Florida Statute 75.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 75
BOND VALIDATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 75.09

75.09 Effect of final judgment.—If the judgment validates such bonds, certificates or other obligations, which may include the validation of the county, municipality, taxing district, political district, subdivision, agency, instrumentality or other public body itself and any taxes, assessments or revenues affected, and no appeal is taken within the time prescribed, or if taken and the judgment is affirmed, such judgment is forever conclusive as to all matters adjudicated against plaintiff and all parties affected thereby, including all property owners, taxpayers and citizens of the plaintiff, and all others having or claiming any right, title or interest in property to be affected by the issuance of said bonds, certificates or other obligations, or to be affected in any way thereby, and the validity of said bonds, certificates or other obligations or of any taxes, assessments or revenues pledged for the payment thereof, or of the proceedings authorizing the issuance thereof, including any remedies provided for their collection, shall never be called in question in any court by any person or party.

History.—s. 4, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3299; s. 4, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5109, 5126; s. 1, ch. 29691, 1955; s. 9, ch. 57-1; s. 25, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 75.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 75.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 75.09

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 75.09

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 75.09.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 75.09

Total Results: 20

Haslauer v. Haslauer

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-06T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: the county where the property is located”); § 61.075(9), Fla. Stat. (requiring trial court to “consider

CHRISTOPHER TAVARIS DEAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-04-08T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: fifteen (15) years on Count 2 were mandatory. § 775.075(9)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004). As noted above, the

WILLIAM DAVID FITTS v. BILL FURST, PROPERTY APPRAISER

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-09-13T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: exemption on property in this state. Cf. § 196.075(9); see generally Miles v. Parrish, 199 So. 3d 1046

RAMESH GUDUR v. KAVITHA GUDUR

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-06-28T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: type and amount of alimony to award. See § 61.075(9) (requiring that the trial court first make its

Morgan v. Morgan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-01-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 213 So. 3d 378

Snippet: whether a judgment for alimony shall be made,” § 61.075(9), Fla. Stat. (2015). Here, the former wife waived

Buckalew v. Buckalew

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-07-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 197 So. 3d 148

Snippet: (“As this court and Florida Statute section 61.075(9) make clear, a ‘trial court is first to do the equitable

Byron Dames v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-02-24T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 186 So. 3d 593

Snippet: entered an open plea to the court. He was sentenced to 75.9 months in prison, the lowest permissible prison

West Brook Isles Partner's 1, LLC v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-04-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 163 So. 3d 635

Snippet: 37 (Fla.1976), superseded by statute, ch. 75-9, § 7, at 20-21, Laws of Fla., on other grounds as

Goodman v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-06-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 117 So. 3d 32

Snippet: 2012 and he was sentenced immediately thereafter to 75.9 months in prison. II. A. Our analysis begins with

Roth v. Cortina

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-03-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 59 So. 3d 163

Snippet: reversed. As this court and Florida Statute section 61.075(9) make clear, a "trial court is first to do

Todd v. Johnson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-09-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 965 So. 2d 255

Snippet: So.2d 25 (Fla.1976), superseded by statute, Ch. 75-9, § 7, at 20-21, Laws of Fla. See Nehme, 863 So.2d

Romero v. Romero

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-05-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 959 So. 2d 333

Snippet: received that value either outright or in kind.4 § 61.075(9), Fla. Stat. The trial court accepted the Former

University of Miami v. Wilson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-02-27T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 948 So. 2d 774

Snippet: emphasized language had only recently been added. See Ch. 75-9, ง 7, Laws of Fla. The Florida Supreme Court was

Bambu v. EI Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-05-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 881 So. 2d 565

Snippet: in its Benlate tests (Plaintiffs' Exhibit 75); (9) a nationally covered press conference conducted

Levy v. Levy

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-10-01T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 862 So. 2d 48

Snippet: to balance the equitable distribution. See § 61.075(9), Fla. Stat. (2000); Canakaris, 382 So.2d at 1203

Nehme v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2003-09-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 863 So. 2d 201

Snippet: That language was not included until 1975. See ch. 75-9 § 7, Laws of Fla. Instead, Nardone discussed and

Board of Trustees of Orlando Police Pension Plan v. Langford

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-12-19T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 833 So. 2d 230

Snippet: who does under equitable circumstances. See § 61.075(9), Fla. Stat. In my view, the purpose of similar

City of Oldsmar v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2001-07-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 790 So. 2d 1042

Snippet: are to bear." (Emphasis supplied.) Section 75.09, Florida Statutes (2000), provides that the final

KEY CITIZENS FOR GOV., INC. v. Florida Keys Aqueduct Auth.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2001-07-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 795 So. 2d 940

Snippet: which is the crux of the instant appeal. Section 75.09, Florida Statutes (2000), provides that the final…necessarily foreclose any further challenges. See § 75.09, Fla. Stat. (2000) (explaining effect of final judgment…necessarily foreclose any further challenges. See § 75.09, Fla. Stat. (2000) (explaining effect of final judgment

Beers v. Beers

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-10-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 724 So. 2d 109

Snippet: alimony. We disagree. Pursuant to subsection 61.075(9), Florida Statutes (1997), a trial court, in order