Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 75 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 75 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 75

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 75
BOND VALIDATION
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 75
CHAPTER 75
BOND VALIDATION
75.01 Jurisdiction.
75.02 Plaintiff.
75.03 Condition precedent.
75.04 Complaint.
75.05 Order and service.
75.06 Publication of notice.
75.07 Intervention; hearings.
75.08 Appeal and review.
75.09 Effect of final judgment.
75.10 Recording of judgment in other counties.
75.11 Stamping instruments validated.
75.12 Payment of costs.
75.13 Certain prior proceedings validated.
75.14 Landowner or taxpayer not disqualification of judge.
75.16 Certain orders and decrees validated.
75.17 Commencement of action after validation; affidavit of good faith.
75.01 Jurisdiction.Circuit courts have jurisdiction to determine the validation of bonds and certificates of indebtedness and all matters connected therewith.
History.s. 25, ch. 67-254.
75.02 Plaintiff.Any county, municipality, taxing district or other political district or subdivision of this state, including the governing body of any drainage, conservation or reclamation district, and including also state agencies, commissions and departments authorized by law to issue bonds, may determine its authority to incur bonded debt or issue certificates of debt and the legality of all proceedings in connection therewith, including assessment of taxes levied or to be levied, the lien thereof and proceedings or other remedies for their collection. For this purpose a complaint shall be filed in the circuit court in the county or in the county where the municipality or district, or any part thereof, is located against the state and the taxpayers, property owners, and citizens of the county, municipality or district, including nonresidents owning property or subject to taxation therein. In actions to validate bonds or certificates of debt issued by state agencies, commissions or departments, the complaint shall be filed in the circuit court of the county where the proceeds of the bond issue are to be expended, or where the seat of state government is situated, and shall be brought against the state and the taxpayers, property owners and citizens thereof, including nonresidents owning property or subject to taxation therein.
History.s. 1, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3296; s. 1, ch. 10036, 1925; s. 1, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5106, 5113, 5123; s. 1, ch. 25263, 1949; s. 25, ch. 67-254.
75.03 Condition precedent.As a condition precedent to filing of a complaint for the validation of bonds or certificates of debt, the county, municipality, state agency, commission or department, or district desiring to issue them shall cause an election to be held to authorize the issuance of such bonds or certificates and show prima facie that the election was in favor of the issuance thereof, or, when permitted by law, adopt an ordinance, resolution or other proceeding providing for the issuance of such bonds or certificates in accordance with law.
History.s. 1, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3296; CGL 5106; s. 2, ch. 25263, 1949; s. 25, ch. 67-254.
75.04 Complaint.
(1) The complaint shall set out the plaintiff’s authority for incurring the bonded debt or issuing certificates of debt, the holding of an election and the result when an election is required, the ordinance, resolution, or other proceeding authorizing the issue and its adoption, all other essential proceedings had or taken in connection therewith, the amount of the bonds or certificates to be issued and the interest they are to bear; and, in case of a drainage, conservation, or reclamation district, the authority for the creation of such district, for the issuance of bonds, for the levy and assessment of taxes and all other pertinent matters.
(2) In the case of an independent special district as defined in s. 218.31(7), the complaint shall allege the creation of a trust indenture established by the petitioner for a bonded trustee acceptable to the court who shall certify the proper expenditure of the proceeds of the bonds.
History.s. 2, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3297; s. 2, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5107, 5123, 5124; s. 1, ch. 14504, 1929; s. 25, ch. 67-254; s. 13, ch. 80-281.
75.05 Order and service.
(1) The court shall issue an order directed against the state and the several property owners, taxpayers, citizens and others having or claiming any right, title or interest in property to be affected by the issuance of bonds or certificates, or to be affected thereby, requiring all persons, in general terms and without naming them and the state through its state attorney or attorneys of the circuits where the county, municipality or district lies, to appear at a designated time and place within the circuit where the complaint is filed and show why the complaint should not be granted and the proceedings and bonds or certificates validated. A copy of the complaint and order shall be served on the state attorney of the circuit in which such proceedings are pending, and when the municipality or district lies in more than one judicial circuit, on the state attorney of each of the circuits at least 20 days before the time fixed for hearing. The state attorney shall examine the complaint, and, if it appears or there is reason to believe that it is defective, insufficient, or untrue, or if in the opinion of the state attorney the issuance of the bonds or certificates in question has not been duly authorized, defense shall be made by said state attorney. The state attorney shall have access, for the purposes aforesaid, to all records and proceedings of the county, municipality, state agency, commission or department, or district, and any officer, agent or employee having charge, possession, or control of any of the books, papers, or records of the county, municipality, state agency, commission, department, or district shall exhibit them for examination on demand of the state attorney, and shall furnish, without cost, duly authenticated copies thereof which pertain to the proceedings for the issuance of the bonds or certificates or which may affect their legality.
