The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 76.11

76.11 Motion for attachment in aid of foreclosure.—In attachments in aid of foreclosure of mortgages on personal property the motion shall describe the property on which the mortgage exists, and state that a complaint has been filed to foreclose the mortgage, the amount of the debt secured by the mortgage, that it is actually due, and that movant has reason to believe in the existence of one or more of the special grounds enumerated in s. 76.07, stating specifically the grounds.

History.—s. 6, Dec. 11, 1824; RS 1645; GS 2109; RGS 3410; CGL 5263; s. 2, ch. 29737, 1955; s. 26, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 76.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE SCHATZ, v., 602 B.R. 411 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2019)

. . . years later to reflect monthly income of $1,483.02, and monthly expenses of $1,559.13, resulting in a $76.11 . . .

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE, v. PERIODICALS PUBLICACOES TECNICAS,, 581 F. Supp. 2d 1248 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . a separate affidavit of the plaintiff, and all applicable requirements of s. 76.09, s. 76.10, or s. 76.11 . . .

UNITED STATES ERVIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. v. THE HAMILTON SECURITIES GROUP, INC., 370 F. Supp. 2d 18 (D.C. Cir. 2005)

. . . Option # 4 was for 76.11% of the unpaid principal balance of the loans being reoffered, resulting in . . .

GEORGIA, v. ASHCROFT,, 195 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . of 79.13%, as well as the Democratic performance numbers for the individual election years of 1996 (76.11% . . . Michael Thurmond in the 1998 primary runoff and 75.83% supported him in his general election contest. 76.11% . . .

D. FRASHER, v. FOX DISTRIBUTING OF S. W. FLORIDA, INC., 813 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . a separate affidavit of the plaintiff, and all applicable requirements of s. 76.09, s. 76.10, or s. 76.11 . . . Sections 76.09, 76.10, and 76.11, together with sections 76.04, 76.05, and 76.07, set forth what actions . . .

In AIR CRASH DISASTER. H. POLEC, D. v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., 86 F.3d 498 (6th Cir. 1996)

. . . the most evenly-balanced controversy in all of compensation law.” 2B Larson, Workmen’s Compensation § 76.11 . . .

JAMES CABLE PARTNERS, L. P. a v. CITY OF JAMESTOWN, TENNESSEE, C., 822 F. Supp. 476 (M.D. Tenn. 1993)

. . . In 1976, the Commission stayed until March 31, 1978, the requirements of §§ 76.11 and 76.13 which provided . . .

HORDIS BROTHERS, INC. v. SENTINEL HOLDINGS, INC., 562 So. 2d 715 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . a separate affidavit of the plaintiff, and all applicable requirements of s. 76.09, s. 76.10, or s. 76.11 . . .

E. COCHENOUR, v. COCHENOUR J., 888 F.2d 1244 (8th Cir. 1989)

. . . The record is abundantly clear, however, that he filed an election under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 76.11 . . .

BIEHL CO. INC. v. APOLLONIA HOLDING, INC. Co. Co. JAMES J. FLANAGAN STEVEDORES, DIVISION OF JAMES J. FLANAGAN SHIPPING CORP. v. M V APOLLONIA Co., 693 F. Supp. 457 (E.D. La. 1988)

. . . B, at 1003-10 (2d ed. 1975); 2B Benedict on Admiralty 7-76.11 to 7-82 (7th ed. 1988). . . . .

COX CABLE TUCSON, INC. v. LADD,, 795 F.2d 1479 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . such new system shall, before instituting service, obtain a certificate of compliance pursuant to § 76.11 . . .

YAKIMA VALLEY CABLEVISION, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CONNECTICUT CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 794 F.2d 737 (D.C. Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 76.11 (1978). . . . .

PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 786 F.2d 370 (10th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 76.11(a) (1975)) (emphasis in original), the court held: “The issuance of a certificate of compliance . . . under 47 C.F.R. § 76.11(a) is a service rendered by the FCC to the cable operators, and the agency is . . .

L. GREGORY, v. GARRETT CORPORATION Co. GARRETT CORPORATION v. TEXASGULF, INC., 578 F. Supp. 871 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . See 2A Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 76.11, at 14-562 (1982); also Elston v. . . . 2A Larson, supra, § 76.11, at 14-563. . . . employer’s negligence has caused or contributed to the injury.” 2A Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 76.11 . . .

