 87, 100 S.Ct. 2035, 64 L.Ed.2d 741 (1980). . . . Robins , 447 U.S. 74, 87-88, 100 S.Ct. 2035, 64 L.Ed.2d 741 (1980) (holding that the Government may require . . . Plasencia , 459 U.S. 21, 32, 103 S.Ct. 321, 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982) (noting that "an alien seeking initial . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Y. , 347 U.S. 442, 451, 74 S.Ct. 650, 98 L.Ed. 829 (1954) (State has "legitimate concern for maintaining . . . The District Court did not address Doe 2's failure to apply to Christus Health. 250 F.Supp.3d at 68-74 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Morales , 527 U.S. 41, 74, 119 S.Ct. 1849, 144 L.Ed.2d 67 (1999) (Scalia, J., dissenting). . . . Shaughnessy , 347 U.S. 260, 74 S.Ct. 499, 98 L.Ed. 681 (1954), Bridges v. . . . App. 67, 70-74. . . . Plasencia , 459 U.S. 21, 32, 103 S.Ct. 321, 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982). . . . Plasencia , 459 U.S. 21, 32, 103 S.Ct. 321, 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982) ). . . . Dotson , 544 U.S. 74, 79, 125 S.Ct. 1242, 161 L.Ed.2d 253 (2005) (similar); Munaf v. . . . Shaughnessy , 347 U.S. 260, 74 S.Ct. 499, 98 L.Ed. 681 (1954). . . . See id. , at 262, 74 S.Ct. 499. But none was based on the Suspension Clause. . . . Plasencia , 459 U.S. 21, 32, 103 S.Ct. 321, 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982) ("This Court has long held that an alien . . .

C. LIU, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (U.S. 2020)

. . . I A Congress authorized the SEC to enforce the Securities Act of 1933, 48 Stat. 74, as amended, 15 U.S.C . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Board of Education , 347 U.S. 483, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). . . . Sharpe , 347 U.S. 497, 499-500, 74 S.Ct. 693, 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954).) . . .

J. THOLE, v. U. S. BANK N. A, 140 S. Ct. 1615 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 74, Comment a , p. 192 (1957); see Blair v. . . . supra ; Blair , 300 U.S. at 13, 57 S.Ct. 330 ; Bogert & Bogert § 1 ; Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 74 . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Board of Education , 347 U.S. 483, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) ; Smith v. . . . Board of Education , 347 U.S. at 494-495, 74 S.Ct. 686 ; Barnette , 319 U.S. at 630-642, 63 S.Ct. 1178 . . . United States , 281 U.S. 276, 288, 50 S.Ct. 253, 74 L.Ed. 854 (1930) ; Thompson v. . . . United States , 281 U.S. 276, 50 S.Ct. 253, 74 L.Ed. 854 (1930), the Court stated that the Sixth Amendment . . . United States , 281 U.S. 276, 288, 50 S.Ct. 253, 74 L.Ed. 854 (1930). Ibid. See also Andres v. . . .

BABB, v. WILKIE,, 140 S. Ct. 1168 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 28(b)(2), 88 Stat. 74-75. Instead, the Court principally relies on Texas v. . . . The federal-sector provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 88 Stat. 74, . . .

K. KAHLER, v. KANSAS, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (U.S. 2020)

. . . State , 909 P. 2d 74, 90 (Okla. 1995) (footnotes omitted). . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Eighth Amendment claim for failure to provide adequate medical treatment), with Malesko , 534 U.S. at 71-74 . . .

L. BALDWIN, Et Ux. v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 690 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Association of American Railroads , 575 U.S. 43, 74, 135 S.Ct. 1225, 191 L.Ed.2d 153 (2015) (THOMAS, . . .

NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. E. MANN v. E., 140 S. Ct. 344 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Louisiana , 379 U.S. 64, 74-75, 85 S.Ct. 209, 13 L.Ed.2d 125 (1964) ("[S]peech concerning public affairs . . .

A. WILLNER, v. DIMON,, 140 S. Ct. 223 (U.S. 2019)

. . . No. 19-74 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. ROMERO, Jr., 935 F.3d 1124 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 673-74. . . .

ELHADY, v. H. KABLE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . MSJ Ex. 74 at ¶ 4. . . . Statement of Material Facts ¶ 74; Defs.' . . . MSJ Ex. 18 at 74-84, 148-49, 158-66. . . .