(2) In the case of state agencies, commissions, or departments, a copy of the complaint and order shall be served on the state attorney of the circuit in which the action is pending and if pending in a county when the proceeds of the bond issue are to be expended in any other county, on the state attorney of each county in which it is proposed to expend the proceeds.
(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, whether a general law or special act, validation of bonds to be issued by a special district, other than a community development district established pursuant to chapter 190, as provided in s. 190.016(12), is not mandatory, but is at the option of the issuer. However, the validation of bonds issued by such community development districts shall not be required on refunding issues.
History.s. 2, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3297; s. 2, ch. 10036, 1925; s. 2, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5107, 5114, 5124; s. 1, ch. 14504, 1929; s. 1, ch. 22623, 1945; s. 3, ch. 25263, 1949; s. 25, ch. 67-254; s. 11, ch. 79-183; s. 32, ch. 89-169; s. 1, ch. 91-308; s. 141, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 5, ch. 2004-305.
75.06 Publication of notice.
(1) Before the date set for hearing, the clerk shall publish a copy of the order in the county where the complaint is filed, and if plaintiff is a municipality or district in more than one county, then in each county, at least once each week for 2 consecutive weeks, commencing with the first publication, which shall not be less than 20 days before the date set for hearing but if there is a newspaper published in the territory to be affected by the issuance of the bonds or certificates, and in the county or counties the publication shall be therein unless otherwise ordered by the court. By this publication all property owners, taxpayers, citizens, and others having or claiming any right, title or interest in the county, municipality or district, or the taxable property therein, are made parties defendant to the action and the court has jurisdiction of them to the same extent as if named as defendants in the complaint and personally served with process.
(2) In actions to validate the bonds of state agencies, commissions or departments, the order shall be published in the same manner in a newspaper in each of the counties where the proceeds of bonds are to be expended, and in a newspaper published in the county in which the seat of state government is located if the action is brought therein.
History.s. 2, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3297; s. 3, ch. 10036, 1925; s. 2, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5107, 5115, 5124; s. 1, ch. 14504, 1929; s. 1, ch. 22633, 1945; s. 4, ch. 25263, 1949; s. 25, ch. 67-254; s. 3, ch. 90-279.
75.07 Intervention; hearings.Any property owner, taxpayer, citizen or person interested may become a party to the action by moving against or pleading to the complaint at or before the time set for hearing. At the hearing the court shall determine all questions of law and fact and make such orders as will enable it to properly try and determine the action and render a final judgment with the least possible delay.
History.s. 3, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3298; s. 1, ch. 11854; s. 3, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5108, 5125; s. 25, ch. 67-254.
75.08 Appeal and review.Any party to the action whether plaintiff, defendant, intervenor or otherwise, dissatisfied with the final judgment, may appeal to the Supreme Court within the time and in the manner prescribed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
History.s. 3, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3298; s. 1, ch. 11854, s. 3, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5108, 5125; s. 10, ch. 63-559; s. 25, ch. 67-254.
75.09 Effect of final judgment.If the judgment validates such bonds, certificates or other obligations, which may include the validation of the county, municipality, taxing district, political district, subdivision, agency, instrumentality or other public body itself and any taxes, assessments or revenues affected, and no appeal is taken within the time prescribed, or if taken and the judgment is affirmed, such judgment is forever conclusive as to all matters adjudicated against plaintiff and all parties affected thereby, including all property owners, taxpayers and citizens of the plaintiff, and all others having or claiming any right, title or interest in property to be affected by the issuance of said bonds, certificates or other obligations, or to be affected in any way thereby, and the validity of said bonds, certificates or other obligations or of any taxes, assessments or revenues pledged for the payment thereof, or of the proceedings authorizing the issuance thereof, including any remedies provided for their collection, shall never be called in question in any court by any person or party.
History.s. 4, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3299; s. 4, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5109, 5126; s. 1, ch. 29691, 1955; s. 9, ch. 57-1; s. 25, ch. 67-254.
75.10 Recording of judgment in other counties.If any judgment extends into more than one county it shall be recorded in each county in which the plaintiff municipality or district extends.
History.s. 4, ch. 10036, 1925; CGL 5116; s. 25, ch. 67-254.
75.11 Stamping instruments validated.
(1) Bonds or certificates, when validated under this chapter, shall have stamped or written thereon, by the proper officers of such county, municipality or district issuing them, a statement in substantially the following form:

