Florida Statute 75.17 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 75
BOND VALIDATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 75.17

75.17 Commencement of action after validation; affidavit of good faith.—Every person who commences an action as taxpayer or otherwise to challenge the validity of any bonds or certificates or to prevent the use of any moneys derived from the sale of the bonds or certificates after the bonds or certificates have been validated by courts of competent jurisdiction pursuant to this chapter, shall file an affidavit of good faith stating that the action is not filed for delay and setting forth with particularity why the objection was not made as part of the validation action.

History.—s. 1, ch. 61-508; s. 25, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 75.17 on Google Scholar

F.S. 75.17 on Casetext

Amendments to 75.17

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 75.17

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 75.17.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 75.17

Total Results: 6

McKnight v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-10-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 319 So. 2d 647, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15366

Snippet: and sentences are affirmed. Affirmed. No. 75-17 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Page v. Rossmore

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-06-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 314 So. 2d 275, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 16504

Snippet: Appeal dismissed. No. 75-17 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp Fla. Dist

State v. Bautista

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-01-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 307 So. 2d 280, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 20333

Snippet: Appeal quashed. No. 75-17 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp Fla. Dist

Holly Hill Fruit Products Co., Inc. v. Bob Staton, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1973-01-30T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 275 So. 2d 583

Snippet: Annotation, 84 A.L.R.2d 103; Corbin, Contracts, cc. 74, 75; 17 Am.Jur.2d, Contracts § 402. The Commissioner did

Lord v. Curry

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1916-01-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 71 Fla. 68, 71 So. 21

Snippet: S. 80° W. 18.00 3,13 17.73 N. 32%° E. 32.00 27.75 17-85 50.00 24.62 .12 Measured Dist. 24.37 •25 .12

Richardson v. Russ

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1874-04-15T00:00:02-07:52:58

Citation: 14 Fla. 463

Snippet: entitled to a judgment against the defendant of $1,075.17. In arriving at this conclusion, the referee first…was rendered on the report of the referee for $1,075.17 only. How this discrepancy occurred is • not explained