V. CASSIDY, v. HALYARD HEALTH, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 474 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . . ¶¶ 70-74. Id. ¶¶ 109-10, 117. Id. ¶¶ 164-68. Anderson v. . . .

ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, v. SANDOZ, INC., 935 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . See Majority Op. 1373-74. . . .

TIMS, v. LGE COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION,, 935 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Electronic Fund Transfers, 74 Fed. Reg. 59,033, 59,033 (Nov. 17, 2009). . . .

IN RE CORPORATE RESOURCE SERVICES, INC. S. v., 603 B.R. 888 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Nomura Holding America, Inc. , 74 F.Supp.3d 639, 651 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (holding that evidence "need not . . .

BELLITTO, v. SNIPES,, 935 F.3d 1192 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Anderson, 470 U.S. at 573-74, 105 S.Ct. 1504 (citation and quotation marks omitted). . . .

IN RE BOWLES,, 935 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . On the second, which was administered in 2017, he received a score of 74. . . . him to bring his intellectual disability claim in his first habeas petition because his IQ score of 74 . . . that Florida was forced to adapt to current medical standards," and that change made his "IQ score [of 74 . . . He received a full-scale IQ score of 74, which falls within the range for intellectual disability. . . . In re Holladay, 331 F.3d 1169, 1173-74 (11th Cir. 2003) (quotation marks omitted). . . .

RAY, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, v. As, 935 F.3d 703 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dep't of Taxation , 509 U.S. 86, 97, 113 S.Ct. 2510, 125 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993). . . .

IN RE JUAREZ, v., 603 B.R. 610 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Bessemer City , 470 U.S. 564, 573-74, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985). DISCUSSION A. . . .

NICHOLSON J. H. a J. N. G. a v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES a a, 935 F.3d 685 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wright , 430 U.S. 651, 673-74, 97 S.Ct. 1401, 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977). . . .

IN RE J. BARIBEAU,, 603 B.R. 797 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . Objection to Debtor's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Converting This Case to a Chapter 7 (ECF No. 74 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HAWKINS, a. k. a. D III, a. k. a., 934 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dominguez Benitez , 542 U.S. 74, 83 n.9, 124 S.Ct. 2333, 159 L.Ed.2d 157 (2004) ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. HOPPER,, 934 F.3d 740 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . R.74 at 17. Id. at 21. R.72 at 1. R.81 ¶ 28. Id. ¶ 12. Id. ¶ 14. Id. ¶ 19. Id. ¶ 20. Id. ¶ 21. Id. . . .

STONE, v. TROY CONSTRUCTION, LLC, 935 F.3d 141 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . (App. at 74 (emphasis added).) . . . Garcia-Ochoa , 607 F.3d 371, 373-74 (4th Cir. 2010). "Q. ... . . .

WOLFINGTON, v. RECONSTRUCTIVE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES II PC, a k a, 935 F.3d 187 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . JA 74. Reply Br. at 2, Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Assocs. . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Cole I , 802 F.3d at 766-74. See id. at 764-65. See id. at 765. Tolan v. . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Finch , 585 F.2d at 773-74. . . .

TURCO v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, NEW JERSEY,, 935 F.3d 155 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Bruni , 824 F.3d at 373-74. Hill , 530 U.S. at 731, 120 S.Ct. 2480. Bruni , 824 F.3d at 374. . . .

NOBRE, ON BEHALF OF K. M. C. L. G. v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, 935 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Corinth , 74 F.3d 633, 639 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc) ("The constitutional rights of a pretrial . . .

MYMAIL, LTD. v. OOVOO, LLC, IAC, 934 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . (U.S.) , 687 F.3d 1266, 1273-74 (Fed. Cir. 2012). . . .

SENNE v. KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. LLC LLC LP St. LLC LLC LLC LLC L. P. L. P. LLC LLC L. P. AZPB L. P. P LLC LLC LP LLP LLC LLC,, 934 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Hilligoss' career spent in California): during the relevant three-year period, one worked 20 days, another 74 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CRUM,, 934 F.3d 963 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cox , 74 F.3d 189 (9th Cir. 1996) ). . . .

AMAZON. COM, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 934 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . See 74 Fed. Reg. 340 (Jan. 5, 2009). . . .