“This bond is one of a series of bonds which were validated by judgment of the Circuit Court for   County, rendered on  ,   (year)  .”

(2) A certified copy of the judgment or decree shall be received as evidence in any court in this state.
History.s. 5, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3300; s. 5, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5110, 5127; s. 1, ch. 57-300; s. 25, ch. 67-254; s. 4, ch. 99-6.
75.12 Payment of costs.The costs shall be paid by the county, municipality, or district filing the complaint except when a taxpayer, citizen, or other person contests the action or intervenes, the court may tax the whole or any part of the costs against him or her as is equitable.
History.s. 6, ch. 6868, 1915; RGS 3301; s. 6, ch. 12003, 1927; CGL 5111, 5128; s. 25, ch. 67-254; s. 367, ch. 95-147.
75.13 Certain prior proceedings validated.Any action for validation heretofore brought by any municipality, special taxing district or political district or subdivision which extends into more than one county or judicial circuit, whereby bonds or certificates of debt have been validated in which the proceedings have been brought in one county and a decree has been entered, said decree shall be binding on all of the citizens, property owners, or taxpayers of each municipality, district or subdivision.
History.s. 5, ch. 10036, 1925; CGL 5117; s. 25, ch. 67-254.
75.14 Landowner or taxpayer not disqualification of judge.No judge shall be disqualified in any validation action because the judge is a landowner or taxpayer of any county, municipality, or district seeking relief hereunder.
History.s. 1, ch. 10164; 1925; CGL 5118; s. 25, ch. 67-254; s. 368, ch. 95-147.
75.16 Certain orders and decrees validated.All orders, decrees, and judgments heretofore or hereafter made in actions for the validation of bonds or certificates of indebtedness by any judge disqualified by matters not apparent on the record are valid and binding on all parties unless attacked within 20 days of the entry thereof; and all orders, decrees, and judgments heretofore made in such validation actions by judges other than the regular judge or those mentioned or designated in the notices, or at places other than, or dates subsequent to, those mentioned in said notices, when it appears that the regular judge was disqualified, absent, or disabled from discharging the duties of his or her office, are hereby ratified.
History.s. 3, ch. 10164, 1925; s. 2, ch. 12066, 1927; CGL 5120, 5122; s. 25, ch. 67-254; s. 369, ch. 95-147.
75.17 Commencement of action after validation; affidavit of good faith.Every person who commences an action as taxpayer or otherwise to challenge the validity of any bonds or certificates or to prevent the use of any moneys derived from the sale of the bonds or certificates after the bonds or certificates have been validated by courts of competent jurisdiction pursuant to this chapter, shall file an affidavit of good faith stating that the action is not filed for delay and setting forth with particularity why the objection was not made as part of the validation action.
History.s. 1, ch. 61-508; s. 25, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 75 on Google Scholar

F.S. 75 on Casetext

Amendments to 75


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 75
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S372.75 - CONSERVATION - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 6409 - M: S
S372.75 - CONSERVATION - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 6408 - M: F
S376.75 2 - CONSERVATION-ENVIRONMENT - FAIL REGISTER AS SELLER USER PERCHLOROETHYLENE - M: F
S499.75 1 - DRUGS-HEALTH OR SAFETY - MANUFACTURE ETHER WO VALID LIC - F: S
S499.75 2 - DRUGS-HEALTH OR SAFETY - PURCHASE ETHER WITHOUT VALID PERMIT - F: T
S499.75 3 - FRAUD - PRESENT FALSE APPLICATION DRUG COSMETIC LIC - M: F
S499.75 4 - DRUGS-HEALTH OR SAFETY - POSSESS ETHER WITHOUT VALID PERMIT OR LICENSE - F: T
S499.75 5 - DRUGS-HEALTH OR SAFETY - SELL ETHER TO NON LICENSED PERSON - F: T
S499.75 6 - FRAUD-FALSE STATEMENT - FALSE ENTRY ON ETHER SALES TICKET - M: F
S499.75 7 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL TO MAINTAIN REQUIRED WRITTEN INVENTORY - M: F
S499.75 8 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL TO MAINTAIN REQUIRED WRITTEN RECORDS - M: F
S499.75 9 - PUBLIC ORDER CRIMES - FAIL TO REPORT SHORTAGE OR THEFT OF ETHER - M: F
S499.75 10 - HEALTH-SAFETY - POSS ETHER NEAR RESIDENTIAL HOUSING STRUCTURE - F: S
S601.75 - HEALTH-SAFETY - DELETE INFRACTION - I: N



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id., at 74-75, 135 S.Ct. 1225. . . . Id. , at 75, 135 S.Ct. 1225. . . . United States , 349 U.S. 155, 75 S.Ct. 668, 99 L.Ed. 964 (1955) (Self-Incrimination Clause); see also . . . United States , 349 U.S. 155, 161, 75 S.Ct. 668, 99 L.Ed. 964 (1955) ; it must "concern[ ] a subject . . . Quinn , 349 U.S. at 161, 75 S.Ct. 668. . . .

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . upon examination that they are competent for a necessary part of them"); In re Neagle , 135 U.S. 1, 75 . . . California , 283 U.S. 423, 451, 51 S.Ct. 522, 75 L.Ed. 1154 (1931) ("The United States may perform its . . .

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . App. 23, 75. As a result, she was her students' religion teacher. Morrissey-Berru earned a B. . . . App. 73-75. Each year, Morrissey-Berru signed an employment contract with the school. . . . App. 75. When teaching religion, Morrissey-Berru followed the contents of a preselected workbook. . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . relevant IFR, promulgated in July 2010, primarily focused on implementing other aspects of § 300gg-13. 75 . . . See, e.g. , 75 Fed. . . .

