Cases from cite.case.law:

FLORIDA BANKERS ASSOCIATION, v. FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION, v., 176 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. 2015)

. . . Section 75.01, Florida Statutes (2014), confers jurisdiction on the circuit courts to determine the validity . . .

DeCASTRO DJJ- v. KAVADIA, 309 F.R.D. 167 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Sand et at., 4-75 Modem-Federal Jury Instructions-Civil, ¶ 75.01 (2015). . . . Sand et al., ¶ 75.01 (comment to instruction 75-7 (citing, inter alia, Zimmermann v. Assocs. . . .

R. WOOLBRIGHT, v. CREWS,, 791 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . P. 75.01. . . .

SMITH, v. TOBON, N. Y., 529 F. App'x 36 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 75.01 (2013). We therefore conclude that the instruction was adequate. . . .

MALI, J. v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 720 F.3d 387 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . Sand, et al., 4 Modern Federal Jury Instructions-Civil ¶ 75.01 (jury instruction explaining the concept . . .

P. DONOVAN, v. OKALOOSA COUNTY,, 82 So. 3d 801 (Fla. 2012)

. . . See § 75.01 (“Circuit courts have jurisdiction to determine the validation of bonds and certificates . . .

ZHI CHEN, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, v., 839 F. Supp. 2d 7 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . Modern Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 75.01 (2007) (Instruction 75-7: Party’s Failure to Produce Evidence . . .

In J. HENNEY, v., 451 B.R. 724 (W.D. Mich. 2011)

. . . Rather, the state trial court gave only the Model Civil Jury Instructions 75.01, 75.02 and 75.11, which . . .

UNITED STATES v. LAURENT,, 607 F.3d 895 (1st Cir. 2010)

. . . Sand et al., Modem Federal Jury Instructions § 75.01 (instruction 75-7), at 75-16 to -18 (2010). . . . Id., § 75.01, at 75-18; United States v. Lopez-Lopez, 282 F.3d 1, 18 (1st Cir.) . . . support the logical inference that the evidence was favorable to the defendant. 4 Sand et al., supra, § 75.01 . . .

PENSION COMMITTEE OF UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL PENSION PLAN, v. BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES, LLC, N. V. W. Jr., 685 F. Supp. 2d 456 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . Sand, et al., 4 Modern Federal Jury Instructions-Civil ¶ 75.01. .See Residential Funding, 306 F.3d at . . .

v., 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 902 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . Presumably, this view is based on Explanatory Note 75.01, which describes intermediate products of nickel . . . Organization, Harmonized Commodity Description & Coding System Explanatory Notes, Explanatory Note 75.01 . . . product at issue is not an intermediate product of metallurgy, even provided that Explanatory Note 75.01 . . .

METCHEM, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 441 F. Supp. 2d 1269 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . Presumably, this view is based on Explanatory Note 75.01, which describes intermediate products of nickel . . . Organization, Harmonized Commodity Description & Coding System Explanatory Notes, Explanatory Note 75.01 . . . product at issue is not an intermediate product of metallurgy, even provided that Explanatory Note 75.01 . . .

S. MOORE- EL, v. Al LUEBBERS,, 446 F.3d 890 (8th Cir. 2006)

. . . subpoenas, endorsement of witnesses, request to keep the hearing open, and request for relief under Rule 75.01 . . .

SCOTT, v. HOME CHOICE, INC. d b a, 316 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (D. Kan. 2004)

. . . Rule 75.01. . . .

GEORGIA, v. ASHCROFT,, 195 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . House District 95, voters within the proposed district also supported Michael Thurmond at a rate of 75.01% . . .

QUEENIE, LTD. v. NYGARD INTERNATIONAL, Co. Co. v., 204 F. Supp. 2d 601 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Sand, et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions § 75.01, Instructions 75-3 and 75-4 (jury instructions . . .

KEYS CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT, INC. v. FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY,, 795 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 2001)

. . . proceedings through reliance on the phrase “all matters connected therewith” contained within section 75.01 . . . Section 75.01, Florida Statutes (2000), vests the circuit courts with “jurisdiction to determine the . . .

CITY OF OLDSMAR, v. STATE, 790 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 2001)

. . . Section 75.01, Florida Statutes (2000), sets forth that “[c]ircuit courts have jurisdiction to determine . . .