NALPROPION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC., 934 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . See Anderson , 470 U.S. at 573-74, 105 S.Ct. 1504 ("If the district court's account of the evidence is . . .

FLORES, v. P. BARR, K. U. S. U. S. U. S., 934 F.3d 910 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Vigman , 74 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 1996). . . .

MENAKER, v. HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY,, 935 F.3d 20 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Auth. , 828 F.3d 70, 74-75 (2d Cir. 2016) ("Claims of sex-based discrimination under Title VII and the . . . Vasquez , 835 F.3d at 273-74. Id. at 273. Walsh , 828 F.3d at 75. Cf. Cox v. Onondaga Cty. . . .

BAUGHMAN, v. HICKMAN K. M., 935 F.3d 302 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Corinth , 74 F.3d 633, 639 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). . . . City of Donna , 922 F.3d 626, 634 (5th Cir. 2019) (citing Hare , 74 F.3d at 643-44 ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. G. WAGUESPACK,, 935 F.3d 322 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . data generated by a machine in conjunction with the testimony of an expert witness. 564 U.S. at 673-74 . . .

ROMO, v. P. BARR,, 933 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . gratifying the lust, passions, or sexual desires of the defendant or the child, Menendez , 908 F.3d at 472-74 . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. BROWN, v. N., 934 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Food City, Inc ., 658 F.2d 369, 373-74 (5th Cir. . . .

LILLY, v. CITY OF NEW YORK NYPD No. NYPD No., 934 F.3d 222 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Mitchell, 495 U.S. 82, 87-88, 110 S.Ct. 1679, 109 L.Ed.2d 74 (1990) (holding that it is the party's right . . .

UNITED STATES v. POPE,, 934 F.3d 770 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dominguez Benitez , 542 U.S. 74, 81-82, 124 S.Ct. 2333, 159 L.Ed.2d 157 (2004) (internal quotation omitted . . .

ARCHER AND WHITE SALES, INCORPORATED, v. HENRY SCHEIN, INCORPORATED L. L. C. L. L. C., 935 F.3d 274 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 460 U.S. 1, 24-25, 103 S.Ct. 927, 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983) ("[A]s a matter of federal law, any doubts . . .

SMITH, OSF v. OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,, 933 F.3d 859 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes of Fort Peck Reservation , 323 F.3d 767, 773-74 (9th Cir. 2003) (denial of . . .

GREYER, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v., 933 F.3d 871 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dotson , 544 U.S. 74, 125 S.Ct. 1242, 161 L.Ed.2d 253 (2005) ; Heck v. . . .

EFFEX CAPITAL, LLC, v. NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION,, 933 F.3d 882 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . No. 74-675, 49 Stat. 1491, 1491 (1936). . . . Meyer , 510 U.S. 471, 473-74, 114 S.Ct. 996, 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994) ; a procedural due process suit against . . .

OWNER OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC. L. B. L. LLC G. v. PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION S. PTC K. PTC T. PTC T. Sr. PTC N. PTC P. PTC R. PTC s, 934 F.3d 283 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Trust Fund, which are, in turn, transferred to four different programs: (1) operating programs under 74 . . . maintenance costs and expenses for public passenger transport; (2) the multimodal transportation fund under 74 . . . freight and passenger rail, and port and waterway projects; (3) the asset improvement program under 74 . . . improvement, replacement, or expansion of capital projects; and (4) programs of statewide significance under 74 . . .

M. RODEN, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 548 (S.D. Ohio 2019)

. . . PageID 74-107. . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, INC. v. MANGAN, G. J., 933 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Swanson , 692 F.3d at 873-74 ; Tooker , 717 F.3d at 596-98. . . . Swanson , 692 F.3d 864, 873-74 (8th Cir. 2012) (en banc) (enjoining Minnesota's reporting requirements . . .

MTD PRODUCTS INC. v. IANCU,, 933 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 1373-74. In contrast, in Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. v. . . .

LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DEERFIELD CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. J., 933 F.3d 806 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 243 F.3d 369, 373-74 (7th Cir. 2001). . . .

HARDEMAN, v. CURRAN,, 933 F.3d 816 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 2473-74. . . . Ct. at 2473-74. . . .

NAUMOVSKI, v. NORRIS, 934 F.3d 200 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Empress Ambulance Serv., Inc. , 835 F.3d 267, 273-74 (2d Cir. 2016) ("Congress has directed federal courts . . .