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, v. BOOKING. COM B. V., 140 S. Ct. 2298 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See In re The Computer Store, Inc. , 211 U.S.P.Q. 72, 74-75 (TTAB 1981). . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Lee Optical of Okla., Inc. , 348 U.S. 483, 488, 75 S.Ct. 461, 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955). . . . proceeded in "good faith" based on a declaration and the transcript of a deposition. 250 F.Supp.3d at 75 . . . See 250 F.Supp.3d at 75-76. . . . Parker , 348 U.S. 26, 32, 75 S.Ct. 98, 99 L.Ed. 27 (1954). . . . Brief for Respondent 75. . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . CFPB , 881 F.3d 75 (2018), which had rejected a challenge similar to the one presented here. 923 F.3d . . . CFPB , 881 F.3d 75, 165 (C.A.D.C. 2018) (Kavanaugh, J., dissenting). . . . No. 95-91, vol. 5, p. 75 (1977). . . . The President in Administrative Law, 75 Geo. Wash. L. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . , 337, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001) (Scalia, J., dissenting); Ex parte Bollman , 4 Cranch 75 . . . , 94, 8 U.S. 75, 2 L.Ed. 554 (1807). . . . See Ex parte Bollman , 4 Cranch 75, 125, 8 U.S. 75, 2 L.Ed. 554 (1807) (taking testimony in conjunction . . . See also Ex parte Bollman , 4 Cranch 75, 95, 2 L.Ed. 554 (1807). We do not revisit that question. . . . Pedreiro , 349 U.S. 48, 51-52, 75 S.Ct. 591, 99 L.Ed. 868 (1955) (interpreting 1952 Immigration and Nationality . . .

C. LIU, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Malesko , 534 U.S. 61, 75, 122 S.Ct. 515, 151 L.Ed.2d 456 (2001) (Scalia, J., concurring). . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 283 U.S. 25, 26, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931). . . . Reed , 404 U.S. 71, 75-77, 92 S.Ct. 251, 30 L.Ed.2d 225 (1971). . . . Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. , 523 U.S. 75, 79, 118 S.Ct. 998, 140 L.Ed.2d 201 (1998). . . . Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. , 523 U.S. 75, 118 S.Ct. 998, 140 L.Ed.2d 201 (1998), a male plaintiff . . . United States , 283 U.S. 25, 26, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931). . . . Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. , 523 U.S. 75, 118 S.Ct. 998, 140 L.Ed.2d 201 (1998). . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . The plan calls for "clearing trees and other vegetation from a 125-foot right of way (reduced to 75 feet . . .

L. BAXTER v. BRACEY,, 140 S. Ct. 1862 (U.S. 2020)

. . . LaHue , 460 U.S. 325, 337, 103 S.Ct. 1108, 75 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983). . . .

ROGERS, v. GREWAL,, 140 S. Ct. 1865 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Rep. 75, 76. . . .

J. THOLE, v. U. S. BANK N. A, 140 S. Ct. 1615 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Record in No. 13-cv-2687 (D Minn.), Doc. 107-1, p. 75. . . . See Record in No. 13-cv-2687, Doc. 107-1, at 75. . . . Document provides petitioners an enforceable residual interest, Record in No. 13-cv-2687, Doc. 107-1, at 75 . . . employer" while the trust exists); see also App. 61; Record in No. 13-cv-2687 (D Minn.), Doc. 107-1, p. 75 . . .

LUCKY BRAND DUNGAREES, INC. v. MARCEL FASHIONS GROUP, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1589 (U.S. 2020)

. . . National Screen Service Corp. , 349 U.S. 322, 327-328, 75 S.Ct. 865, 99 L.Ed. 1122 (1955) (holding that . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . California , 283 U.S. 359, 367, 51 S.Ct. 532, 75 L.Ed. 1117 (1931) ). . . .

BARTON, v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 1442 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Menasche , 348 U.S. 528, 538-539, 75 S.Ct. 513, 99 L.Ed. 615 (1955) ). . . .

ROMAG FASTENERS, INC. v. FOSSIL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1492 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Wade , 461 U.S. 30, 38-51, 103 S.Ct. 1625, 75 L.Ed.2d 632 (1983) ( 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ); Morissette v. . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. A. CHRISTIAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Co. , 349 U.S. 366, 373, 75 S.Ct. 845, 99 L.Ed. 1155 (1955). * * * Section 113 may simply be a piece . . . City of Tarrant , 522 U.S. 75, 81, 118 S.Ct. 481, 139 L.Ed.2d 433 (1997). . . .

BABB, v. WILKIE,, 140 S. Ct. 1168 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 28(b)(2), 88 Stat. 74-75. Instead, the Court principally relies on Texas v. . . .

KANSAS, v. GLOVER, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Royer , 460 U.S. 491, 500, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983) (plurality opinion); Brown v. . . . III-1 (2003) (noting that 75% of drivers with suspended or revoked licenses continue to drive); National . . .