OVERTON, v. NEWTON,, 146 F. Supp. 2d 267 (E.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . Sand, et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 75.01 (1998) (jurors are charged that “[i]n drawing . . .

INTERNATIONAL STAR CLASS YACHT RACING ASSOCIATION, v. TOMMY HILFIGER U. S. A. INC., 959 F. Supp. 623 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Sand at at, Modem Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 75.01 (Instruction 75-3) (1996). . . .

FARR, v. DESIGNER PHOSPHATE AND PREMIX INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. FARR,, 804 F. Supp. 1190 (D. Neb. 1992)

. . . Charles Blackmar, Michael Wolff, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 75.01 (1987). . . .

WARNER CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. CITY OF NICEVILLE,, 911 F.2d 634 (11th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 75.01 et seq. (1989) (statutory mechanism for court approval of municipal bond financing). . . .

In A. LEWIS a k a a k a, 89 B.R. 430 (E.D. Pa. 1988)

. . . Aaron, Bankruptcy Law Fundamentals § 13.03[1] (1987); 3 Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 75.01, at . . .

In A. LEWIS a k a a k a, 85 B.R. 719 (E.D. Pa. 1988)

. . . Norton, Jr., Norton Bankruptcy Law and Practice § 75.01, at 3 (1987). . . .

BROWARD COUNTY, STATE, 515 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1987)

. . . . §§ 75.01, 75.02, 75.04, 75.05. . . .

A. M. SEAMON v. UPHAM,, 536 F. Supp. 931 (E.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . and 320.01; and that part of Dallas County included in census tracts 2.01, 71.01, 73.01, 73.02, 74, 75.01 . . .

GREENE, v. SINCLAIR, St. St. St. St. St. a, 491 F. Supp. 19 (W.D. Mich. 1980)

. . . Joseph Solicitation Licensing Law, Chapter 75.01 et seq., St. . . . Joseph Solicitation Licensing Law, Chapter 75.01 et seq., St. Joseph Code of Ordinances. . . . APPENDIX A CHAPTER 75 — MISCELLANEOUS OCCUPATIONS 75.01 Necessity for License to Engage in Certain Businesses . . .

SWOPE, a v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, 445 F. Supp. 1222 (W.D. Mo. 1978)

. . . The Court lost jurisdiction over the judgment thirty days after rendering as per Rule 75.01, Missouri . . .

FIRSTCO, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 430 F. Supp. 1193 (S.D. Miss. 1977)

. . . owned 71.23% of the stock, and that in 1973, the same eleven, being 20% of all the shareholders, owned 75.01% . . .

FAIR, M. S. v. FAIR, 317 F. Supp. 859 (M.D. Fla. 1970)

. . . County Board of Public Instruction filed an action in the State courts pursuant to Florida Statutes § 75.01 . . .

CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND, a v. F. STRONG, 206 So. 2d 269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . We do not believe this was the intended effect of the validation statute, Florida Statute § 75.01 et . . .

J. KEARNEY, v. COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE,, 126 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 1961)

. . . The only statute relating to the rate of interest such certificates must bear is § 75.01, Florida Statutes . . .

B. STEWART, v. CITY OF DE LAND,, 75 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 1954)

. . . . § 75.01, and has no specification as to whether the proceeding should be brought “in law” or “in chancery . . .

R. D. v. v. R. D. v., 4 T.C. 955 (T.C. 1945)

. . . the amount of $4,099.32 in income tax for the calendar year 1936, and a deficiency in the amount of $75.01 . . .

STATE OF FLORIDA THE TAXPAYERS, PROPERTY OWNERS CITIZENS OF SAID CITY OF SARASOTA, INCLUDING NON- RESIDENTS, OWNING PROPERTY OR SUBJECT TO TAXATION THEREIN, v. CITY OF SARASOTA, a, 154 Fla. 250 (Fla. 1944)

. . . The first section of the validating statute, Section 75.01 confers power and jurisdiction on the circuit . . . days later he could not then proceed to enter such an order, in spite of the broad language of Section 75.01 . . .

Co. v. Co., 20 F. 232 (C.C.D. Ind. 1884)

. . . the 26th, exonerating themselves of all blame; and on the 28th wrote again, inclosing a draft for $75.01 . . . “Your favor of twenty-eighth inst. received, inclosing check in payment of premium on paper-mill, $75.01 . . .