Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 76.14 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 76.14 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 76.14

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 76.14
76.14 Writ; effect of levy.The levy of a writ of attachment does not operate to dispossess the tenant of any lands or tenements, but a levy on real or personal property binds the property attached, except against preexisting liens. Levies on the same property under successive attachments have precedence as liens in the order in which they are made. A levy binds real estate as against subsequent creditors or purchasers only from the time of the record by the clerk of the circuit court of a notice of the levy and a description of the property levied on.
History.s. 9, Feb. 17, 1833; RS 1651; GS 2115; RGS 3416; CGL 5269; s. 26, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 76.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.14 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.14


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.14
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.14.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

P. ALTO v. JEWELL, Sr. v., 661 F. App'x 502 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 76.14) rendered Assistant Secretary Deer’s decision “final and conclusive” and therefore unreviewable . . .

In MUSSELMAN,, 379 B.R. 583 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2007)

. . . . -$76.14). . See In re Williams, Case No. 07-00396-5-ATS (Bankr.E.D.N.C. . . .

L. LUCIEN, v. C. JOHNSON,, 61 F.3d 573 (7th Cir. 1995)

. . . The claims ranged in value from $76.14 to $558.91. . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 21,340 100.00% 13.81% 85.61% 24 99 22 0.10% 0.40% 0.09% Randolph County 19,881 15,138 4,686 100.00% 76.14% . . .

In EMERALD PLAZA WEST, INC. RODRIGUEZ, v. GREAT AMERICAN BANK OF DADE COUNTY, N K A, 47 B.R. 590 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985)

. . . . § 76.14 (1983); 13 Fla.Jur.2A, Creditors’ Rights § 115. . . .

FLORIDA INSURANCE EXCHANGE, v. ADLER, 174 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Section 76.14. . . .

THE CHOCTAW NATION v. THE UNITED STATES AND THE CHICKASAW NATION OF INDIANS, 83 Ct. Cl. 140 (Ct. Cl. 1936)

. . . It is contended that the correct basis for the apportionment and payment of the moneys was 76.14% to . . .

NALBANTIAN v. UNITED STATES, 54 F.2d 63 (7th Cir. 1931)

. . . 31 tt 114.75 88.07 1/ 1/20 tt 1/15/20 98 72.71 1/16 tt tt 1/31 it 121 84.96 2/ 1 tt tt ¡2/15 tt 100 76.14 . . .