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE,, 140 S. Ct. 1205 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Celebrezze , 460 U.S. 780, 789, 103 S.Ct. 1564, 75 L.Ed.2d 547 (1983). . . .

CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY, v. FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., 140 S. Ct. 1081 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See, e.g. , 30 Williston § 75:30, at 108 (whether an alteration of a contract is material). . . .

COMCAST CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN- OWNED MEDIA,, 140 S. Ct. 1009 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Aikens , 460 U.S. 711, 715-716, 103 S.Ct. 1478, 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). . . .

KANSAS, v. GARCIA v. v., 140 S. Ct. 791 (U.S. 2020)

. . . State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Comm'n , 461 U.S. 190, 203, 103 S.Ct. 1713, 75 L.Ed . . .

GUEDES, v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES,, 140 S. Ct. 789 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Apel , 571 U.S. 359, 369, 134 S.Ct. 1144, 186 L.Ed.2d 75 (2014). . . .

C. HERNANDEZ, v. MESA, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 735 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Harmony , 13 How. 115, 14 L.Ed. 75 (1852) (affirming award in trespass suit brought by U.S. citizen against . . . Malesko , 534 U.S. 61, 75, 122 S.Ct. 515, 151 L.Ed.2d 456 (2001) (Scalia, J., concurring)). . . .

R. ISOM v. ARKANSAS, 140 S. Ct. 342 (U.S. 2019)

. . . In re Murchison , 349 U.S. 133, 138, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955). . . .

NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. E. MANN v. E., 140 S. Ct. 344 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Louisiana , 379 U.S. 64, 74-75, 85 S.Ct. 209, 13 L.Ed.2d 125 (1964) ("[S]peech concerning public affairs . . .

GARNER, v. COLORADO, 140 S. Ct. 448 (U.S. 2019)

. . . COLORADO No. 19-75 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

ELHADY, v. H. KABLE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Lyons , 461 U.S. 95, 102, 103 S.Ct. 1660, 75 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983) ). . . .

REYNA, v. P. BARR,, 935 F.3d 630 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 574-75 (emphases added) (quoting Model Penal Code & Commentaries § 223.6 cmt. 4(a) (Am. . . .

L. SMITH, v. SHARP,, 935 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Atkins, "[i]t is estimated that between 1 and 3 percent of the population has an IQ between 70 and 75 . . . , not even one of Smith's IQ scores falls outside the intellectually disabled range "between 70 and 75 . . . view of the evidence showing Smith's consistent low IQ scores and Atkins' statement that a score of 75 . . . Atkins, 536 U.S. at 316 & 309 n.5, 122 S.Ct. 2242 ("[A]n IQ between 70 and 75 or lower ... is typically . . .

IN RE CORPORATE RESOURCE SERVICES, INC. S. v., 603 B.R. 888 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . He asserts that he has performed approximately 75 valuations for a venture capital firm. . . .

IN RE BOWLES,, 935 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . error of measurement of plus or minus 5 points, which meant that an inmate who scored between 70 and 75 . . . DSM-5), which was published in 2013, to hold that "an individual with an IQ test score between 70 and 75 . . . Ct. at 2245 n.5 ("[B]etween 1 and 3 percent of the population has an IQ between 70 and 75 or lower, which . . .

SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL- DENVER, INC. v. M. AZAR II, U. S., 391 F. Supp. 3d 53 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 63, 67-75 (D.D.C. 2002) ; Cal. Hosp. 90-91 Outpatient Crossover Bad Debts Grp. v. . . . Providers offer services did not permit LTCHs to enroll as Medicaid providers.")), 585-86; H-AR at 174-75 . . .

BOWLES, v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 935 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Lands, 461 U.S. 273, 292, 103 S.Ct. 1811, 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983) ; see also Gonzalez v. . . .

DYROFF, v. ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC., 934 F.3d 1093 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id . at 1174-75. . . .

SEMPLE, a a k a a v. GRISWOLD, Be USA A., 934 F.3d 1134 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Celebrezze , 460 U.S. 780, 103 S.Ct. 1564, 75 L.Ed.2d 547 (1983). . . . Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780, 782, 103 S.Ct. 1564, 75 L.Ed.2d 547 (1983), the Court addressed "whether Ohio's . . .

DIVERSE POWER, INC. v. CITY OF LAGRANGE, GEORGIA,, 934 F.3d 1270 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 31-7-75(4), "is not principally concerned with hospital authorities' ability to acquire multiple . . . So presumably many of the actions taken under § 31-7-75(4) would not relate to hospitals, let alone reduce . . .

STONE, v. TROY CONSTRUCTION, LLC, 935 F.3d 141 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . (App. at 75.) . . .