BASTARDO- VALE, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES, 934 F.3d 255 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Kirby , 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 482, 486-87, 19 L.Ed. 278 (1868). See also Encompass Ins. Co. v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. MCCALL, a k a, 934 F.3d 380 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . McGee , 736 F.3d 263, 273-74 (4th Cir. 2013) (finding reasonable under the circumstances the court's . . .

UNITED STATES v. JONES,, 935 F.3d 266 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dominguez Benitez , 542 U.S. 74, 76, 124 S.Ct. 2333, 159 L.Ed.2d 157 (2004) ). . . .

IN RE PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION Ad v. N. A. LP LP LP LLC FSB, 933 F.3d 918 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . P'ship, 507 U.S. 380, 387 n.3, 394, 113 S.Ct. 1489, 123 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993) ; see also In re Andreuccetti . . .

UNITED STATES v. NG LAP SENG, Ng, Ng W. C., 934 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Robinson , 663 F.3d 265, 273-74 (7th Cir. 2011) (holding that "broad language" of § 666 reaches bribery . . .

H. BURTON, v. KOHN LAW FIRM, S. C., 934 F.3d 572 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Sinclair , 74 F.3d 753, 759 (7th Cir. 1996) (interpreting predecessor to Rule 807 ). . . .

UNITED STATES v. TREVINO,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 901 (W.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . App. 2d 559, 568, 20 P.3d 74 (Kan. Ct. . . .

J. AVENA, v. CHAPPELL,, 932 F.3d 1237 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cal.Rptr.2d 413, 909 P.2d at 1045-73 (Mosk, J., dissenting); id. , 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 413, 909 P.2d at 1073-74 . . .

E. ANDREWS, v. SIRIUS XM RADIO INC., 932 F.3d 1253 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . EquipmentFacts, LLC , 774 F.3d 1065, 1073-74 (6th Cir. 2014) ("[T]he plain language of the [CFAA] treats . . .

AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, N. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 932 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Educ. , 302 U.S. 74, 79, 58 S.Ct. 98, 82 L.Ed. 57 (1937) ). . . .

PILLAR DYNASTY LLC, v. NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., 933 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . 700 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) ("Such an inference is equally permissible in bench trials."), aff'd , 833 F.3d 74 . . . UHS of Delaware, Inc. , 631 F.3d 464, 473-74 (8th Cir. 2011) ("Where the jury disgorges profits to remedy . . .

BOUCHER, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,, 934 F.3d 530 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corps Manual at 73-74; Corps Supplement at 100 ("Atypical situations are wetlands in which vegetation . . . Corps Manual at 74-75. . . .

A. LAVITE, v. J. DUNSTAN,, 932 F.3d 1020 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Perry Local Educators' Ass'n , 460 U.S. 37, 45-46, 103 S.Ct. 948, 74 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983). . . .

WINDRIDGE OF NAPERVILLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 932 F.3d 1035 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Doc. 74 at ¶¶ 14-17; Doc. 77 at ¶¶ 7-12. . . .

CHAVEZ, De E. De De De v. OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a, 933 F.3d 186 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 556, 568-74 (E.D. La. 2012). . . .

O NEAL, v. BALCARCEL,, 933 F.3d 618 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . R. 14-2 (Trial Tr. at 74) (Page ID #598). . . . United States , 358 U.S. 74, 80, 79 S.Ct. 136, 3 L.Ed.2d 125 (1958) (declining to find an error harmless . . .

LOCAL COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL- CIO v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 392 F. Supp. 3d 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Co. , 369 F.3d 34, 74 (2d Cir. 2004) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). . . . AGS Computers, Inc. , 74 N.Y.2d 487, 492, 549 N.Y.S.2d 365, 548 N.E.2d 903 (1989). . . . Co., 369 F.3d at 74 (citations omitted). . . . See Hooper Assocs. , Ltd. , 74 N.Y.2d at 492, 549 N.Y.S.2d 365, 548 N.E.2d 903. . . .

KORTRIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, TY v. INVESTCORP INVESTMENT ADVISERS LIMITED,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . (Trial Tr. at 73-74 (Taylor).) . . .

