Cases from cite.case.law:

DANIELS, v. SORRISO DENTAL STUDIO, LLC,, 164 So. 3d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Arnold, Matheny & Eagan, P.A., 982 So.2d at 632 (citing § 77.081). . . .

ARNOLD, MATHENY AND EAGAN, P. A. v. FIRST AMERICAN HOLDINGS, INC., 982 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 2008)

. . . See § 77.081(l)-(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). . . .

M. RUDD, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, FL,, 761 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . default since First Union, as garnishee, failed to answer the writ of garnishment pursuant to section 77.081 . . .

ADVERTISING PUBLISHING CORP. v. SECURITY BANK, N. A., 698 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1997)

. . . Bell-South had argued that on default section 77.081(2), Florida Statutes (1995), creates a penalty so . . . However, the district court found section 77.081(2) only applicable to prejudgment garnishment and further . . . conflict with International Travel Card, Sentry Indemnity, and Hauser on the issue of whether section 77.081 . . . Accordingly, we find that section 77.081(2) applies only to a prejudgment writ of garnishment and that . . . Section 77.081, Florida Statutes (1995), provides: (1) If the garnishee fails to answer as required, . . . Rush, 767 F.2d 800, 808 (11th Cir.1985) (citing section 77.081 as an example of a statute that renders . . . Hendricks Enters., 371 So.2d 1105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) (applying section 77.081 to post-judgment garnishment . . . I respectfully submit that the legislature should review section 77.081 and clarify whether this default . . .

SECURITY BANK, N. A. v. BELLSOUTH ADVERTISING PUBLISHING CORPORATION,, 679 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . This result is consistent with the rationale of section 77.081 which makes the defaulting garnishee liable . . . True, it is nowhere explicitly stated that section 77.081, which was part of the formerly separate prejudgment . . . agree with the cited holdings of the First, Second, and Fourth District Courts of Appeal that section 77.081 . . . The garnishee's refusal to answer compels the conclusion under subsection 77.081(2) that the garnishee . . . In the case of prejudgment garnishment, the legislature, with section 77.081, had enacted a provision . . . BellSouth argues, however, that the judgment is authorized by subsection 77.081(2) of the garnishment . . . What, then, is the purpose of subsection 77.081(2)? . . . By its plain words, subsection 77.081(2) applies only to a prejudgment writ of garnishment. . . . Subsection 77.081(2) supplies the answer. . . . (1965). § 77.081 (Note), Fla.Stat. (1993); 6 Fla.Stat.Ann. 194 (1987). . . .

In RETTEMNIER, 113 B.R. 757 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . Sec. 77.081 (1987). . . .

A. LOFTIN, v. K. RUSH,, 767 F.2d 800 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 77.081 (Supp.1985); § 6-6-457, Code of Alabama 1977, compare Ware v. . . .

A. HENNING, v. T. SHAFER, Jr., 465 So. 2d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 77.081, Florida Statutes (1983), refers to a default judgment against a garnishee as a final . . .

INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL CARD, INC. a v. R. C. HASLER, INC. a, 411 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . . § 77.081. Nowhere is any provision made for service of the writ on the judgment debtor. . . .

SENTRY INDEMNITY COMPANY, v. HENDRICKS ENTERPRISES,, 371 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . circumstances we hold that $1,800.00 was “the amount of the plaintiff’s claim” as that term is used in Section 77.081 . . .

ITT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a v. BARTON, a k a A. R. R. P. A., 569 F.2d 1351 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . Section 77.081(1) provided that “[i]f the garnishee fails to answer as required, a default shall be entered . . . Fla.Stat.Ann. § 77.081(2) (West Supp.1977) provided that “[n]o final judgment against a garnishee shall . . .

HAUSER, v. DR. CHATELIER S PLANT FOOD COMPANY, INC., 350 So. 2d 548 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Appellee attempts to sustain the judgment against Hauser on the basis of Section 77.081, Florida Statutes . . . We think that Section 77.081 and Rule 1.500(e) do not conflict but rather must be read in pari materia . . .

SHANNON, v. GREAT SOUTHERN EQUIPMENT COMPANY,, 326 So. 2d 19 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . First of all, § 77.081, F.S.1973, provides that: “No final judgment against [the] garnishee shall be . . .