WOLFINGTON, v. RECONSTRUCTIVE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES II PC, a k a, 935 F.3d 187 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Putnal , 75 F.3d 190, 197 (5th Cir. 1996) ("In effect, the trial court adopted portions of the defendants . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Putnal, 75 F.3d 190 (5th Cir. 1996). . . . Baker, 75 F.3d at 198. . . . Baker , 75 F.3d at 198. Cole's case, in contrast, does not involve a "chaos on the beach" incident. . . . Putnal , 75 F.3d 190, 193 (5th Cir. 1996). Id . Id . at 198. Id . at 193. Id . Id . at 198. Id . . . . Maj. at 453-54 (citing 75 F.3d 190, 193 (5th Cir. 1996) ). That is mistaken. . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Miller , 283 U.S. 96, 100, 51 S.Ct. 392, 75 L.Ed. 861 (1931) ("The [Fourteenth Amendment] guaranty does . . . Lyons , 461 U.S. 95, 109-10, 103 S.Ct. 1660, 75 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983) (recognizing a plaintiff's standing . . . Sprague , 282 U.S. 716, 731, 51 S.Ct. 220, 75 L.Ed. 640 (1931) ). . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wade , 461 U.S. 30, 56, 103 S.Ct. 1625, 75 L.Ed.2d 632 (1983) ; Hardeman v. . . . In In re Murchison , 349 U.S. 133, 134, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942 (1955), the judge acted as a "one-man . . .

UNITED STATES v. BEGAY,, 934 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Walton , 881 F.3d 768, 774-75 (9th Cir. 2018) (declining to conduct a modified categorical analysis because . . . No. 75-785, § 6, 52 Stat. 1250 (1938) (defining "crime of violence" as "murder, manslaughter, rape, mayhem . . .

UNITED STATES v. SHAYOTA, v., 934 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 349 U.S. 155, 161, 75 S.Ct. 668, 99 L.Ed. 964 (1955) (explaining that the privilege against . . .

CHEMEHUEVI INDIAN TRIBE, v. MCMAHON,, 934 F.3d 1076 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . California , 460 U.S. 605, 636 n.26, 103 S.Ct. 1382, 75 L.Ed.2d 318 (1983), for the proposition that . . .

KEARNEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES M. II,, 934 F.3d 812 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . EPA , 886 F.2d 355, 374-75 (D.C. . . .

TURCO v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, NEW JERSEY,, 935 F.3d 155 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . JA 75. JA 64. JA 86. JA 87. JA 88-89. JA 205. JA 145. JA 145. JA 145. JA 146. JA 146. JA 146. . . .

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN, v. PIER IMPORTS, INCORPORATED W. H., 935 F.3d 424 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Pier 1's stock plummeted from $18.57 on April 28, 2014, to $4.75 on December 17, 2015-a drop of almost 75 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CANO,, 934 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Royer , 460 U.S. 491, 500, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983). 2. . . .

ANZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. MUSHKIN, INC., 934 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Mar. 28, 2017), ECF No. 75. . . . June 8, 2018), ECF No. 75. . . . June 8, 2018), ECF No. 75, with Complaint at 6-7, Anza Tech., Inc. v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN,, 935 F.3d 43 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Speenburgh , 990 F.2d 72, 75 (2d Cir. 1993) (uncertainty whether sentencing judge "understood" authority . . .

BOXILL, v. P. O GRADY E. E. T., 935 F.3d 510 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Myers , 461 U.S. 138, 146, 103 S.Ct. 1684, 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). . . .

MENAKER, v. HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY,, 935 F.3d 20 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Auth. , 828 F.3d 70, 74-75 (2d Cir. 2016) ("Claims of sex-based discrimination under Title VII and the . . . Walsh , 828 F.3d at 75 (citation omitted); see also Littlejohn , 795 F.3d at 311 (explaining that because . . . Vasquez , 835 F.3d at 274-75 (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Holcomb v. . . . Walsh , 828 F.3d at 75. Cf. Cox v. Onondaga Cty. . . . Sundowner Offshore Servs. , 523 U.S. 75, 80, 118 S. Ct. 998, 140 L.Ed.2d 201 (1998). . . .

BAUGHMAN, v. HICKMAN K. M., 935 F.3d 302 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . There, three prison vans were traveling in a convoy and collided with each other after going 75 miles . . .

ST. CHARLES SURGICAL HOSPITAL, L. L. C. v. LOUISIANA HEALTH SERVICE INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 935 F.3d 352 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Under OPM's plan with Blue Cross, the federal government pays 75% of the insurance premiums, and the . . .

DEJORIA, v. MAGHREB PETROLEUM EXPLORATION, S. A., 935 F.3d 381 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id . at 574-75, 105 S.Ct. 1504 ("Duplication of the trial judge's efforts in the court of appeals would . . .

PIZZUTO, Jr. v. BLADES,, 933 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . The Court noted that "an IQ between 70 and 75 or lower ... is typically considered the cutoff IQ score . . . The state observed that "some states have actually gone below the 70 and one state ... has gone to 75 . . . disability exists once the [standard error of measurement] applies and the individual's IQ score is 75 . . . "In effect, this expands the operational definition of mental retardation to 75, and that score of 75 . . . On tests with a standard deviation of 15 and a mean of 100, this involves a score of 65-75 (70 ± 5)." . . .