C. S. MCCROSSAN INC. v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 932 F.3d 1142 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 136 F.3d 71, 74 (1st Cir. 1998) (consulting Black's Law Dictionary and Webster's Third New International . . . representative' did not include employees and officers of the authorized company."); Stop & Shop , 136 F.3d at 74 . . .

MALDONADO L. Jr. v. RODRIGUEZ, Jr., 932 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . County , 723 F.3d 586, 591-92 (5th Cir. 2013) ; Gentry , 337 F.3d at 485-86 ; Aucoin , 306 F.3d at 273-74 . . . See Gunaca , 65 F.3d at 473-74 (in "first determin[ing] whether Gunaca has alleged a violation of a constitutional . . .

PALIN, v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY,, 933 F.3d 160 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Behar, , 173-74 (2d Cir. 2001) (quoting New York Times Co. v. . . . See Behar, 238 F.3d at 173-74 (actual malice satisfied upon a showing the statement was made "with reckless . . .

MORALES- MORALES, v. P. BARR, U. S., 933 F.3d 456 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Trominski , 210 F.3d 470, 473-74 (5th Cir. 2000). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARMAN,, 933 F.3d 614 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co ., 459 U.S. 56, 58, 103 S.Ct. 400, 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982) (per curiam). . . .

IN RE GOOGLE INC. COOKIE PLACEMENT CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION H., 934 F.3d 316 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . did so, following our decision in In re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy Litigation , 827 F.3d 262, 273-74 . . . Id. at 273-74. . . . Id. at 173-74. . . .

GONZALEZ- DE LEON, v. P. BARR,, 932 F.3d 489 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder , 724 F.3d 667, 673-74 (6th Cir. 2013). . . .

CANT v. M. MOODY S. S., 933 F.3d 414 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Alexandria Women's Health Clinic , 506 U.S. 263, 269-74, 113 S.Ct. 753, 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993) ; Scott . . . Malesko , 534 U.S. 61, 74, 122 S.Ct. 515, 151 L.Ed.2d 456 (2001) (rejecting Bivens action-against private . . .

ADI WORLDLINK, L. L. C. v. RSUI INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 932 F.3d 369 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Maj. at 370, 373-74. . . .

GGNSC LOUISVILLE HILLCREEK, LLC GGNSC LLC GGNSC LLC, v. ESTATE OF C. BRAMER, BY AND THROUGH A. BRAMER, A., 932 F.3d 480 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corp. , 460 U.S. 1, 24-25, 103 S.Ct. 927, 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983). . . .

SPORTFUEL, INC. v. PEPSICO, INC., 932 F.3d 589 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . CAE, Inc. , 267 F.3d at 673-74. . . .

ASSOCIATION OF EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS AGCO CNH LLC v. BURGUM, s, 932 F.3d 727 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Power & Light Co., 459 U.S. 400, 411, 103 S.Ct. 697, 74 L.Ed.2d 569 (1983) ; Equip. Mfrs. . . . Power & Light Co. , 459 U.S. 400, 411-12, 103 S.Ct. 697, 74 L.Ed.2d 569 (1983) ). . . .

VIRNETX INC. v. APPLE INC., 931 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Op. 1373-74. . . .

SILVERTOP ASSOCIATES INC. v. KANGAROO MANUFACTURING INC., 931 F.3d 215 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Stein , 347 U.S. 201, 217, 74 S.Ct. 460, 98 L.Ed. 630 (1954) ). . . . Id. at 1011 (citing 347 U.S. at 214, 218-19, 74 S.Ct. 460 ). . . .

DIALYSIS ACCESS CENTER, LLC Tr M. D. v. RMS LIFELINE, INC., 932 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Dialysis I, 638 F.3d at 373-74. . . .

PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. BEACH MART, INC. L L, 932 F.3d 268 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Co. , 388 F.3d 1069, 1073-74 (7th Cir. 2004) (recognizing that the "duty to defend is determined by what . . .

HENDRICKSON USA, LLC. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 932 F.3d 465 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Op. at 473-74.) . . .

ORDUNO, v. PIETRZAK, v., 932 F.3d 710 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Hydrolevel , 456 U.S. at 570-74, 102 S.Ct. 1935 (addressing civil liability under the Sherman Act . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOSYK,, 933 F.3d 319 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Compare J.A. 74-79 (probable cause to search home months after IP address accessed link posted on Bulletin . . . . § 7109, at 74-87 (emphasis added); see also McQueeney v. . . .