VEST, v. O. WARING, M. D., 565 F. Supp. 674 (N.D. Ga. 1983)

. . . . § 76.10 provides that “Subject to the conditions set forth in section 76.11 and the procedural requirements . . .

THREE RIVERS CABLEVISION, INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 502 F. Supp. 1118 (W.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . . § 76.11 (1976 ed.), certified to all concerned that the applicant was in conformity with relevant F.C.C . . .

MIDESSA TELEVISION COMPANY, v. MIDESSA TELECASTING COMPANY, INC., 617 F.2d 1141 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . unless it receives a certificate of compliance from the Commission.” 1972 Rules, 36 F.C.C.2d at 217 (§ 76.11 . . .

KEYSTONE CABLE- VISION CORPORATION S. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION J. S. R. J. Jr., 464 F. Supp. 740 (W.D. Pa. 1979)

. . . plaintiffs filed a petition with the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 76.11 . . .

MIDWEST VIDEO CORPORATION, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 571 F.2d 1025 (8th Cir. 1978)

. . . . § 76.11. . . .

TREASURE VALLEY CATV COMMITTEE, v. UNITED STATES KTVB, UNITED CABLE TELEVISION CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES KTVB,, 562 F.2d 1182 (9th Cir. 1977)

. . . Although filed pursuant to § 76.11 of the Rules, the applications for certificates for the Treasure Valley . . .

TELEPROMPTER CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 565 F.2d 736 (D.C. Cir. 1977)

. . . . § 76.11(a). . . . .

NATIONAL CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION LAMB COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 554 F.2d 1094 (D.C. Cir. 1976)

. . . . § 76.11(a) (1975) (emphasis added). . . . . § 76.11(b) (1975). . . . . § 76.11(a) is a service rendered by the FCC to the cable operators, and the agency is fully justified . . . See 47 C.F.R. § 76.11(a) (1975). . . . . . § 76.11(b) (1975). . . . .

KAKE- TV AND RADIO, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 537 F.2d 1121 (10th Cir. 1976)

. . . objections, and other data supporting or opposing the granting of the certificate of compliance. (47 C.F.R. 76.11 . . .

COMMITTEE FOR OPEN MEDIA, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 533 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1976)

. . . . § 76.11(b) (1974). . . . CATV in the Oakland area filed a petition with the FCC alleging that Focus was in violation of section 76.11 . . . neither obtained a certificate of compliance nor qualified under the grandfathering provision of section 76.11 . . . Focus could not qualify as a “cable television system” within the grandfathering provision of section 76.11 . . . See also 47 C.F.R. § 76.11(b) (1974) (“cable television system lawfully carrying television broadcast . . .

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION,, 523 F.2d 1344 (9th Cir. 1975)

. . . Section 76.11 of the Order, 36 FCC 2d at 217, 47 C.F.R. § 76.11, provides that no cable television system . . . and provide for public notice and for objections to applications. 36 FCC 2d at 217-19, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.11 . . .

NATIONAL CABLE TELEVISION ASSN. INC. v. UNITED STATES, 415 U.S. 336 (U.S. 1974)

. . . Reg. 3280) require a CATV to receive a certificate of compliance from the Commission, 47 CFR §76.11 ( . . .

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. NEW ENGLAND POWER CO., 415 U.S. 345 (U.S. 1974)

. . . operations; existing cable systems must obtain a certificate of compliance by March 31, 1977. 47 CFR §76.11 . . .

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. v. ALLSTATE DRIVING SCHOOL, INC., 301 F. Supp. 4 (E.D.N.Y. 1969)

. . . . § 76.11 (Current regulation promulated by Commissioner of Motor Vehicle pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic . . .

GENERAL FINANCE LOAN COMPANY OF MIAMI NORTH, v. WILLIAMS, Jr., 150 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 1963)

. . . Sections 76.07 and 76.11 both deal with attachments in aid of foreclosure. . . . However, while Sec. 76.11 states that the required affidavit shall, among other things, allege only “ . . . Sec. 76.11 was in existence when the Georgia Fertilizer Co. case was decided and this Court then determined . . .