SANOFI- AVENTIS U. S. LLC, IP, v. DR. REDDY S LABORATORIES, INC. Dr. s USA, LLC, LLC, LLC,, 933 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . See Decision , slip op. at 75 (discussing claims 21 and 30 and finding that "[t]he TROPIC trial was a . . . USA, Inc. , 752 F.3d 967, 974-75 (Fed. Cir. 2014) ). . . .

LILLY, v. CITY OF NEW YORK NYPD No. NYPD No., 934 F.3d 222 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . multiplied them to calculate a lodestar of approximately $6 million, and "then enhanced this award by 75% . . .

BARNES, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, a USA, N. A. a JP Co. a IBM a, 934 F.3d 901 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 673, 674-75 (9th Cir. 2017) (unpublished memorandum disposition). . . . App'x at 674-75. . . .

ARCHER AND WHITE SALES, INCORPORATED, v. HENRY SCHEIN, INCORPORATED L. L. C. L. L. C., 935 F.3d 274 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 263. 724 F.3d 1069, 1072-75 (9th Cir. 2013). . . .

O DONNELL, v. CAINE WEINER COMPANY, LLC,, 935 F.3d 549 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . United Airlines, Inc. , 213 F.3d 365, 374-75 (7th Cir. 2000) (emphasis added). . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERNANDEZ- MARTINEZ, v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v. v., 933 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ct. at 1774-75 ; see also id. at 1779 (Sotomayor, J., concurring). . . .

IN RE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE S SUNDAY TICKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Jr. v. LLC LLC NFL LLC LLC LP LLC LLC NFL LP LLC LP LLC LP Co. LLC LP LLC, 933 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . example, the New England Patriots from broadcasting their game against the Minnesota Vikings within 75 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BLAIR,, 933 F.3d 1271 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 763, 774-75 (10th Cir. 2005) (unpublished); see also United States v. . . .

EFFEX CAPITAL, LLC, v. NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION,, 933 F.3d 882 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Comm'n , 461 U.S. 190, 203, 103 S.Ct. 1713, 75 L.Ed.2d 752 (1983) ; Frank Bros., Inc. v. . . .

OWNER OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC. L. B. L. LLC G. v. PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION S. PTC K. PTC T. PTC T. Sr. PTC N. PTC P. PTC R. PTC s, 934 F.3d 283 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . See 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 8915.3. In 2013, Act 89 amended Act 44, as amended "Act 44/89." . . . Emp'rs, Inc., 460 U.S. 204, 213, 103 S.Ct. 1042, 75 L.Ed.2d 1 (1983) (citation omitted). . . .

HARDEMAN, v. CURRAN,, 933 F.3d 816 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Uphoff , 264 F.3d 965, 974-75 (10th Cir. 2001) (stating that "[e]xposure to human waste, like few other . . . See DeSpain , 264 F.3d at 974-75 ; Johnson , 891 F.2d at 139 ; LaReau v. . . . See id. at 474-75. . . .

NAUMOVSKI, v. NORRIS, 934 F.3d 200 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Auth. , 828 F.3d 70, 75 (2d Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . . Vasquez , 835 F.3d at 272, 274-75 (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. FOWLKES PLUMBING, L. L. C., 934 F.3d 424 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bill Cox Const., Inc. , 75 S.W.3d 6, 13-14 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 2001, no pet.). . . . Exxon Corp. , 526 F.2d 266, 274-75 (5th Cir. 1976) (noting closeness of the question as one of the most . . .

SHIRLEY v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., 392 F. Supp. 3d 1185 (S.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . No. 23-13 at 75-130.) . . .

IN RE MIAMI METALS I, INC., 603 B.R. 727 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Intertrans Corp. , 650 So. 2d 72, 75 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 1994) (quoting Dunham v. . . .

COEUR D ALENE TRIBE, a v. W. HAWKS A., 933 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Johnson , 870 F.2d 1469, 1473-75 (9th Cir. 1989), for example, the Chilkat Indian Village (the "Village . . . Compare Chilkat , 870 F.2d at 1473-75, with Boe v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NG LAP SENG, Ng, Ng W. C., 934 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 2374-75 (emphasis in original) (quoting § 201(a)(3) ). . . . Lawson , 461 U.S. 352, 357, 103 S.Ct. 1855, 75 L.Ed.2d 903 (1983) ; accord United States v. . . . United States , 136 S.Ct. at 2372-75, the district court here instructed the jury that it was the "decision . . .

UNITED STATES E. J. v. ASSA CO. LTD., 934 F.3d 185 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . . & Related Props. , 830 F.3d 66, 75 (2d Cir. 2016). . . . Id. at 75. . . .

H. BURTON, v. KOHN LAW FIRM, S. C., 934 F.3d 572 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . R.75 at 4 (citing Bass v. . . . R.75 at 11. Id. at 13. See Suesz v. . . . R.75 at 10. R.40 at 6. See, e.g. , Linder & Assocs., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. . . . R.75 at 11. See, e.g. , Toroussian v. Asset Acceptance, LLC , No. . . .

