The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 76
ATTACHMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 76.20

76.20 Replevy of property taken by attachment.—If property taken under a writ of attachment is not subject to attachment, it may be replevied by defendant.

History.—s. 4, Feb. 14, 1835; RS 1654; GS 2118; RGS 3419; CGL 5272; s. 26, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 76.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 76.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 76.20

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 76.20

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 76.20.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

HINTON, v. COMBINED SYSTEMS, INC. v., 105 F. Supp. 3d 16 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 76.20, at 14-654 & n.24). . . .

Ta Co. v., 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 794 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . [T]he [ITA] should .. . assign [a] 76.20 percent ad valorem [dumping margin] to Ta Chen’s subject merchandise . . . In applying an adverse inference to Emerdex data, the ITA accepted the domestic industry’s suggested 76.20 . . .

a v., 128 T.C. 62 (T.C. 2007)

. . . ledger of off-invoice/at-show payment: Item #27024 Off invoice At show Sale to AFI customer: List price $76.20 . . . $76.20 Less usual discount 1.20 1.20 Subtotal: Price before markup 75.00 75.00 Add markup: 7.5% 5.25 . . . discount .75 n/a Total amount billed to member store 79.50 80.25 AFI purchase price from vendor: List cost 76.20 . . . 76.20 Less: Usual discount 1.20 1.20 Off-invoice show-money discount .75 n/a Total cost of goods sold . . .

In S. DAVIS, III,, 55 F. App'x 306 (6th Cir. 2003)

. . . His appellate brief includes a motion “to dispense with copy requirement in civil rule 76.20(6)” and . . .

CAREY, WARDEN v. SAFFOLD, 536 U.S. 214 (U.S. 2002)

. . . Proc. 76.20(2)(b) (2002). . . .

UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL- CIO, CLC, AFL- CIO, CLC, v. ALDEN CORRUGATED CONTAINER CORPORATION, UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL v. BATES CORRUGATED BOX CORPORATION v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK OF AMERICA, 901 F. Supp. 426 (D. Mass. 1995)

. . . 10.48 - 83.84 Joseph Presner 9.62 1/2 - 77.00 Thomas L’Heureux 9.24 - 73.92 Cecil Sampson 9.51 1/2 - 76.20 . . .

A AND B CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. ATLAS ROOFING AND SKYLIGHT COMPANY, 867 F. Supp. 100 (D.R.I. 1994)

. . . See 2B Arthur Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 76.20 (1994) (hereinafter “2B Larson ”). . . .

L. SILVERBURG, v. EVITTS,, 993 F.2d 124 (6th Cir. 1993)

. . . Here, however, petitioner’s claims are procedurally barred under Kentucky law, see CR 76.20(2)(b), and . . .

BUNDY, Jr. v. A. WILSON, COLPITT, v. CUNNINGHAM,, 815 F.2d 125 (1st Cir. 1987)

. . . CIY.P. 76.20; KY.R.CRIM.P. 12.02. . . .

In ALL MAINE ASBESTOS LITIGATION BIW CASES, 589 F. Supp. 1563 (D. Me. 1984)

. . . Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation §§ 76.20 et seq. (1982) (arguing against pro tanto relief); . . .

L. GREGORY, v. GARRETT CORPORATION Co. GARRETT CORPORATION v. TEXASGULF, INC., 578 F. Supp. 871 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . party as a joint tortfeasor, whether under contribution statutes or at common law.” 2A Larson, supra, § 76.20 . . .

L. BELCHER, V. v. J. H. FLETCHER COMPANY, a v. ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a, 498 F. Supp. 629 (S.D.W. Va. 1980)

. . . Larson’s Workmens Compensation § 76.20 and cases cited therein. See 53 A.L.R.2d 977, 985. . . .

LAVINO SHIPPING COMPANY, v. P. J. DONOVAN, T., 207 F. Supp. 178 (E.D. Pa. 1962)

. . . 2.00 Cab Fare ...................2.00 Marriage certificate ......... 1.00 Notes of testimony......... 76.20 . . .

EMANUEL BLOCH v. WILLIAM W. FRICK,, 152 Fla. 554 (Fla. 1943)

. . . Section 76.20, Florida Statutes, 1941. . . .

UNITED STATES v. COAST WINERIES,, 131 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1942)

. . . Stat. 313, and on June 10, 1935, filed a claim in said proceedings for certain taxes, in the sum of $76.20 . . . agreed that if the trustee would withdraw his objections to the claims of appellant for $501.67 and $76.20 . . .

DUKE v. ST. LOUIS S. F. R. CO., 172 F. 684 (C.C.W.D. Ark. 1909)

. . . This estimate does not cover the earnings during the month he was killed, which amounted to $76.20, covering . . .

v., 16 F. 248 (S.D.N.Y. 1883)

. . . charged, therefore, with two days de-murrage, amounting, according to the terms of the charter-party, to $76.20 . . .