UNITED STATES v. TREVINO,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 901 (W.D. Mich. 2019)

. . . commonsense, practical question' to be judged from the 'totality-of-the-circumstances.' " Id. at 1074-75 . . .

UNITED STATES v. M. SWARTZ,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 199 (N.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Nos. 75, 80); and Continental Trust Corporation Limited ("Continental Trust") (Dkt. No. 86). . . . No. 75. . . . No. 75-1 ¶ 1. According to Mr. . . . No. 75-1 ¶ 18. . . . No. 75-2, nor the trust's later-filed § 853(n) petition itself, Dkt. . . .

PILLAR DYNASTY LLC, v. NEW YORK COMPANY, INC., 933 F.3d 202 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Hananel , 652 F.3d 75, 87 (1st Cir. 2011). . . .

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC. v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH,, 933 F.3d 275 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . OPINION OF THE COURT For almost 75 years, the official seal of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania has included . . . It was adopted almost 75 years ago, so it is established. . . . four of American Legion 's considerations further confirm the presumption's applicability: First , 75 . . . make two things clear: the Lemon -endorsement test does not apply to Lehigh County's seal, and this 75 . . .

L. ROMANSKY, v. SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, 933 F.3d 293 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 903, removal or falsification of identification numbers under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 7102(b), dealing in . . . vehicles with removed or falsified numbers under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 7103(b), dealing in titles and plates . . . for stolen vehicles under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 7111, and false application for certificate of title or registration . . . under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 7121. . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. HODGE, 933 F.3d 468 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . McMillan , 600 F.3d 434, 457 n.75 (5th Cir. 2010). iii. . . . McMillan , 600 F.3d at 457 n.75. III. Juror No. 7 A. . . .

BOUCHER, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,, 934 F.3d 530 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Corps Manual at 74-75. . . . Id. at 75. . . . Corps Manual at 75. . . . collection/p266001coll1/id/7630; the NRCS Manual and Procedures are in the Administrative Record (AR) at 315-75 . . .

VALBRUNA SLATER STEEL CORPORATION, v. JOSLYN MANUFACTURING COMPANY,, 934 F.3d 553 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . As for contribution, the district court apportioned liability for past and future costs: 75% for Joslyn . . .

BRENDA L. v. SAUL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 858 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . (R. 48-49, 75). . . .

A. LAVITE, v. J. DUNSTAN,, 932 F.3d 1020 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Wakinekona , 461 U.S. 238, 250, 103 S.Ct. 1741, 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983). . . .

WINDRIDGE OF NAPERVILLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 932 F.3d 1035 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Koloms , 177 Ill.2d 473, 227 Ill.Dec. 149, 687 N.E.2d 72, 75 (1997). . . .

EVANS, v. GRIFFIN,, 932 F.3d 1043 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Allied Signal Safety Restraint Sys. , 75 F.3d 1162, 1167 (7th Cir. 1996) ("We have long followed the . . .

CHASE, On On v. FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF KANSAS CITY T. J. W. R. s, 932 F.3d 1158 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . primarily a reserve against losses and secondarily a repository of undivided earnings." 349 U.S. 143, 150, 75 . . .

O NEAL, v. BALCARCEL,, 933 F.3d 618 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . R.14 (Trial Tr. at 43-44) (Page ID #674-75). . . .

T. SCHMITT v. LAROSE,, 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Celebrezze , 460 U.S. 780, 103 S.Ct. 1564, 75 L.Ed.2d 547 (1983), and Burdick v. . . . Celebrezze , 460 U.S. 780, 103 S.Ct. 1564, 75 L.Ed.2d 547 (1983), and Burdick v. . . . Id. at 274-75 (quoting Mass. Const. art. 18; id. art. 48, pt. 2, § 2). . . .

ALBANY AIRPORT HIE, LLC HIE LLC, v. HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC., 391 F. Supp. 3d 193 (N.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . In re Estates of Covert, 97 N.Y.2d 68, 75, 735 N.Y.S.2d 879, 761 N.E.2d 571 (2001). " 'Under New York . . .

LOCAL COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL- CIO v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 392 F. Supp. 3d 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Supp. 3d 672, 674-75 (S.D.N.Y. 2018). . . . Specifically, 75% of the Back Pay will be distributed in accordance with these findings. . . .

KORTRIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, TY v. INVESTCORP INVESTMENT ADVISERS LIMITED,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . (Trial Tr. at 474-75, 478 (Munsell).) . . .

WOZNIAK, v. ADESIDA,, 932 F.3d 1008 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Myers , 461 U.S. 138, 103 S.Ct. 1684, 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). . . .

C. S. MCCROSSAN INC. v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 932 F.3d 1142 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . ."); Stop & Shop , 136 F.3d at 74-75 (noting an authorized company "may carry out its obligations ... . . .

AJINOMOTO CO. INC. v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, CJ CJ PT CJ CJ PT v. Co., 932 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 5374-75. . . .